ENLIGHTENED MAGNETISM (The Full Proof of Ken Wheeler's Theories)

[Markoul]

ricards,

you obviously are not familiar with scientific and academic language and writing.

You should also quoted my second sentence further explaining:

However no one until now has examined for what it really is, thus, how ferromagnetic materials interact with a magnet and not really the magnetic field itself generated by the magnet.

It is a 2D map showing actually the minimum magnetic reluctance paths of the ferromagnetic iron filings when placed close to a magnet and not the field of the magnet affecting the iron filings!

WHAT PART OF THE ABOVE CAUSE AND EFFECT ARGUMENT YOU DIDN'T UNDERSTAND? REALLY?

To make it more easy for you. look at the below pictorial explanation:




Take care,

EM

[bistander]

Fe powder

...

The fact above makes a HUGE difference when TRYING TO COMPARE UNEVENLY CUT, UNEVENLY SIZED, UNEVENLY SPRINKLED AND DISPERSED RANDOMLY, (like throwing seeds of different kinds on the ground) ...THE IRON "FILINGS".
...

Hi Ufo,

These guys seem to prefer iron powder.

The sensitivity of iron powder is far better than ferrofluid, however, it lacks fluidity and no intermediate stage for transformation. It is quite rigid.

Iron powder reacts and form peak pattern only in magnetic field. It gives reaction even in a weak magnetic field

.

[VIDEO]v=5tsbLGf8MZQ[/VIDEO]

https://youtu.be/5tsbLGf8MZQ

From:
iFerrum: Iron powder testing 2

Regards,

bi

[ricards]

On a "Permanent Magnet" it is a "material with a magnetic field, within"...BUT, when we are energizing a Coil-Core, then the Field can propagate in SPACE, to then cut off electrical power to the mere coil of wire...then Field is still on the space and core for a while...

This means the On-Off (TIME) of electric power is NOT using SAME SPACE-TIME as Field does.

Magnetic Fields DOES EXIST without necessarily having to be ENCRUSTED in a "magnet"..BUT ALL OVER THIS PLANET. We have Magnetic Fields LOOSE everywhere...all over our Space...in the Ground...on the waters, etc,etc...

Didn't You know that Ricards?

Is some hobby UFO?. to make a twist on someone statement?.
I do believe I have made a clear statement..
and a specific subject. a magnet and its magnetic field.

applying electricity on coils..
you would have what we call an "ElectroMAGNET" still a "MAGNET"..
what is the material?.. copper.. you can add iron core if you want.. an air core will do..
what is wrong with my statement?.

on the "Magnetic Field" existing by itself..
that is another wild claim.. yes I didn't know that, and I don't believe it..
do you have some proof?.
maybe you confuse "Magnetic Fields" into "Electromagnetic Waves"..

my interpretation is..
It seems you guys are more focused in winning random arguments rather than finding out the truth..

[Ufopolitics]

WHAT?!..
so now it sounds like a magnet is now an entirely different object and can exist without a magnetic field...
in case you didn't know a magnet is a Material with a "Magnetic Field",
a material that has lost it's magnetic field is not a "Magnet"

how can we now believe what you promote.. if you don't even understand what a "magnet" is..

maybe it's a language or grammar problem?.. I dunno, your statement sounds crazy.

On a "Permanent Magnet" it is a "material with a magnetic field, within"...BUT, when we are energizing a Coil-Core, then the Field can propagate in SPACE, to then cut off electrical power to the mere coil of wire...then Field is still on the space and core for a while...

This means the On-Off (TIME) of electric power is NOT using SAME SPACE-TIME as Field does.

Magnetic Fields DOES EXIST without necessarily having to be ENCRUSTED in a "magnet"..BUT ALL OVER THIS PLANET. We have Magnetic Fields LOOSE everywhere...all over our Space...in the Ground...on the waters, etc,etc...

Didn't You know that Ricards?

[ricards]

...

However no one until now has examined for what it really is, thus, how ferromagnetic materials interact with a magnet and not really the magnetic field itself generated by the magnet.
...

WHAT?!..
so now it sounds like a magnet is now an entirely different object and can exist without a magnetic field...
in case you didn't know a magnet is a Material with a "Magnetic Field",
a material that has lost it's magnetic field is not a "Magnet"

how can we now believe what you promote.. if you don't even understand what a "magnet" is..

maybe it's a language or grammar problem?.. I dunno, your statement sounds crazy.

[Ufopolitics]

Hello to All,

Ferrocell LENS enclose ferromagnetic nano particles which are EVENLY dissolved on every square millimeter...and if they would not be EVENLY DISSOLVED, then we would see BLEMISHES, SPOTS all around the lens...BUT INSTEAD, We all can see a VERY CLEAR AMBER COLOR where our eyes CAN NOT SEE EVEN ONE OF THOSE "PARTICLES"...

The fact above makes a HUGE difference when TRYING TO COMPARE UNEVENLY CUT, UNEVENLY SIZED, UNEVENLY SPRINKLED AND DISPERSED RANDOMLY, (like throwing seeds of different kinds on the ground) ...THE IRON "FILINGS".

This is like plainly comparing a 4K AND 8K UHDTV (ULTRA HIGH DEFINITION TV) 4K UHD (4000 Pixels...8K UHD which is 8000 pixels...with HD and HDR CABLE RECEPTION...

COMPARED TO A 1950's BLACK AND WHITE CRT, HEAVILY DISTORTED AND GRAINED "RESOLUTION" with reception from "V" SHAPED ANTENNA TV...

But EVEN the worst part...is that "someone" steps in...to tell anyone of Us here...that the 1950's B&W TV...IS A BETTER SET, AND IMAGES ARE THE REAL AND TRULY "THING"...THE MORE PERFECT IMAGE!!!!

The Fact that Ferrocell have trillions of ferromagnetic nano particles, well dispersed, in a gas-like solution...gives Us all the ULTRA HIGHER DEFINITION OF MAGNETIC FIELDS that so far, no other Tech can do.

And am talking about every single nano detail on that Field...would be reproduced and projected with supreme fidelity by the ferrocell imaging of the field.

I do not think anyone needs to BE A GENIUS, NOT EVEN "TOO SMART", to see the HUGE DIFFERENCE between Ferrocell and Iron Filings Sprinkled loosely around Field, named on top of paper, in water, air, or any suitable surface-environment.


Regards


Ufopolitics

[aljhoa]

these particle do not point to the nearest pole but follow the magnetic field lines.

How To Make Magnetic Pole Detector With Hall Effect Sensor Circuit


Al

[bistander]

Fe in magnetic field

Iron fillings can not flow like the nanoparticles inside the ferrofluid do, therefore are incapable to show really the flux (movements or flow paths under magnetic force vectors) and what they realy do is to show not flux but to align with the single force vector each pointing to the nearest pole relative to their position in space.

They just point to the poles that's all.

In nuts' picture the Fe particles are floating in a fluid and free to move about, of course influenced by gravity, fluid forces and magnetic field.



I've added a couple of red arrows showing areas where these particle do not point to the nearest pole but follow the magnetic field lines.



This ferrofluid appears to be attracted to the pole and form structures pointing away from the pole as would be expected using the classic magnetic field model. That ferrofluid is composed of the same nanoparticles as the thin film in the ferrolens.

Regards,

bi

[mikrovolt]

I showed how using a crt is a poor demonstration.
Next I compared a better demonstration using Helmholtz coils.
I had to bring the uniform field into this to correct the error.

When a uniform magnetic field is perpendicular to the electric field there
is a Deflection and the electron beam's trajectory is curved.

The physics teacher should be accountable. UFO will survive a small correction maybe even switch to uniform field shown.
I appreciate his effort in what he was trying to explain and more crt experiments might benefit the art. They can be sensitive not always accurate Being critical of metal filings and not being critical of cathode ray tube as an indicator let's the reader decide if the use of semantics to influence a bias
against a me trying to show others better way. UFO showed perfectly along with divisive semantics being reflecting on Wheeler.

On the Helmholz coils and e-beam I use a 48 inch level and a large square to set up this experiment and worked the equations so I remember proving that it is something I could recommend. Bad science ?

Get ready for absolute large lettered antagonist words to spread disinformation against the gnomes who originated the cone hats. Used lodestone long before the reptilians.

[Markoul]

You will be amazed of how many theories the so called established theories are never been proven experimentally.

Iron filings experiment is the reverse. It is an experiment which was never really supported by its own theoretical analysis or peer reviewed but rather supposedly explained by the general EM theory of Maxwell. However, no one really bothered to apply the MX theory in order to verify the iron filings experiment or vice versa. It's taken de facto as a dogma more or less saying the iron filings lines represent the force lines of the field.

However no one until now has examined for what it really is, thus, how ferromagnetic materials interact with a magnet and not really the magnetic field itself generated by the magnet.

It is a 2D map showing actually the minimum magnetic reluctance paths of the ferromagnetic iron filings when placed close to a magnet and not the field of the magnet affecting the iron filings!

Iron fillings can not flow like the nanoparticles inside the ferrofluid do, therefore are incapable to show really the flux (movements or flow paths under magnetic force vectors) and what they realy do is to show not flux but to align with the single force vector each pointing to the nearest pole relative to their position in space.

They just point to the poles that's all.

Also notice that the classical magnetic lines representation in all magnet cartoons and schematics showing with an arrow going from North to South pole, the histoy behind that is that the took the imagne from the iron filings to experiment and the put by choice the arrow just to show where the South pole is!... Norhing special and scientific about IT IS JUST A CONVENTION!

And how could it be any differennt than that? since mainstream says it is a static field nothing is moving. Else if you take the arrow seriously that would mean that a flux line comes out first from north pole and the goes in to the south pole!

[Iamnuts]

Screenshot_2018-05-08-13-26-36.png

The effect must be here?

[Ufopolitics]

What I found out after seeing the lovely big square cell someone had made
on YouTube was that basically its an iron filings experiimet. Whats happening is
that the particles line up just like iron filings and its the Rayleigh or Mie scattering
which is conducting the light along a path to give us the lines that we're seeing.
Now if we had a bar magnet under a square cell with the lights on one edge
perpendicular to the length of the conventionally magnetised bar would we see
any skew?

Sure...and also we all could say that same scattering...are ALSO affecting COLOR CRT's...(scattering e-beams?... )PLUS the super low resolution Magnetic viewing film...which do not require specific bright lights...but just room light...

Or is it just "coincidence"?

I find it very difficult to believe that present day science doesn't know about
the actual configuration of a magnetic field when they reckon they know some
things about electrons to a precision of about eleven places.
John.

Sure...that's why MOBIL & EXXON OIL has gathered together a bunch of high level Scientists...to also seek for free energy...and UFO research...

Keep sleeping together with sheep's....


Ufopolitics

[Iamnuts]

What I found out after seeing the lovely big square cell someone had made
on YouTube was that basically its an iron filings experiimet. Whats happening is
that the particles line up just like iron filings and its the Rayleigh or Mie scattering
which is conducting the light along a path to give us the lines that we're seeing.
Now if we had a bar magnet under a square cell with the lights on one edge
perpendicular to the length of the conventionally magnetised bar would we see
any skew?
I find it very difficult to believe that present day science doesn't know about
the actual configuration of a magnetic field when they reckon they know some
things about electrons to a precision of about eleven places.
John.

[Iamnuts]

Screenshot_2018-05-08-13-26-36.png

Ive got 70 pet lambs and do some thinking as I'm tending to them.

[Iamnuts]

Screenshot_2018-05-08-13-26-36.png

There must be something going on.