Gray Tube Replication

[Wicaksono]

E. V Gray "insider"

If I understand my dates correctly Peter was still in high school at the time. He did have an active interest in this technology but was denied any opportunity for an interview. It seems he was not in a position to be an "Insider" despite his desire to do so.

He later was able to talk with a few relatives but was largely black-balled by the rest of the family.

Peter received the Tom Valentine research documents years later and that became the foundation of his book:"The Free Energy Secrets of Cold Electricity".

I speculate that Dr. Gray assumed that Peter must have been an "Insider" to have such a vast knowledge of the E.V. Gray history.

Thanks Mr. McKay, if Mr. James Gray assumes this, then by his definition you should be an "insider" of E. V. Gray group. Well, please continue your NST experiment, I still have tons of ideas to check with.

Wicaksono

[lamare]

Many of us have speculated on a possible correlation between Dr. Tesla's experiments with disruptive discharges (1892) and his radiant energy experiments (1907) as described by Gerry Vasalatos in his book "Lost Science" and his other book.

However, I don't believe that anyone has proved that these two reported seperate phenomena are one in the same - though it seems they might be. Eric Dollard and Peter Lindemann are the only ones thay have developed a setup that demonstrated the radiant energy phenomena. However neither Eric, Peter, or anyone else has replicated this two decade old important demonstration. So we are really in the dark as to how "radiant energy" is created, much less as to how to measure it. there are a lot of clues in Dr. Tesla's writings but we have a long way to go to even begin to duplicate his work.

Now, is the Gray technology also a "Radiant Energy" process? We don't know. Peter Lindemann made this thesis the foundation of his book "The Cold Energy Secrets of Cold Electricity", and it sounded really good. But, technically we haven't proven anything - yet.

The unfortunate fact is that no one has constructed repeatable apparatus (at least in the public domain) that demonstrates:

1. disruptive arc shock waves that penatrate dielectrics and conductive shields.

2. all of the Tesla radiant energy claimed phenomena as proposed by Tom Bearden

3. The E.V. Gray technology

So it is really hard to take what we think we know from one phenomena (based on Gerry's speculations) and make engineering judgements that applies to another phenomena that we know even less about.

If you think that insulated grids for the CEST is the way to go - then have at it. But, you will have to build and test the equipment yourself. The rest of us are spending our precious time and limited money chasing our own pet ideas. And there is always more wild ideas than what we have money or time to explore.

It is unfortunate, but we don't even has enough understanding about the physics of the phenomena we are searching for to even begin a useful and constructive discussion on the subject - like two structural engineers might discuss the construction of a bridge. About all we have are interesting speculations.

Never the less, I firmly believe that Gray and company hit upon something powerful and important.

We know a lot more than a few months ago. First of all, it is clear that the Maxwell equations in their currently accepted form are NFG, which means Einstein's relativity has to go. See my article on this matter:
Tuks DrippingPedia : Ruins 96 Years Einstein Relativity

This means that we will have to return to the aether model in order to understand the physics we are talking about. Paul Stowe did an excellent job in the direction of formulating a unified aether theory, as I posted a.o. here:

From that, we can theorize about the nature of all that can exist in an eather-like medium:

I don't know how Tesla looked at it, but from my point of view matter is essentially ether in a specific steady-state flow of motion, a flow of motion along some kind of vortex pattern in some kind of medium with fluid-like properties. As I posted here, we have no way to know what the ether is really like. All we can investigate is it's properties in terms of the way the elctromagnetic fields can propagate trough it:

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/8501-why-einsteins-relativity-theory-plain-wrong-3.html#post164759

The problem is that there is no way to really know this from an Engineering point of view, because all we know is that everything that exists in the ether is:

1. steady state flows;
2. longitudinal waves;
3. vortexes.

All that is [physical], is a combination of these three phenemenon taking place in a substance called ether, with fluid-like properties in terms of the way it behaves with regard to electrical phenomena taking place.

This is all we really know about it's properties from an Engineering point of view:
A Dissident View of Relativity Theory by William H. Cantrell, Ph.D. :

"Given that the nothingness of a perfect absolute vacuum is bestowed with the physical properties of a permittivity, e_o 8.854 pF/m, a permeability, m_o 4p x 10-7 H/m, and a characteristic impedance of 377 ohms, is the concept of an aether really that outlandish?"

Now the problem is that the only way we can interact with the ether is trough electro-magnetic phenomena in all the various ways these occur. So, how are we going to know what the ether is like, if we can only investigate it's electro-magnetic properties?

Now even though you cannot know what the ether really is made of, you can mathematically define an ideal "superfluid" and match it's properties to the known properties of the actual ether (permittivity, permeability and characteristic impedance) and then you have a theoretical model of the ether with which you can describe everything that we can know about the ether from an engineering point of view, because we can only interact with the ether by means of electro-magnetic interactions.

And that is basically what Paul Stowe did:
<snip>

What is missing in our current engineering models is the understanding of longidudinal dielectric waves, sound waves trough the aether. These are non-existing in all of our theories. These waves can have all a number of different shapes and forms, which all propagate with a speed of pi/2 faster than electromagnetic waves, regardless of the medium. The most basic form of longitudinal dielectric waves, of course, are harmonic sine waves, but you can also have impulses, block waves, etc.

I am currently working on proving the existence of these waves by means of a longitudinal moon-bounce and have constructed an antenna that at least resonates at the designed frequency, while it is not supposed to resonate according to current theory:

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/9727-who-performs-first-longitudinal-moon-bounce-history-4.html#post173559

Note that I found that I needed to use a balun and needed a dipole in order for my antenna to work. Connect the dots to the Kapagen device...

While this in and of itself is is not conclusive evidence, it is clear that Tesla as well as Wheatsone measured propagation speeds in the order of 1.5 - 1.6 times c as early as 1834.

So far, so good.

In essence, what we have with the aether theory is a scaling down of the kinds of waves that we see in water or air. This gives us some insight in the conditions needed for penatrating dielectrics and conductive shields, which is a phenomenon known as diffraction:

Diffraction - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Diffraction refers to various phenomena which occur when a wave encounters an obstacle. Italian scientist Francesco Maria Grimaldi coined the word "diffraction" and was the first to record accurate observations of the phenomenon in 1665. In classical physics, the diffraction phenomenon is described as the apparent bending of waves around small obstacles and the spreading out of waves past small openings. Similar effects occur when light waves travel through a medium with a varying refractive index or a sound wave through one with varying acoustic impedance. Diffraction occurs with all waves, including sound waves, water waves, and electromagnetic waves such as visible light, x-rays and radio waves. As physical objects have wave-like properties (at the atomic level), diffraction also occurs with matter and can be studied according to the principles of quantum mechanics.

This means that the capability of longitudinal shock waves to penetrate dielectrics and conductive shields depends on the wavelength c.q. frequency characteristics of the particular wave. Extremely steep impulses (high frequencies) are capable of penetrating dielectrics and conductive shields, while RF frequency harmonic waves are not. So, in order to create penetrating waves you need an extremely steep impulse, for which you need a sophisticated device, a real Tesla coil (not those blown up ignition coils called "Tesla coils" today) as described by Dollard:

http://www.tuks.nl/pdf/Eric_Dollard_Document_Collection/Condensed_Intro_Tesla_Coils%28OCR%29.pdf

The transformer's principals of operation are as follows:

The first requirement is the sudden collapse of an energy field thereby producing a sudden impulse of energy,

second is the transforming properties of the odd harmonic ordered single wire delay line (coil) which allow for the production of enormous E.M.F. and M.M.F.,

and third, the dielectric phenomena surrounding the free space capacity terminal.

Whithout these extremly steep impulses, what is being called "radiant energy" is basically longitudinal dielectric (or electrostatic) waves, *without* magnetic component, which propagate at a speed of pi/2 times the speed of normal, transverse waves, irrespective of the medium. So, the medium may also be a coil, which means you can also find specific transverse resonance frequencies as well as specific longitudinal resonance frequencies in a coil, provided you terminate your coils correctly. And you have to make sure your coils are in the proper resonance mode.

Eric Dollard also posted some suggestions:

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/9727-who-performs-first-longitudinal-moon-bounce-history-3.html#post172894

Characteristic for the longitudinal mode is that the wave travels in the length direction of the coil, perpendicular with respect to the coil windings, but it may also be possible to create higher order resonance modes whereby the longitudinal wave follows the coil winding, because it looks like you can also get a dipole antenna to resonate in a longitudinal resonance mode. At least my dipole prototype has a near perfect SWR at the designed frequency, according to the ham that tested it:

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/9727-who-performs-first-longitudinal-moon-bounce-history-4.html#post173559

This antenna also has interesting parallels to Tesla's TMT, especially when one realizes that Tesla also had a 1/4 lambda (I assume) "antenna" structure buried into the ground:

http://www.tuks.nl/img/Anderson%20Drawing.jpg

You can more or less say that my 1/4 lambda whip antenna can be compared to the above ground part of the TMT, while the other half of the dipole is the part Tesla buried underneath the surface of the Earth.....

The pieces of the puzzle are slowly coming together more and more...

[Spokane1]

Other Similiar OU Systems

I would risk a brave assumption that Edwin Gray circuit worked the same way as Kapanadze device and was in close relation to Hubbard generator.
All seems to emerge after Word War I and seems to originate from Tesla or Tesla's assistants among a few others.Yeard between WWI and WWII are full of incredible situations when ordinary people were inventing overunity devices.

Dear boguslaw,

Right now, just about any idea is good. WE have no clue as to just where, let alone how, the non-classical conversion took place. Everything is a crap shot.

I find relationships to the Prentice Circuit, The Hendershot Device, The Tesla Table Top Oscillator, the Myer Cell, and the Swiss ML Machine. I'm sure there are many more.

We are in sore need of an understandable theory of operation (That works thank you). I suspect that when we crack this nut the operation of a lot of old OU devices will become apparent. But we are not there yet.

I have always thought that a solution to these challenges will come from a study of all these old devices. Picking up clues from here and there might be the only way we can move forward.

Until then we will just have to muddle through with what we have to work with.

Mark McKay

[boguslaw]

I would risk a brave assumption that Edwin Gray circuit worked the same way as Kapanadze device and was in close relation to Hubbard generator.
All seems to emerge after Word War I and seems to originate from Tesla or Tesla's assistants among a few others.Yeard between WWI and WWII are full of incredible situations when ordinary people were inventing overunity devices.

[Spokane1]

Dr. James Gray and Peter Lindemann

Dear Wicaksono,

Yes, I was surprised as well when Dr. Gray said he thought that Peter Lindemann was one of E.V. Gray's "Insiders".

As far as I can tell the "Insiders" were given the boot in about 1971 to 1972 -just after Marvin Cole left and E.V. Gray Sr. claimed the technology as his own creation.

If I understand my dates correctly Peter was still in high school at the time. He did have an active interest in this technology but was denied any opportunity for an interview. It seems he was not in a position to be an "Insider" despite his desire to do so.

He later was able to talk with a few relatives but was largely black-balled by the rest of the family.

Peter received the Tom Valentine research documents years later and that became the foundation of his book:"The Free Energy Secrets of Cold Electricity".

I speculate that Dr. Gray assumed that Peter must have been an "Insider" to have such a vast knowledge of the E.V. Gray history.

If Peter had been a member of that group we would be not much better off than we are today as far a understanding the fundamental physics of the process. It appears that the "Insiders" numbered between 6 and 30 individuals who were acting as investors/consultants. I speculated that they had technical backgrounds and were convinced about the power of this technology before the first FE Engines were ever constructed.

Since Marvin Cole never gave up his day job it seems that a lot of work must have been done by these people. Perhaps a great deal of supportive design and innovation as well.

When Gray gave all these early supporters the boot, not one of them was able to carry on with the technology on their own. And I'm sure every one of them would have, if they knew the secret(s). E.V. Gray was lacking a lot of technical skills but he somehow knew that all of these people would be no threat to the future disclosure of this technology after he showed them the door. Yet, all of them probably had a close association with the Motor/Engine design as it was being developed.

These circumstances further support that concept that the real secret was in the power supply/converter and not in the rotary portion of the FE Engine. These people probably worked out a lot of details of a workable electromagnetic pulse engine, but Gray/Cole held the details of the "Cold" Electricity generator. If any of these people saw the internals of the real generator then they never saw the whole picture, therefore any reproduction efforts carried on after their dismissal were in vain.

As it was it took Mr. Hackenberger about 3-4 years to figure out what was going on with the original working equipment right in front of him.

Mark McKay

[Wicaksono]

Dr James Gray interview

Mr. McKay, after I read about your e-mail correspondence with Dr. James Gray, I am surprised about what he said about Peter Lindemann involvement with Gray motor from early years. What is Peter Lindemann's comment about this, do you ever confirm this to him ?

Wicaksono

[Spokane1]

Fate of the 2nd Generation Electrostatic Generators

Thanks Mr. McKay, also I wonder what happened to Electrostatic Generator that Edwin Gray gave to Mr. GD ? Does Mr. GD still have it ?

Wicaksono

Dear Wicaksono,

According to GD: He returned both Electrostatic Generators to Richard Hackenberger on Jan. 9, 1976 when he attended the last stock holders meeting in California. He even has a written receipt to this effect.

Side Notes:

According to a phone conversation with Mr. Hackenberger the 2nd generation devices didn't work near as well as the originals. This is understandable. It seems that "Hack" hadn't yet figured out the technology completly in 1976. The EMA6 Pulse Engine only managed 2% of its design output and I suppose the Electrostatic Generators didn't do much better. Hack admitted that the new Coleman floresent camp lamp lasted 22 hours while his olnly lasted about 16-18 hrs. This is hardly an endorsement for a Free-energy device.

The Electrostatic Generators were never produced even though there seems to have been a substantial effort to due so. They had the design all figured out but couldn't get the right fianacial flooring arrangements worked out with a manufacturer. No one wanted to be on the hook for the cost of the parts and labor with only the "if come" on sales for payment.

Then the "Energetic" [No relation to this fourm] company from Denver bought the rights and just sat on them. By late 1975 they were sueing Gray for breech of contract.

After these events the Electrostatic Generator was never seen again. Which is odd. It appears to me that Gray was in sore need of working equipment from 1980 on. A working Electrostatic Generator would have certainly aided in his selling efforts. Perhaps he was making so much money with the Caymen Island venture that he didn't need it?

I speculate that with the death of Mr. Hackenberger in 1980 Gray didn't have a clue as to how to build an original working Electrostatic Generator and the plans he had for the 2nd generation device were usless. He probably had viable plans for the "Blue Engine" and that was what he might have been hocking.

The original Marvin Cole Electrostatic Generator was an impressive device by itself. It could operate 1400 Watts of connected load (according to Dowd Cannady) from a 6 Ahr motor cycle battery. I conjecture that it was this demonstartion device that inspired the early investors to contribute money for the construction of the late 60's pulse motors.

Mark McKay

[Wicaksono]

GD electrostatic generator

Thanks Mr. McKay, also I wonder what happened to Electrostatic Generator that Edwin Gray gave to Mr. GD ? Does Mr. GD still have it ?

Wicaksono

[Spokane1]

Marvin Cole Interview?

Hello Mr. McKay, is Marvin Cole still alive and can be interviewed ?

Wicaksono

Dear Wicaksono,

If I knew that Mr. Cole were alive and also knew where he lived I would immediatly take a week off work and book a plane ticket to that location.

According to George Gray: Mr. Cole moved on with his girl friend.

According to Nelson Schlaft: E.V. Gray was investigated for possible murder of the original inventor of the technology. Apparently some court proceedings were involved and Gray had to hire a lawyer. He didn't have the money to do so and had to lean on friends and relatives for help. Apparently the charges were dropped.

So, the accounts vary widly.

If Edwin and Marvin were the same age that would make Mr. Cole about 86 today.

Mark McKay

[Wicaksono]

interview of Marvin Cole ?

Hello Mr. McKay, is Marvin Cole still alive and can be interviewed ?

Wicaksono

[kalena555]

A quick update on my tube replication. I got the tube working to a degree, I get grid output( lights a neon bulb) but its quite weak possibly due to the homemade cap I'm using. No scope to test but I wouldn't risk trying to scope the grids output even if I had one. Learn a lot threw this project tho, recieved a shock or two from my HV power supply(won't make that mistake again!) And overall just getting a project built instead of thinking about it.

Mark, thanks for your input it was much appreciated. I do believe that the CEST while interesting, is a project I should undertake at a later time( I seriously need more experience with hv experiments!). Thanks again and happy holidays!!
9

[Spokane1]

[lvleon]

Dear Mark,

The bit of info of getting the motor to run without the tubes is new info to me. So much learn XD. Well now I'm gonna scale back my test setup a bit, I'm on limited funds (aren't we all) but I still will build it just to test it. It's an interesting device regardless and if nothing it will teach me a lot. My experienced in the FE is quite limited in terms of actually building circuits (joules thief mostly and working on a solid state state ssg type circuit). Theory is all well and good but until I start more projects I won't learn more so I'm diving head first into this XD

Download Feynman_Lectures_on_Physics_Complete.pdf for free on Filesonic.com



Quote from Feynman Lectures (p. 12-12):End of quote.



To Mark McKay and Eric Dollard - a huge thanks at the historical submissions files about Ed Gray
With respect
Leonid Volkov

P.S. How I can insert a Figures and Images to this text?
At what address I can to download them?
Tell me, please!

Download pic_79.jpg for free on Filesonic.com
Download pic_81.jpg for free on Filesonic.com
Download pic_70-1.jpg for free on Filesonic.com
Download pic_84.jpg for free on Filesonic.com

[lamare]

Dear kalena555,

If you would like, drop me an email at [email protected] and I shall send you a 50 page history of the CEST device as reference material. Of course this includes all my own speculations which you can disregard. This document is in Word format and includes several photos and drawings.

Mark has sent me a collection of various documents, which I published with his permission at my site:
Directory contents of /pdf/Reference_Material/McKay_Gray_Material/

Enjoy!

[Spokane1]

The Phinney Device (What the CEST was copied from)

Dear Mark,

The bit of info of getting the motor to run without the tubes is new info to me. So much learn XD. Well now I'm gonna scale back my test setup a bit, I'm on limited funds (aren't we all) but I still will build it just to test it. It's an interesting device regardless and if nothing it will teach me a lot. My experienced in the FE is quite limited in terms of actually building circuits (joules thief mostly and working on a solid state state ssg type circuit). Theory is all well and good but until I start more projects I won't learn more so I'm diving head first into this XD

Dear kalena555,

I shall also send you a chapter on where I think the CEST technology originally came from and what its real purpose was - but failed to accomplish its mission in this application.

Review the Pulse Engine Patent 3-890-548. check out the Reference patents. Go down to the bottom (or near bottom) of the list and download the Phinney patent. This device was developed in the LA area about the time Marvin Cole was improving his secret technology. It is a novel system to ignite jet engines and employs two power supplies - just like the Gray patent does. It also has two spark gaps.

Now this is something you can build and probably get to function as a HV switch. But, I wouldn't expect any OU from it.

I speculate that at the time the EMA4 was being developed it became apparent that the spark gap timing used in the much larger Engine was not preceise enough to maximize the avaliable energy. The jitter factor in striking arcs left too much to chance. At the speeds that the engine was operating this became a real bottle neck.

Cole needed a system or device that would allow much more preceise triggering. The only device available in early 1971 was a Thyratron, which would have worked just fine. Except it needed a huge amount of heater current to handle a large pulse. Cole needed the switching feature for just a brief moment about three times a revolution. The Thyratron consumes watts of power continuously. Since the engine did not generate electricity directly any additional strain on the battery would reduce the life that much more. An alternate device was needed.

In fact this is why John Bedini and his mentor Ron Cole (no relation to Marvin Cole) were invited into the Gray shop in the first place in 1973. Gray needed a HV switch and Mr. Hackenberger's experiance was with low voltage transistors. At the time Gray didn't know what a Thyratron was. I'm sure the real inventor did, but didn't employ them because of the energy overhead.

Be sure to have fun with your construction project. No mater how well it does or doesn't work you will add to your skill set to face more complex challenges down the road. Just don't give up your day job.

I won't be back to this computer until Monday. So if you send me that email I will be unable to respond until then.

Mark Mckay