Bedini Ferris Wheel Regauging Motor

[John_Bedini]

Big Bed Wheel

redrichie,
Don't worry about if you have any training right now people here will get this to work. I have faith or I would not be here. Do not let my rants disturb you.
John B

John,
Prob from many previous posts you can tell Im like the child with no electronics background. I will be honest, and I was hoping you were going to explain it, I have no real idea what re-gauging is. I remember hearing it in EFTV. Is there a place to read up on it where I do not have to waste your time? Your view of what is going on will prob be best though. Thanks.

[redrichie]

@uused.

When I went to EDs place (why is his name always capitalized?) i got the impression that the side bolts are for holding down various pieces of equipment that ed attached to the flywheel.

[uusedman]

Sorry, he has only 5 rows of 24 magnets so 120 magnets in total.

It looks like you are right. For some reason I counted 6 rows before.
thanks for the correction.

[Jetijs]

The flywheel of Ed has 144 V-Shaped magnets. 6 rows times 24 V-Magnets = 144.



Abe

Sorry, he has only 5 rows of 24 magnets so 120 magnets in total.

[redrichie]

John,
Prob from many previous posts you can tell Im like the child with no electronics background. I will be honest, and I was hoping you were going to explain it, I have no real idea what re-gauging is. I remember hearing it in EFTV. Is there a place to read up on it where I do not have to waste your time? Your view of what is going on will prob be best though. Thanks.

[uusedman]

The flywheel of Ed has 144 V-Shaped magnets. 6 rows times 24 V-Magnets = 144.

Also, in Ed's flywheel setup there is 2 wooden tables. The coils/PMH were placed to be charge at the wooden tables. How do I know? There is metal screws on the side of the tables for connections.

The amount of Pulse need for attraction of the PMH is definitely more in attraction force happening when coming together. With a small pulse we are able to attract more force/attraction/PMH than usual force/attraction/Coil.

Abe

[darkwizard]

Cody drawing is great.


i have one question: the magnets are in a bucking field configuration ( all north poles exposed to the cores) or just g field configuration (north and south poles exposed to the cores)

[John_K]

Figuring it out...

Hi All,

Just wanted to say how much I'm enjoying the thread. John is really make us think here outside of the box, so thanks for that John.

It's amazing, I started re-reading the thread from the start amd looking at all the pictures and Tony's video again.

I still don't get it all, but some of John's original posts that did not make any sense to me when he posted them are starting to now make some sense.

I think even more will sink in as my build progresses and I study what it is doing, for me it's the way I put all the pieces together. I think I have graduated from kindergarten and moved into primary or "junior" school. I still have a long way to go before I graduate!

So guys, keep thinking and researching. I don't think there are any dumb questions being asked, the only dumb ones are the ones you don't ask. There is so much to learn in John's Big Motor that he is also trying to teach us.

There are some great minds on this thread and we will work it out, if not today or tomorrow, then maybe the next day or the day after that.

All the best and may your wheel turn forever.


John K.

[John_Bedini]

Big Bedii Wheel

Mathew,
I said at the conference that the configuration was series, switching five times. What you must learn is that you take advantage of every known thing. ED's PMH is to show how the magnetic streams keep circulating forever, which I agree with under that condition, magnets do it all the time, but electromagnets do not unless you do it ED's way.

The Axial Motor was to test the theory of whether ED's motor worked or not, Radus also plays a very important part here in Re-Gauging of magnetic fields, what do you think happens when magnetic fields flip with Ed's PMH holder. I did not say that to waste everybody time at the conference. Cody has the drawing posted on how to make that star motor which I called the Idle Motor.

The real thing to learn is how you take advantage by putting all the pieces together since everything in science is scattered to the four winds. This is so much easer to teach Kids as old dogs can not learn new tricks in electronics, they have mind blocks. You can not look at this with conventional eyes. You will never get rid of Lenz's law ever fully. Bruce DePalma is the only one that did that, why because he truly used the Bloch wall, look it up The N Machine.

Does anybody really understand what Re-gauging is. I understand that people are not going to get pie shaped magnets like that but other things work the same way. Lenz's law can be tricked if you do it right.

My Star Motor is just arranged much different since I had a space problem. I got everybody up at the conference to look at what happened when it switched it shook violently towards the axel and sucked in as the fields Re-Gauged. I could make this machine in my sleep and many different ways. I understand what it is I'm looking for and it's not current as we know it. I have told people thousands of times do not use current meters on the output, why because the reading is false you can't keep up with a negative spike, that is why you could not see any current in idle mode. It's not rocket science here it's just reverse. I do find a positive universe and a negative universe in this field and were dealing in the negative one.


John B

I believe that when it was free wheeling in front of us all day.
Had the generator coils not been present the Lenz free motor would have continued to accelerate. While the coils were off the Lenz that was present controlled this from happening. "42 lbs of attraction"
But when the whole thing was running this effect was controlled by the axle motor and the time it switched based on the need to reduce Lenz around the energizer as theorized in my above thread.

Matt

[darkwizard]

2 years ago i was thinking about that motor / generator configuration, i think when i first saw the Charles Flynn motor, i know this was the same that Radus invented for the boots.

I discused this with Patmac another user of the forum, i was considering to build a perpetual motion motor, without lenz law. But university is taking my time away... just for the GE theory that i hate, im studying Electronic Engineering.

I want to build that generator, is my dream, i love this technology.

[darkwizard]

When i first saw the Ed Electromagnetic Device, i think that he used it for generate large amounts of pure voltage, pure delta phi waves, that come across the output, perhaps he used that output in the objects in order to make the objects loose weight, i think that the coil in the bottle with water was used with this purpose. perhaps the water he used contained some mineral in it.

I dont know it is just a theory.

[everyidea]

Concepts for possible motor/generator arrangement.

rw

[Jetijs]

Check out this thread:

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/5740-how-move-mountains-leedskalnin-style-4.html

lots of high resolution pictures of Eds wheel and tools there.

[everyidea]

Just posting some observations of the wheel/ed photo. Maybe it might strike some ideas for you.

[Jetijs]

Hi Aaron.
Yes, the wheel is in superpole config, 12 super N poles and 12 super S poles. The setup looks similar to the picture everyidea posted only with one PMH. The PMH has two coils on it, 0.7mm thick and some 400 turns on each coil