Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

gravity waves found

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • CatLady
    replied
    University

    Originally posted by david lambright View Post
    i am the oldest of 13 children, i have 6 brothers and 6 sisters...ben has not seen any of this or has not said any thing as of yet....ben, i believe is the only brother that has not seen this with his own eyes...being schooled in modern physics, he must be skeptical....i am going to take my device to a local university, to see they would like to run a few tests....and jet, i will build another model so you also can test, but you might have to wait a couple weeks extra. jet, thanks for all of your effort on your replication, just remember these effects are very subtle but they are there ....david
    David, do you think you will go to the University of Oregon in Eugene? I have some friends in Springfield and I should see if they know any of the staff there. Sounds like a good idea to get a University to look at it ALSO I think Glen's live broadcast Is GREAT idea too.....give it some thought



    Cat
    Last edited by CatLady; 09-19-2010, 01:33 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • FuzzyTomCat
    replied
    Originally posted by Harvey View Post
    David, if there is anything we can do to help you prove this, please ask. Glen has offered to put it up on a live show for you, I don't know if you saw his post, but he has access to a venue that can air up to 5 hours of continuous video and broadcast that in real time with a high speed up-link. Good stuff

    Cheers,

    Harvey
    Hey Harvey,

    You forgot to mention to David there is not only a "LIVE" venue at Open Source Research and Development ..... BUT it has a "interactive" chat room going on at the same time as the broadcast ..... can't beat that !!!

    Best,
    Glen

    Leave a comment:


  • david lambright
    replied
    ben

    i am the oldest of 13 children, i have 6 brothers and 6 sisters...ben has not seen any of this or has not said any thing as of yet....ben, i believe is the only brother that has not seen this with his own eyes...being schooled in modern physics, he must be skeptical....i am going to take my device to a local university, to see they would like to run a few tests....and jet, i will build another model so you also can test, but you might have to wait a couple weeks extra. jet, thanks for all of your effort on your replication, just remember these effects are very subtle but they are there ....david

    Leave a comment:


  • Harvey
    replied
    how the red blood cells work and it is an electrical bond that causes that action. So, it is interesting that the mind associates a lack of oxygen in the muscles as increased weight. Similarly, when muscles are energetic and we 'feel strong', the mind perceives that things are 'lighter'. It is very possible that David's rig somehow affects the way that blood is bonding to oxygen in the body. It would be interesting to have that tested, a blood test after or during exposure to the rig. If the oxygen is elevates when exposed to the rig, then we may have some proof that the rig does affect the surroundings

    David, if there is anything we can do to help you prove this, please ask. Glen has offered to put it up on a live show for you, I don't know if you saw his post, but he has access to a venue that can air up to 5 hours of continuous video and broadcast that in real time with a high speed up-link. Good stuff

    I have limited resources here, but I will help however I can.

    Cheers,

    Harvey

    Leave a comment:


  • david lambright
    replied
    hi jet

    i will get back to you soon, i need to find out where every one went....david

    Leave a comment:


  • Cloxxki
    replied
    Originally posted by rave154 View Post
    broli.,. great idea for a test there

    simple & to the point
    The test is simple, but can also only show one possible type of anomous effect that I see, a difference between the regular 9.81m/ss gravity, and whichever valid above or around the device. Gravity as it affects objects placed statically relative to the source (or horizon), being Earth.
    Unless being brought in motion. And there may be deeper layers on which David's device works, making it hard to read them.

    Just speculating, to indicate where the turth might go to. Perhaps the device can lighten an object, but only at the expense of another, connected object. To conserve energy. So, the rock feels lighter in David's hands at some stage, I'll accept that as fact. Who knows, his feet may feel heavier by the same amount, just less apparent when you feel anti-gravity messing with your hands. Or, the device itself becomes heavier. Stunning each way, but so much to learn and check before we declare it an energy source :-)

    Leave a comment:


  • rave154
    replied
    broli.,. great idea for a test there

    simple & to the point

    Leave a comment:


  • Cloxxki
    replied
    Originally posted by broli View Post
    Probably the most simplest experiment is attached below and probably mentioned a few times in this thread. No advanced equipment needed.

    The deflection angle gives you instant feedback on weight reduction and the effect of changing parameters like rotational speed.

    Leave a comment:


  • broli
    replied
    Probably the most simplest experiment is attached below and probably mentioned a few times in this thread. No advanced equipment needed.

    The deflection angle gives you instant feedback on weight reduction and the effect of changing parameters like rotational speed.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • Jetijs
    replied
    Hi David, nice to hear from you.
    Since Bruce does not show up anymore, there is no chance in telling when he will sen the device to the next person. Is there any chance for me to get one of your current devices for testing for a while? Of course I will pay for shipping and send it to the next person in line after that.
    As for me, I got my laser cut wheels back and am hoping to put it on a rotating wheel and give it a spin to the max rpm's my motor can get this evening. I will then share the results
    Thanks,
    Jetijs

    Leave a comment:


  • Cloxxki
    replied
    Well said David!

    However, "energy output" may also be jumping to conclusions? It might as well be a conversion of some kind, with the glimmer as energy-neutral by-effect. It doesn not light up in the dark, does it? Then perhaps we're seeing a wave frequency shift more than an emission.

    I wholeheartedly believe that the effect is real, and you deserve to have it named after yourself. However, WHAT exactly it is, or means, will need to be determined.
    Even the gravitational/inertial effects you expereince near the locked device, might be conversions of energy more than an over unity release. We just may for the moment be unaware of the source, and unable to tap the output.

    I'm sure the Lambright effect is a vital puzzle piece in the library of knowledge Ed took to the grave. But which puzzle piece, is yet to be determined. Permanent magnet electrical generator, or anti-gravity? Possibly even a part of his (sonical?) rock seperation system?

    Leave a comment:


  • david lambright
    replied
    hello everyone...

    let me start by saying that this effect is real. not just the glimmer, but the other effects i stated also...there are some people who will try and discredit every thing i have stated, but this fact remains, THIS IS REAL....i have shown about 50 people this device, most see the glimmer right away. a small percentage of people do not see it yet, but given more time they would, and yes i am talking about northwind, but he did feel something...i built a copy and sent it to bruce, he and his family saw the effects, i do wonder where he went to?...witsend built a device,different in design, but she was getting the gravitational anomalies like my device does...spiralout followed my step by step instructions, built a device and got the same glimmer effect...these people have shown the device and its replications to others i am sure, so to even hint that this is not real,at this point, is ridiculous....i have been locked out of another thread on thunderbolts i am not sure why , but they flat out lied about what i had said, i must say its funny. just to discredit my findings and not even doing the experiments...one of them lives 30 miles from me and wont see for him self,that my device works....the title of this thread, "gravity waves found", i wrote to say that this glimmer effect has never been explored fully....i guess i should have put, "something strange found", as the title, but the first one is sure to get attention...witsend was getting the same type of effects where every thing felt magnetic in the field of my device...so if a non magnetic material feels as though it is being pushed and or pulled, what is it?...magnetism?...electricity?...static?...and the glimmer, what is causing it?....many people try to explain away these effects saying that it is caused by heat, magnets, etc....where is the energy coming from to distort the image...my device does not have to be moving to see the effect. the amount of heat energy to create the same distortions that my device produces would have to be a whole lot because my device produces this wave form 24-7 non stop with no extra input and no loss of output....a birthday candle when burning will cause heat type distortions...my device produces more distortions than a single candle, but for simplicity, lets say one candle. how much heat energy would it consume in one day, 24 hours....now i am not saying my device produces heat but it produces the wave form we associate with convection...this must take some type of energy to produce....so what i am saying is my device has a constant output of energy....this needs to be explored further....david

    Leave a comment:


  • sucahyo
    replied
    Do PMH need to be a multiple of 6?

    Leave a comment:


  • gravityblock
    replied
    The Secret of the Universe 1 of 6

    GB

    Leave a comment:


  • broli
    replied
    I've seen haramein nassim's lectures and there he suggests something quite different. From the evidence and facts that have been found on the pyramids, sphinx and other constructions. It is deduced that the "Egyptians" that we know of from the textbooks had nothing to do with them. The structures are much older than historians lead us to belief. Many thousands of years before Egyptian times.
    This is why Egyptology is in the same boat as physics when it comes to a dogmatic belief system.

    I wouldn't be surprised if the same went for Mayan or any other unexplainable-for-its-time-behemoth-construction.

    This would imply the some terrestrial or extra terrestrial species rectified these and some unknown thing happened which led us back to our current APPARENT primitive phase.

    But this information would get us nowhere, it's not technical in any way and most people who have invented things relating to it have seen it in "dreams" or "visions" and are dead.

    To progress we need to look at our current position and possibilities. Many people have suggested good experiments that deserve to be on the front page to keep things organized. A forum thread is not the most efficient collaboration and information tool. If it drags on for too long it usually ends up in a perpetual phase of zero accomplishment.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X