Your Basic Coil

[Allen Burgess]

Core saturation.

Thanks, that was nicely done. I have done the same experiment but never watched it on the scope.
I think a motor would be a neat thing to try. Like in Tesla'a patent.

Cheers
Matt

@Matthew Jones,

Maybe you could try adding a magnet to the back of the core rod to see how the higher saturation effects the coil location.

[gotoluc]

Thanks, that was nicely done. I have done the same experiment but never watched it on the scope.
I think a motor would be a neat thing to try. Like in Tesla'a patent.

Cheers
Matt

Glad you liked it Matt

Tesla's motor is now on the building list.

Here are the results of the specially wound coil I showed in the video but did not demonstrate.

Using a wire resistance chart I was able to calculate the coil to be 0.00135 Ohm.
It has 16uH Inductance (on core)

With an amazingly low magnet rotor frequency of 45Hz and coil position at the furthest position on the rod core, 2.3 in. or 58mm away from magnet rotor, when shorting the coil with its own 10AWG 12 inch long wire leads = 0.002 Ohm load resistor, the magnet rotor goes to 46Hz and 37mV RMS is maintained across the coil = .685 Watt
Open coil voltage at 45Hz is 106mV

Regards

Luc

[Matthew Jones]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cr3x0xTqM_k

The coil used in the demo has 5.3 Ohms dc resistance and between 26 to 27mH at any point on the 1/2" round rod core.

Luc

Thanks, that was nicely done. I have done the same experiment but never watched it on the scope.
I think a motor would be a neat thing to try. Like in Tesla'a patent.

Cheers
Matt

[Allen Burgess]

Air coil core.

@Erfinder,

Air core coils are on the scale of core permeability along with all the other elements. The essential criteria of CMF coil inductance and rotor magnet gauss apply to the air core along with all the other cores.

The ideal core would be a very high permeability ferro-ceramic with low remanence, not an air core. Two wraps, one to control saturation and the other output can add a dynamic control mechanism to the AUL coil. Two diodes, one tunnel for the saturation wrap and a zener for the output feed can automatically regulate an ideal coil core distance from the rotor magnet to sustain acceleration.

The reverse lenz effect stalls out as the accelerating rotor increases the saturation of the core, this includes air, because the increased core saturation retards the wave refection, and throws the timing off. The "Symbionese Diodes" reduce core saturation as the rotor accelerates to keep the acceleration timing on dwell.

Luc is uniquely set up to do the basic special testing for this advanced coil concept, so just keep your shirt on Mr. Erfinder and stay tuned for some exciting advances!

[Allen Burgess]

Core saturation.

@Erfinder,

The important test is what effect increasing core saturation has on the output coil position for AUL. A primary winding can do the job of shifting the output coil position if there's a correlation. Luc's on the test bench with the apparatus so stay off his back!

[Allen Burgess]

Well, you obviously know what I want and everyone else who are doing the hard work. The thing is, we are possibly not where you are. So do share to help us reach that place were we don't need a scope to see the results... or else, what's the point of telling use we are not seeing what we should be seeing if we can't see it?
Do you think telling us this over and over will help?
So far you haven't shared or made obvious anything I'm not aware of.
So if you're tired of the loop throw in something new.

Regards

Luc

@Gotoluc,

What I would like to see you test more then anything is the effect adding a permanent magnet to back end of the coil core would have, if any, on the distance the output coil would need to be from the magnet rotor to achieve AUL wave reflection. Can you try this for us please with both polarities?

[Pembelton]

Gotoluc,

I and I know many others appreciate what you do for all of us, Thank you and don't worry about the detractors.


Pembelton

[gotoluc]

oooh
oooh oooh
oooh oooh oooh

Mr. Kotter I know...oooh oooh oooh

Okay... then tell us what you know

Regards

Luc

[gotoluc]

You are repeating what you are already well versed in. If you want to continue in that direction then yeah, in my opinion, which shouldn't matter to you, you are going nowhere. On the other hand if you try to approach from the perspective of one who has nothing to prove, you might see that there is an entirely new world just waiting for you to explore, one where your scope will do nothing for you.

What is practical in your opinion?


Regards

Well, you obviously know what I want and everyone else who are doing the hard work. The thing is, we are possibly not where you are. So do share to help us reach that place were we don't need a scope to see the results... or else, what's the point of telling use we are not seeing what we should be seeing if we can't see it?
Do you think telling us this over and over will help?
So far you haven't shared or made obvious anything I'm not aware of.
So if you're tired of the loop throw in something new.

Regards

Luc

[gotoluc]

https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=p.../US8555867.pdf

I did not apply for that patent and obviously would not waste any money on such a thing.

Do you have any other evidence to prove what you are insinuating?

Remember, the one you got this information from has been proven to manipulate events and information (Eric Dollard fiasco) and lost much credibility over it.
The difference with me is I didn't bother exposing this and just walked away.

Who do you trust?... someone that sells books and videos for profit on secrets that are never revealed... or someone that has always freely shared and has never even activated advertizing (to profit) on his video?

Prove me wrong that I have patented or made a single cent with what I have shared over the years.

Luc

[barbosi]

I'm not into patents, so I don't get your remark...

https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/pdfs/US8555867.pdf

[gotoluc]

Technically Luc, you didn't answer my question.....

Well then, I guess we're going nowhere.

Sorry for taking everyone's time on sharing useless stuff that everyone seems to know.

[Dog-One]

Okay, what is practical in your opinion?

I'm not positive about Erfinder, but I can tell you what I'd be impressed with:

A device, started with a pull string, that runs up to some predetermined RPM and stays constant. This device can be connected to a water pump via the shaft and the RPM will remain constant. The device also has electrical connections that can be connected to a heater element and will continue to maintain the same RPM and provide constant electrical power. Or you can do both electrical and mechanical at the same time. Call it an all-purpose power plant.

Erfinder highlighted something I think is really important:

"This can be done using a small amount of power from an external source providing voltage while the coil itself will add the amperage resulting a magnification process."

I partially understand it, but I think a little more verbiage will help nail it down. Where do we add this voltage and how?

[gotoluc]

Or better put, your sharing is only a confirmation on what was shared before regarding the acceleration under the load.

... just making sure there is no frivolous attempt to patent it ...

What I refer to as "NEW" is me doing a public video demonstration of the effects of moving the coil on a core with different loads.

I'm not into patents, so I don't get your remark... make me feel you are insinuating something you think I do.

Luc

[gotoluc]

Seriously?

Okay, what is practical in your opinion?