The ultimate secret of free energy: Split the postive AND the negative

[lamare]

I hope you understand this concept. If not ask away.. I would really like your input here guys....

At this moment, it's hard for me to follow you, but let me give you a few references you may like. Yesterday, I read this article. Very interesting:

Free Energy, Gravity and the Aether 10/18/97

My research and discoveries have led me to characterize the aether as follows:

* 1. A superfluidic particulate medium which pervades all space.
* 2. A medium, which in its various modes, is the building block of the physical universe.
* 3. A medium, which, in one of its modes, is responsible for gravity and inertia.
* 4. A medium which is controllable by our mind and can be manipulated my our thoughts.
* 5. A medium which can be controlled by geometric shapes.

There's also an intriguing story in there about how Tibettan munks managed to perform levitation using nothing but sound.

More in this direction:
The nature of Charge - Paul Stowe
An Overview of the Concept of Attenuation [Pushing] Gravity (Paul Stowe) - Mountain Man's News Archive

http://www.vacuum-physics.com/QVC/quantum_vacuum_charge.pdf

http://www.vacuum-physics.com/Maxwell/maxwell_oplf.pdf

And Eric Dollard also said some things on discharges:

http://www.tuks.nl/pdf/Eric_Dollard_Document_Collection/Functional%20Thinking%20-%20An%20Interview%20with%20Eric%20Dollard%20by%20Tom%20Brown%28OCR%29.pdf

http://www.tuks.nl/pdf/Eric_Dollard_Document_Collection/Functional%20Thinking%20-%20An%20Interview%20with%20Eric%20Dollard%20by%20Tom%20Brown.pdf

I'm sure you'll like these.

Update: The book Dollard mentions on Tesla can be found here:
[Projekat Rastko] John J. O'Neill: Prodigal Genius - The Life of Nikola Tesla (1944)

[Jbignes5]

Wow! I like these

It does intrigue me to see the action of the discharges as they are called. And it led me to believe that when this field of both dielectric and charges form they flow in an reaction counter action mode. I also thought that they(charges) get picked up in the invisible portions of the streamer and gain intensity as the charges run into other slower(larger) charges preceding it. This has two effects. One of actually slowing that charge down while it gain in intensity and the other that it has more drag on the surrounding influences. I have postulated that the charges slow because they are gaining in density and can effect more of an area and likewise to the area affecting them. But I am somewhat hesitant to lock that view in because if the charges gain in density then the pull that gets asserted on them gets greater you would think.
It could be that the emissions that are emitted both light and dielectric are splash over from charges hitting the now denser charges and a portion of the charges get flung away in a backwards direction. It could explain the fork like extensions of the discharges.
I am thinking that in higher potentials you get the discharge because the transporters in matter have a set capability to transmit charges. This causes a backup like effect or slow drain effect in plumbing. It could also be that it is from the method of excitation of the matter. A back and forth movement over rides the conduits ability to channel that much and it has no where to go but away. Kinda like the process of making smaller wires. Some a drawn through a die that strips some of the material away and makes the wire smaller.

The really interesting picture is the plate ones. Man it really gives you a different view on the event and shows the density of the charges and sorta how the flow goes on a whole view. You can plainly see the lines and the flow twords those lines in those.

Take picture 4. There is a lot to see in this picture. try to let your eyes relax and look at the left knob. There is a semi bright shell about 1 inch from the surface of that knob on the left. This I believe is a charge shell or charged filled boundry. Like a water surface around the knob. I suspect the charges circulate in that medium around the knob but I haven't figure the dynamics of that flow yet. If you look around the petals as I like to call them the tips have finger like conduits of the dielectric medium with a light charge on them. This is a much better picture of what I see in my mind of what surrounds all matter, just on a very light scale. This also makes me believe that this might even be an accurate picture of an atom. With the networks connecting outwards making new connections to it's neighbor. The knob cap in the photo could be the matter surrounding the internal charges of the material and if I can suggest that the matter is flaky like snow and is statically attracted to the internal charges. This causes a layering effect that overlap each other forming the round appearance when we look at super HD picture of atoms. This creates a pathway around the whole atoms real structure that causes charges passing around the flaky matter in varying densities and pathways. So if we looked at a charge entering the atom through the top roadway traveling twords the matter which is the knob. It then enters the matter slightly but has to swing 90 degrees to travel around the outside of the matters flakes and out the bottom or maybe somewhere before and continue away from the atom. This is the same process that we call gravity when looked at from the scale of the earth. But our earth has distinct ins and outs and they are called poles. Take the scale and back it down to the atom. If the earth has inward rushing charges all falling in slow(outer atmosphere) to fast(near atmosphere) speeds tword the center charge or potential then the same action must be the same on the smaller scales. The charges from the earth rain down constantly going through matter having to go around the matter and exit. This little deviation is the force we call gravity. It should be based on the speed of those charges when it hits the matter and that should determine it's standing weight and the strength of pull on the matter as well.

A few references:
Scanning electron microscope - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia This is what we can see atm... Try looking at the ice crystals. What looks to be solid is actually flaky and layered up close.
Research News: Debut of TEAM 0.5, the World's Best Microscope Pay attention to the section of "New vistas in the realm of the small" Nice gold what? Crystals.. hmmm

I hope you understand this concept. If not ask away.. I would really like your input here guys....

Just a poke at the established status quo.

Science@Berkeley Lab: Looking Toward TeV - Where Cosmology and Particle Physics Meet

They have it all backwards and then wonder why they can not make the connections or unify the whole lot. They make all these words to explain what they don't understand and then try to learn their secrets. They ask if they ever will find the unifying factor and it is starring them right in the face. Blind they are..

[lamare]

This topic was started and boy is it a good way to see the pathways.

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/5637-corona-discharge.html

With the voltage potential being the attractor of the medium and the thin blue lines are actually what I suspect is the charges flowing twords the high potential.

These are just beautiful.

Wow! I like these

[lamare]

Lamare
Seeing as how you have a duke aroo goin on.
something came up today that you [and all]should see

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/271-electric-motor-secrets-48.html

Post 1435

Chet

I uploaded the whole thing here:
Bestandsoverzicht van /pdf/Aether%20Vortex%20Energy%20Converter/

Thanks!

[Jbignes5]

A little more information.

Since I started to read Tesla's descriptions of his experiments little he says does not make sense to me. Here is a nice explanation of something he observed while working in Colorado Springs.

"Tesla's New Discovery" by Nikola Tesla

Although the difference in the capacitance of a wire suspended at a fixed distance above the ground does give this result I am not sure that it wouldn't alter a system unless it's design was so tight as to allow or filter this variation out.

It could be that is exactly what Moray did with his device. He picked up the change and used a natural amplifier (treated crystal) to boost the variation enough to enact a change or provide enough of a swing to drive his device like a quasi crystal radio set. This would drive his setup much like the crystal radio drives the ear piece that is part of the circuit for free.

Although I do believe what Tesla is saying from seeing with my own eyes I don't think the direction he was looking was the source. This of course was the time that he was looking in an outward direction. From my studies I think it was the impacts of the charges rushing into our central source. I would assume that everyone would agree that our atmosphere is very very dynamic? Well this has to be related to the density of the charges changing as it flows twords our source.

I only have one more component to explain at this point and that is magnets. I have found out that after the process of sintering a magnet the internal structure is of a crytaline nature.

Reference:

Neodymium magnet - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Again a crystal reference hmmm most curious.

It seems to me that all a magnet is, is a crystal infused with other crytaline components of different density to form diode like connections withing it's micro structure. This in itself causes the external diectric component to line up in what we call lines of force. Each line of force repelling the other they spread evenly around the structure or as evenly as possibly can be done with a dynamic medium it resides in (dielectric). I don't know for sure about the dielectric lines having charges as a component but it sure makes sense.

If we look at iron filings when exposed to a magnetic source we see that the forms it makes are not as dynamic as we would expect. And it can be proofed by the simple experiment of holding a coil in any orientation from the magnet and it does in fact not produce a voltage. This must mean that these lines are typically not motive in a circular fashion. Once established in the forming of the magnets they are usually inert in that sense and is evident by the motion we have to give to a coil or the magnet for it to either strip or add charges to the wire. Remember that I am thinking that the charges are heavy but not heavy enough to be pulled or added to the lines that the gather around. But when the lines cut a conductor they have the ability to strip or add charges to the wire netting the wire a + or - charge without interfering with the lines but only in the slightest of ways. These lines move but not in the way one would think. It is a spongy mass of these lines. And they are very very dynamic in that sense. Even when a line gets a dielectric negative it has plenty to reform the line in an instant of time.
Ok so I have the fundamental operation down and need to figure out why there are two poles. The only thing that leads me to believe that these are two fundamental particles or Dielectric is because of the direction of the examples of the Sierpinski triangle I referenced earlier. If there was a beginning event of great energetic release whatever the form the you subscribe to you will have to agree that it would have made all kinds of sized particles as well. This would have to be true because thats what we see when we explode things on our scale. Given that we can conclude that these fundamental particles form in different sizes as well. This makes the reference I gave earlier about the triangle more weight when compared to traditional theories. It also might explain why the south pole when compared to the north pole has different strengths in a magnet. With the south being the weakest or less capable of having additional charges because of lack of space, these particles carry the basic charges in it's structure that bind it together and since there is more physical structure when compared to the increased surface area of the northpole particle to the south pole it has less capability to ferry charges. As to the level of difference between the the two I can not say. I don't have the sensitive equipment to measure this.

If Harimein is right about the shape of the apple he shows there is direct correlation to the field a magnet exhibits. Except for the motion he shows I believe that in a magnet there is no motion but that is because the mechanism that drives the lines to be stable (solid Structure of the magnet) and the charges bound to those lines in a steady state only capable of holding so much line and so much charge that gathers around those lines.

If we again look at the components of the magnet we indeed find that Iron is a crystaline structure. Hmmm...

Reference:

"Single crystal of pure iron"

Iron - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[nilrehob]

Posted these at my website: Bestandsoverzicht van /pdf/Patents/Benitez/

Enjoy!

[Slovenia]

Cut Some Slack Please!!

Hi Raui,

I think we should cut Lamare a great deal of slack on this thread. He is an electrical engineer with much knowledge which he is freely sharing with all of us. He has spent a lot of time researching which is apparent from all of his posts and I think we should be very grateful to him for what he has shared with us. He is a great man who deserves a little respect I think. He knows things many of us just don't know and/or understand and yet he still shares with us unlike many others here who don't share and/or care about us.

Let's not kill the goose that laid the golden egg as they say in US.

Best Regards,
Slovenia

Just out of curiosity have you built any of these devices yet? I think you'll earn a lot more cred if you 'put your money where your mouth is' as they say.
Raui

[lamare]

@lamare,

Please please take a look at Benitez patents:

Posted these at my website: Bestandsoverzicht van /pdf/Patents/Benitez/

Enjoy!

[nilrehob]

@lamare,

Please please take a look at Benitez patents:
espacenet — results view
I think You will be inspired!

Tell me if Im wrong but i think Your schematic is a Benitez copy,
here is a small part of one patent that i posted in another thread:

(e and f are diodes)

Its taken from this patent:

http://www.energeticforum.com/attach...191417811a.pdf

Tell me if you have troubles downloading his other patents from espacenet and i will try to help.

This is the thread i started about Benitez:

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/5227-carlos-f-benitez.html

/Hob

[lamare]

Yes! I do have a feeling that the first method would work better all round though otherwise you'd need identical loads which isn't practical in most situations. Just out of curiosity have you built any of these devices yet? I think you'll earn a lot more cred if you 'put your money where your mouth is' as they say.

With the second method I also meant resonating a single, open coil at higher harmonics, so multiples of it's natural resonance frequency as Dr. Stiffler is doing..

As for putting my money where my mouth is, well, if you take it literally I don't have too much to spend on my experiments, because I have a family to take care of. And that also means I don't have much time to actually do experiments. Only during the weekends I can do that.

I did experiment with Dr. Stifflers stuff, a CSET and I experimented with aluminum tubes in a borax solution. See my YT channel: YouTube - l4m4re's Channel

Last week I made the circuit Slayer posted, only I had to use thicker wire. I used all 0.5 mm. It did create HV, though. Lights a neon bulb nicely, but a fluorescent only slightly. I wanted to make that switchable, but it didn't work as I planned it to, so I have to get back at that. Maybe this weekend, maybe later...

I might also try this:

I'm sure I have two identical TF somewhere, but my workshop is always a mess (as you can see in my vids ) and so far I couldn't find them...

Update: Coming to think of it, you probably have to drive two identical transformers in series if you want to do this, so you need three identical transformers. You see, the driving transformer is in quarter wave resonance and the load should be in half wave resonance. So, you would need two of the same transformers in series as load....

Update 2: I am not so certain about the requirement to drive 2 transformers anymore. It depends on wether or not the driving transformer is in half or quarter wave resonance. And that probably depends on how/where you connect the negative terminal of the secondary of the driving coil. So, some experimentation will have to be done to determine the details.

[lamare]

Lamare,

Gravity is a "standing electrostatic wave?"

Yes, gravity sure is dynamic but gravity is not in itself electrostatic
even though electrostatics can increase or decrease the effect of
gravity.

Just stumbled across this article that seems to be an interesting read:

Free Energy, Gravity and the Aether 10/18/97

My research and discoveries have led me to characterize the aether as follows:

* 1. A superfluidic particulate medium which pervades all space.
* 2. A medium, which in its various modes, is the building block of the physical universe.
* 3. A medium, which, in one of its modes, is responsible for gravity and inertia.
* 4. A medium which is controllable by our mind and can be manipulated my our thoughts.
* 5. A medium which can be controlled by geometric shapes.

These may also be interesting:
Ultrasonic Oxygen Generator - 01/12/98
Doctor X Water Dissociation

[Raui]

Exactly!

And a way to do that is to make source and load operate in a different frequency bands, so you can get this non-reciprocal relationship using a high pass filter.

And another way to do that is to use higher harmonic resonances. Then you have what you may see as multiple identical loads in series, but you only have to drive one of them....

Yes! I do have a feeling that the first method would work better all round though otherwise you'd need identical loads which isn't practical in most situations. Just out of curiosity have you built any of these devices yet? I think you'll earn a lot more cred if you 'put your money where your mouth is' as they say.

You can also utilize parametric exciters with orthogonal windings on a transformer to achieve inductance changes without the primary being affected or a special configuration capacitor with a pair of capacitor plates 90 degrees to each other so that one effects the dielectric and therefore capacitance and one is the excited system.

I am going to do a little experiment where I have 1 capacitor that is charged up to 2 - 5kV and try an AV plug configuration on the positive terminal of the capacitor and pulse it and see if I can get a separate capacitor to charge off the potential changing or what I call 'flux modulation'. Although it's not going to be COP > 1 as far as I'm concerned because I'll expend more energy moving my wrists than it will use to charge the capacitor but we all know there are more energy efficient ways of switching. It would show if my device idea I posted above would work or not though.

I think that serious researchers should concentrate themselves on this thread and the thread I made about parametric excitation as these are two methods which non-reciprocal actions are easy to achieve.

Raui

[Slovenia]

Very Interesting

Hi Lamare,

This is very interesting stuff.It's fantastic you were able to figure this all out for us.

Best Regards,
Slovenia

Exactly!

And a way to do that is to make source and load operate in a different frequency bands, so you can get this non-reciprocal relationship using a high pass filter.

And another way to do that is to use higher harmonic resonances. Then you have what you may see as multiple identical loads in series, but you only have to drive one of them....

[lamare]

UFO howto patents

As I posted here(http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...tml#post110603), I did a patent search on UFO patents based on the "basic" book I got from UFO How-To: Build UFO antigravity electrogravitic saucer

Uploaded the patents I found here: Bestandsoverzicht van /pdf/Patents/UfoHowto/

More at: Index of /patents

Compare this patent

http://www.tuks.nl/pdf/Patents/UfoHowto/Magnetohydrodynamic%20propulsion%20apparatus%20-%20US3322374A.pdf

with this picture of a now *identified* flying object:

The balls below the craft are described in the patent as being capacitors....

[lamare]

The non-reciprocal relationship between source and load here I think is the real key to all of this that is; the exchange of potential between systems where a change in one doesn't affect the other.

Exactly!

And a way to do that is to make source and load operate in a different frequency bands, so you can get this non-reciprocal relationship using a high pass filter.

And another way to do that is to use higher harmonic resonances. Then you have what you may see as multiple identical loads in series, but you only have to drive one of them....