This forum is preserved as a permanent archive. The community continues at eMedia Press.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Multifilar Generator Coil - Lenz delay Experiments

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • BroMikey
    replied

    Sounds like you have agreed with our plan. So it doesn't HAVE to be
    3 circuits. Well I know that from my first one only had one channel
    and it sped up under load

    Good to see everyone out today making the rounds

    Leave a comment:


  • SkyWatcher
    replied
    Hi all, Hi bromikey, yes that is correct and the other information you gave is also correct.

    Hi turion, thanks for sharing the information again, hope it's at least lenz neutral at a reasonable rpm.

    Have been cleaning the wire ends today and applying masking tape to each wire for continuity checking and marking.
    peace love light

    Leave a comment:


  • BroMikey
    replied
    Originally posted by SkyWatcher View Post
    Hi all, Hi bromikey, nice work and nice coil you have going there.

    I finished my first coil, I integrated the other 12 strand coil I had, though that means I had to make the strand length shorter.
    Specs:
    26 strand multifilar coil
    110 feet per strand
    24awg. magnet wire
    46 ounces of copper

    Might be good, will continue working on project.
    peace love light

    Is this the correct winding information?

    Leave a comment:


  • BroMikey
    replied
    Originally posted by Turion
    My coil: 24 strands of #23 each 125 feet long = 4.62 lbs of copper per coil

    Sky's coil: 26 strands of #24 each 110 feet long = 3.497 pounds

    That's .75% as much copper. Sky, I have NO IDEA if you will see the speed up under load effect or not with your coil at 1800 rpm, 2800 rpm, or if it will have to be FASTER.

    Dave
    Also in an earlier post Sky and I talked about this and I suggested that
    may need to settle for 2 channels of 12 strands a piece. This would give
    him a double channel with each circuit having a satisfactory amount of
    wire and possibly run at 3000 rpm's because with the small rotors it
    seems it takes a higher rpm than the 12" rotor which travels so much
    faster.

    He is going to try 12 strands of 110' which is 12 X 110 = 1300' so
    his circuit will have 300 feet more than your circuit which is 4 X 250' or
    the other build of 8 X 125' = 1000' Also.

    He wants to see if this coil will speed up under load as a beginning then
    later he may build a better machine. This was all discussed early in the
    thread.

    Although I am wondering if 3 circuits give an exponential increase over
    2 circuits of a 1000'? Just wondering if it must be 3 circuits of a 1000'
    to get more.


    Note: I have been following your design for 6 years and it was only
    recently that it became clear to me about there being 3 chennels so
    now I know.
    Last edited by BroMikey; 07-08-2019, 12:05 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • BroMikey
    replied
    Originally posted by Turion
    Sky,
    How long is each strand?
    Originally posted by SkyWatcher View Post
    Hi bromikey, nice work and nice coil
    you have going there.

    I finished my first coil, I integrated the other 12 strand coil I had,
    though that means I had to make the strand length shorter.
    Specs:
    26 strand multifilar coil
    110 feet per strand
    24awg. magnet wire
    46 ounces of copper

    I think this is the right post.

    Leave a comment:


  • BroMikey
    replied
    Originally posted by SkyWatcher View Post
    Hi all, found some energy to wind the 26 strand, 24awg. coil onto the bobbin, seems to fit fine.
    Will be marking all the wires next and wiring them to terminals for testing soon.
    peace love light


    Nice work Sky, great progress from a bold person.

    Leave a comment:


  • SkyWatcher
    replied
    Hi all, found some energy to wind the 26 strand, 24awg. coil onto the bobbin, seems to fit fine.
    Will be marking all the wires next and wiring them to terminals for testing soon.
    peace love light

    Leave a comment:


  • bistander
    replied
    Data?

    Hi Turion,

    Are you going to post that data?

    bi

    Originally posted by Turion
    ... Will try and get the rest of the data I wanted. I did shoot a video,but put the camera down while I put coils in the machine and forgot to record the rpm with the coils in place, so just need to start over in the morning.

    Originally posted by bistander View Post
    BTW, did you get a chance to get that data? Will you share it?

    bi

    Leave a comment:


  • BroMikey
    replied
    Originally posted by Turion
    The generator is crap. I have no more time for this.
    Yes it is amazing to me when I go back and look at some of my beginnings
    and see how poorly the construction tolerances were and this all takes
    time and money to order parts install, test.

    Plastic (some) can warp on you, cores get misaligned, platforms
    twist. This is why I am looking at composite material sheeting.
    Otherwise 4" of shock resistance chopping block board, that won't
    move. And a 1" OR 1 1/8" Shaft with comparable bearing set to
    keep "end play" within 1 thousandths of and inch.

    For those who are not mechanics "END PLAY" is the travel of the shaft
    end to end. Excessive "end play" can be due to wear and in the
    case of a new set of bearings if "end play" exceeds the tolerance
    it may be that the bearings are cheap made or to small.

    After running the machine 5 hours poor designs suffer "end play"
    that is a danger if the magnet eventually strikes the core material.

    Dave knows all this. Good mechanical design takes effort.

    Leave a comment:


  • BroMikey
    replied
    Originally posted by Turion
    Why turn my machine off? . How many times do I have to say that before you get it? With the magnets in place it only draws 12 amps.



    Bi is a clown, clowns do not concern themselves with specific criteria
    because this is not the goal. Clowns just clown around, jump all over
    scatter brain like adding confusion.

    Thanks for the repeats Dave I always enjoy them, they are almost sacred.


    Happy 4th guys no hard feelings over view points hear?
    Last edited by BroMikey; 07-04-2019, 09:45 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • BroMikey
    replied
    Originally posted by dragon View Post
    The cure for overcoming these forces was developed back in the 1800's. ...yes, Mikey, I am an electronic/physics "freak".
    ...there is no need to be disrespectful to those that are skeptical... bursts of sarcasm, disrespect and name calling.
    Don't try to correct me for your unwillingness to address the criteria.
    Grown men should not pout. Anyway glad you are a thinker just do
    some more of it and you will see that the stuff we were taught is
    flawed. I don't like it anymore than you do so better go back and
    fix what is broken. Don't blame me for your inabilities to stop the
    "POLLY WANT A CRACKER" parroting of old flawed science for the
    super genius.

    Leave a comment:


  • bistander
    replied
    Your generator

    I was referring to "your generator" in general, not specific to the first prototypes, you know, after you get the bugs worked out.

    Leave a comment:


  • bistander
    replied
    Breaking magnetic lock

    Originally posted by Turion
    bi, ... With no magnets in place my big machine pulls over 100 amps to break the magnetic lock ...
    Hi Turion,

    I often wonder why this is such a concern. It only happens on start up. With your generator producing a kilowatt or two of free energy, why turn it off? Just give the rotor a push by hand to get it going and leave it run for a couple of years, or forever.

    That question comes to mind every time I see one of those fake videos where the actors are starting up their free energy generator. Why was it off? And often, it runs for a few minutes, and then they turn it off. Why turn it off?

    Regards,

    bi

    Leave a comment:


  • dragon
    replied
    Originally posted by BroMikey View Post

    Exactly the right thinking, what about inertia, what about gravity, how
    about momentum? You can't talk pull in and pull out = 0. These guys
    are rambling, keep going Dave.

    it's the same ole hat, the electrical freaks ONLY focus on charge and
    the physics guys TALK about forces and each group thinks this stuff
    exists in a world all buy itself when the project is submersed in all of
    it, including what we can't explain and create cute little formula for.

    You want TAKE TWO? Naw they don't want take two, just build it and
    quite generalizing you sound helpless. Shouldn't work? And it does.
    The cure for overcoming these forces was developed back in the 1800's. I talked briefly on this in the last couple posts... no one read them with intentions of learning anything I suppose and yes, Mikey, I am an electronic/physics "freak". Because of those "freaks" from the past and present we have the ability to do all sorts of cool stuff today... I enjoy learning from them so I don't make needless mistakes. Your a good builder Mikey and I respect that, there is no need to be disrespectful to those that are skeptical. Simple answers to questions would go much farther than bursts of sarcasm, disrespect and name calling.

    Respectfully...
    Last edited by dragon; 07-04-2019, 02:28 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • bistander
    replied
    Data

    Originally posted by Turion
    ... Will try and get the rest of the data I wanted. I did shoot a video,but put the camera down while I put coils in the machine and forgot to record the rpm with the coils in place, so just need to start over in the morning.
    BTW, did you get a chance to get that data? Will you share it?

    bi

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X