This forum is preserved as a permanent archive. The community continues at eMedia Press.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Newman Motor Finally Explained?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • BroMikey
    replied
    Originally posted by vidbid View Post
    , but the ratio is about 90% religious dogmatism to about 10% technical information, so maybe it's better to watch videos of his motor in operation with the audio turn way down or off.
    The key video is the test result. And Jnaudin clearly stated that he
    could not conclude that it was OU. He stated that he was still testing.

    The rest is the same rehash about how many ways he tried it.

    I like the fact that you compile video's and collect things up
    putting them together. In the end the test result is best, then work
    backwards from there if a conclusion can be positive.

    Jnaudin said he needed a better scope or something like that and never
    validated Newman motors. I write this for those who look at the graph
    thinking it is a done did OU machine.

    Scopes and data are not the final test. The only way to prove these
    type of devices it to loop one back. Some of them ran for minutes and
    some for days in every case over a 50 year period.

    I am not saying OU can not be had, I am saying that the Newman
    motor must not have been shared in it's entirety because Newman wanted
    to milk out his flim flam years, tempting investors with a mere $100,000
    dollar package that he said would revolutionized the globe.

    It is estimated that after years of pitching the sales of his motors that
    Newman took in millions (after lawyer fees)from those who would write
    it off on their income tax anyway.

    Newman was a smooth talker and using his education the knowledge
    of the law in fine print kept him in the clear regardless. Got to read the
    fine print while your ears are ringing from the high pressure sales.

    Suckin in and blow'em out. It is no different than any get rich scheme.

    You are fool enough to get sucked in then the judge is there to laugh.

    That is why Newman mixed his Bible talking points in with his motor
    sales, buyers forgive easy when they are being command to.

    Very improper to say the least. I have seen all these Newman Bible
    messages before but forgot about them all. He stole and idea that
    probably works and suckered as many as he could.

    Someone already has it working by now but they don't call it a Newman
    motor, it is more like JB window motor.

    This is the video where he says that 50 men all working together
    came up with the first OU device and over many years this machine
    was born.

    In other words 50 men took 1 year to make a device that was very
    little OU, so 50 years into the future and after many years like say
    10-15 year this machine was created so 500 - 700 years into the
    future.

    See the power of unity? It can bring OVER UNITY.




    [VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TG1DXscWG9E[/VIDEO]
    Last edited by BroMikey; 01-05-2017, 09:26 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • BroMikey
    replied
    Originally posted by Duncan View Post
    I don't know your electrical training & so don't really know where to start . Perhaps if you could research a little bit on the difference between electrical series and parallel resonance it would be a very good spring board.
    The level of my training is all over the place but in the late 60's our
    class was building the first transistor TV in the country. Quadratic equations
    to a little calculus before leaving high school but all of the electronics like


    It is basic stuff




    And these






    Just baby steps, I have not used them lately but it was easy.



    Later the frequency cutoff stuff and it has been so long.
    All of a sudden I remember stuff that surprises me.
    Last edited by BroMikey; 01-05-2017, 07:55 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Duncan
    replied
    And if you ignore your prejudice to the man what can you discover on the + side of the equation ?
    after all I'm not really interested in 'Joe Newman' only the machine and its operation .
    Like John Hutchinson in the comments here I think the machine 'good work' (probably) and say so
    reading the testimonials of many skilled folks who tested this machine supports that view.
    Joseph Newman Motor replications by Geoffrey Miller of EnergyBat Labs -- Historic and Recent - YouTube
    I think I see at least some of the principle used . I have ordered a few odds and sods so I might try the ambition.
    - Bro you asked for a little more on reactive current and power. The infinite I was writing of related mathematically (It might also apply to deity's I don't know) I don't know your electrical training & so don't really know where to start . Perhaps if you could research a little bit on the difference between electrical series and parallel resonance it would be a very good spring board.
    regards Duncan
    PS - great research as usual Vidbid

    Leave a comment:


  • vidbid
    replied
    Biss motor

    Originally posted by BroMikey View Post
    Look Vidbid just because you can show proof that J.Newman was
    a complete and total wack job doesn't he really meant all those things
    he had said. I can believe what I want so I think I'll build a Newman
    motor and prove it works.

    Shame on you VIDBID for hurting Joe's reputation, right when I was
    about to get it running. You know Joe never thought the end of the
    world was coming, he didn't mean that.

    And when I get back I'll prove Newman was right. Oh in about another
    50 years.

    I almost got it. BRB

    Originally posted by Norm Biss

    I (not Joe Newman) completely designed a motor from his sketchy information.
    (Joe evidently didn't put much thought, research or effort into his life's
    work!) I worked out all mathematics for the electrical and mechanical aspects
    of this motor. Furthermore, I did all the drafting and mechanical drawings for
    the prototype. These drawings are copyrighted and patent is pending!

    Norm Biss
    Erie, PA
    August 13, 1998

    Source: Joe Newman - free energy claimant accused of incompetance
    Maybe you should call it a BISS MOTOR.

    Back story info: Directory:Joseph Newman Motor - PESwiki.com

    If you do decide to go forward with your plans to build a Newman (Biss) Motor, consider taking a look J. L. Naudin's work:

    Main Page on Newman: The Newman's Energy Machine tested by JL Naudin

    1. Housing: http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/qm11bp.htm

    2. Commutator & Power Supply: http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/qm11com.htm

    3. Tuning: http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/qm11tun.htm

    4. Test Results: http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/qm11pt1.htm

    5. Additional Comments: http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/NMac0618.htm

    6. Segmented Commutator Required for Overunity (temporary and partial): http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/NMac0629.htm

    7. Newman's Keys: http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/NWMkeys.htm

    Originally posted by J. L. Naudin

    THE NEWMAN'S MACHINE KEYS FOUNDS on 06-27-98

    Key ONE : The FREE energy must be tapped from the collector (inductor) WHILE it charges itself with its own magnetic energy,

    Key TWO : HIGHER the POTENTIAL, HIGHER the NEGATIVE POWER tapped.

    Key THREE : GREATER THE NUMBER of STEPS (Broken flow) DURING THE CHARGING PHASE of the "collector", GREATER the efficiency.....

    Key FOUR : To get more electrical power back from the coil, the pulse duration must be at least 1/20th of the L/R time constant and, at the same time, a very big _changing_ magnetic field must be applied (generated by a rotating permanent magnet rotor).

    Key FIVE : The negative current comes from the DISRUPTIVE EFFECT caused by the "Broken segments" or a bumpy surface during the firing sequence. The negative energy (the real Free Energy) is pumped from the vacuum DURING THE DROPS OF POSITIVE CURRENT. These drops create a kind of "siphon effect" in the Aether which pumps free energy and creates these deep and strong spikes showed in my scope picture.

    Key SIX : The duration or the "life" of this negative current can be SUSTAINED by SMALL FLUCTUATIONS in the dropping potential, just after the disruption. This can be done by some SPECIAL SPARK-GAP DESIGN or a SPECIAL SHAPE of the "Broken segments".

    more keys coming soon.....
    One thing that I notice about the Newman device by Stephan Hartmann in the image below



    is it looks a lot like the motor/generator device in the image below this comment:



    We all know who the folks are who own the above device.

    Check it out:
    Code:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0J0D1tSFK9s
    Maybe they got Newman's (Biss) Motor to work, after all.

    By the way, it looks a lot like this:



    How do you like those apples?

    I hate to say this but as CRAZY as Newman was, if you separate his religiously dogmatic remarks from just the technical facts that he rarely gives out and you focus on how his machine functions, you MIGHT have something, but the ratio is about 90% religious dogmatism to about 10% technical information, so maybe it's better to watch videos of his motor in operation with the audio turn way down or off.
    Last edited by vidbid; 02-15-2019, 04:49 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • BroMikey
    replied
    Look Vidbid just because you can show proof that J.Newman was
    a complete and total wack job doesn't he really meant all those things
    he had said. I can believe what I want so I think I'll build a Newman
    motor and prove it works.

    Shame on you VIDBID for hurting Joe's reputation, right when I was
    about to get it running. You know Joe never thought the end of the
    world was coming, he didn't mean that.

    And when I get back I'll prove Newman was right. Oh in about another
    50 years.

    I almost got it. BRB

    Last edited by BroMikey; 01-05-2017, 01:19 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • vidbid
    replied
    Josepf Newman College

    Welcome to Joseph Newman College

    Course Lecture #1
    [VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pjGZStTDsHU[/VIDEO]

    Course Lecture #2
    [VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l_DB5qSwbKQ[/VIDEO]

    Course Lecture #3
    [VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLheepkrycM[/VIDEO]

    Congratulations after watching and listening to the above.

    You're an expert.

    Leave a comment:


  • vidbid
    replied
    Originally posted by BroMikey View Post
    OH MY GOD!! I NEVER SAW THIS VIDEO, SPACE CHICKEN IS TO NICE

    More like dementia saturated delusion.

    THIS IS TO MUCH
    REVEREND JOE BLOW, OMG

    THIS CAN"T BE REAL. AND PEOPLE BELIEVE THIS GUY????????

    I think he was the only one who believed what came out of his mouth.

    I heard that in the end, he had to dismantle Big Eureka and sell the copper wire as scrap because he was having money troubles.

    [VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XMV8Jxb1Vfg[/VIDEO]

    DOOMSDAY Solution: CrAzY MarK TV, part 3 - YouTube

    Code:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XMV8Jxb1Vfg
    It's a very sad case. Poor bastard didn't know how much he was out in left field.

    Leave a comment:


  • BroMikey
    replied
    Originally posted by Duncan View Post
    Bro - To expand just a little

    There is a different dimension'.

    what isn't a sin wave is by infinitesimal maths
    taken to be a cosine.

    An impulse that is infinitely small there for
    cannot exists (in theory)

    in electrical practice an infinite amount of the infinitesimal is a
    possibility and a dimension ignored

    There is certainly another
    .
    That other dimension you talk about is so real, I heard that space
    was like a fabric but your brain storm is far better to hear. Yes as
    with the never ending sub-atomic list getting longer with more and
    more space between those units on top of all of the space we are
    taught (And is true) between a simple nucleus and electron.

    My goodness that seems like an awful lot of wasted space with just
    one atom. And what holds all of that together so perfectly?

    It must be a powerful force I wonder what it is? I love
    to talk about the limitless self existent one. Oh HE is there right inside
    all that space in your eye when you look down a telescope trying to
    find who is out there.

    Limitless is so cool.

    Leave a comment:


  • BroMikey
    replied
    Originally posted by vidbid View Post
    BroMikey,

    I'm not sure about Norm's motives, but Newman probably did him wrong. With that being said, I find Newman's jabberings tiring. For example:

    [VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bB_FCzJ773s[/VIDEO]

    Newman Preparing for the Ride of Your Life! - YouTube

    Code:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bB_FCzJ773s
    Prophet of God, yeah right.
    OH MY GOD!! I NEVER SAW THIS VIDEO, SPACE CHICKEN IS TO NICE

    More like dementia saturated delusion.

    THIS IS TO MUCH
    REVEREND JOE BLOW, OMG

    THIS CAN"T BE REAL. AND PEOPLE BELIEVE THIS GUY????????

    Last edited by BroMikey; 01-04-2017, 08:14 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Duncan
    replied
    Bro - To expand just a little - EPD and CC and now AC as well you humble servant I, with my limited understanding are telling you ' There is a different dimension'. The units and space and the norm no longer exist.
    (at least electrically) in simple maths - a circle is the plot base of a sine wave and a pendulum . what isn't a sin wave is by infinitesimal maths taken to be a cosine. An impulse that is infinitively small there for cannot exists (in theory) a square wave cannot change state instantly ergo it cannot ever be square. So -
    a circle cannot be perfect . nor a square. and certainly not an impulse . you also assume the vertical of this square wave you only visualize 'as perfect' cannot be pushed backward because it would violate the dimension you think of as time.
    It transpires that in electrical practice an infinite amount of the infinitesimal is a possibility and a dimension ignored.
    all school children are taught the Pi ratio 3.142..... some know its an irregular number . electrics has rounded it up because they had to , given it space and time and everything you are taught is based on that being absolute.
    ask yourself this question and dwell on it -- is pi infinity big or infinity small ? It is true there is a dimension based on boundless to the small . There is certainly another .

    Leave a comment:


  • vidbid
    replied
    Newman, Prophet of God?

    Originally posted by BroMikey View Post
    I guess you and others felt that Norm was making a political move by using his standing to discredit Newman while advancing another agenda.

    This must be the reason he didn't just talk motor parts, well remember
    this was 40 years ago and Norm did start that way.

    According to Norm he followed and tried many designs over the years and
    no other inventor got so severally criticized. I won't call him a
    liar but when dealing with a lying person the issue of lying does seem to
    get off of everyone, meaning that people tend to think the whole group
    of them must be lying.

    It is the nature of a lying spirit. Same with the sexual perversion aspects
    of opposing a person, outsiders tend to think anyone revealing the fact
    must be twisting ideas to cover their own involvement when that was not
    the case.

    That is the nature of a perverse spirit and so on. We need to weigh each
    communication fairly an objectively and that is not always easy to do when
    subject is so difficult or traumatic.

    Feelings of insecurity, denial, roll reversal, cracking lewd jokes and
    complete rejection of every source of info, hidden in plain sight.
    Mind freezing. Willingly blinded by the light.

    Change the channel.

    May The Lord help us all. This is our test. You've
    been set up to be tried.

    BroMikey,

    I'm not sure about Norm's motives, but Newman probably did him wrong. With that being said, I find Newman's jabberings tiring. For example:

    [VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bB_FCzJ773s[/VIDEO]

    Newman Preparing for the Ride of Your Life! - YouTube

    Code:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bB_FCzJ773s
    Prophet of God, yeah right.

    However, I'm not concerned with Newman's theology. I can't judge the child (Newman's motor) based on the actions of its father (Joseph Newman). I'm concerned with his technology. That's it.
    Last edited by vidbid; 02-15-2019, 04:43 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • BroMikey
    replied
    Originally posted by Duncan View Post
    Just an opinion - This isn't electricity thats going to conform to any standard theory - Its reactive current and power. classic electrical theory tells us it can do no work of any sort.
    That isn't true! but having said that there are no ratio's or laws to manipulate the effect that I know of.
    to engineer towards 0 PF with a high inductance to try to provoke the effect is what I have in mind .
    Can you talk more about "reactive Current"? I hear talk of reactive power
    and naturally current in there somewhere. Do you have any more words
    to gain a perspective on the idea?

    Paul B. talks about it, Thane Heins talks about it
    Last edited by BroMikey; 01-03-2017, 10:01 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • BroMikey
    replied
    Originally posted by vidbid View Post
    I never like how Newman talked. There was something contrived with the way he spoke.

    He should have talked more about his motor worked than anything else. He should have been showing people how to build it.
    I guess you and others felt that Norm was making a political move by
    using his standing to discredit Newman while advancing another agenda.

    This must be the reason he didn't just talk motor parts, well remember
    this was 40 years ago and Norm did start that way.

    According to Norm he followed and tried many designs over the years and
    no other inventor got so severally criticized. I won't call him a
    liar but when dealing with a lying person the issue of lying does seem to
    get off of everyone, meaning that people tend to think the whole group
    of them must be lying.

    It is the nature of a lying spirit. Same with the sexual perversion aspects
    of opposing a person, outsiders tend to think anyone revealing the fact
    must be twisting ideas to cover their own involvement when that was not
    the case.

    That is the nature of a perverse spirit and so on. We need to weigh each
    communication fairly an objectively and that is not always easy to do when
    subject is so difficult or traumatic.

    Feelings of insecurity, denial, roll reversal, cracking lewd jokes and
    complete rejection of every source of info, hidden in plain sight.
    Mind freezing. Willingly blinded by the light.

    Change the channel.

    May The Lord help us all. This is our test. You've
    been set up to be tried.
    Last edited by BroMikey; 01-04-2017, 03:57 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Duncan
    replied
    Just an opinion - This isn't electricity thats going to conform to any standard theory - Its reactive current and power. classic electrical theory tells us it can do no work of any sort.
    That isn't true! but having said that there are no ratio's or laws to manipulate the effect that I know of.
    to engineer towards 0 PF with a high inductance to try to provoke the effect is what I have in mind .

    Leave a comment:


  • Duncan
    replied
    Eric knows a thing or two!

    Originally posted by Allcanadian View Post
    @Duncan
    I was watching that video link you posted on Eric Dollard the other day. I had seen it before but I had to chuckle when some dingleballs in the crowd piped up and said, hey you can't exceed the speed of light. I had quite a few people question me on this and when they said, "you can't exceed the speed of light" I simply said "Why"?. As it turns out none of the people I have ever met are smart enough to give me an answer why. The majority have literally no comprehension of what it means or how others have come to the conclusion it could or should be a constant... funny how that works.

    In fact if there is one constant we can depend on it is that a majority of the time everyone is wrong about limitations. They said the universe is finite yet whenever we look further we always see more unexpected stuff. They said this is the smallest particle yet whenever we look closer we always see more unexpected stuff. They said we can never fly, exceed the speed of sound, go to the moon etc... yet we always do.

    I would agree there are constants... people are constantly wrong in their beliefs about limitations in almost every case.

    AC
    There is no absolute scale of size in the Universe, for it is boundless towards the great and also boundless towards the small. Oliver heaviside



    Waves from moving sources: Adagio. Andante. Allegro moderato Oliver Heaviside

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X