Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

gravity waves found

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Harvey
    replied


    No one commented on the surprise ending so I thought perhaps the video link was overlooked in the above post. But I see that at least 28 persons have viewed it on You-Tube.

    For those that missed it, here is the direct link:
    YouTube - Lambright - 014





    (I'm going to start processing my last videos now and hope to get them up today)

    Leave a comment:


  • Jetijs
    replied
    Hi David,
    our time difference is about 7 hours
    I looked carefully at your ring device and could not see anything you mention, I showed it also to two other people and they didn't see anything also. I will have some sensitives over at weekend and will show the ring to them. Also I will have another look using black background and good lighting, this usually helps me to see my aetheric body around my arms. I can see my etheric body anb hope I will see something around your device. However if it will be much harder to see than the aetheric body around my hands, then I guess you could see something like that looking at about anything if you try really hard. This is also one of the reasons why I will send you one of our orgonite pendants to see what you see around it. Might be that you are simply very sensitive. Or one more time the location plays a role. Will keep you updated about this.
    I have not thought about your aluminum core thing, sounds interesting
    Another update is that I finally bought some of the ford model T V-magnets, hope they will arrive soon, then more experiments will follow. At this time I am busy with other stuff.
    Thanks,
    Jetijs

    Leave a comment:


  • david lambright
    replied
    jetijs!

    sorry about buggin you....how many hours time difference is there?....i will be looking for your posts!....david...also i was thinking....the FERRO magnetic aluminum you made...could you use some of it for a core to make an electromagnet core?...i bet you already thought about that.....david...also has anyone heard about my devices on other forums/threads?...thanks
    Last edited by david lambright; 09-08-2010, 05:58 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Harvey
    replied
    Sorry Jetijs, (or was it someone else that asked me to do this - I can't find the post now )

    I said I was going to check the convective outlook before doing the test and I didn't - so the test was a bust - I'll have to do another when the Forecast is "Clear Skies"

    I honestly had no idea that this cloud bank was moving in - it had been hot and clear for days

    At any rate - here is a quick video - check the video information for the forecast data: YouTube - Lambright - 024

    Do you think the fan changes anything? I was thinking a motor might interfere with the Magnetic fields so . . . I used the fan.

    I still have more stuff to process when I get the time things have been busy this week already.

    Have I over looked any requested tests?

    Cheers,

    Last edited by Harvey; 09-08-2010, 07:50 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • david lambright
    replied
    good news!

    Originally posted by Jetijs View Post
    David, the package is in the postal office, I will get it tomorrow and show to everyone. Very exciting
    yes, exciting for me as well....i have been nervous about the Extreme Makeover stuff....tonite i showed a couple [friends of friends] the oxide core device, similar to yours, they too saw it...she said at first it looked "hazy" inside the ring, then she was able to see the 'lens type effect.....just some info.....anyway jet, thank you for your interest in all of this.....i know you have spent considerable time on replicating these devices, so thanks.....david

    Leave a comment:


  • Jetijs
    replied
    David, the package is in the postal office, I will get it tomorrow and show to everyone. Very exciting

    Leave a comment:


  • david lambright
    replied
    hi jet

    did the mail come yet!....just curious...david

    Leave a comment:


  • Harvey
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • woopy
    replied
    Hi all

    This thing is not evident at all.

    So i decided to make some icing test without the pmh.

    One particular result is the following

    First i froze a pmh in double u-shape in a container in the freezer no1 the pix 1 shows the icing.

    Than i refill the same container with about the same quantity of water (no pmh inside) and froze it in the freezer no2 (the freezer where i did all my previous "head pmh" test) and pix 2 shows the result. The icing is very different but is very similar to the "head pmh" icing with a bulb at the top of pix.

    Than i refill the same container with new water and no pmh and refroze it in the freezer no 1 and the result is very similar to the first icing with the double u-shape pmh

    Very weird it seems that or the freezer freeze differently or there is as a memory effect , Sucahyo said that the energy can stay few days in the freezer,

    what do you think

    good luck at all

    Laurent
    Last edited by woopy; 05-16-2011, 09:34 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Harvey
    replied
    No PMH Freeze

    The next activity in the sequence was an attempt at gathering the different stages of the PMH Ice meltdown. There simply is too much to work on it right now, so I am taking the things out of sequence here.

    If anyone would like a zip file with the videos and stills of the PMH Ice meltdown let me know.

    This sequence here is the NO PMH freeze:
    <Zoom <Zoom <Zoom

    <Zoom <Zoom <Zoom

    <Zoom <Zoom <Zoom

    <Zoom <Zoom <Zoom

    <Zoom <Zoom <Zoom

    For a lousy mid process video at the freezing which shows the bubble trails elongating from the outside in:YouTube - Lambright - 022 See pictures three and four above for the snap shots at this moment.

    For the rest of the video after freezing: YouTube - Lambright - 022

    I have more to do, but I am burned out for the night - tomorrow is another day (or actually today is another day) *Bangs Head On Keyboard*

    =)

    Leave a comment:


  • sucahyo
    replied
    Originally posted by Harvey View Post
    This video is the requested Tri-Pod rundown using my cell phone resolution. I will need to do another AVCHD version when I can get the time and drive space to handle those large files and borrow my son's camera again. But for now, perhaps this will do:
    YouTube - Lambright - 021
    I saw wave like motion. However after a retouch the video, I am not sure if it is the effect of youtube converter, something not exist in real video, or it is because of the way camera compression work, or real deal.

    YouTube - Diff of Harvey Lambright -021

    Leave a comment:


  • thekubiaks
    replied
    Originally posted by david lambright View Post
    sunday, a friend came by, we talked about the icing and he had a suggestion...time lapse....i think it is a great idea but i do not have the right equipment to do it....something like 1 frame every 60 seconds?...i dont know but i bet you guys do!...david
    GoPro HD has this capability.

    Leave a comment:


  • david lambright
    replied
    harvey...

    i should have known that you were already thinking of that!...great work, by the way!...question;...do your videos look different after they are processed?...with my vids, there is a lot of difference after processing...on youtube, if you go to "add captions and subtitles", it seems that they use the raw image...in "mikes house #3", the effects are much more visible with the raw image information...david....and harvey, great work!

    Leave a comment:


  • Harvey
    replied
    Originally posted by david lambright View Post
    sunday, a friend came by, we talked about the icing and he had a suggestion...time lapse....i think it is a great idea but i do not have the right equipment to do it....something like 1 frame every 60 seconds?...i dont know but i bet you guys do!...david
    LOL - yeah I wanted to do a time lapse melt yesterday, but the only way the HFM31 will do it is in post processing (via software) and it would take the entire internal disc (32GB?) to save two hours of HD recording. So the same would be necessary in reverse.

    Canon sells an Intervalometer that is specially designed to work with the SLR series cameras and then stitch the stills together into a fluid video - but I couldn't find anything for the HFM31. So it becomes a manual process of clicking the video snapshot at the desired intervals or filming the whole process and then using software to change the time base.

    Also, a special freezer with a non-fog window would need to be used for the filming because you don't want your camera in the freezer.

    The good news here, is that I did take some shots in the middle of the freeze that helps show what is happening - I just have to get it all processed.

    Leave a comment:


  • david lambright
    replied
    hi everyone...

    sunday, a friend came by, we talked about the icing and he had a suggestion...time lapse....i think it is a great idea but i do not have the right equipment to do it....something like 1 frame every 60 seconds?...i dont know but i bet you guys do!...david

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X