Oscillating Reed Switch Pulse Motor.

[Allen Burgess]

Multiple sets of "Hex nuts".

Ludic science locks six "Hex nuts" with a spark from a 12 volt battery. What would take place if a second set of "Hex nuts" were set up around the wire? Would the spark lock the second set for free?

Let's say we strung 12 sets of "Hex nuts" bound by rubber bands around the wire. Would we get a locking effect on the extra 11 sets of nuts for the same input cost?

Now, if we got the locking effect on all 72 nuts, the next question would be; What would happen if we doubled the length of the wire and added an additional 72 "Hex nuts" for a total of 144?

TPU Bruce is demonstrating something in his latest video to help. The answer is that; The magnetic locking field is generated by the copper wire! The same spark should be able to double the magnetic locking force on the matching sets of "Hex nuts" with twice the wire length for the same input power!

The question that follows is; Can this magnetic broadcast field be made to turn a magnet rotor? The prospects for (Over-Unity) performance are obvious.

The seconday A.C. spark from a Ruhmkopff Coil can either be sent to a capacitor and coupled antenna coil for an LC tank oscillation to broadcast an electrical A.M. radio signal, or rectified, like Branly and Tesla did to generate a pure D.C. pulsed magnet wave to do work.

The critical difference between radio and magnet wave power transmission is the coil and capacitor LC tank for RF, or the rectifier for pulsed D.C. magnet wave broadcast on the Ruhmkopff A.C. secondary coil. The LC tank oscillation generates the electrical side of the electromagnetic wave and the rectified D.C. the magnetic.

[Allen Burgess]

Branly steel ball coherer.

A better picture of Branly's "Steel Ball Coherer" below:

"The Steel Ball coherer consists of a glass tube enclosing six steel balls. It operates on the "dirty contact" principle discovered by Hughes. An adjustment at the top of the tube provides a way to vary the pressure on the stack, thereby changing the electrical characteristics of the detector".

Branly rectified the High Voltage A.C. spark from a "Ruhmkopff Coil" secondary, to magneticly lock these steel balls from a distance, with a pure D.C. spark discharge. After locking, they conducted an electrical current. This is identical to the "Hex Nut" effect. The "Hex Nut" lock effect required 50 amps at 12 volts or 600 watts of power in the "Ludic Science" video. The Branly spark should only require .024 micro-amps at 25,000 volts to deliver the same 600 watts of locking power to the "Steel Ball Coherer" over a distance of 20 meters.

[Allen Burgess]

Power gain from copper wire.

TPU Bruce shows himself generating more power out then power in just by adding lengths of copper wire:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X1uzG0G0NIA

[Allen Burgess]

High voltage diode rectifier.

This (2 amp) - (30 kv) diode is $25 off ebay. I think the bridge may need 4. That's $100.

I think a High Voltage rectifier bridge assembled from these diodes would allow us to lock those "Hex nuts", with antennas, from accross the street off a HV ignition coil spark. The same broadcast spark should lock a multitude of "Hex nut" sets in the same range vicinity.

2CLG 30KV 2A High Voltage Diode HV Rectifier Tesla Ham

[Allen Burgess]

POWER, not current alone, and that a higher voltage ratio increases the distance that the magnetic field can be broadcasted.!

[Allen Burgess]

Branly "Coherer" and Hex nut magnetization.

We see six steel Hex Nuts magneticly locked by a high amperage spark in the video linked below:

Then, below that, we see a picture of the "Branly Coherer" that magneticly locked six steel balls from a high voltage electromagnetic radio wave!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E5rFQNQ3JK4

Branly generated high voltage A.C. sparks from a "Ruhmkorff Coil". "The action of the electrical discharge diminishes as the distance increases; but he observed it easily, and without taking any special precautions, at a distance of several yards by using a Wheatstone bridge".

So "Branly" discovered that the magnetic power was multiplied by adding a D.C. rectifier to the high voltage ignition coil spark!

I'm betting I can get a spin result off the single wire simply by rectifying the high voltage A.C. current to D.C. like Branly did. I plan to try that next.

[Allen Burgess]

Wi-Fi camera.

I bought a new Wi-Fi digital video camera from "Radio Shack" today. I'm charging the internal battery right now. I can't wait to upload my new "Marconi Pendulum" video. I believe this will be a historic precedent setting video!

[Allen Burgess]

Spark collapse "Coherer Effect" magnetic propulsion..

I managed to get the kind of effect I was looking for with a very simple test set up. The magnets are suspended by a thin copper magnet wire, grounded to the ignition coil at the top. The magnet wire swings in close to the positive high voltage electrode, untill a nice size spark jumps; Then as the magnets swing back on the pendulum arc, the large spark collapses. I believe this "Spark Collapse" generates a magnet wave that imparts a push to the stack of neo-magnets and sustains the pendulum oscillation. I've been timing it for several days now. The pendulum motion dies off when the power's disconnected. This kind of "Spark Collapse" magnetic field propulsion has nothing what-so-ever to do with current.

The basic law states that "The amount of current in a coil directly relates to magnetic field strength" this law may have an exception!

The "Spark Collapse" might be considered more of a "Coherer" effect.

[Allen Burgess]

Pulse power from spark.

I found a way to get the spark to produce a propulsive effect on the magnets. I connected the ignition coil ground to the top of the magnet wire attached to the magnets, and the high voltage end near to the bottem over the magnets, to generate the "Plasma Vortex" there, and it's producing an oscillation in the magnet stack. I plan to upload a video of this effect soon.

[Allen Burgess]

LLC tank effect.

So far I have had no success spinning the magents over a single wire with the high voltage "Plasma Vortex" spark and cathode magnet. I did discover an interesting effect however; The neo magnet stack rocks in a pendulum motion over the single wire after the power's turned off. I think the fully charged 2500vac .75uF 60/hz capacitor is in LLC tank oscillation with the ignition coil, and that this is imparting motion to the very sensitive suspended axial magnet stack. This motion slows down and stops when I disconnect the capacitor wire. I plan to try and spin with a power coil next.

[Allen Burgess]

High voltage spin.

I gave up on the 12 volt relay and went with the Austin Jewsbury 2500 volt microwave capacitor, 26 Kv ignition coil and wall dimmer plugged into a 120 volt outlet. This setup is throwing a powerful 1" long spark!

Running the high voltage alone through the "Oersted" wire has no effect at all on the frictionless over head magnet stack. Next comes the important "Plasma Vortex" experiment. Look at what the magnet on the cathode of the spark plug does to the plasma arc in this video below:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UMJ3eCHZtGY

This next test promises to be very exciting; To finally find out if the swirling plasma will spin the magnets.

[Allen Burgess]

I'm interested to see where you go with this without the spinning magnet.
A series wound bifilar secondary should avoid the Lenz' law problem of secondary reflection, should it not?
Bob

@Bob,

I'm part way done with the "Buzz Coil". I have a knife switch wired to the wall transformer and the positive and negative pins of the relay soldered to the knife switch. I'm preparing to move forward with the spin tests. I need to buy a spark plug wire and a 600 volt capacitor tomorrow at the auto parts store.

The bifilar coil is definitly among the test components. I should have a nice video uploaded this comming week.

A rotary spark gap, driven by a small D.C. motor should be able to pulse the high frequency current to gradually speed the magnet rotor up to where the A.C. sine wave can grab hold, if it dosen't spin up by itself.

[Bob Smith]

Let's say ...that we simply lay a second wire next to the first. The oscillating high voltage A.C. magnetic field from the primary wire will generate electric current in the seconday wire laying along side it through induction. (Oversimplification) The amount of output would be directly proportional to the lengths of the wires, with a constant input.

...
We really don't need to spin magnets to generate power from the oscillating magnetic field. Lenz's law is the enemy of the rotating magnet generator because any increase in gained magnet force factors out from increased drag at output.

I'm interested to see where you go with this without the spinning magnet.
A series wound bifilar secondary should avoid the Lenz' law problem of secondary reflection, should it not?
Bob

[Allen Burgess]

Induction and Lenz's law.

Let's say instead of spinning a series of magnets with the high voltage A.C. oscillating current through a wire, that we simply lay a second wire next to the first. The oscillating high voltage A.C. magnetic field from the primary wire will generate electric current in the seconday wire laying along side it through induction. (Oversimplification) The amount of output would be directly proportional to the lengths of the wires, with a constant input.

Spinning a magnet with that high voltage A.C. current and generating power in an output coil would be ruled by the same laws governing the copper mass to output proportion as in the wireless system; That's why Tesla used the term "Magnifying Transmitter": The power's magnified by the size of the antennas.

We really don't need to spin magnets to generate power from the oscillating magnetic field. Lenz's law is the enemy of the rotating magnet generator because any increase in gained magnet force factors out from increased drag at output.

[Allen Burgess]

Tesla's Wireless Transmitter and Receiver.

Prof. Konstantin Meyl is the worlds leading physicist in the research on scalar waves. When asked if Tesla's "Wireless Transmitter and Receiver" was Overunity he replied "It would depend on how you designed it".

Running A.C current into a spiral broadcast coil generates magnetic waves. Doubling the size of the broadcast coil doubles the oscillating magnetic field with the same power input. The reciever coil needs to match the broadcast coil in mass and geometry to maintain resonance. Doubling the size of the antennas doubles the COP!

It should be clear how the copper mass determines the Pin/Pout proportion. My point is that, in the end, we get the same deal with Tesla's wireless system as we would get with the wire current and magnet spinners.