This forum is preserved as a permanent archive. The community continues at eMedia Press.
If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Symmetric versus Asymmetric Electromagnetic Systems
I think you've got it all wrong dear, Farmhand and I go a long way back of long disputes , discussions and arguments, back and forth about FE and OU...and this I posted was a joke to him, He knows that...I know He will never change, no matter how many videos I will show...He will not trust any over-unity device, ever...
So, reserve your "critics" about two "senior members" arguments...
Cheer up, is real
Ufopolitics
It is definitely possible to extract energy from the aether. In fact, charge carriers such as electrons do that all the time. They extract energy from the aether and emit it in the shape of electric and magnetic fields, which are movements in/of the aether.
Prof. Claus Turtur made a straight forward calculation of the energy contained in the propagating electric field and shows that there is a constant energy exchange between charge carriers and the medium using nothing but Coulomb's law and the propagation speed of the electric field c.
I started writing an article about thee fundamental theory, based on a/o Turtur and Bearden, in which I explain that the electric field IS an energy source:
So far, I have not been able to find a design for a practical device that can be reliably replicated within a tiny budget. The Tesla switch is promising, but requires a lot of work, because the details are still unclear. The Joule thief and variants are also promising, but so far I have not seen anyone driving a decent motor. Edwin Gray's device is still a mystery, but progress is being made there, too. Stanley Meyer's device is also not completely understood and pretty complicated to replicate. And Don Smith's stuff is not that well documented nor understood, so all these are not the holy grail yet.
And now, out of the blue, we got a device that appears to work, appears to be well understood and appears to be relatively easy to replicate AND produce as well.
So, I am intrigued by what I have seen so far, which is just the photographs and the animation. We may very well have a winner here....
According to the relativists, space has a tendency to curvature owing to an inherent property or presence of celestial bodies. Granting a semblance of reality to this fantastic idea, it is still self-contradictory. Every action is accompanied by an equivalent reaction and the effects of the latter are directly opposite to those of the former. Supposing that the bodies act upon the surrounding space causing curvature of the same, it appears to my simple mind that the curved spaces must react on the bodies and, producing the opposite effects, straighten out the curves. Since action and reaction are coexistent, it follows that the supposed curvature of space is entirely impossible.
And BTW, Quantum Mechanics is flawed, too. See my posts here:
I have determined that in my opinion all of physical processes can be defined in terms of the aether populational momenta (p). Such that,
Force (F) -> Grad p
Charge (q) -> Div p
Magnetism (B) -> Curl p
Gravity for example is Grad E where E is the electric potential at x. This resolves to Le Sagian type process as outlined in the Pushing Gravity models. The electric potential E in turn is created by charge which is Div p...
My model is a direct extension of Maxwell's vortex model of interacting rings (the smoke ring model). I have been able to define all fundamental constants in terms of basic parameters, including the gravitational constant G. Further, G is, within this system, seamlessly integrated to all others, fitting into a unified system.
There is a crew here in Brazil which also claim this return energy from nature. I don't remember their name right now i'm trying to. However the prototype they shown was with a rotating permanent magnet...
I would like understand why opening the circuit instead of reversing the polarity give this effect. Is that correct you are simply opening the circuit right?
Same Battery, different Motor, Asymmetric, 20 Poles Armature, Four (4) Permanent Magnet Stators, Four Upper/ Four Lower set of Brushes...a 700 Watts Motor RAN by a 12 V R/C Small LiPo Battery, 1350 mAh...watch torque...watch Time, versus Output...
Those little Batteries are designed to run a type Radio Shack "Symmetric" Motor for only 10-15 minutes...
Here am showing a bigger Motor, same spec's, Asymmetric, is based on a Sullivan Starter Motor Core for R/C Gas Helicopters...cost? $200.00 USD Each Motor...So, this set up Motor wise, not Coil wire included costs $400.00 just to kill one motor...
Is running with a 1350 mAh LiPoBatt...11.something to 12 V...
This Motors have 10 Poles, this set up I have made is based on Two Pentagons opposed...meaning the way windings are set...I will supply CAD of it later on...
Do you have any "amperage" measurements on your input/output for that little RadioShack motor? On your video it's showing input voltage of about 8.5 and output voltage of around 20.8 so I was wondering about the amp readings for both.
Leave a comment: