Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
gravity waves found
Collapse
X
-
Having studied David hamels work, Leedskalin generator and now the original ford magneto, the basic shape is all very similar. One thing that now stands out now that i had another look at david hamels design which had 3 circular magnets at the bottom and the orginal ford magneto with the supposed 2 cow magnets underneath. Hamel said that this (the 3 magnets at the base) oscillated the field in some way.
@david have you tried a circular magnet (or 3) underneath your device. This may boost its power output. Possible an inch in from the outer diameterLast edited by nat1971a; 05-20-2010, 10:44 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
Personally, I think on Ed's device, each combined pole sticking out represented a single magnetic value like NN next to each other. So I think all of these were in a state of repulsion. This is also like Ford used them. When to poles of the same polarity are forced together, a knife edge field is driven out from the gap between with very high density.Originally posted by Cloxxki View PostDidn't Ed's setup have 4-way stacked V-magnets in the 24-pointed star shape? Could the "stars" of 24 be magnetised in SERIES? Since he poored concrete over it, we can't see this. Seems like it would be rather easy to do if so wished.
I envision some torsions being created, ed may have cast it in concrete before even testing the magnetic lock of the whole rig.
With current, although I never understood this in highschool and still don't, parallel and series connection bring vastly different effects.
In the 4 layers are magnetised in series, we'd have a huge COIL on our hands, with the flux possibly being taken a dimension further.
Perhaps Ed's magnets were touching at one time, but the stress and wear caused them to separate from the repulsion.
Maybe Ed didn't lock the magnets together - maybe he just energized the flywheel rings - same principle, same effect right?
Leave a comment:
-
Didn't Ed's setup have 4-way stacked V-magnets in the 24-pointed star shape? Could the "stars" of 24 be magnetised in SERIES? Since he poored concrete over it, we can't see this. Seems like it would be rather easy to do if so wished.
I envision some torsions being created, ed may have cast it in concrete before even testing the magnetic lock of the whole rig.
With current, although I never understood this in highschool and still don't, parallel and series connection bring vastly different effects.
In the 4 layers are magnetised in series, we'd have a huge COIL on our hands, with the flux possibly being taken a dimension further.
Leave a comment:
-
minerals...
hi..i took the rotor off, still works fine.. vermiculite might do better in making this wave form more visible... vermiculite is a mineral used as insulation and in potting soil....a small ziplock bag full held close gives off a cold feeling and this wave form seems to be more visible... this is still subtle but can be felt...the model i made works...that means Eds machine worked ....from my observations this wave acts like light...a magnifying mirror does push away from the rotor...this is subtle...there must be a way to amplify this wave ...we humans are wave manipulators!...every wave we found so for and we will again soon it has already begun...i also agree that segment shape and material is important....i tried holding a coil over the rotor with an ohm meter.. no volts..yet...i want to make a generator part ferrite part steel...after#2.........thanks every one
Leave a comment:
-
Since things with weight, mass and force "aren't" what they "seem", I wonder if objects in David's device's field could be seen to accelerate slower in free fall. Who knows, perhaps G in m/s/s is different, while the reading on a KG/LB scale is still the same.
The rock tumbling from David's hands seemed more twitchy than than I would expect from it's size and weight.
I trust David is not "seeing things", we just need to find what this Lambright Effect is actually doing. What causes it, and how to put it to use.
If a gravity motor based on the effect could only be stationed at special locations on the earth, that's a bit of a disappointment, but a huge gift to mankind nevertheless.
Leave a comment:
-
Thanks DaveOriginally posted by david lambright View Postyou already knew this.....could someone post the youtube link
Don't get discouraged - there is a saying that extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof but I feel that the truth always prevails and sometimes it is a very simple truth that proves a matter with absolute conclusion.
Leading scientists doubted that the Earth was spherical and all it took was a simple trip in a ship to prove it. And that after it was already demonstrated mathematically but not well accepted.
Many are resistant to change and I think at our core we are all skeptical in varying degrees. But we are also hopeful that new discoveries will unlock benefits for everyone.
Personally, I keep an open mind and I learn new things daily. When new discoveries are claimed I have hope like everyone else and do what I can to help. Sometimes the proof does not come as quickly as we would like, but the lack of proof does not invalidate the claim, it only leaves it unanswered awaiting the proof. Some of Einsteins claims were proven quickly, but Gravity Waves, not so quick and so we are anxious to see it however it can be proven.
I was hoping the two tests I suggested early on would show something good for us. But I guess they didn't or they were not done?
Perhaps we can come up with some other way if we keep thinking on it. In the mean time I hope some of those that have contacted you to visit can get the scheduling sorted out.
At some point we will need to get a rig to your location for testing and a duplicate from you that works out to another location for testing to help sort out the geographical possibilities.
Hang in there
Leave a comment:
-
video
you already knew this.....could someone post the youtube linkLast edited by david lambright; 05-20-2010, 07:54 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
This ordinary ferromagnetic field.Originally posted by Vickers View Post[ATTACH]5536[/ATTACH]
This is field from a stepper motor. Been playing around with it and I do notice a coldness coming of it and large objects like bricks feel heavier when passed over it. I tried it upside down over a brick on a bathroom scale but didn't notice any change, but I guess the field would affect the scale as well.
I figure this is the way it works.
Oxygen is paramagnetic. So therefore magnetic currents, vortexes, turbulence can be induced in air... thereby lowering the atmospheric pressure within the magnetic field. I imagine the turbulence could very well be visible with a design like David Lambrights.
Leave a comment:
-
Hmmm . . .Originally posted by VickersWhat the hell... David. Hold a coil of copper wire attached to a multimeter over your device. I'm getting between 20 to 26 volts on my plain old circular ferro field. No idea of amps so don't ask. But the thing is static. Its pulling energy out of thin air.. or to be scientific. OXYGEN.
'circular ferro field' ?
Leave a comment:
-
Why out of the oxygen, as opposed to nitrogen? If it doesn't work with vacume, AND this would be UFO fuel, then saucers need motherships to reach the earth, or alternative propulsion :-)Originally posted by VickersWhat the hell... David. Hold a coil of copper wire attached to a multimeter over your device. I'm getting between 20 to 26 volts on my plain old circular ferro field. No idea of amps so don't ask. But the thing is static. Its pulling energy out of thin air.. or to be scientific. OXYGEN.
Leave a comment:
-
Awesome photos man!!!! Holy ****!!!!
Hey guess what? The air is really good to breathe close to this magnetic field.
Oh yeah..this is the stator from the stepper motor. Kinda interesting I guess.Attached FilesLast edited by Vickers; 05-20-2010, 05:33 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
Hi, 1 3/4" OD [more like 1 7/8" is diameter 1 1/2" nominal size pipe. Something like 2x4 is not 2" x 4", pipes are the same s%^t up to 12". Then it starts going by real inches.Originally posted by Reiyuki View PostDavid, I'm starting a replication over here. Only thing I could find is 2" sch40 galvanized, 1-3/4 seems hard to find.
I have 1/2 of the crescent pieces cut and sanded down. It's pretty tough cutting that much steel, even with a sawzall and metal-cutting blades. How long did it take you to put everything together once you decided to try a replication?
Here's hoping for the best. I should have something to test by Saturday.
happy tinkering,
Reiyuki
Ciao, Slavek.
Leave a comment:
-
david hammel
AAGGRHOriginally posted by SDK View PostHi Guys,
May be. Fran De Aquino. http://users.elo.com.br/~deaquino/GCC.pdf
****, Dave's low RPM and the wobble of the rotor. Read the thing, skip the math, get the gist, have a look at the schematics and get back here and tell me that I am seeing things. I would say, that must be it. The low frequency induction from the aether, geomagnetic field, whatever, but not from within the gizmo. It only facilitates the process. And I thought Dave was seeing things.
Ciao, Slavek.
David Hammel,
three cones in a 55 gal drum with magnets all over, slowly spinning and wobbling.
The David Hamel Flying Saucer construction - Pictures Album
And Ralph Sansbury with his faster than light experiments, and probably more. It is real anitigravity and I was wrong all along on Leedskalnin's levitation.
With kind regards, Slavek.
P.S. Thanks Dave for sharing.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: