An Inquiry in to the Alien Reproduction Vehicle

[robur]

Gone by request

[Gambeir]

Well that was still pretty unclear. You'll figure it out once you try spinning two or three individual homemade tetrahedrons.

The whole idea here in the tetrahedron is the dielectric field is transmitted by this form such that one can understand how an invisible energy field (the dielectric field) can be feed into material to create a capacitor much like water flowing over a water wheel provides energy: That these shapes produce a resultant force is due to the dielectric induction which they seem capable of transmitting, but then to utilize this energy flow it must be stressed, per Wheeler, and which produces power. That stress is induced by the 12 volt DC field cutting through the electrostatic AC. The AC should be a source for sustained constant electrostatic power. Where the Alexey probably fails is in the unprotected motors which are driving the magnets and the upper steel plate and which is likely to happen when the electrostatic discharge reaches a high enough potential in an emp discharge.

Right now though, this area is outside of where I want to want to direct our focus, which is on the Alexey device, and which I do not think is very complex at all. If I'm right then understanding what is happening will make replications much easier.

The first thing is I'm pretty sure the Alexey is emitting an electromagnetic pulse wave; an EMP wave. I believe the discovery of the EMP Pulse wave was the enabling technology that made Nazi Saucers reality. We know absolutely that the Nazi's had developed an EMP defensive weapon system. That is fact and not fiction and which is supportive of the claims that the Germans did infact succeed in developing a saucer.

I think the concept is a fairly simple and can be seen in the Alexey machine. The hard part is explaining this to people who are used to seeing the world in terms of capacitors which become storage devices for energy by applying a charge. Energy is contained in space. The enabling tool is understanding how to make this dielectric field flow in where you want it to go to and then how to stress that dielectric field so that it produces energy.

All in all, I feel that what I've outlined as a method of operations is probably close to being accurate. I leave it to the experts to decipher the specifics.

For me, the important thing seems to be that the Alexey must be drawing in the ether, the dielectric field which is energy, and that the DC dipole field must be stressing that energy field so as to result in electrical power being supplied from surrounding space such that the aluminum plate becomes a de-facto capacitor. The magnets are naturally providing a steady flux of dielectric energy. Somewhere on Scrubtube Walter Lewin demonstrates that energy in a capacitor is inexplicably being held in what appears to be an empty container. In the matter of stressing the dielectric field one could look at the water droplet experiment.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oY1eyLEo8_A

Leyden Jar revisited.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=By2ogrSwgVo

So now a dielectric is also a mirror and which also alters the spectum of visible light too.
I think in considering UFO's and their lights you will want to look at this link and at the
little gif that is also at the link on the right side.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dielectric_mirror

"The color transmitted by the dielectric filters shifts when the angle of incident light changes."
I theorize that the reason this machine takes so long to get working is it needs refining and understanding it is necessary to refine it. Another aspect to the machine is how the magnets interact to form a magnetic thrust chamber, or in other words, how by altering the diameter of the magnetic ring would effect the repulsion force produced on a given area. So there's lots to monkey with but I feel this explanation of operation is a good start towards understanding the machine.

[Gambeir]

Rewrote this about ten times now as a result of having to "evidently" make this as clear as possible.



I do think the Vril design spun the tetrahedrons. But if you're going to try this then instead think of making the frames that hold the magnets in combination with high frequency emitters rotate around the tetrahedron shapes, because you cannot get individually made tetrahedron shapes balanced well enough and moving without developing centrifugal force problems of very high power and which will be virtually impossible to control. There is no way the tetrahedrons rotated as individual independent bodies. Not even precisely machined parts with high quality bearing are capable of keeping that sort of system in balance. The load forces are huge. Any imbalance will destroy the whole arrangement in nothing flat. Do not even try that. I'm sure the Nazi's did not try that. It isn't logical at all. The only logical system is to link the tetrahedrons into a ring like arrangement, which is what the artist below shows, it's either that or else to spin the outer shell.

For this to work as rotating tetrahedrons the tetrahedrons would have to form a continuous ring as show in this drawing. Now look here at this illustration. This is very likely a correct 3D illustration of the design.

https://lionhart.cgsociety.org/qcl0/vril-wwii-german-fly

If you look at the Vril design the energy is being focused on to a sphere in the center. Now unless you have the design shown by the artist above, then you cannot have the tetrahedrons spinning because of the dynamic centrifugal force issues, in which case it would be highly likely that the sphere at the core rotates, not the tetrahedrons, and that the outer frames are what would then spin around tetrahedrons.

Do you understand or not? It's a matter of what is possible to build with your own hands. Have you got an aircraft factory or not? You're going to have to be creative is the bottom line and that comes with having some concept of what is taking place.

What Joe Parr was studying is how a large shape is a macro representation of a micro structure. Obviously he was doing that because there's something somewhere else on planet earth that suggests there is a reason to think that Shape power is capable of producing in large scale what a millions of crystalline forms produce when exposed to the some kind of energy. So the micro shapes translate across to the macro. That's the basic theory as expressed by Joe Parr. That idea cross validates the Vril design. In the Vril design notice there is an upper tetrahedron shape and a lower larger tetrahedron shape. I think the sphere may be copper or aluminum, which makes this very Alexey like in certain respects.

Probably with enough screwing around this thing works one way or other in a manner similar to the Alexey


The 3D artist's depiction looks very closely like the fabric covered versions shown in images and in a clip of it hovering.
Pretty sure this machine isn't a fictional construct (Vril 7) and the artwork shows a deep appreciation for the design.

https://lionhart.cgsociety.org/qcl0/vril-wwii-german-fly

So all facts added up does seem to suggest that these Vril drawings are not complete and total it lunancy. Other ideas which have been injected in to the Nazi Saucer stories, such as this business about mercury or the marconi ball being a ball filled with mercury really do not seem to have a rational scientific basis for existing and are garbled or purposely created disinformation. A Marconi ball is very likely some invention which springs from someone seeing drawings of the Karl Schappeller Device but didn't know what it was. I have absolutely no idea where the marconi ball business springs from. There's some cross over between the Schapeller device and the later discovery of the Schumann Frequency in how the device probably works, but that comes later on and was done independently in theory by Schumann whereas the Shappeller device is neither theoretical nor fictional and predates Schumann, so it's design concepts probably originate from Victor Schauberger.

The late great Rob Arnet's original publication on the Vril Saucers. Here's where some of this information crops up.

http://www.unicusmagazine.com/PDF/Third%20Reich%20Nazi%20Antigravity%20Aerospace%20Craft%20Weapons%20Development%20Programs.pdf

[Gambeir]

First off I can't research for you. Joe Parr repeatedly suffered catastrophic failures with his machine which he attributed to the generation of some unknown and undetectable energy.
I also have repeatedly said I would not even try to spin 3D tetrahedrons and offered some alternates to consider.
Black light is not black but it is light.

You got fingers or what? Just google black light.
"A blacklight (or often black light), also referred to as a UV-A light, Wood's lamp, or ultraviolet light, is a lamp that emits long-wave (UV-A) ultraviolet light and very little visible light."

I swear that Wikipedia has re-written this piece on the properties of aluminum. Possibly I somehow misunderstood, but I seriously doubt that since I cited it more than once.
Previously I said aluminum absorbed LR UV radiation based on what I had repeatedly read from Wikipedia ( I think I actually quoted it verbatim) and now it says exactly the opposite!
I know I'm right about what I had previously read. Untrustworthy source evidently.

Instead consult this for the light reflecting properties of aluminum

https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/jres/4/jresv4n2p189_A2b.pdf

http://marktechopto.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/uv-color-spectrum.png

I don't know how much research you've done but it's not enough.

http://www.rexresearch.com/parrpyr/parrpyram.htm

"It took 3 years to develop the Pyramid Centrifuge and locate a DC motor large enough to drive it to the calculated speed. The first Centrifuge was like a Model "T" Ford, very basic. When 2500 RPM's was reached, on September 17, 1983, a loud explosion was heard. When the machine was shut down and cover removed, I discovered my arm was "wiped clean." Four Pyramids and a CS137 isotope were surgically removed. At the time, I didn't know what had happened. After 55 such experiments, I realize that was my first jump into Hyperspace."

[robur]

Gone by request

[robur]

Gone by request

[Gambeir]

[QUOTE=robur;319776]Moreover, if one were to produce a circular track of magnets on a plate and were to spin the plate beneath the tetrahedron then that may itself produce a propulsive force, and finally if while projecting black light on to the tetrahedron we might see levitation if it had not already been produced by the rotation of the moving magnetic field. It would be highly entertaining if that also then resulted in the tetrahedron and plate suddenly becoming invisible as well. Just have not gotten round to fooling with these ideas, but maybe someone else will if I mention them.

I understand plate of magnets and tetrahedrone.
BUT
What the deal with black light?
By black light you mean exactly what?
Light bulb painted in black so it would ''shine'' with black light?
I don't get it.

See papers by Fran De Aquino. Go to link.

https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0109060

14 papers on correlations between weight loss and IR/black light radiation.

https://arxiv.org/search/physics?searchtype=author&query=De+Aquino%2C+F

And regarding tetrahedron - can i ask why tetrahedron and not pyramid?
Wasn't joe parr using pyramids?

Because Germans don't use pyramids. Only inferior sub humans use pyramids, and because the Nazi Vril don't show Pyramids/ They only show tetrahedrons. Pyramids seem to be omni-directional in how they work. They are symmetrical shapes, where a tetrahedron is not. Yes, Joe was using pyramids, but just look what happened to his machines, all blown to hell and why, because of Juden Science is why.... snort....Ok so not really, it's more likely that the shape of a pyramid is evidently omni directional energy projection. That's my guess. If I wan't a thousand years old then I might wonder about repeating that experiment with tetrahedron shapes pointing inwards to the center of the shaft.

And when you say tetrahedron do you mean a full 3-d tetrahedron or just a flat triangle?

Thanks

Yes, 3D formed full real tetrahedrons. Not flat cut shapes.

[Gambeir]

See if this helps to envision what I think is going on in the UFO HD Image.

[Gambeir]

I am sorry to disappoint you Gambeir about me never hearing about automotive Silicone.
I don't have a car so I never heard about that

EVO Stik impact was best glue I was shown before.
I have a look on e-bay about That silicone glue.
And if you got time pls read my replies.

Copper is always the best gasket material. High quality head gaskets are typically copper. This is what I buy most times. I'm big on silicone myself.
Notice this is 700 degree's and the other is 300 degrees.

[Gambeir]

Is that it?
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/High-Temp...4AAOSwgQ9Vzb1k

Only if you're imprisoned on the British Isle's it is.

Yes, that's what I was thinking about. Usually I buy smaller amounts but hell maybe you're building a space ship or something.

[robur]

Gone by request

[robur]

Gone by request

[robur]

Gone by request

[robur]

Gone by request

[robur]

Gone by request