This forum is preserved as a permanent archive. The community continues at eMedia Press.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

gravity waves found

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • witsend
    replied
    Originally posted by sucahyo View Post

    Maybe, possibly, suppose, there is chance that black glows indicate anti gravity?
    I'll tell you what. If you're right then there's a very real correspondence to the 'dark' matter that our scientists are looking for. Golly. You may be onto something sucahyo.

    Leave a comment:


  • sucahyo
    replied
    Originally posted by witsend View Post
    The question is how he generates those fields to create the effects.
    Many failed to replicate it...


    BTW, I just found weird coincidence. Jetijs and david lambright PMH produce black glow. People body emit white glow. As reference Schauberger repulsin emit black glow.





    Maybe, possibly, suppose, there is chance that black glows indicate anti gravity?

    Leave a comment:


  • witsend
    replied
    Originally posted by Cloxxki View Post

    Nice simple build, I was very interested in slotted pipes like you crafted. Recently I read that current is subjected to some sort of centrifugal force, taking the most outward path around a bend. I can imagine at some ratio, also flux might take the outside path, despite some hurdles to overcome, to a least stay on the outside.
    I wonder if the relevance of that apparatus could be explained to the Lambright effect?

    Originally posted by Cloxxki View Post
    Does your PMH have magnetic attraction to iron filings etc? The effect on the overhanging magnet becomes either more or less significant dependin on your answer, I suppose.
    Surely if magnets are being used then filings would stick? I would have thought. I tried this on my own rig and with magnets attached it certainly holds those filings.
    Last edited by witsend; 06-30-2010, 11:59 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • witsend
    replied
    @ sucahyo
    It seems that the Hutchinson effect was an accident - developed from Hutchinson's experimentation with Tesla coils. I thought he had a basic thesis. It seems that the thesis followed the experiments and may, therefore, have been imposed on the experimental evidence. Very interesting effects and certainly not confined to motion. So. The thesis itself is not exclusively - as you refer to it 'scalar'. He has wood bonding into metals. Metals disassociating into powder. He clearly is showing effects that do not conform to known thermodynamic principles. The question is how he generates those fields to create the effects. Is this info available. I see on that thread that there's a general invitation for the public to duplicate the experiments - within the constraints of your average supply grid.

    Leave a comment:


  • witsend
    replied
    Adie, check out this link.
    PuPP's Theories Forum -> The Hutchison Effect

    It's got discussions strongly in support of 'vortices' - and sundry that I am certain conform to your thesis on centrifugal forces. Very interesting.

    The following extract which points to a 'WELL WORN COMPLAINT'.

    On September 20th, 1985, Hastings issued an affidavit to the effect that ...
    On September 19th, 1985, the motor was operated at 1,000 and 2,000 volts
    battery input, with output powers of 50 and 100 watts respectively. Input
    power in these tests were 7 and 14 watts yielding efficiencies of
    700% and 1,400% respectively...

    Searl, Schauberger and Newman, working independently, all discovered
    the same thing, vortex motion produced free energy in apparent defiance
    of the laws of thermodynamics. The free-energy machines they constructed
    are called OVER-UNITY machines because they operated in excess of
    100% efficiency.

    The experiments of Searl, de Palma, Trombly, Schauberger and
    Newman have not been repeated in the university establishments
    nor have their claims been taken seriously by professional scientists
    on the basis that it is impossible to get energy out of nowhere. Free
    energy researchers have either been opposed, ignored or labelled
    as pseudoscientists and their apparatus dismissed as
    'perpetual motion machines'.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cloxxki
    replied
    @Harvey
    Nice simple build, I was very interested in slotted pipes like you crafted.
    I expected though from your pictures that you'd place the slots on the outside as described near the end of the video.
    Recently I read that current is subjected to some sort of centrifugal force, taking the most outward path around a bend. I can imagine at some ratio, also flux might take the outside path, despite some hurdles to overcome, to a least stay on the outside.

    Does your PMH have magnetic attraction to iron filings etc? The effect on the overhanging magnet becomes either more or less significant dependin on your answer, I suppose.

    Leave a comment:


  • sucahyo
    replied
    Originally posted by Harvey View Post
    That is interesting - I wonder if your technique would work on my recent wobble video - perhaps there is something there that I cannot see.
    My download corrupt, so this is the best I can get from stationary shot:



    Originally posted by witsend View Post
    That's interesting sucahyo. I think that's more or less Adie's thesis. Can you elaborate on this? I'd be very interested.
    From TheHutchisonFile.pdf:




    This is theory of others too, maybe Bearden.

    Originally posted by witsend View Post
    btw - did you take that photograph? It's unarguably coming from the 'flesh' rather than from where the clothes shield it.
    No, I download it from the net. I guess any source will do.

    Leave a comment:


  • witsend
    replied
    Originally posted by sucahyo View Post
    I think hutchison effect happen because of intereference of two EM wave of spesific frequency create scalar effect. Different.
    That's interesting sucahyo. I think that's more or less Adie's thesis. Can you elaborate on this? I'd be very interested.

    btw - did you take that photograph? It's unarguably coming from the 'flesh' rather than from where the clothes shield it.
    Originally posted by sucahyo View Post
    I now developing a method to extract "aura" from a picture. Not PIP because I can not get color, I can only get silhouette. But I don't know if it really aura or not.
    Love to see this.

    Last edited by witsend; 06-30-2010, 06:20 AM. Reason: LOL Kept repeating the same editing error with the quotes over and over

    Leave a comment:


  • Harvey
    replied
    Originally posted by Stealth View Post
    I see a lot of similarities in this and David Hamel's spinner. If you would turn this PMH upside down and use a smaller ring magnet and a steel ball,I wonder if it would work the same way.When I get mine built, I will do some experiments to determine what it will do.I also see a lot of similarities between this arrangement and the arrangement of Stonehenge. I have more ideas in mind also,but will reserve them for myself when I get mine built. Good Luck. Stealth

    Hi Stealth,

    Yes the 'gap' in the Hamel Ring seems to show up in many different places. Unfortunately, many of us have replicated his 'spinner' and found out it was a hoax. The magnetic ring simply levitates the ring magnet which is never perfectly centered because of imperceptible motion in the hands, as a result it drags the ball along the surface and friction causes the ball to spin. Very precise systems were built to test this and it was found that when the human muscle was removed from the equation, the spin failed. So the general consensus among a very large group of persons evaluating this, was that the device is essentially human powered.

    The closest thing I've seen to a perpetual Magneto-Gravitic motor is the Finsrud Perpetuum Mobile which is kept locked in a Vault. This works because it splits the two fields into non-conservative parts and extracts energy from those parts midway through their cycle.

    Also: The Vault

    Last edited by Harvey; 06-30-2010, 06:20 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Harvey
    replied
    Originally posted by sucahyo View Post
    . . .
    Wether anyone consider this as fake or not, if it is possible, I like someone with postive result to post picture illuminated by uniform and very bright white light taken in front of uniform white background.
    That is interesting - I wonder if your technique would work on my recent wobble video - perhaps there is something there that I cannot see.

    The lighting was not real bright - but much of the background was white and clear plastic.

    Leave a comment:


  • sucahyo
    replied
    I think hutchison effect happen because of intereference of two EM wave of spesific frequency create scalar effect. Different.

    Originally posted by Harvey View Post
    Could it be, that something is there but our brains refuse to see it?

    Motion Induced Blindness

    Interesting . I also experience the missing dot too lol.


    I now developing a method to extract "aura" from a picture. Not PIP because I can not get color, I can only get silhouette. But I don't know if it really aura or not.

    If my method is valid the Jetijs right PMH have stronger effect.



    And child has lower aura, notice that glow only emited from hair/body but not cloth.



    Wether anyone consider this as fake or not, if it is possible, I like someone with postive result to post picture illuminated by uniform and very bright white light taken in front of uniform white background.

    Leave a comment:


  • witsend
    replied
    Just some thoughts on the Casimir Effect guys.

    Casimir himself was a mathematician. He proposed that on a really small scale - materials would be able to 'lock' or 'bond'. His theories were tested and proved on metals. In effect - with really small samples, it's possible to get this bond which is not easily broken. 'Sticks Like Crazy'.

    Anyway - both the proposal and the observation are profound. The 'bond' seems to 'knit' two amalgams together with a force that requires nothing more than proximity to each other. No electromagnetic or gravitational force accounts for it. And obviously the distances involved rule out an influence from the strong or weak nuclear forces. Which means that on a really small - albeit measurable level - there is an apparent attraction between materials that is not accounted for by known forces.

    My own proposal is that this force may be accounted for by small magnetic fields that are extraneous to the atom itself. But to argue this I first need to suggest that the magnetic field itself is a force with it's own energy and it's own matter making up that force. Then. For Casimir effect one can just as well say Magnetic effect. In my view two magnetic fields will always find some method to bond given that there are no restrictions to that requirement - or to their movement.

    What we also know about permanent magnet interactions with other magnets and with any kind of magnetic material - is that they will always reach a rest state. If one is looking for perpetual motion - then any superficial alignment of permanent magnets - no matter how they're configured - will inevitably find that 'rest' state. While any of those magnets in that alignment can experience the earth's magnetic fields - they will, mathematically and inevitably, find that position that best expresses a balance between those fields. And for that balance to be perfect, then the objects themselves must also be somehow - either immediately or systematically - rendered motionless. A magnetic field, in my book, always looks to find perfect balance and can move objects to achieve that balance. Which is why I, personally, do not subscribe to magnetic motors as being wholly perpetual motion machines. To work there must always be the introduction of some applied electric field or some applied force to sustain an imbalance.

    This is why effects such as the Lambright Effect are so significant. Here there is the clear introduction of a field that, without being itself 'overtly' magnetic, it somehow generates a magnetic response in a wide variety of materials. Which is not to say that alignment may still result in a rest state. It's just that the interaction itself is more varied. If it's based on these 'small' magnetic fields then balance cannot really be achieved unless these fields - themselves - extrude the material where they were previously hidden or housed. And what I believe we are seeing in the Lambright Effect - is precisely that extrusion. What is interesting is that it is associated with the emanation of that distinctive 'glimmer'.
    Last edited by witsend; 06-30-2010, 05:31 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • witsend
    replied
    Originally posted by CatLady View Post
    I have seen this video before and I DID NOT see the gorilla until it was brought to my attention. Interesting stuff
    Cat - just a question. That phone in a glass number. Could you repeat that whole experiment and see if it levitates with six batteries around the glass? I'd gladly do the experiment but it does not work off my foil. Just a thought. I know Dave has suggested that this may be worth looking into. One never actually knows if we're being duped by these videos or if they're based on some truth.

    btw - I was entirely unable to find out the properties of our foil as it's imported and it seems that none know except obviously the manufacturer. And I'm not that interested that I'll pick up the tab for an international call.

    Leave a comment:


  • Harvey
    replied
    Strange Wobble

    Strange wobble in suspended magnet:

    YouTube - Strange wobble in overhead magnet

    Leave a comment:


  • witsend
    replied
    There's a light shining.

    Originally posted by Shamus View Post
    Actually, this is more common than is realized: Check out "The Invisible Gorilla" by Christopher Chabris & Daniel Simons.

    And it's not just motion induced: In general, if we don't expect to see something, we wont.

    The Invisible Gorilla: And Other Ways Our Intuitions Deceive Us
    That's a really apt reference Shamus. Golly. I actually thought that the 'glimmer' was evident to everyone on Dave's penultimate video. Certainly there was no difficulty seeing it on this side. I must still ask another two people if they see it. I'll get back on this. Until those last three members - I assumed it was widely apparent to everyone.

    I'll tell you what. Once seen - it doesn't go away again. But I understand more and more why Dave was so anxious to show this. It's compelling viewing. Entirely fascinating. I have never seen the likes.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X