Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ReGenX Coils and ReGenXtra switching

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • BroMikey
    replied
    Steel rotor cancellation upgrade FAILURE, I told ya so?Forgot to tighten the motor bolts, duh.

    Last edited by BroMikey; 05-17-2020, 01:16 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • bistander
    replied
    Originally posted by Treacle View Post
    ...
    Researchers:
    ...
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kfRxsC9yumQ
    ETC Or am I wrong?
    Hi Treacle,

    What does ETC stand for?

    And I would like to see comments from Turion regarding the video demonstration of the bifilar generator coil. It confirms what I have said was the reason he sees 'speed up under load'.

    Thanks,

    bi


    ​​​​​

    Leave a comment:


  • BroMikey
    replied
    Steel rotor does not work the same as a liquid plastic non magnetic material. The spaces in between the magnets attract during opposition cancellation and repulse over the magnet counteracting one another. Does not show any improvement using steel rotors as a place holder for magnets. Fiber glass sheets would work well, also carbon fiber GLASS structurally is not considered a liquid. The price for such a plate? Unknown as most only sell 1/8" thick. If you do find some figure $5000 per sq. ft. On the other hand you can buy fiber clothes for little or nothing, mating, resins

    Leave a comment:


  • BroMikey
    replied
    Did some testing after putting the generator back together for Monday class. I notice without the magnets 1 core drag can not go above a higher speed than I have been using to see what happens. As it turns out when I try getting past 1200-1300 rpm's without counter magnets I can turn the amps way up and it won't go faster. On the other hand she goes up to the higher speed with the opposing magnets for only a slight increase. It seems I need to go to the new 28vdc scooter motor for faster speeds and for making more accurate measurements. I can only imagine what 10-12 coils and core would be like if one throws a fit getting past 1300 rpm's

    Leave a comment:


  • BroMikey
    replied
    Originally posted by Treacle View Post
    In fairness, it should be noted that any generator has a counter-action of the rotor with the stator only for the good ones, it is very smooth and for the cheap ones with sticking, when the rotor rotates, this interaction takes away drive energy in any case... Modern generators and motors make of higher quality iron capable of working at 400 or more hertz.
    https://youtu.be/LMB2Rrpz9yg
    Models with a core winding almost do not create losses at idle, although even under minimum load they slow down. It would be fair to make a comparative test of ReGenX with just such a generator
    Yes I agree, amorphous material suitable 1000 hz is what the ReGenX man uses. I use 60hz core very bad

    Leave a comment:


  • Treacle
    replied
    In fairness, it should be noted that any generator has a counter-action of the rotor with the stator only for the good ones, it is very smooth and for the cheap ones with sticking, when the rotor rotates, this interaction takes away drive energy in any case... Modern generators and motors make of higher quality iron capable of working at 400 or more hertz.
    https://youtu.be/LMB2Rrpz9yg
    Models with a core winding almost do not create losses at idle, although even under minimum load they slow down. It would be fair to make a comparative test of ReGenX with just such a generator

    Leave a comment:


  • Treacle
    replied
    https://patents.google.com/patent/US20140111054A1/en
    You should have noticed that the Thane C. Heins bifilar coil with a wire of two parallel wound conductors whose ends are connected in series, has an increase in inductance which allows you to get more voltage but with less current. But the main reason for the small inductive interaction is the placement of the coil in the middle of the magэnetic circuit where there is practically 0 magnetic field ...
    Perhaps a PWM that shortens the coil allows for more efficiency:
    https://youtu.be/YqpSNbDFhEshttps://...be/YqpSNbDFhEs

    Leave a comment:


  • BroMikey
    replied
    Originally posted by Treacle View Post
    ...
    Suppose there are 2 high-speed multipolar generators with the same groups of coils but with cores of different materials: 1) iron; 2) ferrite. 1) generation compensates for a part of the expended energy and replenishes the source so that the same consumption as in 2) at idle and no more comes out. TE will be idle consumption with a ferrite core is equal to the consumption of loaded with an iron core. Too high magnetization reversal frequency for 50 (60) hertz transformer iron leads to its (induction) heating for a better understanding of the link to researchers below and the experiment with ferrite:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uAXtB_7RkEg
    (you can watch from the middle), of course ferrite is less suitable for motors ... and not practical ... <br> Regen-x technology is a bad core + high inductive resistance of the winding works like a bud to compensate for the Lenz law, but in fact, compensation only occurs which can be avoided. Modern generators and motors make of higher quality iron capable of working at 400 or more hertz and almost do not create losses on the twentieth. Researchers:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YUoyuiQTrRA
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kfRxsC9yumQ
    ETC Or am I wrong?
    All of your input is excellent. Very intelligent. However let me make this short and sweet. MY generator does not care which core I use though it may be improved as you said. The real secret is in the way the coils are wound together to form a MULTIFILAR COIL. In my case 50 strands 72 feet long each (Looks like a rope) are turned onto a spool and later connected in series. Start there, you will never let it go.

    Also using cancellation magnets to oppose the attraction side core drag further will increase COP.

    Leave a comment:


  • Treacle
    replied
    ...
    Suppose there are 2 high-speed multipolar generators with the same groups of coils but with cores of different materials: 1) iron; 2) ferrite. 1) generation compensates for a part of the expended energy and replenishes the source so that the same consumption as in 2) at idle and no more comes out. TE will be idle consumption with a ferrite core is equal to the consumption of loaded with an iron core. Too high magnetization reversal frequency for 50 (60) hertz transformer iron leads to its (induction) heating for a better understanding of the link to researchers below and the experiment with ferrite:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uAXtB_7RkEg
    (you can watch from the middle), of course ferrite is less suitable for motors ... and not practical ... <br> Regen-x technology is a bad core + high inductive resistance of the winding works like a bud to compensate for the Lenz law, but in fact, compensation only occurs which can be avoided. Modern generators and motors make of higher quality iron capable of working at 400 or more hertz and almost do not create losses on the twentieth. Researchers:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YUoyuiQTrRA
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kfRxsC9yumQ
    ETC Or am I wrong?

    Leave a comment:


  • BroMikey
    replied
    Thane Heins releases a video had been working on since the early 2000's and then posts one of many experiments. For all you late bloomers. Before he moved on he let his work be noticed in 2008. It takes years guys better get going.

    Old thinking

    Complete with university speech tick and tape measure clicking






    Last edited by BroMikey; 05-16-2020, 10:30 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • BroMikey
    replied
    ................................

    Part 2 Cancellation Magnets thanks to MadMack, present company not excluded
    That tiny 10mm shaft is as smooth as a silky garment plus my fingers are calloused and dry yet with
    no effort I can move the rotor along out of the locked position while running drag has been cut to a minimum. Not bad, I am patting myself on the back. Someone needs to do it I will get the job done you slugs.




    Last edited by BroMikey; 05-16-2020, 09:40 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • BroMikey
    replied
    Originally posted by bistander View Post

    Your logic is like this:

    2 rotors.
    Green one and a blue one.
    Green rotor draws 2 amps.
    Blue rotor draws 5 amps. That is observable fact.
    Your conclusion is blue rotors draw more amps than green rotors.

    you reject Newton's First Law.

    bi
    Where does this space chicken get blue and green for the color of the 2 rotors. The amp draw is 1.8amps and 2.9amps respectively. If you can't get that right you need your head examined. The rotors are black dimwitts.

    Dave what planet does this guy live on? Are you serious about a conversation with a low IQ #@&^%? Seriously?




    Last edited by BroMikey; 05-16-2020, 07:50 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • bistander
    replied
    Originally posted by Turion View Post
    bi

    That the amp draw increased with the larger rotor is an observable FACT. You can argue theory all day long, but the amp draw still went up, which is what I said would happen. Period. I was right. What does that make you? I'll give you a clue...WRONG.
    What was I wrong about?

    bi

    Leave a comment:


  • Turion
    replied
    bi

    That the amp draw increased with the larger rotor is an observable FACT. You can argue theory all day long, but the amp draw still went up, which is what I said would happen. Period. I was right. What does that make you? I'll give you a clue...WRONG.


    bi is WRONG
    https://youtu.be/LFlnhVQLWPk
    https://youtu.be/RvB3arCUPNg

    I can do this all day.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kfYie-NRL2Q

    Leave a comment:


  • bistander
    replied
    Originally posted by Turion View Post
    bi

    That the amp draw increased with the larger rotor is an observable FACT. You can argue theory all day long, but the amp draw still went up, which is what I said would happen. Period. I was right. What does that make you? I'll give you a clue...WRONG.
    ...
    Your logic is like this:

    2 rotors.
    Green one and a blue one.
    Green rotor draws 2 amps.
    Blue rotor draws 5 amps. That is observable fact.
    Your conclusion is blue rotors draw more amps than green rotors.

    ​​​​​​Yes, I believe you. The amp draw increased with the heavier rotor, but not because it is heavier.

    That's what I've said from the start. But you don't believe me which means you reject Newton's First Law.

    bi

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X