Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Lockridge Device - Peter Lindemann

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Mark
    replied
    Hi Penno64

    With the 2 pole motor your using there is no way to wind a zig-zag style, that is for a 4 pole motor.

    With the 2 pole motor you also dont need a diode. With a diode your motor will only fire 1 time per revolution. Without the diode it will fire twice per revolution.

    You may also want to hook 2 commutator sections together where your coil wires are hooked up so you can have a longer "on" time. This will get that motor really going.

    I also did not see any recovery brushes in your pictures. Without the recovery brushes you will have lots of arcing and will burn up your power brushes quickly.

    I'm not sure how many volts you used to run your motor but you also need to increase the voltage, remember that the way your motor is now with only 1 pulse per revolution and only using 1 commutator section you have an effective on time of only 8-9%.

    Leave a comment:


  • penno64
    replied
    Here's a few pics.

    The magnet rotor was simply used as flywheel.

    Thanks
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • penno64
    replied
    Hi Matt,

    Thanks for the reply.

    Yes it a 2 pole (2 magnet) motor.

    I have soldered the diode in the other way, but still no run.

    I added some weight and found that it will run - just!.

    And yes, I had it wound as you detailed.

    Matt, from Peter's comment regarding your Z-type wind, I feel we need a different way of winding for the 2 magnet motor.

    Using Brian's offset brush placement, means I can eliminate the internal diode, so
    I will need to do some work on the brush holder.

    Once again, Thanks for the advice.

    I will post a couple of Pics if time permits.

    Kindest Regards, Penno

    Leave a comment:


  • Matthew Jones
    replied
    Originally posted by joeqsmith View Post
    The first dyno was damaged and had enough design problems that it was not worth repairing. This is my second attempt at an improved dyno.......
    Thats some pretty work. Looking forward to seeing your results.

    Originally posted by penno64 View Post
    Some help please.
    After several attempts at different windings, I must declare that I am beaten.
    My setup is similar to that which Turion showed a few pages back and that
    which Brian (n84dafun) shows.
    Razor scooter B1308222 motor
    2 pole
    12 segments
    12 slots
    I now understand why I get 1 pulse at 0 degress and a reverse pulse at 180.
    Hence, no continued motion.
    I tried the diode, but no joy.
    I clearly see the z-type winding for Matt's 4 pole setup, though I cannot see
    how to apply this to the two pole with 12 slots.
    I will keep going while the skin on my fingers holds up, but would greatly appreciate any advice.
    Kindest Regards, Penno
    What happened with the diode? How many magnets in the motor?

    If you have 2 magnets.....
    Your winding should start on the same side as the commutator go through slot 1 and down to 6, and back up to one.
    looking at the rotor from the commutator you should use 2 slot of the commutator to left of the wire slot.
    Your motor will be a puller if wound this way.

    If you need a drawing ask. But give all the specifics of the motor you have, or link to the one your talking about.

    Cheers
    Matt

    Leave a comment:


  • penno64
    replied
    Some help please.

    After several attempts at different windings, I must declare that I am beaten.

    My setup is similar to that which Turion showed a few pages back and that
    which Brian (n84dafun) shows.

    Razor scooter B1308222 motor

    2 pole
    12 segments
    12 slots

    I now understand why I get 1 pulse at 0 degress and a reverse pulse at 180.
    Hence, no continued motion.

    I tried the diode, but no joy.

    I clearly see the z-type winding for Matt's 4 pole setup, though I cannot see
    how to apply this to the two pole with 12 slots.

    I will keep going while the skin on my fingers holds up, but would greatly appreciate any advice.

    Kindest Regards, Penno
    Last edited by penno64; 04-22-2011, 08:33 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • joeqsmith
    replied
    The first dyno was damaged and had enough design problems that it was not worth repairing. This is my second attempt at an improved dyno.

    Base is steel
    Absorber is brushless
    Absorber bearings are full ceramic
    All other bearings are hybrids
    No shims
    Only one drive shaft to connect test motor to coupler
    Total drag with synthetic lube in all five bearings is much less than first dyno
    Electronics are the same except the bridge added for the new absorber

    I estimate this dyno will easily handle shaft speeds in the 30-40,000 RPM range and should allow measurements to 150 Watts.

    Leave a comment:


  • WeThePeople
    replied
    Deleted off topic drivel...
    Last edited by WeThePeople; 04-22-2011, 09:24 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Matthew Jones
    replied
    I think somehow he thought he could pull it off.

    You can only thank stupid people, they set the bottom of the bar for everybody else.

    Matt

    Leave a comment:


  • WeThePeople
    replied
    Looked like a post-&-run, doubt he'll be back...

    Give him a piece of your mind directly instead:

    GoReggie = Reginald Garcia
    YouTube - goreggie100's Channel
    "Electric Motor Company (of) America":
    http://www.EMCoAmerica.com/Contacts.html
    951-300-3371 = Sprint/NexTel cell phone
    Telephone Number IDentification - Searching
    GoReggie2@Verizon.net

    He is also listed as a "Manager" for fire alarm services here:
    "TDC Communications":
    Contact Us
    CCTV Security TDS
    1701 Rimpau Ave Suite 101
    Corona, California
    92881-xxxx
    909-217-4376 - Tel
    951-625-5476 - Fax
    TDCComm1@Yahoo.com
    T.Chacon@TACI.tv

    Also listed as a "Government Vendor" here:
    "Renaissance Structures"
    http://www.Government-Vendor.us/Comp...dale/Home.html
    26365 Buccaneer Lane
    Helendale, California
    92342-2051
    951-300-3371

    Hope this helps somehow.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • Turion
    replied
    This quote is from the ozone.bz website:
    "A no back emf motor with recovery of that field..."

    Is this the fabled "Having no cake and eating it too?"

    Leave a comment:


  • Peter Lindemann
    replied
    Beyond Belief!!

    Originally posted by goreggie View Post
    ozone.bz

    Hi back at it, Tomorrow I will run more tests with a load and post results in a few days
    Look at site interesting
    Thanks
    Reggie,

    Your actions here are completely unethical. Take that website down immediately. You have no right to sell copies of Matt's motor design associated with exaggerated and unsubstantiated claims. Matt has generously donated his time and intelligence to this open source project to help everyone try to understand the principles I discussed in my lecture.

    That you would build a website like that and have the nerve to post a link to it in this thread shows a staggering contempt for all of us here. If your goal was to strongly discourage all honest researchers from sharing openly in these forums, then you have succeeded. This action ranks you as the #1 agent of social chaos who has ever posted in this forum.

    For all of us who have contributed openly to science in the public domain, I repudiate your actions in the strongest terms available to a member of a dwindling, civil society.

    Unbelievable! You have burned all of your bridges with me.

    Peter
    Last edited by Peter Lindemann; 04-19-2011, 03:33 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • pault
    replied
    And in the opening shot (0-12 seconds), the brushes are sparking, quite badly.
    pt

    Leave a comment:


  • Web000x
    replied
    Originally posted by goreggie View Post
    ozone.bz

    Hi back at it, Tomorrow I will run more tests with a load and post results in a few days
    Look at site interesting
    Thanks
    Wow,

    You haven't even shown any worthy test results of your motor self running. By itself, Voltage doesn't mean ****. You need watt meters(Voltage*Amperage) before you can claim anything.

    It is people like you that discredit the whole unconventional renewable energy movement.

    Thanks,

    Dave

    Leave a comment:


  • Bill H
    replied
    Full agreement with Matt here.
    Bill H.

    Leave a comment:


  • Matthew Jones
    replied
    Originally posted by goreggie View Post
    ozone.bz
    Hi back at it, Tomorrow I will run more tests with a load and post results in a few days
    Look at site interesting
    Thanks
    Thats a bad Joke. Take some plans from an open source community discussion, and sell prototypes as "Self Running".

    Whats next "Power Your Entire Home". Where have we seen that before?

    Not a shred of Proof.

    I am glad to see that you put in your OverView . Now we know what you are.

    Makes me sick to have to respond to people like you. You should be ashamed and disgusted with yourself.

    Sincerely
    Matthew Jones

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X