ReGenX Coils and ReGenXtra switching

[BroMikey]

I have not yet read all patents yet and reviewed all Thane
Heins data but I have this. And alsoa common sense quote
from the patent that calls for precise calculations in
timing to assist rotor torque.

Shade tree experiments are destine to fail, random tests
without understanding coil calculation millisecond timing
are futile.

I have looked on many sites and NOBODY and I mean NOBODY
is showing how they arrived at a timing calculation mathmatically
to confirm that they are qualified to understand these systems.

I will be back to address the similarities of the BiTT and ReGenX.

Patent quotes in RED.

[BroMikey]

Images of double or Bi-Coil arrangement using type 2 HTS wire.

http://lss.fnal.gov/archive/2009/pub...-09-537-td.pdf

http://www.itep.kit.edu/hts4fusion20...nloads/1B2.pdf

[BroMikey]

Here is a Patent document that speaks about wire type
and the timing issue for tuning. If you are not using
"Type II superconducting High temp wire" for building
coils, you have missed the entire experiment.



Infinity Generator
Canadian Patent # 2,437,745
( 15 Feb 2005 )

Description of Operation

List of Components ( Figure 1.0 [ Not vailable ] )

4 Permanent magnets; M1, M2, M3, m4
4 Type II High Temperature Superconducting WireBecause Type II High Temperature Superconducting Wire/Coils are employed there is no resistance in the wire and no loss of output due to the windings resistance in the exterior coils.

[BroMikey]

According to the Thane Heins Patent information special
wire must be used and we all know the core material is
different than standard generators.

Here is one definition of the wire needed.

[BroMikey]

Hello Experimenters

I have updated the diagram. In this installment I am running
basic math for reference in the future.

First the diagram look at the left side point A and B



The points A and B represent the distance that the rotor
will travel in 1 mSec @ 1800RPM here is how to reach that
value.

First we need the circumference at the center of the magnets
measured in INCHES. Since the diameter at the center of the
magnets is 9.6" we use PIE (3.14) X 9.6" = 30" Approx.

So using 30" around the circle for 1 rotation, at 1800 rotations
or 1800 RPM'S is 30" X 1800 = 54,000 inches of travel in 1 minute.

1 Minute = 60 sec so we can divide 54,000" by 60 sec and this
gives us the number of inches the rotor travels per second

OR
54,000 / 60 = 900" per second. So what about milliseconds?
Well 1 second = 1000 milliseconds and if we want
to figure out how far the rotor can travel in 1 mSec we divide
again.

Remember it was 900" per second? So divide 900 by 1000mSec
and this equals .9" @ one speed of 1800 revolutions per minute.

AT 1800RPM"S the 11" rotor will travel .9" in 1 mSec from point
A to point B at the left. If our core area that faces the
round rotor magnets is about 3/4" square as it travels from
point A to B this is about the time that it takes for one magnet
to loose it's influence on the core while the next magnet is
coming into full force.

This is about 1 mSec between magnetic poles @ 1800 RPM'S is
this case.


We don't want adjacent magnets fighting over the core
material, we want them working together.


If we use a 1.5" core this being to large the magnets will
fight each other for control over the core material and cause
heat. If the core area selected is 1/4" there will be a dead
zone of non active force that would depend more on momentum
as one magnet looses it's influence, waiting for another force to
pick it up.

It maybe a good lesson for experimenters to use 2 round magnets
of North and South as planned for a motor/generator and pass
various thickness core material over the area to understand
this exercise. Use different spacing and core thickness to
achieve an optimized geometry for your design.

Backyard experimenting without calculation will result in
complete and total failure, leaving 10 such builders wondering
why each person had a different result.

[BroMikey]

Hello experimenters

I have a start for doing the math on the rotor. First we must
have something to start with and that is 1" magnets. Next we
need the number of poles. After that we must consider the
thickness of the magnet holders at 1/8th inch or 3mm. This
gives us a 6mm or 1/4" gap between magnets.

Next we can multiply 1.25" X 24 magnets = 30" dia. at the
center of the 1" magnets. This leaves 1/2" to the outside
of each magnet plus another 1/4" for an edge X 2 = an
additional 1.5" on to 9.6" = 11.1"

In other words 9.6" is the dia. at the center of the magnets

like this

1.25" magnet and gap X 24 = 30"

also found by trial

9.6" X 3.14 PIE = 30"

That is all for now, next we will need to look at the core area
and also the gap between magnet and core. Also remember that
the magnet holders might be used to shield so the magnets sitting
next to one another are not interacting with one another all of the
time. The goal is to have North and South pole magnets interacting
with core and coil only.

Think about how strong those bad boys are then look at the fields
as they lay by each other WITHOUT shielding, then add shielding.

Metal shielding can also redirect flux for a greater concentration
on one side, the side we are working with, unless of course you
want a double open end and that is fine. More possibilities later
as they all come to mind.

[BroMikey]

Here is a basic formula for these coils and let's
not forget the magnets have a distance apart
from one another. Distance traveled or speed
is one measurement to be made on YOUR rotor
and then there is the core area facing the magnets
if to large or small will result in reduced effects.

[BroMikey]

It is important that people understand that motors are not
built in a random fashion whether conventional or otherwise.
I see ReGenX acceleration Under Load attempts all over the
web with half of them calling it a hoax.

Yet not many are addressing the math in their replications.
It would appear these experimenters drum up some part on hand
nail it up and give it a shot without understanding how accurate
motor building must be.

Give these diagrams a look. The first one is a beautifully machined
rig with perfection in math by none other than Thane the EE.

The next diagram is my feeble try at suggesting math is required.
It's no wonder that few successful replications are found.

The distance between magnets and core thickness all play a roll.
The critical minimum freq will not be reached and optimized at
random.

Some values will not be found without testing as long as you
are in the ball field.

[BroMikey]

For those of you who are not sure about the basic coil theory and
terms such as cemp or bemf and many other speculative
declarations look at these simple diagrams for a more practical
side that will allow you to start building right away.

Unless this teaching is followed to the letter the input current
will climb out of control, the input current will drop if done
as follows and the output coils will assist rotor torque while
collecting huge sums of power returned to the battery.

You will need to take notes on this video.
Critical minimum freq and low resistance, high impedance are
all important thoughts. Self induced capacitance.

Equal and Equal reaction. Delayed Lenz.

I recommend that each diagram have hand written notes.

Unless each step is followed you will come back thinking
that acceleration under load is a meaningless operation.
Don't be like all the rest. Build yours today.

This man is building his empire on this simple thought.

In his case patents are not put together to hide his work along
with supplemented video instruction. He is safe this way.

Safe from attack because he has given away his work for free.

If you didn't know Thane was in EE college that told him that
his experiments were wrong. It was his experiments that produced
the innovation, not the school books













[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5osYN5f35Bc[/VIDEO]

[BroMikey]

Look up the TESLA patent US524426 there you will see
a plan to shift phase on 2 of the motor windings as a
suggestion. The patents are vague and mostly hypothetical
so we must go beyond there obvious statements.

Look at how this man uses a 10-12 year old idea based of
Thane Heins RegenX coils.

He says one thing I have been looking Hi and Low for he says
that the small DC motor current draw is the same or almost
the same without generator coils as with generator cores.

This has been a question that I have had for sometime.



[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZM76OUle-A[/VIDEO]

[BroMikey]

Looking at the Performance video above and also the patent
we can see that one set of coils is placed further away from
the rotor as a depiction of a delayed lenz when in fact both
distance and coil length are a more complete duty list to
delay maxium armature reaction at TDC.

Look at the shape of the core material, what do you see?
I see and irregular shaped core that is probably made from
a Permalloy that has a low response rate but never the less
higher than iron.
And not one pole only but two poles.

[BroMikey]

It is important to look at this performance test of a coil
set. Coil set meaning a spool that is wound having one
low impedance wind and one high impedance winding.

The beginning of this test shows a phase shift that I
say is associated reactive power factors. Almost 90
degrees means you multiply by .2 but this applies to
other calculations.

After we look at these numbers long enough it will become
clear what Thane is showing us about coils that assist
rotor torque while reclaiming huge amounts of energy
back to source.

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qh2YnHelZSs[/VIDEO]

[BroMikey]

For a better look at the numbers for recycling power look here.
Demo 1 & 2 are very clear for those who have a mind to see.


[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IgHFhNMkDiw[/VIDEO]


[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SCRx9MW-a7M[/VIDEO]

[BroMikey]

In case you missed the thread, here is all you need to let go of not only 7 years but 100+ years of old news:

http://www.energeticforum.com/284778-post9.html

Regards.

PS: That is because I could not pass one minute on first clip, without noticing the high voltage coil is receded on the core, as compared to the low voltage core, Read that post and you'll understand. Or not.

Hello barbosi

I am new at this and will consider your entry. I also found this
old video. What do you make of this one? These are beginners
tests and the basis for a new invention.

BTW thanks for the CAPTOR system patent work.

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F_DApU2ApXc[/VIDEO]

[barbosi]

7 years ago Thane started testing with 2 MOT
(Microwave Oven Transformers)

In case you missed the thread, here is all you need to let go of not only 7 years but 100+ years of old news:

http://www.energeticforum.com/284778-post9.html

Regards.

PS: That is because I could not pass one minute on first clip, without noticing the high voltage coil is receded on the core, as compared to the low voltage core, Read that post and you'll understand. Or not.