Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Muller generator replication by Romerouk

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • time to put out results

    Hello all
    I have many measurements watts current
    I will share them with you. I need some time to put them into a comprehensive format.

    But over all the OU is not working at the moment. I have run the motor on 1 coil and 2 coils. On 50 volts, 12 volts 24 volts.
    collected back emf. tried PWM timing tried diffident coils may types of magnets on top under neath.
    have seen some amazing results watched it do things I did not expect. But no OU. I will make a video very soon.

    the other point is there are still many test to do and configurations to try. its not over by any means. I work on.

    I would like to hear from others with there results. Not theory black and white
    recoded information.

    Rod
    Last edited by toranarod; 05-31-2011, 10:23 PM.

    Comment


    • Muller generator replication by Romerouk

      Just an idea

      Why not use the Imhotep Oscillator Fan as driving units for the Muller generator. Some people already could run them as self runners. That mean no power losses on the drive of the generator. The Imhotep Radiant Oscillator can be considered too as driving unit.

      Comment


      • Comment


        • Originally posted by toranarod View Post
          Hello all
          I have many measurements watts current
          I will share them with you. I need some time to put them into a comprehensive format.

          But over all the OU is not working at the moment. I have run the motor on 1 coil and 2 coils. On 50 volts, 12 volts 24 volts.
          collected back emf. tried PWM timing tried diffident coils may types of magnets on top under neath.
          have seen some amazing results watched it do things I did not expect. But no OU. I will make a video very soon.

          the other point is there are still many test to do and configurations to try. its not over by any means. I work on.

          I would like to hear from others with there results. Not theory black and white
          recoded information.

          Rod
          Rod the reason why you WILL get it one day is because you have that attitude and drive, thats as much of a respect for us to watch as your hard work like Clanzers. We are going to do the same as you on the 8X SEC and JT variants ASAP .. busy on the cancer cures course (as much of a rabbit hole as FREE energy) . Rod all respect its not over yet lets keep learning. Thank you for this my friend never seen you work so fast Rod.

          Ash

          Comment


          • Hi guys,

            Something to report I found interesting.

            Im driving the rotor at 1900 rpm with the coils unloaded. If I place any of the coils in series with any other coil besides their opposite I do get an increase in voltage and current but when loaded I loose about 300-400 rpm. With each coil in series with its opposite, like Romero had essentially, all to bridges I get an increase in power with each one and a very minimal decrease in rpm. In one case I only lost 20rpm. I had 4 coilsets with bridges charging another battery and I was still at 1750 rpm.

            The unit is 7 pole all north rotor, 6 coils each side, all air core.

            So it was interesting to see that all coils to their respective bridges loaded down the rotor less. I get increases in no load voltages each time I parallel another bridge. I think with 3 bridges it was around 35v. I still need to get a current meter, as the other one is monitoring the input of the SG.

            Regards
            "Once you've come to the conclusion that what what you know already is all you need to know, then you have a degree in disinterest." - John Dobson

            Comment


            • Hi Ren,

              It is interesting you left out the ferrite cores from the coils. Of course any experience counts and is many times useful, thanks for sharing.

              On your missing current meter: until you obtain a real one and you have got an extra voltmeter of any kind, you could still use a series resistor of 1 Ohm, or 5 Ohm etc and connect the voltmeter across it to see the voltage drop, from the voltage changes you can see whether the output "current" draw increases or decreases. For the tests it is not so important what is the actual value of a current, only watching its changing up or down can be a big help too.

              Still that you do not have ferromagnetic cores, you may wish to place a permanent magnet near the outer end of the generator coils and see how the drag or the output changes.

              In your tests when you found the RPM decreased say 300-400, did the input current draw increased accordingly? (indicating normal Lenz drag) The same question to the lost 20 RPM case too. Romero wrote he needed 1 month to get there...

              Thanks, Gyula

              Comment


              • Hi Gyula,

                Good to hear from you again.

                My device is a little unorthodox, it should perhaps have a separate thread started. But I thought my last post relevant to the muller build being done here so I shared.

                The muller is in full gen mode, meaning it has no drive coils. To rotate the shaft I am using a 3 coil multiple transistor SG. So my input is variable up to 150v and I have kept the SG output separate for now. So any decrease in rotor speed due to drag from the generator costs me no more on the input to the SG.

                I did some tests with a removeable core on one coil. I do note an increase in output with a magnet on the core but with air cores I haven't seen any improvement. I will be looking at cores again soon now that I have all coils in place. I was reading a link on magnetic amplifiers and I saw that saturating a core with a magnet lowers inductance and allows more ac current to pass. I believe this is the reason for the effect.

                I have tried some various loads there 12v 3 watt led, and 12v batteries. I will do some tests with resistors. Pretty happy with the results so far, the coils are wound on homemade wooden bobbins there is much space wasted not only on the ends but in center. If the center wasn't so large (40mm diameter, 20mm hollow center) I could fit more turns and most likely increase the capabilities. As it is when the magnet is tdc it actually doesn't have any windings directly opposite. But I can't complain, these coils were left overs and were the only reason I was able to get something up and running quickly.

                I will do a video soon, almost ready

                Regards
                "Once you've come to the conclusion that what what you know already is all you need to know, then you have a degree in disinterest." - John Dobson

                Comment


                • Hi all

                  hope this can helps

                  good luck at all


                  YouTube - ‪romero-muller 4.wmv‬‏


                  Laurent

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by ren View Post
                    Hi guys,

                    Something to report I found interesting.

                    Im driving the rotor at 1900 rpm with the coils unloaded. If I place any of the coils in series with any other coil besides their opposite I do get an increase in voltage and current but when loaded I loose about 300-400 rpm. With each coil in series with its opposite, like Romero had essentially, all to bridges I get an increase in power with each one and a very minimal decrease in rpm. In one case I only lost 20rpm. I had 4 coilsets with bridges charging another battery and I was still at 1750 rpm.

                    The unit is 7 pole all north rotor, 6 coils each side, all air core.

                    So it was interesting to see that all coils to their respective bridges loaded down the rotor less. I get increases in no load voltages each time I parallel another bridge. I think with 3 bridges it was around 35v. I still need to get a current meter, as the other one is monitoring the input of the SG.

                    Regards
                    Thx Bro

                    Comment


                    • Comment


                      • Originally posted by redrichie View Post
                        Ive been thinking the same thing also Minoly. Exactly that. It kind of reminds me about one of JB's patents. This is kind of what I was saying at the beginning of the thread. Very similar to ED's work. which in turn is similar to JB's work. Not that anyone is copying anything. But if its the type of system that works then they would be similar in many ways.
                        Ive been thinking of casting a few magnetite C type cores the way you drew em. I really think, thin acrylic tube that can be bent with a heat gun should suffice for the core form. wind coils. put over acrylic tube. bend to desired shape. stuff with as much magnetite/resin as possible.
                        Read your recent post today @ OU about possible coil shorting on top of the Kromrey stuff, excellent questions.
                        I did a small limited test last night with my son's amplified coil short.
                        after the rectifier I put a cap and shorted it:
                        YouTube - ‪Muller Bolt coil short speeds up‬‏
                        I think this is the key to the big lock on this door, only a couple more to go...

                        Patrick

                        Comment


                        • some ways but you need splitting the positive

                          You can use some ways for obtain BEMF or cold energy but in all case you need splitting the positive and add gravity mass for obtain an OU device. That is clear example of electronic scheme I think that help you a lot.

                          Circuit Simulator Applet

                          Comment


                          • Woopy's Discovery----a big clue on how Romero did it???

                            @Woopy
                            I downloaded your new Romero circuit diagram this morning and studied it. You may be onto something. Paralleled generator and drive circuits may indeed be part of this mystery. You should post the diagram here also. I was able to somewhat replicate the "event" that Romeo showed in that first video where the amp draw did not go up when the light bulb load was applied. I just have a small "testing" unit to work with but the idea should work on others full scale units. Well done Laurent.
                            Here is the video of my test:

                            YouTube - ‪RomeroUK Muller----Woopy discovery!!.ASF‬‏

                            Cheers,
                            Lidmotor
                            Last edited by Lidmotor; 06-05-2011, 02:39 AM.

                            Comment


                            • @Lidmotor,

                              Have a look at my post over at OU.

                              Regards, Penno

                              Comment


                              • Caps

                                Originally posted by penno64 View Post
                                @Lidmotor,

                                Have a look at my post over at OU.

                                Regards, Penno
                                The use of capacitors (and what kind and size) may be very important for this thing to work right. In my testing setup I have a large cap on the drive and a small one at the Joule Thief load. Romero may have been very right about "over thinking" what is going on here and getting stuck. There may have been a great deal of trial and error in his build. No matter WHAT one thinks about the validity of it -----there had to have been hundreds of hours of work put in to get where he was when the MIB showed up.

                                Lidmotor

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X