This forum is preserved as a permanent archive. The community continues at eMedia Press.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Don't Kill Dipole

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Rebus57
    replied
    Ferrite's and Coil form's

    bytemark.com Ferrite rod supplier. Also for coil forms check with Precision Fiberglass Products Torrance, California, sorry can't find their web address, lost in the infernal machine.
    Last edited by Rebus57; 10-20-2010, 06:21 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rebus57
    replied
    Copper Wire cloth

    Give me a few minutes I will dig them out their pretty deep in the pile but accessable. Ok I purchased a variety of sizes 16x16 .018; 14x14 .020; 24x24 .014; 80x80 .0055. I used copper wire cloth to try and reduce the capacitive effect of a solid plate. Try not to use too tight of a weave or cloth will act as a solid but use large enough size to handle designed output current. My choice was 24x24 .014 for my output tubes and the 80x80 .0055 for CC Tube. hope this help's. Rebus
    Last edited by Rebus57; 10-20-2010, 05:28 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rebus57
    replied
    Did not intend to be rude

    I must apologize for that statment I sometimes speak without thinking I am sorry. The short answer is no. the explanition for this can be found in my theory post (#166) the 3rd note at the bottom. I believe Tesla's device was also high voltage output but the motor windings were HV insulation to take the suspected 2000v. I believe Westinghouse was still building things for Tesla and built the motor to Tesla's specs. the HV also explains the reported thick wires, HV insulation. My plan was to use a isolation transformer designed like one the light company uses on the pole by our houses here,(USA), they have a single primary and two secondaries wound on core in opposite directions to achieve the polyphase effect, these coils are wound on an "E" core with primary in center and secondaries on each end. Energize primary with a pair of output tubes and you will get only 110/220v 50 or 60cy,(depending on firing speed of output tubes, the trigger cir must be very stable), from secondaries. This is how I see a stationary setup. The best thing would be newer devices be built to take it, can't play my 8-tracks any more. Your welcome on the better pics thanks for the tip sorry for the huge waste of time with the others I will be more careful in the future. Thanks for your time, Rebus57.
    Last edited by Rebus57; 10-20-2010, 04:53 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • dragon
    replied
    Rebus57, Is there a specific size copper mesh we should be looking for? I was looking at the available sizes on this site... Copper wire mesh data,prices,helpful information . Quite a bit to choose from...
    ________
    DEPAKOTE WITHDRAW
    Last edited by dragon; 05-11-2011, 10:56 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • sucahyo
    replied
    Originally posted by Rebus57 View Post
    Why do you need to charge a battery ? With 1000a @ 120v available from a briefcase size device I don't see the need.
    Would it be safe to use for electronics directly?


    Thanks for better picture .

    Leave a comment:


  • ABCStore
    replied
    Speaking of asymmetric capacitor and weight loss, take a look at a this experiment. Capacitor is filled with distilled water, then charged and discharged.
    YouTube - liquidcap2.wmv

    ABC

    Leave a comment:


  • quantumuppercut
    replied
    Originally posted by Jbignes5 View Post
    No static potential? Care to explain the leyden jar then?
    I think what lamare saying is that even static potential like inside the leyden jar resides smaller particles that vibrates.

    Guys, what if I tell you the ultimate truth doesn't contain logic? All this aether, free energy, science, thoughts don't mean anything.
    That's the highest state of truth I've realized. Of course it's pointless for our existance but it is the greatest tool for constructive discussions. Everyone will eventually realized this state as the Buddha, Jesus, Tesla, Eistein, and many other high scientists and spiritual masters.

    Anyway, you two and I having the exact thoughts on this matter and I can see it very well.

    Leave a comment:


  • dragon
    replied
    Those are much better, very clear ! Thanks Rebus57 and Slovania for posting them.
    ________
    IPAD ACCESSORIES
    Last edited by dragon; 05-11-2011, 10:56 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Slovenia
    replied
    Better Pics from Rebus57

    Rebus57 Additional Information

    This project is still under construction/ development. Several years ago I built a prototype to prove the basic theory and hardware, (conversion element switching tube), function and both proved positive results but were not right for final device so it was taken apart to use some parts for final design. Please note a few changes made that have not yet made it into the drawing, first the bobbin coils on ferrite cores are reduced to only three per core a center primary and a secondary at each end, all wound with one turn spacing,(about 31t ea.). Second, breakdown gaps will be 1/4 in. (.250) diameter hollow spheres. Third, I settled in on 1/4 in. dia. X 6.000 long ferrites for 100 HZ, (material). Finally FREE ENERGY SHOULD BE FREE please do not offer for sale this stuff. My goal all along this project has been to build it with easily available parts and materials so anyone with basic tools and skills can be successful in their build. Thanks again for the interest, Rebus57








    Last edited by Slovenia; 10-20-2010, 02:33 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jbignes5
    replied
    Think of it like this.

    Originally posted by lamare View Post
    Your post here was interesting to read. However, I think in fact there is no static potential. What we think of being potential is in fact a movement of even smaller particles we used to call ether. So, voltage is a measurement for the amount ether flowing around a certain surface area, which is much like a wing of an earoplane. It has a certain lift you could call "potential" but the actual force that creates the lift is a dynamic one caused by the movement of air around the wing.
    No static potential? Care to explain the leyden jar then?

    Leave a comment:


  • lamare
    replied
    Originally posted by Jbignes5 View Post
    I just wanted to say again that there are two components of any electrical phenomina we can see. One is an initiator (Voltage) and the other is the answer or resultant push back from the environment. We supply one and the other comes from the environment. One has to realize this process for what it is. For ever action there is an equal but opposite reaction when dealing with the environment. When we initiate a potential to be exposed to the environment the environment reacts with an equal but different push back. This push back is with the opposite component of electricity. There are only two.
    Coming back to the frozen waterfall analogy: voltage, potential is not a static force. In my article I explain that with my fandoor analogy.

    Consider a closed cylinder with a piston. If you move the piston into the cylinder, gass pressure will build up which pushes the piston back.

    Now take that same piston and move it in front of a blowing fan. Then you get the same kind of force, only cause by a *dynamic* force, wind blowing agains the piston.

    That is what we have here. If you have a potential difference, a voltage, we think in terms of static forces, but in actual fact the force that makes your charges move and thus causes a current to flow is dynamic, it's like wind moving trough the air.

    So, the trick is to take that blowing wind from your power source, your voltage source, and divert the part you're not using to do useful work somewhere else. So, you want to use your voltage source to cause charge carriers to move such that they don't end up in your voltage source.

    The TROS circuit posted here appears to be just about one of the simplest ways to do just that:

    YouTube - TROS - "bemf"

    You create a current trough your load that cannot reach your battery. You use the "wind" created by your battery to move charge carriers around that do not reach your battery...

    This circuit has some interesting similarities with what Meyer, Puharich and Gray were doing: get a coil into resonance such that you don't have to pay for the current that goes trough the load. This circuit drives the coil into resonance using a different technique, but you still have the load current going *outside* of your driving circuitry!!!!!

    And while it looks at first sight that it may be less efficient in terms of COP, as long as the COP is well above 1, who cares???
    Last edited by lamare; 10-19-2010, 08:53 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • lamare
    replied
    Originally posted by Jbignes5 View Post
    Oh I agree but we are going beyond many's ability to handle such information. To suffice it to say me and you know how the finer elements work but to the layman they would just get confused by those additional facts.

    I wanted it to be simple to handle for the other guys and gals so I chose potential. In of itself potential in all references is just a reflection of the source. It has a reach based on the density of the charges in the source and the density of the surrounding medium of aether. This reach is the smaller particles forming fine structures out of the chaotic sea that all matter resides. kinda how iron orients itself when exposed to a magnetic field which is a different beast all together but is a good analogy.
    Well, we do have a bit of a problem then, because the free energy is to be found in the flowing ether, as Tesla said years ago:
    Nikola Tesla - Wikiquote

    Throughout space there is energy. Is this energy static or kinetic! If static our hopes are in vain; if kinetic
    In that sense, the frozen waterfall anology is what matters here. A frozen waterfall (static) won't turn the wheel of your watermill, while a flowing waterfall will and thus give you free energy....

    Leave a comment:


  • lamare
    replied
    Originally posted by Jbignes5 View Post
    It that to scale of the larger ones? Also what is it made of? From my studies on the Great Pyramids they were actually capacitors. More in the lines of a laden jar but the outside material was just dielectric.
    Very interesting if you connect the dots towards anti gravity, the Biefeld Brown effect:

    The story of the Lifter Project by Jean-Louis Naudin
    The Lifter is an asymmetrical capacitor which uses High Voltage ( > 20KV ) to produce a thrust.
    Ether*Physics

    Summary: The forces of magnetism, electricity, and gravity are simply different types of perturbations in a single fieldMaximizing intensity and nonlinearity in the electric field increases the effect. Ether pressure also influences the natural spacing between electric charges and can thus be measured indirectly by measuring charge density.
    So, if you can create anti gravity with an asymetric capacitor, which basically means creating a difference in ether pressure and thus a flow of ether, me thinks you can also use that principle the other way around. If you have an inflow of ether, which causes what we call gravity, you should be able to somehow charge an asymetric capacitor using this inflowing ether, right?

    So, if you would make an asymetric capacitor shaped as a pyramid.....



    Hmm. This Montalk site seems interesting: Fringe knowledge for beginners:
    Last edited by lamare; 10-19-2010, 08:12 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jbignes5
    replied
    Originally posted by lamare View Post
    Your post here was interesting to read. However, I think in fact there is no static potential. What we think of being potential is in fact a movement of even smaller particles we used to call ether. So, voltage is a measurement for the amount ether flowing around a certain surface area, which is much like a wing of an earoplane. It has a certain lift you could call "potential" but the actual force that creates the lift is a dynamic one caused by the movement of air around the wing.
    Oh I agree but we are going beyond many's ability to handle such information. To suffice it to say me and you know how the finer elements work but to the layman they would just get confused by those additional facts.

    I wanted it to be simple to handle for the other guys and gals so I chose potential. In of itself potential in all references is just a reflection of the source. It has a reach based on the density of the charges in the source and the density of the surrounding medium of aether. This reach is the smaller particles forming fine structures out of the chaotic sea that all matter resides. kinda how iron orients itself when exposed to a magnetic field which is a different beast all together but is a good analogy.

    Leave a comment:


  • lamare
    replied
    Originally posted by Jbignes5 View Post
    MISLED! We are too arrogant to admit that we could have been wrong this whole time. By we I mean the establishment. There are whole industries based off of the mistakes or errors in judgement and they rely on the fact that they have the facts. Well based off what they know they indeed have the facts as it applies to that industry. They then apply those facts to the area of everything else and then are confused when it doesn't fit correctly. In fact after the confusion sets in they shun it because it makes their own facts not so fact based. They will never admit that they are wrong about this because that would loosen the grip that they have on us.

    You are not in fact ignorant but deceived into thinking that you are. It would be ignorance if you chose to ignore the truth once presented to you and I do not see that from anyone that is open to my discoveries.

    Re education is a hard process because we become complacent in the fact that what we thought we knew was correct in every instance and we relied on that notion.

    Oh yeah, we have been misled. The establishment still doesn't understand what gravity is, while in actual fact it is an electric phenomenon. There are standing longitudinal electric waves that are nothing but the flow of ether. Posted on that before. They still believe in SantaStein and then they are baffled when their sattelites run into an area with a higher ether pressure they didn't account for:

    Mystery force in space baffles NASA

    Mystery force in space baffles NASA

    A force in space is hindering the journey of a NASA spacecraft.
    A force in space is hindering the journey of a NASA spacecraft.

    Scientists have been baffled by a mysterious phenomenon that has prevented the craft from moving further into outer space.

    Described as a force that defies all laws of nature, they have said gravity laws may eventually need to be changed.

    Defying all previously-known theories about the universe, the strange force that gently pushes spacecraft away from outer space was discovered last year when the spacecraft Pioneer 10 was stopped in its path by the unknown phenomenon.

    Researchers for NASA have said the force could be a totally new phenomenon that does not fall under familiar titles such as gravity or electromagnetic power.

    A tangible scientific explanation has not been put forward for the fact that the Pioneer 10 left the solar system to start its voyage in a space where there is no solar radiation or planets to attract it toward their orbits.

    Pioneer 10, which travels more than one million kilometres per day, started slowing down in an area where it is not supposed to meet any obstacles.

    Pioneer 10 is the first spacecraft to have taken close photos of Jupiter, which it passed in 1973.

    In 1978, it traveled towards Pluto and reached it in 1983.

    It then left for a region called the Asteroid Belt, which is occupied by several irregular-shaped minor planets.

    The spacecraft, which is currently 11 billion kilometers away from earth, now only travels at 25 centimetres every day, going backwards.
    Oh boy, what a mystery.

    It comes down to this: Einstein was wrong because Morgan didn't want us to have free energy, so they crippled the Maxwell equations which describe the electromagnetic fields by postulating that EM fields must be caused by charge carriers, pieces of matter, while we *know* it's the fields that cause the matter and not the other way around. And so we can't have an electric field without charge carriers, we can't have longitudinal electric waves and we need some freaking coordinate transform known as the Lorentz transform to be able to "generalize" these freaked up versions of the Maxwell equations. So, the good old ether theory went down the drain and now we get mysterious forces that are perfectly explainable with straight simple ether theory. What a joke!

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X