gravity waves found

[Van T Stride]

Ankhs?

Isn't an "ankh" a closed loop resting on a cross-shape? Like a "T" with a teardrop on top?

Seems like a stretch to me. But then I also don't think it very likely that a giant invisible sun is poised on the edge of the solar system ready to redistribute our planetary boides (...in fullfilment of biblical prophecy).

Call me a "doubting Thomas" if you like.

So, if an anhk sign can levitate stones, and with the popularity of the ankh as a form of jewelry, why do you think others have not discovered that they have this ability?

Van

[renevanderlende]

Hi David,

I have not been long into magnetism, so my knowledge is quite limited, but you might be interested in getting in contact with Prof. Andre Geim, who discovered that a very strong EM is albe to levitate organic matter (frog, cheese, piece of pizza. saw it on Discovery just yesterday).

Also Jerry Lamb of Magna Force Inc., who invented "Adjustable Speed Coupling" (some frictionless magnetic drive for turbines), might have some answers for you.


This is my first post on this forum, but you have certainly caught my attention. I am a photographer with a keen interest in physics and also very curious to discover what you are showing us.

I have watched your last video and I see a faint movement above your device (at 720p). From a photographic standpoint you will probably get much better video results when you print a few sheets of paper with a grid of black vertical and horizontal lines and put these in the background (not too close). Video at an angle where you can only see (part of) your device and the grid, then theoretically the waves should distort the grid. Also, play a bit with the lighting: place a main lightsource 1 or 2 feet on either side of the camera and dim the rest a bit. With a bit of luck the waves not only distort the grid, but also reflect light.

I hope this works...

Cheers, Rene

[SuperCaviTationIstic]

David,
after checking your machine, i noticed the shapes of the metal on the sides resemble ankh signs.

ankh - Google zoeken

As being known in ancient egyptology, i know the egyptians used this ankh to levitate stones with. somehow they pointed the ankh on a stone and floated it to its position. in your design the straight end rod is missing, and magnetism flows straight out of the circular shape. i have to think about it what it means, but it might very well be that if we charge an ankh with coils, we can direct a wave an make thing lose gravity.
has anybody thought about this ?

regards
Oliver

exactly.... that's why I suggested earlier/ or on an other thread maybe it was, that the iron rod placed in front of the generator in the picture with Ed standing turning it, was what conducted the energy out of it... Also, think about the way a cyclotron particle accelerator works, with the final linear particle accelerator at the end to shoot stuff out when it gets up to speed.

Take a look at the thread I started about Ed's generator being a magnetic analog to a Tibetan singing bowl, and like a magnetron configuration. http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...ging-bowl.html

[Oliver1975]

David,
after checking your machine, i noticed the shapes of the metal on the sides resemble ankh signs.

ankh - Google zoeken

As being known in ancient egyptology, i know the egyptians used this ankh to levitate stones with. somehow they pointed the ankh on a stone and floated it to its position. in your design the straight end rod is missing, and magnetism flows straight out of the circular shape. i have to think about it what it means, but it might very well be that if we charge an ankh with coils, we can direct a wave an make thing lose gravity.
has anybody thought about this ?

regards
Oliver

[Oliver1975]

Ankh signs

David,
after checking your machine, i noticed the shapes of the metal on the sides resemble ankh signs.

ankh - Google zoeken

As being known in ancient egyptology, i know the egyptians used this ankh to levitate stones with. somehow they pointed the ankh on a stone and floated it to its position. in your design the straight end rod is missing, and magnetism flows straight out of the circular shape. i have to think about it what it means, but it might very well be that if we charge an ankh with coils, we can direct a wave an make thing lose gravity.
has anybody thought about this ?

regards
Oliver

[gravityblock]

Here's a NASA scientist, David Morrison, saying Planet X is a no show, even though NASA is fully aware of there being a possible massive body, Tyche, on the edge of our solar system. Lies, lies, and more lies! NASA knows Tyche is there. Tyche isn't giving off much light at the moment, but as it approaches the magnetic center of our solar system, the more luminous it will become.

GB

[gravityblock]

A group of astronomers have reported the discovery of a new planet possibly inhabitable close to the solar system (40 light years). A group of astronomers can make this discovery with small telescopes at 40 light years away, but NASA can't confirm a massive body on the edge of our solar system? LOL. Everybody knows NASA is a coverup for the real space program.

GB

[gravityblock]

In late September 2010, WISE ran out of the coolant needed to chill its infrared detectors. How cold do the sensors need to be? I thought it was pretty cold in space. Just more lies to try and keep Tyche covered up.

GB

[gravityblock]

Discovery possible but not yet confirmed:
NASA - Can WISE Find the Hypothetical 'Tyche'?

No, WISE won't be able to confirm Tyche, because NASA has shut WISE down. It's funny, how NASA releases an article asking if WISE can find the hypothetical Tyche when it's been shut down. How can it be a hypothetical when they know it's 4 times the size of Jupiter and is made of hydrogen and helium along with where it's located? This doesn't sound hypothetical to me. Besides, NASA has known about Tyche since 1983 and it was on major US news then, but in 1984 NASA tried to cover it up.

GB

[Harvey]

Nasa discovers a new super giant, named Tyche, on the edge of our solar system, which is 4 times the size of Jupiter made of hydrogen and helium.

GB

Discovery possible but not yet confirmed:
NASA - Can WISE Find the Hypothetical 'Tyche'?

[gravityblock]

Nasa discovers a new super giant, named Tyche, on the edge of our solar system, which is 4 times the size of Jupiter made of hydrogen and helium.

GB

[Harvey]

Too bad we can't use the backdrop of the starfield and constellations to measure the parallax and solar deviations.

[Van T Stride]

er...

[gravityblock]

A few follow-up questions: If the point of equilbrium is 3X the diamater of the sun, what do you think would be a noticeable effect of our planet moving closer to or further away from this point (since the orbits of the inner planets are somewhat eliptical) - is there any corresponding change to the magentic field strength on earth? Do you picture this equilbrium point as a spherical region in space, or would it be more like a flat plane slicing the sun through at it's middle - roughly in the same plane as the orbit of the inner-most planets?
-Van

Soon, there will be noticeable effects of our planet moving further away from this point of equilibrium. Our solar system is part of a Binary Solar System with twin Suns, and this complicates things. This other Sun won't emit any light as the light of a Sun only becomes intense when it enters into a secondary magnetic field such as our solar system. Once it enters into this field, then it will begin to rotate while deforming space around itself and generate currents which will give rise to its brilliance. For more information on how the planets will be affected when this other Sun enters our solar system, then see this thread, where I go into great detail.

All the planets move in a given plane which we can call the equatorial plane of the system. The Sun, however, revolves around the magnetic centre in a different plane which, to be exact, lies at an angle of 460 to the mean plane of the planets. The first optical effect that this gives rise to is to make it appear to the inhabitants of a planet that the angle of the planet's axis in relation to the Sun changes as the planet moves round in its orbit every year, giving greater illumination to its northern hemisphere when the Sun is rising towards its upper node, and its southern when the Sun is going down into its lower node. We are also subject to the illusion that the Sun describes a pendulum-like movement in space. It is true that the orbits of all the planets are inclined to a certain extent, but for the most part this is optical illusion, due to the movement of the Sun. The true inclination is due to the Sun exerting a downward pressure and pushing the planet down in its orbit, when rising in its own plane of revolution, and pushing the planet upward when going down in its plane of revolution. The remainder is optical illusion due to the fact that the displaced Sun is taken as a fixed point of reference, which gives the appearance that all the planets are also displaced.

GB

[Van T Stride]

K, thanks

@GB - Sorry, didn't mean any offense by poking on only part of your earlier post.

So, I think you're saying that bodies in space are attracted to each other (weakly?) but that attraction and centrifigul force are not the only forces at play?

I'm a little slow... I had to read your recent posts many times, and am still not sure I fully comprehend it.

A few follow-up questions: If the point of equilbrium is 3X the diamater of the sun, what do you think would be a noticeable effect of our planet moving closer to or further away from this point (since the orbits of the inner planets are somewhat eliptical) - is there any corresponding change to the magentic field strength on earth? Do you picture this equilbrium point as a spherical region in space, or would it be more like a flat plane slicing the sun through at it's middle - roughly in the same plane as the orbit of the inner-most planets?
-Van