This forum is preserved as a permanent archive. The community continues at eMedia Press.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Symmetric versus Asymmetric Electromagnetic Systems

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Ufopolitics
    replied
    Great question...

    Originally posted by JJUK View Post
    Hi UFO,

    I went away for the weekend and have spent a whole morning reading the motors thread just to catch up. It's great to see such an enthusiastic embrace of your ideas but there's just so much info to keep abreast of. How you find time to do it I really don't know. (I've got to force myself to do some work this afternoon so that my family doesn't starve!).



    I didn't actually spot that mistake I have to confess! I was busy looking at the big picture more than the detail. The question that I have may well expose my ignorance but having had the weekend to mull it over and still not having been able to come up with an answer I thought I'd better stick my head above the parapet and satisfy my curiosity.

    The answer that you gave adilu on the motors forum talked about the Push-Pull action when a coil is pulsed and convinced me that I had understood the basics of the principle that you have described. But what I am not sure of is what limits the quantity of radiant energy that a coil can capture when in its "Negative Induction" phase. Is it merely when the coil reaches saturation? If so, when building a solid state device I am assuming that the timer should be adjusted or tuned so that each new pulse occurs at the point at which the coil reaches saturation. And does the pulse duration have an effect on the duration of Negative Induction and thus radiant energy capture? Is it better to saturate the coil with the pulse or not?

    With this in mind but taking the concept a step further, is it possible to tap the coil when it is in its Negative Induction phase so that saturation is never reached and the coil continues to pull in radiant energy. In this fashion the pulse is merely acting to prime the system. In my mind I envisage the process to be akin to siphoning a reservoir (radiant energy) with a hose (coil) into a bucket. The hose is primed once and then the water will continue to flow indefinitely whilst there is water remaining in the reservoir and the hose remains below the waterline of the reservoir and not in the bucket. If you were to put a float on the end of the hose and then put the hose in a bucket with its rim above the waterline then the flow would stop once the bucket had filled (coil saturation). In order to restart the flow the bucket has to be drained and the hose re-primed (pulsed). However, if the bucket has a hole in the bottom of a size such that the water flows out of the bucket (something is now draining energy from the coil) as quickly as it enters then the water will continue to flow until the reservoir falls below the level of the bottom of the bucket. I am working on the assumption that the reservoir is being topped up by streams etc at a rate equal to or greater than the rate at which it is being siphoned. Otherwise we're all in trouble!

    I could of course be making a fool of myself. Regardless, I would value your opinion.



    JJUK

    Hello JJUK!

    Well a great question there...the examples are awesome...I love the "Bucket" idea!...

    The way I have interpreted as per my experience and tests...I will try my best to explain it...so please be "open minded"...
    The way Radiant Field gets excited...is not through our Electrical Field at all, so looking from electronic flow end, will not help to understand this phenomena at all...but on the contrary...will make it more difficult to "digest"...
    Radiant Field gets excited through our Generated Magnetic Field into open space. Now the means of making that happen from our end, is obvious we need electronic flow in coil...as Amps and Voltages...but what defines the "Incoming Reversed Radiant Field" is our Huge Magnetic Pulse out...then at the point we collapse our magnetic field drastically at zero time, zero electrical values...Radiant drives in at a faster rate, at a faster frequency and intensity. RE enters at our Times Off, looking at our Square Wave...From here I have tested playing with the duty cycle and Frequency...as with voltage intensity...and there are certain points when she enters constant and robust...and other that does not occur the same, so I have to increase, scale up my magnetic field strength to achieve same parameters...As I have observed many other effects that affect "Her" to increase or decrease...like certain types of Light Spectrum...basically Ultra Violet rays...

    The Final frontier to make it "usable" is to store the Radiant Energy in High Frequency Capacitors...then process back to Hot side...it is not "usable" to run our equipment as is in Her "Original State"...
    Another great advantage is Her capacity to induce "negatively" through air, without any loss...through Isolated and Non Isolated Secondaries...We could create as many "branches"(outputs) as we want with just One Coil Pulsing...and that is awesome.

    Now you have mentioned something very interesting, and reminded me I have to disclose that...as to finish those videos and diagrams...and it relates exactly to what you are "conceiving" it could be done...and incredibly you are very right...I will explain....
    There is a type of connection, a very simple one...that we have to make between Diodes Oscillator and Coil...and basically is just one single wire...I call it "Enhanced Mode"...when I do that, Radiant Enters super strong at first shot...first pulses...but once I have it On, for a small period of time...I can physically disconnect the negative pulses from oscillator...and Radiant will stay...however, and exactly like you have said...if we pull too much load...she will simply go...disappear...that we have to "re-dial" to get her back again...


    Hope this explain-answered, somewhere near your questions.


    Regards


    Ufopolitics

    Leave a comment:


  • JJUK
    replied
    Saturation and the Reservoir

    Hi UFO,

    I went away for the weekend and have spent a whole morning reading the motors thread just to catch up. It's great to see such an enthusiastic embrace of your ideas but there's just so much info to keep abreast of. How you find time to do it I really don't know. (I've got to force myself to do some work this afternoon so that my family doesn't starve!).

    Originally posted by Ufopolitics View Post
    Hello Dear JJUK,
    However, I think what your question would be...The signal is wrong at pulsing Mosfet...N-Channel...right?...Yes it is...it should be pulsing at Upper side of square wave...a little twist of the whole animated Wave and light...will have made it correctly...
    I didn't actually spot that mistake I have to confess! I was busy looking at the big picture more than the detail. The question that I have may well expose my ignorance but having had the weekend to mull it over and still not having been able to come up with an answer I thought I'd better stick my head above the parapet and satisfy my curiosity.

    The answer that you gave adilu on the motors forum talked about the Push-Pull action when a coil is pulsed and convinced me that I had understood the basics of the principle that you have described. But what I am not sure of is what limits the quantity of radiant energy that a coil can capture when in its "Negative Induction" phase. Is it merely when the coil reaches saturation? If so, when building a solid state device I am assuming that the timer should be adjusted or tuned so that each new pulse occurs at the point at which the coil reaches saturation. And does the pulse duration have an effect on the duration of Negative Induction and thus radiant energy capture? Is it better to saturate the coil with the pulse or not?

    With this in mind but taking the concept a step further, is it possible to tap the coil when it is in its Negative Induction phase so that saturation is never reached and the coil continues to pull in radiant energy. In this fashion the pulse is merely acting to prime the system. In my mind I envisage the process to be akin to siphoning a reservoir (radiant energy) with a hose (coil) into a bucket. The hose is primed once and then the water will continue to flow indefinitely whilst there is water remaining in the reservoir and the hose remains below the waterline of the reservoir and not in the bucket. If you were to put a float on the end of the hose and then put the hose in a bucket with its rim above the waterline then the flow would stop once the bucket had filled (coil saturation). In order to restart the flow the bucket has to be drained and the hose re-primed (pulsed). However, if the bucket has a hole in the bottom of a size such that the water flows out of the bucket (something is now draining energy from the coil) as quickly as it enters then the water will continue to flow until the reservoir falls below the level of the bottom of the bucket. I am working on the assumption that the reservoir is being topped up by streams etc at a rate equal to or greater than the rate at which it is being siphoned. Otherwise we're all in trouble!

    I could of course be making a fool of myself. Regardless, I would value your opinion.



    JJUK
    Last edited by JJUK; 08-13-2012, 07:24 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ufopolitics
    replied
    It is Ok Dear JJUK...

    Originally posted by JJUK View Post
    Hi UFO,

    I have a question about the pulsed solid state circuit in your 'Asymmetry to Enlightenment' video. Is this he correct thread to be discussing these ideas or are all your projects being dealt with through the 'My Asymmetric Electrodynamic Machines' thread now?

    Thanks!

    JJUK
    Hello Dear JJUK,

    It is Ok here...or in the thread related to Oscillators and Static Coils...My First one...However, I will not be "picky" about it...

    This Thread I open it before My Machines...it relates basically to the "Politics" behind this Mutilation to Science...as also to bring here any Symmetry or Asymmetry differences or discussions...

    However, I think what your question would be...The signal is wrong at pulsing Mosfet...N-Channel...right?...Yes it is...it should be pulsing at Upper side of square wave...a little twist of the whole animated Wave and light...will have made it correctly...
    I did that video in such a hurry...to make it before 12:00 Midnight of July 10 Th...Tesla's Birthday...I barely made it by a few seconds...lol

    Regards


    Ufopolitics
    Last edited by Ufopolitics; 08-09-2012, 07:20 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • JJUK
    replied
    Assymetry to Enlightenment

    Hi UFO,

    I have a question about the pulsed solid state circuit in your 'Asymmetry to Enlightenment' video. Is this he correct thread to be discussing these ideas or are all your projects being dealt with through the 'My Asymmetric Electrodynamic Machines' thread now?

    Thanks!

    JJUK

    Leave a comment:


  • Ufopolitics
    replied
    Good morning Dear Lamare

    Originally posted by codeboundfuture View Post
    Hi lamare!

    The rotating magnetic field we refer to when talking about these motors is just the alternation of poles to -emulate- a smooth rotation in the scale of interaction we are working with.

    Check out Wikipedia - Rotating Magnetic Field for a visual.

    With time we will do it better, more like you mention.

    Best wishes,
    matt

    G Day Lamare,

    The Main problem We all have been "miss-informed" about...

    Is a Real Fact...That I have proven all along...and I will keep doing it...

    There is "An Artificial Magnetic Field", created by Our Means...and that is the one shown, and "visible"...
    It is a huge mistake to "believe" they are both "The Same Phenomena"...that is not correct...

    There is "Another One"...Completely Natural, and Completely Different in Manifestations and Laws...just like Gas exist deep inside our Earth , but as an Inexhaustible Source of Power... this Natural Magnetic Field/Electricity, exist and have existed everywhere, not only in our Planet...but in the whole Universe...and is Free...

    "All We need to do, in order to capture it"...is a very simple "device"....just like an Igniter, triggers and Flames out a Natural Gas flow , leaking from an Earth Crack...

    Then We turn Off...our Igniter...We got Fire...


    Regards


    U.F.O

    Leave a comment:


  • Ufopolitics
    replied
    Watch...

    Originally posted by JumpingFlea View Post
    Hi Ufo
    Just watched your Asymmetry to enlightenment video
    Very impressive
    A question ,
    how is the witches c emf value calculated as in 12.1 -9.1volts ?
    Cheers
    Flea
    Hello Jumping Flea,

    Thanks.

    Watch:Peter Lindemann -- Electric Motor Secrets - YouTube

    All My Data is Based from Mr. Lindemann's Video...above.

    Regards


    UFO

    Leave a comment:


  • JumpingFlea
    replied
    Hi Ufo
    Just watched your Asymmetry to enlightenment video
    Very impressive
    A question ,
    how is the witches c emf value calculated as in 12.1 -9.1volts ?
    Cheers
    Flea

    Leave a comment:


  • codeboundfuture
    replied
    Rotating magnetic fields, current tech motors.

    Hi lamare!

    The rotating magnetic field we refer to when talking about these motors is just the alternation of poles to -emulate- a smooth rotation in the scale of interaction we are working with.

    Check out Wikipedia - Rotating Magnetic Field for a visual.

    With time we will do it better, more like you mention.

    Best wishes,
    matt

    Leave a comment:


  • lamare
    replied
    Originally posted by Ufopolitics View Post
    Coil reverses (by grace of Natural response) its polarity (magnetic and electrical) when "left alone", idling, not "injecting" a purposely reversed electrical flow(Symmetry)
    That is not correct, Ufo.

    The magnetic field is a rotational movement in/of the aether. What happens when you drive a current trough a coil is that the current runs around in circles, creating a vortex in/of the aether, which is what we call a magnetic field. This is very, very much like spinning a flying wheel.

    Now imagine taking a piece of rope and attack that to the side of a flying wheel. When you pull the rope round the flying wheel starts rotating. As long as you keep pulling and pulling round and round, you pull the rope and the flying wheel starts spinning faster and faster.

    The moment you stop moving your hand, the flying wheel continues spinning and will pull at the rope. It will drag your hand along. IN THE SAME DIRECTION.

    In other words: the direction of the force on the rope changes polarity. It changes from your hand pulling the flying wheel to the flying wheel pulling your hand.

    With a coil, the same principle applies. The magnetic field does NOT change polarity and the current trough the coil winding also continues in the same direction. What does change is that the coil, instead of "sucking" current from your battery starts "pushing" the current to the load.

    And that means that the *voltage* changes polarity, but the magnetic field does not.

    Leave a comment:


  • lamare
    replied
    Originally posted by Ufopolitics View Post
    Unfortunately John, yes, motors have to be stripped off all wires, clean...The Symmetry most popular winding is the "Lap winding"...where Coils are all connected in a continuous loop and just passing by the commutator hooks to "bite them", they have very little turns (since from end to end of brushes it adds up since they are in series...That is a reason why Motors should be chosen as not having the heavy epoxy resin in wiring...it could become a nightmare...and more complicated process...some people boil them to strip them..The way to build a Motor the right way...after winding it, to epoxy high temp it, then get them in a vacuum chamber...so all the resin is impregnated deep inside compacting all wires to the Core...avoiding vibrations and damping noise...so, must of times is better a cheaper motor...that was built without that expensive procedure.
    Here is a document explaining a/o "lap winding" and explains that the coils are indeed put in series:



    (copy: http://www.tuks.nl/pdf/Reference_Mat...ings%20etc.pdf )

    Double layer lap or wave windings are generally used for armature. Essentially all the armature coils are connected in series forming a closed armature circuit. However as the coils are distributed, the resultant voltage acting in the closed path is zero thereby ensuring no circulating current in the armature. The junctions of two consecutive coils are terminated on to the commutator segments.

    Leave a comment:


  • SkyWatcher
    replied
    Hi Rl2003, the armature coil does wrap around 2 of the poles, then continue wrapping when done with that coil to the right or left, whichever direction you are choosing, start winding another coil over the next 2 poles to create the typical north on one end and south on other end.
    These 2 coils are in series and will look like a pyramid or V shape when looking down shaft.
    Hope that helps, as I intently studied all his videos and pictures and words.
    peace love light
    tyson
    Last edited by SkyWatcher; 07-13-2012, 02:10 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rl2003
    replied
    Ready to Wind

    Thanks for all the info UFO, Great work on all the videos.

    I purchased some similar small motors to the RS, although it maybe a little larger,
    same five pole conf. and I am going to cut off the end of the second motor
    and weld it to the first. (picture below)
    The picture you posted, of yours, is a little vague on the windings, as it appears one
    coil wraps on two poles.
    I drew it out and looks like each pole has two windings around it, as left of one
    winding and right side of the other winding.
    CCW direction for us northern hemisphere.. Right.
    Can you please clearify, for all of us.

    Thanks, Mark
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • Shanjaq
    replied
    Looks good! Everything in science is so abstract and disconnected from reality these days, it's mass-ively refreshing to see a practical, working example to put things into context. Kudos for breaking the mold

    Leave a comment:


  • Les_K
    replied
    Yup!

    Wow....."That's what I'm Talkin about"...

    Les

    Leave a comment:


  • Farmhand
    replied
    Originally posted by wings View Post

    Congratulations! Thank You
    Hi UFO, I wasn't being critical, or skeptical, I just was wondering why if you get
    a C.O.P. of 2 or 200 % efficiency then why not show it. If you can't see the
    value in people not "just believing" claims and asking for some validation, then
    fair enough, just ignore me. For setups that claim to be efficient I'm
    interested in efficiency and practicality. If no one ever questioned anything
    there would be no balance. And there would be a big bias towards belief
    rather than science. For setups that "do something" I'm interested in how well
    they do it "Not necessarily efficiency".

    I just asked if you were claiming over C.O.P. 1 and stated i would like to see
    it. People keep saying things like "the gain cannot be measured", if that is the
    case I don't see how can it be even detected.

    Feel free to ignore me if you don't want to answer the questions, or feel free
    to react any way you wish. But......

    If we cannot ask for some in-out measurements then why are we here ?

    Cheers

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X