An Inquiry in to the Alien Reproduction Vehicle

[aljhoa]

Refer to Joe Parr's notes. He says that for the pyramid concept to pinch off (become engulfed in a protective orb which shielded it from both gravity and cosmic rays including gamma rays) that it needed to have a nuclear isotope. This makes sense to me now, at least given the time period when he was involved in doing this research.

Notice how similar this sounds to the electromagnetic field generator where enhancement for the PZT materials calls out for either cobalt or Iron 57

https://patents.google.com/patent/US10135366B2/en

It wasn't clear before but the whole point of high frequency and high energy (radio isotopes for example) is specifically to facilitate as fast a fluxing between the magnetic polar opposites; or grinding/crunching of a coherent magnetic field because in Joe Parr's work the magnets are coherent dielectric material. To have gravity you have to have an "Incoherent Dielectric Field"
Sometimes I think we are all just a bunch of stupid clones. Honestly....Lol~

Bob Lazar Says the FBI Raided Him to Seize Area 51's Alien Fuel. The Truth Is Weirder


Al

[Gambeir]

Stay off the dark web freak~

https://patents.google.com/patent/US20190295733A1/en?inventor=Salvatore+Pais&oq=inventor:(Salvatore+Pais

Ya, Thanks...I can't decide if they are now panicking and trying to keep the high ground for themselves by pretending that this is new's to them with the release of these patents, or whether the entire sudden flood (slightly super supicious) is a mixed bag for mind controlling hoaxing which helps keep real understanding in the bag. I mean you have to realize by now that with the completely transparent manipulations of mass media, of the net, and so on that obviously any education relating to anything around this topic is going to be monitored and manipulated, so very likely we have look at these patents with an idea that they might or might not work as described. In other words, the device might work but not for the stated reasons, or it might be that in some instances the concepts forwarded are being forwarded using conventional explanations with the idea to misguide.


Gravity is just incoherent magnetism. So the issue is how then to re-create an incoherent magnetic cloud sufficiently dense enough that you've formed a gravitational bubble; right? Now ask me again: Why are all the UFO Photo's blurry? Maybe Bugsfly understood this long before I did, but that is what I see in the Bugsfly grinder concept and in the ARV design and something similar in the Alexey could be going on.

A picture is emerging about the reality of what is gravity and how to re-create it. I see most all of these patents as somewhat suspect. There's only logic in them which is based on Einsteinian Concepts and so called effects of various types, but as to a rational and coherent understanding being communicated is not visible in my eye's. Only by understanding Wheeler can I see what makes logical sense. Otherwise I see a lot of mumbo jumbo witch doctor physics. Not to say it doesn't make sense because that's the really disturbing part, and that is how they can make some of this sound completely rational and logical, but ultimately you have to measure it against Wheeler's teaching. I mean what is super conduction really? Is the Meissner effect really the expulsion of a magnetic field?

In my mind you have to make sense of this whole business about spinning magnetic fields, inducing fluxing piezoelectric materials to vibrate at ubber high frequencies, ultrasonics, ect, and to makes sense of the real reasons for employing these things has to have some immediate logical link to the notion of what causes gravity, and I think it's quite clear that in this area the most logical and rational explanation is Ken Wheelers. I do not see where the use of these materials in the manner employed should cause space time to bend inwards. To me it seems pretty clear that the Einsteinian version of reality was based on the real understanding but perverted specifically for maintaining the illusion under a pretext of national security.

Further, the notion that a surrounding ether is the cause of gravity seems validated by the use of preferred materials such as PZT in present patents involving this topic? So ya know, the official versions, the patented explanations are one thing, but that's only the beginning of seeing whether it makes sense because their explanations and the reason these patents are accepted are based on the former bankrupt notion that gravity is cause by dirt bending space time inwards, which is sort of like saying the Earth's core is giant round iron magnetic ball. A highly dubious concept but one which suffices for a grade school student.

In simple terms, since we are able to create a magnetic field with assorted means, then to create an artificial gravity field we need to grind the field back to an incoherent mass: The ARV is now beginning to appear to a space voyaging coffee grinder.

Pretty sure that was what Bugsfly was trying to show but I wasn't there.
Is this what you were thinking Bugsfly? Just curious.

Somehow this is what the Late Joe Parr was doing~!!!
Look again at the Tesla Saucer with the twin opposed pyramids.


Refer to Joe Parr's notes. He says that for the pyramid concept to pinch off (become engulfed in a protective orb which shielded it from both gravity and cosmic rays including gamma rays) that it needed to have a nuclear isotope. This makes sense to me now, at least given the time period when he was involved in doing this research.

Notice how similar this sounds to the electromagnetic field generator where enhancement for the PZT materials calls out for either cobalt or Iron 57

https://patents.google.com/patent/US10135366B2/en

It wasn't clear before but the whole point of high frequency and high energy (radio isotopes for example) is specifically to facilitate as fast a fluxing between the magnetic polar opposites; or grinding/crunching of a coherent magnetic field because in Joe Parr's work the magnets are coherent dielectric material. To have gravity you have to have an "Incoherent Dielectric Field"
Sometimes I think we are all just a bunch of stupid clones. Honestly....Lol~

I might be wrong about this but the concept is simple enough, I'm afraid I just couldn't see it previously, but it seems that the ARV, the Alexy, The Joe Parr Pyramid motor setup were, in one form or other, grinding the "Coherent Magnetic back to Incoherent" and which was then possibly acting like super charging dielectric cloud surrounding the vehicle and space around it, and which logically should of be going directly back into the immediate mass that was creating the dense incoherent dielectric cloud, which leads then to a mass developing it's own gravity.


Joe Parr/Dr. John DeSalvo
Great Pyramid of Giza Research Association

If you look at what is recorded on Joe Parr's experimental work, the pyramids which rotate through opposing magnets alternate in a push pull arrangement, which is a magnetic alternating field like a pair of shears chopping the field up. which is in the drawings in this link.
New Page 1


New Page 1
New Page 1

[BroMikey]

Found on the dark web

https://media.8kun.top/file_store/5d0c9585b570e7a28e25cdd248e84385636b97bf8305a1f74b cb2ab139b583b4.jpghttps://media.8kun.top/file_store/5c...3bf75cd30a.pdf

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/28729/docs-show-navy-got-ufo-patent-granted-by-warning-of-similar-chinese-tech-advances?utm_source=fark&utm_medium=website&utm_content=link&ICID=ref_fark

https://patents.google.com/patent/US10322827B2/en?inventor=Salvatore+Pais

https://patents.google.com/patent/US10135366B2/en?inventor=Salvatore+Pais

https://patents.google.com/patent/US...Salvatore+Pais)

Note: this patent is still pending

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/30256/scientist-behind-the-navys-ufo-patents-has-now-filed-one-for-a-compact-fusion-reactor

https://patents.google.com/patent/US20190058105A1/en?inventor=Salvatore+Pais

Check the links for moar info.

Implications of this Tech goes far beyond building a spaceship, but the spaceship encapsulates the info into an easily deliverable package. Thanks for taking the time to read this.

Consolidated patents above and more here.

https://patents.google.com/?inventor=Salvatore+Pais&oq=inventor:(Salvatore+P

[spacecase0]

Interesting patent, seems like this is the blaze labs experiment 10 with a self contained generator and a piezio-electric embedded sphere instead of a disc. A nice small but powerful solar wind shield. I remember after reading about the blaze labs experiment how that methodology could be used to a make a self propelled utron. Thinking about it again, still think it still could be relative to the arv, but you would need counter rotating discs.

he did that in the newest design

https://patents.google.com/patent/US10322827B2/en

[phoneboy]

Has anyone really taken the time to read through this patent with a fine tooth comb?

Electromagnetic field generator and method to generate an electromagnetic field
https://patents.google.com/patent/US10135366B2/en

Interesting patent, seems like this is the blaze labs experiment 10 with a self contained generator and a piezio-electric embedded sphere instead of a disc. A nice small but powerful solar wind shield. I remember after reading about the blaze labs experiment how that methodology could be used to a make a self propelled utron. Thinking about it again, still think it still could be relative to the arv, but you would need counter rotating discs.

[aljhoa]

Has anyone really taken the time to read through this patent with a fine tooth comb?

Electromagnetic field generator and method to generate an electromagnetic field
https://patents.google.com/patent/US10135366B2/en

UFO Tech Deconstruction


Al

[spacecase0]

Has anyone really taken the time to read through this patent with a fine tooth comb?

Electromagnetic field generator and method to generate an electromagnetic field
https://patents.google.com/patent/US10135366B2/en

I did read that one, read all of them by that guy.
thought about them quite a bit. learned something from them.
it really is in line with the others he wrote,
and if you put them in order of time they were filed, you can see he is learning and updating the designs.
the real thing he seems to be sharing is what he calls a macroscopic quantum effect (large scale quantum), and I saw this in my own tests. it is an entirely new section of physics.
and how he tells it all is just how a well trained physicists would tell it.
the implications here are that large things with magnetic and electric fields like planets, suns, galaxies, etc... all act as a quantum thing to large scale things.
this means that things we see as electrons may be much more complex than we think, also means that large scale things might see something like the earth as an electron...
so the trick to flying around and making free power is to simulate these things, and he tells how.
when you look at how he dose it, it is a bit of chaos, and fields interact at crossing points in a way that works,
things like the MAGVID appear to make the fields directly.
but the neat thing is that it all matches and makes sense.
I know you define dimensions another way, but for a moment look at some other definition of dimensions.
you can count the 12 dimensions that wilbert smith tells of and then if you get to the 13th, you are back at the first one... but what he did not say is that you are at a larger scale first one... and here is the magic of it all.
do you get what I am saying ? or should I try again ? I get that it is a messy topic with no words that actually really apply

[Gambeir]

"There is no possible way that someone with my education and intellect can figure out the operating fundamentals"

Thanks but I only think I understand because of what others have said and written.

This is my generalized visual about the nature of incoherent counterspace, which is the space we live in, and which is is a hyperspatial medium whose disarray is induced by matter. This incoherency of the hyperspatial field is most likely because of our location in the Milky Way Galaxy along with most other matter, whereby the exiting hyperspatial medium is continually exiting all matter independently, creating an incoherent hyperspatial counterspace field, and which also results in our preception of space as distance, whereas if this medium were organized then space/distance would vanish.

So we are not living in a shadow land of quasi-crystal's cast off by a higher dimension, not in my opinion, but are instead in the same as hyperspatial medium only one which disorganized, and if there is such a thing as an organized dielectrical counterspace, which I'm not even sure could be described as another dimension, because the only apparent difference is the nature of this medium's flow. In our space the liquid crystalline medium is in disarray and incoherently flowing, coming from all directions at once, and that this is probably the same situation everywhere, however it is evidently possible to organize this hyperspatial fluid so that there is a directional flow pattern, one which is evidently self induced, and when that happens distance is voided. What we would call teleportation is the end result.

What we are really talking about is simply a medium of inertial energy with a hyper~velocity and which permeates the Universe and which may exist in some structured form elsewhere in Universe. We simply don't know but I bet Boeing knows.

[Gambeir]

Has anyone really taken the time to read through this patent with a fine tooth comb?

Electromagnetic field generator and method to generate an electromagnetic field

https://patents.google.com/patent/US10135366B2/en

[aljhoa]

I hate to use the term fluid because counterspace isn't energy, not as we think of energy in daily terms, I mean I know it is, but rather it's behavior is that of potential energy, a kinetic energy, like water and carried in a medium of some kind, and the best analogy seems to be a superfluid. Again, this is the same conclusion that the historical research seems to say was behind the push to create isotopes of helium, and in order to produce a form of superfluid which most closely behaved in the same ways.

So yes, I agree, because the evidence does say a hyperspatial fluid is what creates gravity, magnetism, and electricity, and that this fluid follows crystalline patterns, and that it is the arrangement of the crystals form which dictates the subsequent outcome, directionally and energetically, and that this fluid is best represented as a liquid crystal in the form of a tetrahedron.

Hyperspace must be a coherent and organized flow of this superfluid, but we are in a cloud of incoherent flows, creating a kind of shadow of this hyperspatial fluid, resulting from a dense plane of matter in the Milky Way Galaxy that perturbs the natural coherency of this fluid. So the analogy used is that we are living in a shadow of hyperspace because the shadow is made up of an incoherent flow of hyperspatial fluids, but hyperspaces is composed of cohorent flows, and so our space is one filled with incoherent flows, and resulting from this superfluids interactions with matter. This is basically the way I'm reading Wheeler.

So there is this fluid all around us moving a high velocity but not organized, and it's nature is to move until it unites with hyperspace where it organizes. A magnet organizes this fluid, after which it's nature is to return to hyperspace, whatever the material is that makes up a magnetic line is what I assume to be this superfluid.

"There is no possible way that someone with my education and intellect can figure out the operating fundamentals"

[Gambeir]

I hate to use the term fluid because counterspace isn't energy, not as we think of energy in daily terms, I mean I know it is, but rather it's behavior is that of potential energy, a kinetic energy, like water and carried in a medium of some kind, and the best analogy seems to be a superfluid. Again, this is the same conclusion that the historical research seems to say was behind the push to create isotopes of helium, and in order to produce a form of superfluid which most closely behaved in the same ways.

So yes, I agree, because the evidence does say a hyperspatial fluid is what creates gravity, magnetism, and electricity, and that this fluid follows crystalline patterns, and that it is the arrangement of the crystals form which dictates the subsequent outcome, directionally and energetically, and that this fluid is best represented as a liquid crystal in the form of a tetrahedron.

Hyperspace must be a coherent and organized flow of this superfluid, but we are in a cloud of incoherent flows, creating a kind of shadow of this hyperspatial fluid, resulting from a dense plane of matter in the Milky Way Galaxy that perturbs the natural coherency of this fluid. So the analogy used is that we are living in a shadow of hyperspace because the shadow is made up of an incoherent flow of hyperspatial fluids, but hyperspaces is composed of coherent flows, and so our space is one filled with incoherent flows, and resulting from this superfluids interactions with matter. This is basically the way I'm reading Wheeler.

So there is this fluid all around us moving at a high hyperspeed velocity, but not organized, and it's nature is to move until it unites with hyperspace where it organizes. A magnet organizes this fluid, after which it's nature is to return to hyperspace, whatever the material is that makes up a magnetic line is what I assume to be this superfluid.

[aljhoa]

Pay close attention here. He tells us right here what's happening in the first few minutes. Example: "Loss of inertia = incoherency." Counterspace is coherent. Gravity is incoherent, and magnetism is coherency returning to counterspace. The earth has a coherent magnetic field because it rotates and because of the interactions with the moon and planets: Rocks orbiting Rocks. Now is any of this seeming to have connections which we can't quite put our finger on to the way the Alexey works?

VIDEO 103 UNCOVERING SECRETS OF MAGNETISM. Gravity does NOT exist. F+M vs. I+A. What!?
[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_IcxHxGZ4OI[/VIDEO]

VIDEO 104 UNCOVERING SECRETS OF MAGNETISM. How genuine ANTI-GRAVITY works
[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rh0jfsACx88[/VIDEO]

"Gravity" more likely is ∆Psuperfluid
because the rotating "rocks" also have South and North "Poles".


Al

[Gambeir]

Pay close attention here. He tells us right here what's happening in the first few minutes. Example: "Loss of inertia = incoherency." Counterspace is coherent. Gravity is incoherent, and magnetism is coherency returning to counterspace. The earth has a coherent magnetic field because it rotates and because of the interactions with the moon and planets: Rocks orbiting Rocks. Now is any of this seeming to have connections which we can't quite put our finger on to the way the Alexey works?

VIDEO 103 UNCOVERING SECRETS OF MAGNETISM. Gravity does NOT exist. F+M vs. I+A. What!?
[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_IcxHxGZ4OI[/VIDEO]

VIDEO 104 UNCOVERING SECRETS OF MAGNETISM. How genuine ANTI-GRAVITY works
[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rh0jfsACx88[/VIDEO]

[Gambeir]

I happen to know a number of Polish Americans so I can say what I did with complete confidence.


Spacecase sent me this link. Take a look. Really I just skimmed over the article because I don't have time to waste.

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/30499/the-truth-is-the-military-has-been-researching-anti-gravity-for-nearly-70-years

I notice throughout the whole of the War-Zone Article there is not a blip about the Alexey, and yet that device is operating with RTSC (Room Temp Super Conduction).



I'd like to think that the reason we are seeing secrets revealed, primarily in the form of patents revealed, is directly related to a collective effort to unravel the mystery. There's no mistaking the fact that this late jump on the band wagon development is aimed at controlling the information with the idea that by doing that some of the past lies can be salvaged. Yes, I'm sure that somewhere down the road it will be shown that spinning dirt does have something to do with quote "gravity" since doing that will, logically one would think, create some coherency out of the incoherent dielectric counterspace surrounding us, and hence giving rise to a coherent magnetism which is demonstrated with orbiting rocks around one another.

Remember the family video on how to magnetize rocks using another rock, so now we are getting some sense to the whole, don't ya see...?



The fact that there is no mention of the Alexey shows me that people do no yet comprehend the simple nature of dielectric inertial acceleration. In Ken's very first video he shows us that by acceleration of the magnet's dielectric inertial plane, the accretion disk, expands with velocity, which is a de~facto force multiplier. He can only show this by forcing the magnet forward along the pole axis, but I think that this is also accomplished by rotating the magnetic field such as the Alexey does.
Video 1 Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWMu0cndKl4

The idea is deceptively simple, so simple it's hard to believe, but ya know... going back to the early pages of this three year old thread, and look again at the remarks by Allen Burgess and his experiences with a spinning magnetic field. Acceleration of the dielectric inertial accretion disk is basic physics, same as cramming more air into a motor like a super charger, so really it's not all that different, at least on the surface.

So now, there's more to the way the Alexey works, because I think, am not positive, but that in the Alexey we are dealing with what Ken Wheeler identified as a false mass which is what is creating the upward force by way of mutual mass attraction. So there's evidently more going on than just creating a state of super conduction in the aluminum plate as previously conjectured.

The Aluminum is paramagnetic, and becomes a de-facto magnet when the magnets move over it's surface, thus there is mutual attraction which is above the plane of the spinning magnetic plate in the Alexey. However that's not enough (obviously) otherwise two magnets held apart would/should be able to lift something. There has to be a link to counterspace, and this appears to be achieved through a dielectric acceleration, which as Wheeler shows in his first video is accomplished by acceleration of the magnets dielectric accretion disk.


Observe in this video that ground is achieved when the body touches the magnets. You are ground, which by the way does validate Wheeler's/Oleg_D._Jefimenko's inductive gravity theory, because Earth is not ground. Earth is negative, the Sky/Space is positive, and counterspace (the ether) is ground.

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pu7JjnvW66o&feature=emb_logo[/VIDEO]

Observe this from 3:00 minutes on. There is a center line inside of the spiral. Now think about the RTSC Patent and the Alexey at the same time, or maybe by seeing the Alexey as a cross section of the RTSC Patent; like you took a cross section of the RTSC illustration and compare that to the Alexey. Think on that for a bit.

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?list=PLYZrWecxZWiPd1BK4F8VR0AZ7jKwyLMpO&time _continue=7&v=eoTnLTViHJM&feature=emb_logo[/VIDEO]

[BroMikey]

By now it is obvious that the McCandlish
illustration is much more than a fabrication as claimed by his
detractors......In this light space does not exist and transport is
instantaneous.

Good info thank you, I'll consider it.