Originally posted by Lidmotor
View Post
I am all for reducing amp draw as much as possible, but I am trying to focus on modifications that reduce amp draw for none or very little loss in light output.
@ AC. "you have only seen one." hmmm.
Your explaination on the dual coil configuration made alot of sense to me. However I didnt factor in the part about one coil discharging into another. Interesting.
I also noted that if the primaries are wired in parallel you can hook both secondaries together and connect to light and then to ground/sink. I have yet to determine if two in parallel offer an advantage over one. Ive been thinking of using multiple coils with half in parallel and the other half in series.
I like the idea of charging a cap with the potential that has already been used by the light, a little like Bodkins has been playing around with. I havent had many results with it yet though. If I use one coil and have it discharge through the light to the charging batteries capacitor (-) I dont see any increase in charging ability, the light is brighter however because it now has a sink.
Many things to mull over...
The 25 ohm rheostat resistor that I'm using as a voltage/current control on the source battery helped matters to. Good luck.
I was surprised. I have always thought that you could not close the loop like that. I am going to leave the LB hooked up like that. It makes the whole thing alot easier. I set it up like you said so that I can still use the unit as a charger when I want to. The little battery pack will run the light for 4 hours now between charge ups. That is enough for me. Us 'old folks' go to bed pretty early these day.
Finally I got tired of it and just did something else for the day.
All for one one for All

Comment