Getting started
Hello UFOpolitics,
I am having a very difficult time understanding how to do any of this, but I have some really cool ideas on what it could be used for. How can I get started making these radiant energy devices? I want to experiment with tesla turbines being powered by air compressors that are powered with radiant energy....
Thank you,
Meeker77
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Symmetric versus Asymmetric Electromagnetic Systems
Collapse
X
-
Getting started
Hello all,
How do I get started experimenting with radiant energy? I have a really hard time understanding all of this, but I have some cool ideas on how to use it. Can anyone offer some assistance?
Meeker77
Leave a comment:
-
Asymmetry is Asymmetry My Friend...
Hello Jmag0904,Originally posted by jmag0904 View PostUFO,
Would you say your design parallels some of the developments of P. Tewari's Space Energy Generator featured below? He also stresses the ability to overcome Lenz Law through what appears to be asymmetrical principals...but perhaps it looks different to you. Thanks!
Genesis of Free Power Generation
Sorry for small delay to answer, I have been busy...making some money...so we can keep going on...
I was reviewing that work, excellent!
I also saw the following link
Very interesting...
I will give you a "general" answer...
There are MANY WAYS to brake the Symmetry, and there is where the whole secret lies....my friend. Many great Scientists have done it before in the past...whether in Solid State Circuits...or Electrodynamics...or Electronics, or simply in old Vacuum Tubes...and the main issue here is so simple...Symmetry is Symmetry...meaning, you add One and Take/Subtract One...then, what do you have?...Zero...a nicely round and very symmetrical zero [0].
It is all about "Interactions"..."Exchanges"..."Equations"...
If You take a look around Yourself...Our Lives...Our NATURAL Environment...You will find out most of everything around Us...is Asymmetrical...nothing "exchanges" into a perfect "Zero" equation...a very "clean Zero"...it does not exist...it is completely "man made"...
I have shown through My Motors Design...there has been a "way" to make a Motor Spin with great performance...and still, render a Positive Value as a "GAIN" and NOT a Loss...that brakes Symmetry very simple, do not need to make OU...or Excess Output over Input...even being below...it IS NOT Negative...but Positive return to Us...
And..."My Machines"(that actually they are a "property" of DR Nikola Tesla's Design, done in the 1800's...)...are just a tiny grain of Sand in a Huge Dessert...My Friend...
Kind regards and thanks for bringing up this Thread!
UfopoliticsLast edited by Ufopolitics; 08-08-2013, 03:49 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
UFO,
Would you say your design parallels some of the developments of P. Tewari's Space Energy Generator featured below? He also stresses the ability to overcome Lenz Law through what appears to be asymmetrical principals...but perhaps it looks different to you. Thanks!
Genesis of Free Power Generation
Leave a comment:
-
Exactly Dave...We all have our avenues of research...Originally posted by Dave45 View Post
We all have our avenues of research and I do enjoy reading your opinions.
I am more into creating a wave guide, a sink but will keep up to date on your research.
all the best
dave
"creating a wave guide"...that sounds interesting...
Regards
Ufopolitics
Leave a comment:
-
We all have our avenues of research and I do enjoy reading your opinions.
I am more into creating a wave guide, a sink but will keep up to date on your research.
all the best
dave
Leave a comment:
-
Asymmetry...
Hello Dave45,Originally posted by Dave45 View PostIs the question really symmetry vs asymmetry or understanding the changing fields.

I have written about the best way to understand Asymmetry many times before in this Forum...but I will keep doing it as far as everyone understands where was "the Hidden Trick"
When Einstein refers to Asymmetry, He does it referring at TWO different fields of Science...First one is in the Mathematical Equations... related to "Non Equalities" showing on both sides...He disregard it just because E=mc2...will not be a Symmetrical Equality then...
The Second Asymmetry (As He refers to) is in the Physical field of Electromagnetic Induction from Faraday...and refers to the situation where Conductor is moving...Magnet at rest...or the other way around...Magnet moving Conductor at rest...would they be same?
However neither of both "cases" will fit into what was behind the Scenes to be hidden...and that were the Father of Magnetism , James Clerk Maxwell's Electromagnetic Asymmetries from the Ether (Aether in other descriptions)...Where Lorentz and Einstein "simply disregard them all"
BUT, IN ELECTRODYNAMIC MACHINES AND TRANSFORMERS...ASYMMETRY BECOMES A COMPLETELY DIFFERENT CONCEPT/APPROACH
And here, it refers to the "Virtual Volume/Geometry of their Magnetic Fields Projections into the 3D Space"
So, NO, it does NOT refers to the way you feed polarities to the same coil...NOT to the Electric Field...like You Posted in above Diagram/Post...so, please, forget about the Electric Field when it concerns Symmetry or Asymmetry related to Electrodynamic Machines...or Transformers.
The famous Tesla Coil, where a Primary seats at bottom (Pancake Type Winding)...with heavier gauge wire and less turns...than secondary, which is an elongated, very long tower like shaped Coil, with very fine awg...and thousands of turns...is a perfect example of an Asymmetrical Transformer. Here, Both Coils projects completely different Virtual Magnetic Field Patterns into the 3D Space...and , AGAIN, it IS NOT DIRECTLY RELATED to the Coils Physical Shape ...but to the projected virtual magnetic fields...So, You could have two identical shaped coils as primary-secondary in a given Transformer...but, depending on the way they are positioned related to each others... will DEFINE IF, Transformer is Symmetrical or Asymmetrical...
When We relate to Asymmetrical Motors and Generators...is basically very similar as above examples...except it relates to Dynamic (moving) Coils through Space/Time...
Regards
Ufopolitics
Leave a comment:
-
I guess the field could be considered asymmetrical as more current passes through the first part of the coil vs the end, allowing the field to be larger.
Leave a comment:
-
Is the question really symmetry vs asymmetry or understanding the changing fields.
Leave a comment:
-
Relatively speaking..
"steady dc"Originally posted by Dave45I can understand why an ac motor would be asymmetric, if we look at normal ac induction in a transformer the current changes direction, but is dc asymmetric thats the question.
If we pulse a transformer with dc it appears to be asymmetric because of the bemf collapsing into the coil changes the polarity of the coil, but is a coil powered with steady dc asymmetric.
I think DC is very asymmetric but, as we know, all systems tend towards balance. So relatively speaking, yes, but no.
Also, if I may add. I find solace in that everything is cyclical.
Hey UFO,
How are those rotating transformers coming along?
cheers,
matt
Leave a comment:
-
I can understand why an ac motor would be asymmetric, if we look at normal ac induction in a transformer the current changes direction, but is dc asymmetric thats the question.
If we pulse a transformer with dc it appears to be asymmetric because of the bemf collapsing into the coil changes the polarity of the coil, but is a coil powered with steady dc asymmetric.
Leave a comment:
-
yes thanks.Originally posted by MonsieurM View Post
THE KEY to Free Energy is Asymmetric Approach in all fields. Cos Asymmetry is Dynamic and Simmetry static (balanced) effect.
Avramenko gave us one very strange constant. He called it Quantum key. Strange things happened when experimenting on exactly 3.73KVolts.
Possible explaniation 1st Aetheric or Etheric threshold - Some kind of Etheric Energetic barrier.
We need to find proper frequency or frequencies (Burst Pulses) and phase to tunnel through Etheric dimension like US governement did in famous Philadelphia Experiment when many sailors were missed forever.
And again Asymmetric Coild have been used !!
Also remember Tesla Asymmetric Magnifying Transformer !! His original Aetheric Pump in Wardencliff have had 3 coils. Primary one wound of heavy copper bar, Secondary inside primary but with weak coupling and third Extra coil. If you look on geometry you will find perfectly Asymmetric Geometry closing with huge torroidal Asymmetric Capacitor. Tesla controled TeraWatts Power and we can't couple of tenth kwatts.
What a shame for today "science" which only know how to destroy elemental particles. Where is there Creation ?? Why they don't take some particles and made new useful Element. One word answer -IGNORANCE - TOTAL IGNORANCE of people with Nobel Prize Badges !! And they say they "know" only 5% of all interactions in Cosmos. I know they don't know nor 0,0005% of all interactions. How they will know than our Cosmos is Infinite and Every Time interval he is expanding tremendous spped!! Expanding in What ?? In nonexistence ??
So back to Real Sources of Cosmic Knowledge THE Slavonic Aryan Vedas
(Source for all Indian Vedas - The Slavonic-Aryan Vedas have been given to ancient Dravides and Nagas tribes in Ancient India but they have failed to save it in the way which had been given to them. Fortunatly the Ancient The Slavonic-Aryan Vedas have been saved on huge lands of Siberia.
Some parts from Slavonic-Aryan Vedas
THE BOOK OF LIGHT
In the True Primordialф
exact than in Infinite New Reality
had spilt mighty powerful stream
Life bringing, shiny Inglia,
Primordial Life borning Light
in New Reality had been born
various Universes and Realities
of worlds Jav, Nav and Prav.
And as nearer to Primordial Source of Light
had been settled these Universes and Realities
in various shining Worlds
the more so dimensionalities all of these
Magnificent Universes and Realities had have.
....
....
Like a branches of tree had joined
Primordial Life borning Light
Leafs of Realities of our World Tree
with mighty shining trunk.
And every Leaf-Reality had shone infinitely,
iridescent blazing Light of various Suns
while the trunk of World Tree had extended
with numerous own roots
in Infinite New Eternity
borned in New Reality.
etc.etc.
So very intersting. BIG BANG HAD BEEN LONG TIME AGO AND STILL IS. OUR UNIVERSE IS EXPANDING. BIG BANG STILL CONTINUE .....
I HAVE TRILLIONS OF QUESTION BUT NO ONE ON THIS PLANET HAVE ANSWERS FOR ME !! MAYBE IS SOLUTION TO MAKE PERSONAL UFO AND GET OUT THERE ... IN SEARCH FOR ANSWERS .... OR CHANGE MIND FORM AND AGAIN GET OUT OF THERE .... WHO KNOWS ??
Leave a comment:
-
And now one qute serious question for you UFO politic
Is is TRUTH that more than 4 Millions Americans have been abducted and many never founed by Evil Alien Race.
IS is TRUTH that Obama and US Governement made secret agreement with Alien Forces and 26 Alien Officer work in Top Secret US Navy bases together with American Military personal ??
What can you say us about the Biggest Alien Base under Sausalito in the huge underground vaults remained from WW2 and big submarine entrance on the seabed of Richardson gulf.
I was watching interview Most Famous American Psyhologist John E.Mack who had examined more than 1000 abductions and made regressive hypnotic technique to unlock blocked memory of victims. He was killed by ILLUMINATI CABAL in England i think in London downtown.
Also i have many informations about Evil Alien Forms so if you want you could open new EVIL ALIENS THREAD and to public discuss many "UNSOLVED" cases by world governements !!
I THINK WILL BE VERY INTERESTING AND AMAZING TO PEOPLE FINALLY UNDERSTAND THAT THEY ARE NOT ALONE IN COSMOS AND TO GET CLEAR IDEA IN MIND THAT THERE EXIST MANY VERY EVIL ALIEN RACES WHICH INTERESTS ARE IN DERECT CONFRONTATION WITH OUR !! (OUR=MANKIND)
IS IT TRUTH THAT IN US MANY UFOLOGIST WERE KILLED LAST TIME BY JOINT EVIL ALIEN-US GOVERNEMENTS TEAMS ??
check this resource by Dr. Bob Koontz and one Very famous American surgeon with many proofs of EVIL ALIEN IMPLANTS - MIND PROGRAMMING - ZOMBIE TECHNIQUE AND ALIEN SURGERY ON OPEN BRAIN and other human organs.
Web Site of Dr. Robert W. Koontz* www.DoctorKoontz.com
Leave a comment:
-
Всем Привет
Hi UFO politics
Read this - The First Transformer in the wolrd had been made by Russian Physicist Invertor Павел Николаевич Яблочков 1876 also First Asymmetric Electrodynamic Motor 1877 had been his invention together with many other his inventions. From text you will find patent numbers. So Asymmetric motor is 150 year old technology.
If you are interested you can find his Asymmetric Capacitor patent and his over unity test in presence of the most prominent scientist that time. Try French patent office !!

Павел Николаевич Яблочков
Родился в Саратовской губернии, 14 сентября 1847 года. В 1866 году окончил Военное Инженерное Училище, в 1871 году был произведен в чин поручика и в 1872 году уволен со службы. В 1875 году он поехал в Америку на Всемирную выставку изобретателей в Филадельфии. К этому времени у него было изобретен электромагнит с обмотками необычной формы, придававшие магниту особую силу. Но денег на поездку не хватило и Яблочков остался работать в Париже у Бреге, в мастерской, изготовлявшей знаменитые часы и другие физические приборы.
Первый патент Яблочкова выдан французским правительством на электромагнит №110479 от 29 ноября 1875 года. Отличительной особенностью электромагнита Яблочкова было то, что его обмотка была образована из плоской ленты, намотанной на ребро, так что плоскость ленты была перпендикулярна к сердечнику.
Второй патент № 111535 от 17 февраля 1876 года также упоминает о применении ленточной обмотки.
23 марта 1876 года он получает патент на "свечу Яблочкова".
В 1877 году он получил французский патент на магнито-динамо-электрическую машину переменного тока, в которой как намагничивающая обмотка, так и обмотка, в которой индуцировалась ЭДС, оставались неподвижными. Аналогичные машины использовали конструкторы Клименко, Кингдон, Томпсон и др. Изменения магнитного потока происходили за счет вращения зубчатого железного диска. Фактически, это одна из первых схем АЛЬТЕРНАТОРА. При такой конструкции нет контрЭДС и почти нет торможения ротора, особенно если он не железный, а ферритовый, то есть минимизированы потери в роторе, создаваемые токами Фуко.
Имеется французский патент от 1876 года на электростатический генератор Яблочкова.
13 сентября 1877 года в Русском Физико-Химическом Обществе был сделан доклад Проф. Егорова об изобретениях Яблочкова, в том числе по вопросу "введения больших конденсаторов в цепь машины-генератора для увеличения мощности ламп".
Французский патент № 115793 от 30 ноября 1876 года описывает первый трансформатор, изобретенный Яблочковым: "...в любой точке цепи я включаю индуктирующую катушку, через которую проходит ток от источника тока. Далее я помещаю надлежащим образом вторую катушку, в которой первая индуцирует ток."
Позднее он получает аналогичный русский патент от 6 апреля 1878 года.
В немецкой "Истории трансформаторов" Уппенборн пишет: "В 1878 году мы встречаемся с первым опытом промышленного применения индукционных катушек для освещения; в этом году Яблочков взял немецкий патент №1630..."
Изучая явления резонансного преобразования энергии в трансформаторах, Яблочков нашел способ увеличения мощности во вторичной цепи. В 1877 году он взял французский патент № 120684 от 11 октября 1877 года на "Систему распределения и усиления атмосферным электричеством токов, получаемых от одного источника тока..."
В описании он указывает на следующее: "...я заставляю динамическое электричество, доставляемое источником электричества, претерпевать двойную трансформацию - сначала в статическое электричество, а затем снова в динамическое... я соединяю проводник, идущий от машин переменного тока с ВНУТРЕННЕЙ обкладкой Лейденской банки или конденсатора особого устройства, а второй провод соединяю со свечой."
Асимметрия цилиндрического конденсатора, которая не наблюдается в плоском конденсаторе или в современном металлобумажном конденсаторе, позволяла получать индуцированное электричество большей мощности, чем расходовал источник. Яблочков пишет: "Включение конденсаторов не только позволяет распределить ток по разным направлениям, но имеет еще целью развить атмосферное электричество, которое аккумулируется в конденсаторах... Поэтому сумма количества электричества, посылаемая в источники света, больше, чем количество электричества, доставляемое первоначальным источником тока". Крупнейшие французские физики той эпохи, например, Маскар и Варрен-Деларю присутствовали при опытах Яблочкова и получали, что сумма токов от обкладок конденсаторов в землю превышала в 2 раза силу первичного тока. Увеличение силы тока особенно отмечалось при наличии в цепях катушек. Фактически, Яблочков развивал внедрение резонансных трансформаторов. Однако, также важен принцип асимметрии электрической индукции в цилиндрических конденсаторох: источник подключен к внутренней обкладке, а нагрузка - к внешней. Очевидно, что изменение заряда на внутренней обкладке лейденской банки приводит к изменению заряда на внешней, но не наоборот. Можно сказать, что геометрия конденсатора определяет причинно-следственную асимметрию.
Книга "Электрическое освещение", изданная в 1883 году Дю Монселем, пишет: "Для того, чтобы увеличить световую мощность электрических свечей, Яблочкову пришла мысль применить конденсаторы большой поверхности".
Другой аспект заключается в преобразовании "динамического электричества" в "статическое". При непосредственном подключении нагрузки (лампы) к источнику возникало соответствующее увеличение тока потребления. Но если электричество накапливалость в конденсаторе, то нагрузка могла быть включена не в цепь источника, а в цепь между обкладкой и заземлением. Фактически, цепи нагрузки и источника не были замкнуты.
Интересная схема генератора Яблочкова "Эклиптика", патент 1882 года, использует особую суперпозицию намагничивающей обмотки: ось вращения ротора (вторичной обмотки) лежит под уголом к оси магнитного потока.
Парижская выставка 1878 года, сыгравшая такую роль в успехе Яблочкова, была местом, где началась драма в его жизни. Именно на выставке у него возникла мысль реализовать свои идеи в России. Он выкупил за миллион франков свои изобретения у Французского Общества и уехал в Петербург, где основал "Товарищество Электрического Освещения и изготовления электрических аппаратов и машин в России" и построил завод на Обводном канале. Конкуренция с газовыми компаниями ти его финансовая неопытность привели к краху предприятия. Разочаровавшись в возможности развить свою деятельность в России, Яблочков в 1880 уехал обратно в Париж.
В 1887 году он взял патент на гальванический элемент, использующий водород и кислород для производства электричества. В процессе химических опытов Яблочков подорвал свое здоровье. В 1893 году он вернулся в Россию, в Петербурге заболел и скончался в 1894 году в Саратове.
Среди его патентов есть первый трансформатор, первая промышленная осветительная свеча, резонансные индуктивно-емкостные цепи, топливный элемент, альтернатор и электромобиль.
For translation from Russian to English try our Яндекс.Перевод - онлайн-переводчикLast edited by SERG V.; 07-17-2013, 08:26 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
An Interesting Book to Review...
Hello to All,
It has been a while since I do not post here...but recently I found a very interesting Book that is free (as pdf) below is the Link:
HOW EINSTEIN MADE ASYMMETRY DISAPPEAR:
SYMMETRY AND RELATIVITY IN 1905
To anyone interested...We can start a nice review of this great Book, right here.
I want to thank Member Raphael37 for posting the original link to this Book on his recent thread My Asymmetric SWASTIKA NANO Machines
Regards to all
Ufopolitics
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: