The ultimate secret of free energy: Split the postive AND the negative

[SuperCaviTationIstic]

that seems similar, except only the primary is labeled bucking. It would be like Naudin's experiment. By having ONLY the primary in a bucking configuration, I think it would create a situation were it can't couple to the secondary, just like hum-bucking pickups on a guitar won't let an ambient magnetic field register. That allows for that nice ring-down on the secondary at its resonant frequency without interference from the primary
(on a side note, John Hutchison recommends for a Tesla coil to use a toroidal primary with a regular solenoidal secondary, along with a shorted toroidal choke on the other end of the secondary. Seems good for unhindered resonance by eliminating magnetic orientation of the input from being a factor and converting it to magnetic intensity with no net directional orientation.) very interesting
That doesn't seem like it's the effect we're looking for. This is about impulses (I THINK?)

[Jbignes5]

Might I add this?

Check this drawing out and see if this is what you are talking about....

http://i128.photobucket.com/albums/p171/jbignes5/Teslacircuit.jpg

The second half of the circuit after the first oil filled transformer from the left is statically shielded except for the in and out antennas to better separate the charges and not allow the environment supply the charges directly.

Although some of the circuit I have shown is incorrect per Tesla's design. Stick to the initial Tesla design for the driving transformer and shield everything after that including the transformer itself. The tap can be unshielded but that transformer needs to have the same shielding. The output doesn't need it because we want it to react like conventional electronics.

Maybe this will need to be added?

http://i128.photobucket.com/albums/p171/jbignes5/Teslacircuit-1.jpg

[SuperCaviTationIstic]

I've come to a similar conclusion regarding nodes.
Seems to me that a node which has 2 connections must have about equal flows from both sides to sum in a compression or rarefaction at the node.
Now look at the coil that Tesla tells how to construct in "EXPERIMENTS WITH ALTERNATE CURRENTS OF HIGH POTENTIAL AND HIGH FREQUENCY".
The primary and secondary are split into 2 equal sections turned in opposite directions and connected in series.

Why did he do this? I think it's to simulate a node set! A section of a lattice. A superconductor junction if you will.

Does anyone remember J. Naudin's "bifilar vs bucking coils" test?
JLN Labs - The TEP Project - Bifilar VS Bucking coils

He didn't do the one last test that he should have. What if his pickup coil was a bucking coil? Then we'd have something similar to Tesla's device.

If current flows in series between 2 coils that create opposing fields, would that not be a magnetic nodal configuration? 2 nodes on the ends, 1 antinode in the center.

On the other hand, if 1 continuous magnetic field span the set of coils, there would be an electric node set! Equal voltage on each end, opposite in the middle.

I said it seems to me like it's a superconductor junction, because of the diamagnetic configuration, and the electrons would be going in balanced opposite directions, so perhaps is could create/utilize paired electrons and tunneling!
Has anyone seen that picture of Tesla's Wydenclyff tower that is the same design as this coil, but with a 3rd secondary connected at the antinode? Like a better version of his magnifying transmitter, run the opposing fields against each other at the resonant frequency of the middle coil?

[Jbignes5]

Now thats an interesting analogy Dr...

Very very interesting indeed.

[DrStiffler]

A better picture

@lamare

You may enjoy looking at a little better picture of the 'Energy Lattice' it is more explanatory than what I have posted public yet. The fine detail is far to deep for a general form so this overview is better.

All waveforms (frequencies) of the universe ride on the energy conduits between energy nodes. Each node when opened can offer the entire energy of the universe as it is a virtual connection. You can not increase energy beyond this level, but what is so clear is that you only have to fully access one set of nodes to obtain unlimited energy. The lattice appears three dimensional in such a pictorial view, yet when interfaced it acts as one node set, therefore when you connect say to 1500 node pairs, they all resolve to one node pair, so is mother nature.

To open a node is what you all are looking for, the amount of energy you obtain is how wide you open the door. Think of a door and a mass of people wanting to get through to the other side. What factors affect the number of people per period? I guess most will guess first, how wide is the door, then we say how fast can the people move through, how much mass is each person. All the factors affect who and what gets through the door and even if the door is open.

http://67.76.235.52/images/wake15.jpg

[lamare]

Being compared to Tesla should be an honor not something to shun.

Amen, brother, amen.

[Jbignes5]

The best reference.

I would like you guys to reread this document fully. Try to understand that what Tesla is doing is really what Dr. Stiffler did in his experiment with the diode in water. The effects were different but the method is the same. I'll explain later.

"Experiments with Alternate Currents of High Potential and High Frequency"

Keep in mind about the static shielding of the bulbs to direct the charges to only enter or exit where Tesla wanted them to through a material that reacted to the flow. Well what Dr. Stiffler did with the diode is the same thing except the material was water. The reaction was disassociation of the water in that flow process.

I have made additions and combined Ideas presented in that paper to for a completely balanced system for generation and a tap to extract all the charges one would need to put into another traditional system. This combination of Tesla's ideas makes a system that uses the same principles of Tesla and coincidently Dr. Stiffler who rediscovered that method.

I know Dr. Stiffler hates the Tesla reference but you have to admit that it is the same principle that Tesla saw. Trust me Dr. Stiffler being in the company of Tesla is a good thing. Tesla was an observer. One that could see beyond the box. Being compared to Tesla should be an honor not something to shun.

[lamare]

One more thing on relativity

The fact that Einstein's relativity theory is based on an error, does not mean it cannot produce correct results.

The Lorentz transform is mathematically correct. I trust Thornhill on that one. So, Einstein does give you the correct numbers, no doubt about that. It's just that your image of reality is blurred trough a pair of very awkward lenses known as the Lorentz transform.

That basically means you do get the correct results, but you have no idea what you're really looking at.

[lamare]

What if splitting positive and negative is actually refer to orgone or radiant? And the capacitor is utilized to accumulate the orgone, not the electric?

The problem is how to convert it to electricity. What if the strange design of Ed gray is actually a way to convert orgone to electricity?

If we utilize orgone, the battery do not have to be shorted and kept its charge because orgone circuit only need the voltage, not the current. Voltage potential generate orgone. This satisfy of utilizing power without breaking the dipole.

Just ranting...

Orgone, radiant, gravity, what's in a name?

It's all the same thing. We Electrical Engineers call it the static electric field, which isn't static at all.

[wings]

Cymatic application patent

"This invention relates to an improvement in systems, methods and apparati for handling and processing information, energy and matter by making use of potentials of new technologies, science and industrial art, principally in cymatics, quantum field theory and psychoenergetic science. It comprises...
Inventor: Ernst von Bezold"

Application number: 12/350,960

System of Methods and Apparati for ... - Google Patent Search

[sucahyo]

What if splitting positive and negative is actually refer to orgone or radiant? And the capacitor is utilized to accumulate the orgone, not the electric?

The problem is how to convert it to electricity. What if the strange design of Ed gray is actually a way to convert orgone to electricity?

If we utilize orgone, the battery do not have to be shorted and kept its charge because orgone circuit only need the voltage, not the current. Voltage potential generate orgone. This satisfy of utilizing power without breaking the dipole.

Just ranting...

[Jbignes5]

more on the subject.

Lets take what we think we know today. We think we know what electricity is today. What we are know finding out is that give a conduit to travel you need to exceed the resistance to get travel right? well what happens when we exceed the limits of the conduit with a very high potential? Corona happens right. Well did we look closer at that event? No we think it is very very unimportant. But I say it is the key to the secret. Corona is actually a virtual connection based on static laws to the environments natural network.
This virtual connection is a bidirectional connection with connectors or transmitters lining up to for virtual conduits that flow from source to environment. Kinda like bunching up the spiders webs to become thicker and stronger connections radially outwards which allows for the connectors to pull on charges further away. These charges are actually bunches of the little connectors all facing inwards twords the charge itself. The charge can be seen on the surfaces of the connectors and obey all the laws of statics. Meaning the highest charge is the center of the charge. When a larger charge gets amalgamated it flows internally to the center and becomes the nucleus of the charge pack. Like an onion these connectors and surface charges create a geometric fractal pattern. That pattern is seen in all of the natural processes.

As addition reference I know point you to an example that we have only half of the picture.

http://ia311542.us.archive.org/3/items/dielectricphenom028893mbp/dielectricphenom028893mbp.pdf

I haven't read all of this yet but this might give you an insight as to how this works. Don't take this as the whole truth but it does point you to major keys that electricity or magnetic is only half of the picture. A sub component that is a dialectric also needs to be included in our energy systems. This dialectric obeys the static laws in nature and is the initiator of the electrical effect by potential only. What we commonly call voltage. Once the connection is made the charges enter the system from the environment and flow in our device thru these virtual connections. We only supply the umf or potential to attract more of these real charges into our conduits or wires (traces).
The trick is to find a way to keep a constant or near constant potential in our system and get work out of the flow of charges twords our standing potential. I thing the good Doctor was doing that with a diode connected thru a magnetic connection in water. When the charges were flowing twords the metal of only one side of the diode this performed work on the way there for just having the potential maintained. Well what if we can design the perfect capacitor (laden jar) that could maintain that charge for very very long times. How much work could we get out of that like the good Dr. has shown already but maintaining the potential of the exposed end of the diode in water. This caused electrolysis of the water with only one end of the diode connected to anything. Remember he induced the charge to the one end of the diode. Thats a virtual connection and one that would enable it to work forever at longer periods if we could only use static potentials of electricity to charge the diode with.

[wings]

http://www.mirit.ru/articles/index_en.htm

http://mirit.narod.ru/video/experiments/stw.wmv

index_en

rhythmodynamics

[Jbignes5]

Exactly.

You want to know about what happens on the smallest scale all one would need to look at is the scale they are at. Inferring the process that way would be just as good as seeing it on the smallest scale. That is the one truth that let ancient man look into and calculate when our planet would need to be equalized again.
I truely believe from all I have been researching that this has happened many many times in the past. A cycle if you will that is very very predictable. But like so many things in our understanding we have misunderstood and confused the natural processes with our "Most unnatural" electron theories. You want to know why no one has ever captured the electron? Thats because it doesn't exist. That would be like saying clouds are electrons for which they are not. It is only a shell around the matter that is a field effect. You can add to it and that would impart more charge to the inner well or point charge of the matter making it more energetic but there is no electron. Thats why it can not be seen.
By the way that quote is from Tesla himself. He called his invention (ac) that after he saw what his HV <- (static like) experiments showed him. But as usual man knows they are right. They make up electrons to explain what they don't know or don't truely understand to quantify the mystery without actually detecting the electron.

[lamare]

@Jbignes5: I will look at this later.

So, there's quite a lot of things to check out, but the major conclusion of the whole fractal / Cymatic exercise is this:

There is one and only one difference between "real" gas/fluid/solid matter and the ether (and also planetary systems and galaxies for that matter). And that is the scale at which you're looking at the phenomena. And that has a one to one relation to the frequency of the wave phenomena we're talking about.

That means that f.e. Cymatic experiments and all the stuff Victor Schauberger, for example, figured out is an exact and precise model for the phenomena that take place at that sub-sub-nano scale we think of as "the ether" as well as for the giant scales of planetary systems and galaxies.

Really, there's only one difference, IMHO.