Allwest:
It is easy to say that something is "old", meaning that it is no longer useable or of value, or "be careful of what you follow". Like what? Are these cells going to blow up in my face? So, I'm not a realist, like yourself? Consider what you are suggesting... Enough said? Well... if you say so.
What I am mentioning is all very REAL, and well studied, and worked on.
I am telling you, (since you don't know) the best of what has been accomplished by someone here, up to now, that we are aware of.
There may be a lot more to this than meets the eye, and that we are totally not aware of. As I am dumbly assuming. As there are hundreds of the best scientists working on this all over the world. Cells that can run a car, light a house, that never need recharging. Not a small matter, as it would blow the current ship right out of the water. And the guy that invents it, will have the men in black on their doorstep, in a flash...
If you can do better, please show us. But, not by suggesting that we are all barking up the wrong tree.
You are the newbie, so, don't assume that we don't know much about this, as this research all goes back a couple hundred years, or more.
The Pyramids were built so long ago, and no one can even replicate them now, with our best current technology. There is nothing NEW under the Sun.
This is not about competition, who knows more than who, or who has the best latest battery or cells. Humble Opinion?
This is a team effort. At least it has been, and will probably continue to be.
It has taken a lot of effort to get even to where we're at. Think about it.
NickZ
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Bedini Earth Light
Collapse
X
-
@Allwest - you might be right, but, how many people even know of such 100 year old technology ? How many people even know they can use Alum in a car battery ? there have been plenty of old cars that i've owned where I wish the previous owners had known about it for the sake of the battery trays ! lol
If we try 1001 different things and then find the old ways were indeed the best, then nothing is lost, though it seems like it perhaps.
In terms of investment in what we're doing, I have even recycled the copper from deceased cells before now, so perhaps I have some equating wrongly placed.
Here was a fun one from a couple of weeks ago. Lidmotor showed a Glowstick powering a motor via solar on one video and I thought to try the stuff in a cell. Did you know it glows without being mixed with the water ? Neither did I
I snipped off one end, removed the glass vial and broke that into the prepared pills bottle (burnt copper and galv steel electrodes). 0.75V @ 2mA when it started, fair enough for a water based electrolyte, or air humidity at least.
The cell glowed away for a few hours, was hilarious to see it running an oscillator.
Last edited by Slider2732; 06-03-2012, 04:03 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
Your right Nick, that was the second to the last, which had just over an Amp then they hit it a second time and it was just below the ampOriginally posted by NickZ View Post@ Allwest and All:
That video in the link you've posted was not his latest, showing about a 200mA range of output. As one of the last videos that he presented to us is not available now, as far as I can tell, and are not being shown any more. Possibly for the reasons that I've already mentioned. His last videos were showing cells with an output of about 1.3 amps, dropping down from a starting current output of about 1.8 amps. Not mAs! And he mentioning his hopeful goal of a much higher output yet, like possibly up to 5 amps. After than he went silent.
If I am wrong about this, someone please correct me. My memory is not what it used to be... but I'm not brain dead yet, either.
His best and strongest cells were at times connected to his laptop to register the draw under a load over a period of time, from hours to several days. Afterwards they were opened up and inspected for galvanic wear of the magnesium, and such.
My only point in mentioning this is to relate what was achieved. As no one has come even close to those results. In my opinion, and my less than perfect memory.
NickZ
Here is the last one with the same blue liquid
Crystal cell paste - YouTube
Nick, my point being that this was there last cell that they where doing R&D on, so I am assuming that all the other cells they did testing on where not doing as well as these
Also, another note: At their conference they where preparing for
If you noticed they decided to go with the Alum and Mag cell (and start selling ) after this no more videos
Nick, you can spend your time any way you like, just be careful of what you are following
Myself ....I guess I am a realist, their last video tells me, that is the best they have, and if my theory is correct they are going back to the 100 year old technology by using copper sulfate
Nuff said
Leave a comment:
-
Slider,Originally posted by Slider2732 View PostThings are complicated for me, because i'm not sure what is galvanic and what isn't. I mean, I know the process and that the metals will corrode...but there seems to be no bench mark outside of effects noted on Magnesium for clear visible indications. Some cells react over months if not years.
I know that galvanized steel in water will form a slime after a couple of months (cleaned off it returns to fine) and I know that copper (burnt or untouched) can form the blue or green oxides.
However, there are several own cells that just trundle and trundle onward, 24/7, which by all rights ought to have developed a healthy dose of unhealthiness by now..
The 2 in the pic below, are such examples and show them running as of today. Sorry about the quality, it's a video capture because the oscillators are flashing. The one on the left is the one that fell down the back of the dresser in December 2011, the one on the right is the seashell cell i've shown in videos, built in February of this year.
Both just carry on and carry on, powering blocking oscillators like they don't know they have a use by date !

To me, the output is fine for the purpose intended, but, only fine and still running because of that micro load requirement. Perhaps i'd be further along had I used Magnesium and scaled up to running a flashlight or something
Then there's the fact that the blue LED one is running contrary to all the advice we've collected about open air cells - it is indeed open and has never had more than humidity as a water source.
Or, let's throw in that the first cells, the concrete mix types and onward, will spark back to life with a couple of drops of water...after months of inactivity and run along for at least a few days. Again, the electrodes seem fine, it's all repeatable.
Finally, the likes of the wet cells such as Alum and water in a pills bottle. While the water may turn a definite shade of horrid, those still carry on and will still take a charge. All again complicated, because one of them (called APB2) has run a blocking oscillator for the last month without any charge being applied in any case
I'd say a lot more of us are actively experimenting, away from the thread - we have no choice, the LED's are still running lol
I think you have a winner with no water being added and still going
Leave a comment:
-
@ Allwest and All:
That video in the link you've posted was not his latest, showing about a 200mA range of output. As one of the last videos that he presented to us is not available now, as far as I can tell, and are not being shown any more. Possibly for the reasons that I've already mentioned. His last videos were showing cells with an output of about 1.3 amps, dropping down from a starting current output of about 1.8 amps. Not mAs! And he mentioning his hopeful goal of a much higher output yet, like possibly up to 5 amps. After than he went silent.
If I am wrong about this, someone please correct me. My memory is not what it used to be... but I'm not brain dead yet, either.
His best and strongest cells were at times connected to his laptop to register the draw under a load over a period of time, from hours to several days. Afterwards they were opened up and inspected for galvanic wear of the magnesium, and such.
My only point in mentioning this is to relate what was achieved. As no one has come even close to those results. In my opinion, and my less than perfect memory.
NickZ
Leave a comment:
-
Things are complicated for me, because i'm not sure what is galvanic and what isn't. I mean, I know the process and that the metals will corrode...but there seems to be no bench mark outside of effects noted on Magnesium for clear visible indications. Some cells react over months if not years.
I know that galvanized steel in water will form a slime after a couple of months (cleaned off it returns to fine) and I know that copper (burnt or untouched) can form the blue or green oxides.
However, there are several own cells that just trundle and trundle onward, 24/7, which by all rights ought to have developed a healthy dose of unhealthiness by now..
The 2 in the pic below, are such examples and show them running as of today. Sorry about the quality, it's a video capture because the oscillators are flashing. The one on the left is the one that fell down the back of the dresser in December 2011, the one on the right is the seashell cell i've shown in videos, built in February of this year.
Both just carry on and carry on, powering blocking oscillators like they don't know they have a use by date !

To me, the output is fine for the purpose intended, but, only fine and still running because of that micro load requirement. Perhaps i'd be further along had I used Magnesium and scaled up to running a flashlight or something
Then there's the fact that the blue LED one is running contrary to all the advice we've collected about open air cells - it is indeed open and has never had more than humidity as a water source.
Or, let's throw in that the first cells, the concrete mix types and onward, will spark back to life with a couple of drops of water...after months of inactivity and run along for at least a few days. Again, the electrodes seem fine, it's all repeatable.
Finally, the likes of the wet cells such as Alum and water in a pills bottle. While the water may turn a definite shade of horrid, those still carry on and will still take a charge. All again complicated, because one of them (called APB2) has run a blocking oscillator for the last month without any charge being applied in any case
I'd say a lot more of us are actively experimenting, away from the thread - we have no choice, the LED's are still running lol
Leave a comment:
-
NickOriginally posted by NickZ View PostAllwest and All:
The use of common sea salt, (sodium chloride), and ammonia, has been used and tested, along with many other hundreds of combinations. There is nothing new or exciting there. Nor do they show the actual discharge curve, after months of constant use, UNDER A LOAD. Which is what really counts.
That combination is basically what I use, which is activated carbon, wet salty beach sand, filled into an aluminum tube with a carbon or graphite rod as the positive rail. Silica gel helps to maintain the cells from drying out and thus further losing power. Epsom and other salts work better than table or sea salt.
This has all been done before. Check the previous 137 pages of this forum, and other forums as well. As no de-polarizer is used in your suggested cell, it will also mean a dropping of output over a short time, as hydrogen gas builds up, which will also lower the output, as stated earlier. As well as the contamination of the carbon, aluminum alloy, or whatever metal is used.
Although 130 mA as is suggested is not bad, it is a long ways (1/10 the current) from what John B has shown on his last tests. That was before going silent and no further post, videos, or results were shown or discussed.
John Hutchinson, was another person that stopped showing his results, and has not laid out all his cards on the table for all to see, possibly when his best results were obtained. This is no coincidence, at all, as we'll all soon see.
As a result of the above, My personal feeling is that soon this type of cell that never needs to be charged, and does not ever fully discharge, will be available for all, to just simply buy off the shelf.
NickZ
All in my humble opinion
Here is JB's last cell, so I assume it is the best they have so far
If you look at the hydrate used, it looks like copper sulfate blue
Crystal battery flooded - YouTube
This is very commonly used, try it and you can get high power, I believe it is called a concentration cell
Regarding the Chemalloy battery
I just came across this, so I do not know all there is to know, they say the electrodes do not get eaten up, only the water, this is not just Au, it is a mix, with other claims other than batteries, worth further research to me
And regarding long term testing of this cell, don't know, but we do not have any long term tests from JB either
Leave a comment:
-
Allwest and All:
The use of common sea salt, (sodium chloride), and ammonia, has been used and tested, along with many other hundreds of combinations. There is nothing new or exciting there. Nor do they show the actual discharge curve, after months of constant use, UNDER A LOAD. Which is what really counts.
That combination is basically what I use, which is activated carbon, wet salty beach sand, filled into an aluminum tube with a carbon or graphite rod as the positive rail. Silica gel helps to maintain the cells from drying out and thus further losing power. Epsom and other salts work better than table or sea salt.
This has all been done before. Check the previous 137 pages of this forum, and other forums as well. As no de-polarizer is used in your suggested cell, it will also mean a dropping of output over a short time, as hydrogen gas builds up, which will also lower the output, as stated earlier. As well as the contamination of the carbon, aluminum alloy, or whatever metal is used.
Although 130 mA as is suggested is not bad, it is a long ways (1/10 the current) from what John B has shown on his last tests. That was before going silent and no further post, videos, or results were shown or discussed.
John Hutchinson, was another person that stopped showing his results, and has not laid out all his cards on the table for all to see, possibly when his best results were obtained. This is no coincidence, at all, as we'll all soon see.
As a result of the above, My personal feeling is that soon this type of cell that never needs to be charged, and does not ever fully discharge, will be available for all, to just simply buy off the shelf.
NickZLast edited by NickZ; 06-02-2012, 04:30 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
NickOriginally posted by NickZ View PostI realize that there is more than one newbie to this effort, and an effort it's been. And I really really wish that I had a solution to mention, or one that someone else has made or done that really works, and keeps working... But, I don't. That does not mean that it's not possible, by far.
The original idea was to avoid galvanics, as we saw that there are already many ready made galvanic batteries out there, primary and secondary batteries and wet and dry cells, that worked just fine. Some with a couple hundred years of development behind them like the lead acid batteries, and several others.
So, we here worked towards finding solutions to the basic problem of metal break down of the cells, as well as hydrogen gas build up that leads up a detriment in the output. Those issues are still unresolved, at least for the most part, in our case.
Dry non galvanic cells were next on the list of what we're trying to accomplish. The results were nominal, with little useable power, only a couple of mAs, although they had some voltage, but no power behind those volts. Fluffy voltage, like when a battery is discharged, and self charges back but with no current, as it had before.
So, it was back to wet cells that could give some power, even an amp or two, or more.
Anyways, that is where we are now. Can we maintain a current of an amp, or two? Well, that is the question... And it's possible that the answer is yes, and that may be the very reason why no one is talking about it, anymore. If you follow my drift... as we all have to eat...
My favorite saying, Time will tell...
NickZ
I commend you for keeping up the fight,
But believe me, JB would be shouting from the top of the mountains if he made it, but he would not show us how to make it until he got his patents inline
This power cell is as close as it gets to what you want for now, with instructions
Nu EnergyTM Sodium Chloride Ion-valve Technology
"Using a chemalloy anode and center drilled graphite rod we obtained an output voltage of 1.6 volts open voltage, which remains constant. 130 milliamps was obtained shunted across our Simpson meter. This is equivalent to around 1/3rd of a watt."
Best of luckLast edited by Allwest; 06-02-2012, 02:18 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
I realize that there is more than one newbie to this effort, and an effort it's been. And I really really wish that I had a solution to mention, or one that someone else has made or done that really works, and keeps working... But, I don't. That does not mean that it's not possible, by far.
The original idea was to avoid galvanics, as we saw that there are already many ready made galvanic batteries out there, primary and secondary batteries and wet and dry cells, that worked just fine. Some with a couple hundred years of development behind them like the lead acid batteries, and several others.
So, we here worked towards finding solutions to the basic problem of metal break down of the cells, as well as hydrogen gas build up that leads up a detriment in the output. Those issues are still unresolved, at least for the most part, in our case.
Dry non galvanic cells were next on the list of what we're trying to accomplish. The results were nominal, with little useable power, only a couple of mAs, although they had some voltage, but no power behind those volts. Fluffy voltage, like when a battery is discharged, and self charges back but with no current, as it had before.
So, it was back to wet cells that could give some power, even an amp or two, or more.
Anyways, that is where we are now. Can we maintain a current of an amp, or two? Well, that is the question... And it's possible that the answer is yes, and that may be the very reason why no one is talking about it, anymore. If you follow my drift... as we all have to eat...
My favorite saying, Time will tell...
NickZ
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by NickZ View PostExtropy exists. You will not find it by looking on the internet, but, I'm letting you know that there is more to it than just entropy, or the break down of energy and things.
The polarization of light and actual creation of light, is what I'm really talking about. It is not coming from the Sun, as I've mentioned before, believe it not.
The only way to avoid the galvanic break down in our cells, is by not letting this happen. I'm tired of mentioning this, again. Seams like nobody is listening, or believing it, anyways.
We are not getting there by placing metal cells into dissolving caustic salt baths, acid, or alkaline solutions, or by putting a nail in a tree, or adding water to blood, or, or, or, ....
Several years have passed and NO ONE has a cell that is not dissolving into mush. Or not??? By this I mean a USEABLE CELL, not one that will hardly light an led. Wow, it works!!!
If the lights go out, as is expected, and as we have been warned repeatedly, then what are we going to do??? All 4 billion of us??? Not happening yet? BUT, look around, things are not the same, sh!t is happening... everywhere. I know that most of us here are aware of that, or are we?
Rechargeable batteries, solar panels, wind, and hydro are all very useable answers. Unless we wait to long.
Have you seen what happens during even fake gasoline shortages.... real bad earthquakes, power shortages, huricanes, etz... I have.
I don't care what people do, or don't do, anymore or less than how much people care what I do, but, in order to get anywhere with this project WE need to FOCUS....
Our great leader is not with us any longer, JB, and so, can we still run with this, and make something USEFUL of it all, not just spending more time, pissin' into the wind. Do you know what I'm talking about, does it matter?
Sorry if my attitude is not very "NICE", now. It's Not a matter of faults.
I'm a practical guy looking and working on real solutions, not a hobby, not a pastime, as if my life depended on this, and so is John B, which I do value and miss a lot. If he only knew...
NickZ
P.S. My only intention is to direct this project to a real life solution.
While we still can... I am on YOUR SIDE, THIS IS A TEAM EFFORT.
Nick
Unfortunately I was not apart of this board when JB was running it, and I do not really know who he is
I have seen several of his videos, and I guess the only ones I have seen was the ones tested right after the cells where created, except the one he shows created by someone else, have you seen any testing of his cells on long term?
Also, I would like to know one thing about JB, Is he claiming these cells that he is making are NON-Galvanic?
Best of luck
Leave a comment:
-
Extropy exists. You will not find it by looking on the internet, but, I'm letting you know that there is more to it than just entropy, or the break down of energy and things.
The polarization of light and actual creation of light, is what I'm really talking about. It is not coming from the Sun, as I've mentioned before, believe it not.
The only way to avoid the galvanic break down in our cells, is by not letting this happen. I'm tired of mentioning this, again. Seams like nobody is listening, or believing it, anyways.
We are not getting there by placing metal cells into dissolving caustic salt baths, acid, or alkaline solutions, or by putting a nail in a tree, or adding water to blood, or, or, or, ....
Several years have passed and NO ONE has a cell that is not dissolving into mush. Or not??? By this I mean a USEABLE CELL, not one that will hardly light an led. Wow, it works!!!
If the lights go out, as is expected, and as we have been warned repeatedly, then what are we going to do??? All 4 billion of us??? Not happening yet? BUT, look around, things are not the same, sh!t is happening... everywhere. I know that most of us here are aware of that, or are we?
Rechargeable batteries, solar panels, wind, and hydro are all very useable answers. Unless we wait to long.
Have you seen what happens during even fake gasoline shortages.... real bad earthquakes, power shortages, huricanes, etz... I have.
I don't care what people do, or don't do, anymore or less than how much people care what I do, but, in order to get anywhere with this project WE need to FOCUS....
Our great leader is not with us any longer, JB, and so, can we still run with this, and make something USEFUL of it all, not just spending more time, pissin' into the wind. Do you know what I'm talking about, does it matter?
Sorry if my attitude is not very "NICE", now. It's Not a matter of faults.
I'm a practical guy looking and working on real solutions, not a hobby, not a pastime, as if my life depended on this, and so is John B, which I do value and miss a lot. If he only knew...
NickZ
P.S. My only intention is to direct this project to a real life solution.
While we still can... I am on YOUR SIDE, THIS IS A TEAM EFFORT.
Leave a comment:
-
Hi NickOriginally posted by NickZ View PostExtropy also exists, which is the opposite of entropy, and is really what we are looking for here. It is the effect of building up instead of breaking down. Or a situation where something is constantly giving off, that which it is also constantly receiving. Such as what a Sun, a planet, or a Vortex are doing, although there may be nothing that may do so, forever.
The best closest example of what we are trying to create here is the solar cell. There is no oxidation involved, and it produces energy by a conversion factor. And, so can our power cells, although it may take us a while to achieve this. Remember that it only took a few thousand years to come up with the current version of the solar cell. It's only a matter of time...
China will produce them cheaper than we can buy the parts to build it ourselves. It is already happening, we just don't realize it, yet. There are many scientists in mayor companies like EverReady, Panasonic, G.E. Motorola, etz...working on this. I'm sure the N.A.S.A already is utilizing them. They are not being produced for the public for the same reason that gasoline motors are still being produced. As these companies will not compete with their own technologies. It's all about money, and competition.
If you don't think so, just wait and see. There are already batteries that don't need to be recharged, with a three year guarantee. If they fail, they will be replaced for free.
Even At the Dollar Stores now, regular AAs are being sold for 12 cent each.
Are we going to make something better by placing a couple of pieces of metal into a puddle of salts???
NickZ
Just some thoughts
Extropy is referring to our hope in human intelligence to expand in an orderly way
It is my belief that the power we are tapping into is the power of Entropy
Although, I love trying to prove myself wrong
But in the mean time, I believe we can improve on the power we are collecting from entropy
There are ways of collecting power that we are not tapping into (waste)
that does not take away from the energy expended (work)
Such as piezo electric placed in highways, the cars running over these will create electricity and it does not slow down the car
Many more examples
This is kinda what I am going for with these cells, crystal, piezo, galvanic and what ever else you can think of collecting power in concert as one
Best of luck to allLast edited by Allwest; 06-01-2012, 02:26 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Thanks you guys. Definitely spreading the word.
Also, I made I mistake with link for the PDF. I didn't know the direct link could expire, you have to press the download button on the page to get the file.Originally posted by Allwest View PostGood Job guys
Here is the correct link: Crystal Battery Engineering - PV Engineeering Team
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: