Free Energy At Last Step By Step Must See

[Lourent]

I was wondering, when you remove the printed circuit what about the commutator. How is the current reversed? Thanks Laurent

[RAMSET]

Same consept as above

Stephan
Quote
A new video by MrFreeEnergy claiming
100 KWatts output running 2 big motors and a
electric heater via big Tesla coils:

YouTube - FREE ENERGY GENERATOR BY KAPANADZE 100 KW - PART -1

Amazing !

* Reply with quoteQuote

Looks like input is 240 Volts x 2 amps per
phase and output looks like 240 Volts x 10 amps per phase, 3 phases total.
For each phase there is a Teslatranformer with a special Kapanadze transformer
amplifying the power.

[RAMSET]

Trying Jolt's suggestion[thanks hope it works]
Don Smith Free Energy - Video

Nope Don't know why, but when I paste in the address this worthless link shows up
see post 595 please

Thanks Chet

[Joit]

Ramset
Either you copy the Link directly in, or edit the Post with the go advanced Button lower Side right. This should work.

[RAMSET]

you folks need to watch this Peter Lindemann ,Don Smith

Won't take link posted above POST# 595

[RAMSET]

Watch the vids Peter Lindemann is in them

You folks need to watch this

Don Smith Free Energy - Video

[RAMSET]

The reason for these posts

Quote from user bolt at OU

just make imhoptep setup you will learn a lot as you acquire parts and experience try to make simple collector coils. Use a car spark plug to start is much easier then solid state. There is MUCH more harmonic energy in a spark then SS devices. You need HF and HV.

Experiment with ground and small aerial connections to pull in ambient free electrons and it wont take long before you have lit up half a dozen 60 watt bulbs with only 10 watts driven the car ignition coil.

[RAMSET]

Don Smith MUST READ PDF

Sorry for consecutive posts but can't edit once I leave and come back to forum

Paul r posted these links at OU
quote
I reckon the best Don Smith links are:
http://www.free-energy-info.co.uk/Chapter3.pdf (Page 20 onwards)
and

http://www.free-energy-info.co.uk/Smith.pdf

This is the stuff where all chasing !!

Chet
PS

And according to those in the KNOW, you fellows are on this road

[RAMSET]

Don Smith Movies MUST SEE

bolt said[at OU]
go and watch my 3 videos i posted here some time ago before you do anything else on this subject.

Don Smith Free Energy - Video

Don Smith PDF to follow
Chet

[RAMSET]

Don Smith, Tesla Mag flux to power

User bolt at OU suggested we study /learn what you fellows are doing here
He posted this vid and said you are on your way to doing what these Russian fellows are doing

YouTube - Эксперимент с трансформатором Тесла

[IGavius]

a homemade doserate meter to detect/measure X-ray and gamma-photon radiation

@ Henieck : this question about X-rays is interesting and clever. Since I don't yet know how to detect them...

Is there a simple (cheap) device to indicate there's X-rays ?

Maybe the cheapest doserate meter is here: A Homemade Fallout Meter . It is called as "fallout meter", because it was intended to measure the radiation coming from the fall-out of radioactive isotopes after the explosion of nuclear wheapons.

It measures the dose rate of gamma-radiation indeed (as it is an "ionizing chamber" detector in principle), so if it works, it can measure any kind of photon radiation, i.e. photon radiation emitted from X-ray tubes, too.

[IGavius]

@ Henieck : this question about X-rays is interesting and clever. Since I don't yet know how to detect them...

Is there a simple (cheap) device to indicate there's X-rays ?

Kodak produces films specially developed to detect presence of X-ray and gamma-photons and determine the amount of their radiation (dose):
"Kodak Personal Monitoring Film Type 2". The Carestream Health Inc. deals with the trade of this filmdosimeters. The other X-ray film products, developed for X-ray imaging, are usually not such sensitive for small doses than this film.

It is quite cheap, 1 pc is cca. 1 USD in Hungary, and can detect a wide range of doses (cca. 0,1 mR...500 R).

The behaviour of the film is heavily nonlinear - in case of small doses the film replies with a very small (although significant) increase of the darkness: so, if you irradiate it with small doses, it is not sure, whether you can visualize the darkness of the exposed film by your eyes.
Usually, a sensitive transmission photodensitometer is needed, which can measure optical density more precisely than 0.02. This device is very expensive, more than 1000 USD.
Instead of an expensive densitometer, you may try to use a flat bed scanner and an imaging software to detect the differences of darkness of the films when your eye cannot do that (e.g scan your films at the same scanning position, copy the two scanned image into a new single empty image, than alter the intensity and the contrast in your software: the difference will appear if it exist).
The other disadvantage of the nonlinearity of the film is that if you produce X-ray with different photon-energy (e.g. you alter either the voltage or material of anode), you might get different amount of the darkness even the intensity was same: the film is most sensitive for the cca. 80..100 keV photon energy. So, when you either increase or decrease the photon energy, the film will be lighter at the same dose (at same photon intensity).
E.g. the darkness is cca. 20-24 times higher in case of 80..100 keV than 1250 keV!

To overcome this problem, usually a special film holder (badge) is used, which contains 2 or 3 different metal filters and 2 or 3 different plastic filters (the principle is same as Henieck mentioned): these filters reduces the intensity of the photon beam, causing spots having different darknesses. As the film and the filters behave non-linearly, the ratio of different darknesses of spots below the different filters characterize the mean photon energy.
Although, you cannot evalute it unless you have got a complete series of films irradiated with the radiation calibration standards... which might cost several thousand of dollars.:-(

But you need NOT buy all of this - even, I guess, you have to buy nothing, except a service.
All the countries of the world have a so-called "Personal Monitoring/Dosimetry Service" providing individual dosimeters for the ionizing radiation workers: in our country it costs only 8 USD for a single case - I am positive, that you can find a similar service near to you, even cheaper.
(If not, call your local authority and ask, "which local laboratory/company is accepted and approved by the authority for personal monitoring of radiation workers exposed to ionizing X-ray?" - and you will get the answer,
what and where it is in your case.)
In my country this service uses Kodak filmdosimeters - some other countries uses so called TL-dosimeters (thermoluminescent solid state dosimeters), but the result is same: if you order this service, they will lend a badge and a film (or a TL-card) for you and when you finish your radiation work, you have to post them back: the service will evaluate your dosimeters and sends back the numeric results to you.

If you select this way, I wish to recommend to order TWO dosimeters:
(1) keep both dosimeter #1 and #2 at that position of your machine where X-ray will be present
(2) but! BEFORE you wish to produce X-ray (you would switch your machine on), remove dosimeter #2 and put to a safe, radiation free location as far distance from your machine as possible.
As you know, there are a natural background radiation everywhere coming from the space, the Earth, the building materials, etc., which is not constant, it might change from location to location.
So, if you do not know, what the background radiation was at the interest position of your machine, you cannot make a difference, so you cannot assure, whether you have failed or succeeded to produce X-ray.
By this method above, you measure your natural background by dosimeter #2, and the operational+background dose by dosimeter #1. Substract the dose of #2 from dose of #1, you get your operational dose: if this number differs from 0, you surely produced X-ray.

Some years ago some guys measured the background radiation doserate in our buiding: it was 90 nSv/h at the 4th floor, 105 nSv/h at the ground floor and 115 nSv/h in front of the building, in open air - so, if I had a machine at the 4th floor, which would elevate the doserate to 115 nSv/h, I would be very happy.

By the way, the cheapest and most productive solution would be the purchase of a cheap electric doserate meter.
I am also interested to buy such an equipment, but at this moment it is not available in Hungary. Some years ago a cheap commercial Chinese electric dosimeter was available, it costed cca. 30 USD, but disappeared.
Rarely the military shops sells some rubbishy electric dosimeters, although none of them can operate... maybe not this is the case in your country!:-)

[henieck]

Is there a simple (cheap) device to indicate there's X-rays ?

- in hospitals they used photographic materials. I am not quite sure that all the photo films or papers will detect all lengths of x-ray (probably yes) but it would be relatively cheap method to start with. Take piece of photo paper or film for camera put it into special light tight envelope (in a dark room of course, so you don't expose it to any light). I would use relatively thick, black paper for this. Then place it behind the gas tube in such a way that if there are any x-rays emitted they have a chance to hit the envelope. Place a piece of metal on the envelope so it will absorb any possible radiation in this area for comparison. Razor blade for example, or anything (lead aborbs the best). Run it for some time, depends on how intense is the radiation minutes or hours and get the film processed... If any x-rays were present it will look similar to like it was exposed to visible light - and areas under the metal object will be unexposed. I think this method is very simple and reliable. If you ask for a little of used chemicals from photo lab (should be still active in some extend therefore sufficient to start with) and you know how to use it - the method may be even very cheap to implement as well.

[IGavius]

[Bodkins]

@Bodkins,
@Marseye,
thank you for the kind greetings and the recommended link about the RE!

Today I found some small (only 40 mm sized, 12V, 1W and 0.9W, "impedance protected" as their labels shows) old CPU cooler fans, I have tried to "transform" by the usual way; the only pity that there were no posts at all: the wires were soldered to the control panel directly. Even, there are no the usual four-armed (cross-like) iron plate core with four coils - only a single cylindic coil is there (bifilar, I guess, as there are four small wires coming out from it), located axially, and there are two thin iron plates (the core, I guess) one is below and one is above the coil.
Do you have some experience/idea about this kind of fan? Could it be better, or worse than the "usual" fans? (If you find it better, that will have a very bad consequence for me, as the wires are very short and thin. )

is it like this one? if so these are the best coils, just put a bedini on it and it works.
If you can get the maker of the fan please post i have only got two of these fan and would like more, the one in the picture has bifilar with three north and south poles on each end.