ENLIGHTENED MAGNETISM (The Full Proof of Ken Wheeler's Theories)

[Ufopolitics]

Got a question...

Ok,

If the Magnetic Viewing Film...reveals clearly the exact position where the "supposed" Domain Wall is in every magnet we approach it to...:

[IMG][/IMG]

With even millimeters of thickness in certain magnets and exactitude and accuracy/precision to almost molecular levels:

[IMG][/IMG]

Like in above Arc Segment of 2.5 mm thickness...

And "supposedly" a Domain Wall is to be "encrusted" within the magnet's mass right?...meaning it "supposedly" ONLY EXIST within where the "physical" domains are located...in the very crust and intrinsically "built in" the magnet's mass...

Then how come it could be clearly seen...that same light green stripe appear right in the middle of nowhere...right on Space...right in the center between Two Magnets separated by an Air Gap..?

[IMG][/IMG]

[IMG][/IMG]

Who is gonna answer that?


Bistander...You are welcome here...well... after you finally accept there IS the existence of a Main Domain Wall in the center of every magnet...of course.


Ufopolitics

[bistander]

Bistander,


See, that is your problem on above quoted post...you keep looking at the microscopic levels while ignoring (or simply denying to accept) the Big Picture. And I really can not understand why?...if you can find those images all over the net!!!

All you have to do is type in any search engine:

Magnet Domain Wall Pictures

And I have uploaded some of them that I thought displayed a better understanding into my Photobucket, for you to analyze better on this Forum previously...now I see it was in vain...so, my final conclusion is that you are in one of those two "States of Mind" I cited before...or maybe both simultaneously, idk...:

1- Ignoring it.
2- Denying to Accept it.

Which one is worst?...I honestly don't know...


Let me try to explain it again...

Say you get two magnets and attach them together by normal opposite poles attraction...what happens then?

Answer: What happens is that you actually "made" a larger magnet with double the strength as a result of both attached magnets added up...simple right?

And you agree with me previously when I showed you what happens when two magnets are attached by attraction:

[IMG][/IMG]

AND NOT THIS BELOW:

[IMG][/IMG]

Now go back to your microscopic domain wall view per molecular structures...how will they align?

Answer: Exactly the same way as the previous two magnets attached above...except there are thousands or millions of them...and lined up in 3D structures/chains/bridges according to the magnet's volume...

And so every time you get a bunch of magnets and attach them together by their normal attraction...they will "UNIFY" into a big magnet with a CENTER MAIN DIVISION originated naturally and that not necessarily need to be a perfect line...nor a straight 2D plane.

I know for little kids this is kind of hard to understand...but how old are you now?....

Hi Ufo,

So we agree there are millions of domains in your magnet, not just two, correct? Next step: Please clarify, do you believe all the South domains migrate to the red end of the magnet and all the North domains to the blue end?

Or as I believe, that the magnetic material is essentially homogeneous down to the microscopic level and that the material in the red area is the same as the material in the blue area? And that on a microscopic investigation, it all looks the same, even the middle where you claim there is a wall. The middle is just like all the rest of the magnet.

The North and South poles (or Blue and Red) are just visualization aids to identify the direction of the field.

So again, my point, there is nothing in the middle of the magnet different from the rest of the magnet. If you want to imagine an invisible dielectric inertial plane there, fine with me, but I see no value in it.

Regards,

bi

[dR-Green]

I chose the Polarity of the Scope?...

That was the best one you have shot so far...I thought you knew better than that!

You know the Scope, any scope, would "interpret" (meaning process) ANY Signal...and send it to screen the right way?...no matter if I just use One Terminal...the "Positive" or the Probe Pen without the gator clips?

It would invert the polarity. The scope doesn't know positive and negative. It displays the signal as is. Inverting the probe is to invert the signal.

[Ufopolitics]

This was not new...

[IMG][/IMG]

Site: Resonant domain wall nucleation

Main Article:

Time-Domain Observation of the Spinmotive Force in Permalloy Nanowires

The above image and sites...are just to demonstrate this Topic is absolutely NOT a new concept or discovery...that by moving the so called "Domain Wall" we obtain electric output...

However, above was referred to Nano scale Models where outputs are given in Micro Volts (uV)...in my video I demonstrate a much higher output is available by different type of displacements vectors and exciters.
Plus it was dedicated not to a Domain Wall...but to a Dielectric Plane Demonstration of its existence.


Thanks to all for visiting.


Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

Hi Ufo,

Unless you're God, you cannot state with any certainty what I knew. And awareness and acceptance are different.

At any rate, my point is that there are millions of very small (microscopic) domains in that magnet of yours, not 2 like you illustrate and seem to believe. It is my understanding that each domain has walls between it and its neighbors. How many of these walls are Bloch walls? I don't know. But I do not believe there is a dividing wall at the geometric center between the north and south poles of every magnet.

You say there is and call it a main domain wall or Bloch Wall and also a dielectric plane. I don't know about that for sure. Heck, I don't even know what a dielectric plane is. You and Ken seem to need counterspace to explain that. So let's not go there.

I know this is from wikipedia, but I have seen it elsewhere many times and believe it is an actual microphotograph of domains.





bi

Bistander,


See, that is your problem on above quoted post...you keep looking at the microscopic levels while ignoring (or simply denying to accept) the Big Picture. And I really can not understand why?...if you can find those images all over the net!!!

All you have to do is type in any search engine:

Magnet Domain Wall Pictures

And I have uploaded some of them that I thought displayed a better understanding into my Photobucket, for you to analyze better on this Forum previously...now I see it was in vain...so, my final conclusion is that you are in one of those two "States of Mind" I cited before...or maybe both simultaneously, idk...:

1- Ignoring it.
2- Denying to Accept it.

Which one is worst?...I honestly don't know...


Let me try to explain it again...

Say you get two magnets and attach them together by normal opposite poles attraction...what happens then?

Answer: What happens is that you actually "made" a larger magnet with double the strength as a result of both attached magnets added up...simple right?

And you agree with me previously when I showed you what happens when two magnets are attached by attraction:

[IMG][/IMG]

AND NOT THIS BELOW:

[IMG][/IMG]

Now go back to your microscopic domain wall view per molecular structures...how will they align?

Answer: Exactly the same way as the previous two magnets attached above...except there are thousands or millions of them...and lined up in 3D structures/chains/bridges according to the magnet's volume...

And so every time you get a bunch of magnets and attach them together by their normal attraction...they will "UNIFY" into a big magnet with a CENTER MAIN DIVISION originated naturally and that not necessarily need to be a perfect line...nor a straight 2D plane.

I know for little kids this is kind of hard to understand...but how old are you now?....


Take care



Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

Hi UFO.

After watching several YT videos I am more and more becoming convinced that there are big differences between permanent Magnets fields and electro magnetic fields. One video ( I think it was by Tinman) showed clearly the vortex of a permanent magnet, whereas the electromagnet didn't

Again, looking forward for your next installments. The more you puzzle me, the more I like it.
Thanks again.
Best regards,
Ben

[bistander]

@Bistander:

Hi Ufo,

Inside the magnet there is not an all North domain on one end and an all South domain on the other end divided by a wall down the middle. I don't believe there is anything "in" the magnet in the middle which shows as the white line on your images.

Up to that discussion we had in the above quoted post from you in another thread...you did not even know about the proven discovery and existence of a Main Domain Wall or Bloch Wall, exactly in the middle of every single magnet in the world...search Felix Bloch discovery of its structure.

Hi Ufo,

Unless you're God, you cannot state with any certainty what I knew. And awareness and acceptance are different.

At any rate, my point is that there are millions of very small (microscopic) domains in that magnet of yours, not 2 like you illustrate and seem to believe. It is my understanding that each domain has walls between it and its neighbors. How many of these walls are Bloch walls? I don't know. But I do not believe there is a dividing wall at the geometric center between the north and south poles of every magnet.

You say there is and call it a main domain wall or Bloch Wall and also a dielectric plane. I don't know about that for sure. Heck, I don't even know what a dielectric plane is. You and Ken seem to need counterspace to explain that. So let's not go there.

I know this is from wikipedia, but I have seen it elsewhere many times and believe it is an actual microphotograph of domains.

Photomicrograph of NdFeB, the magnetic material used to make neodymium rare earth magnets, under a Kerr-microscope, showing the magnetic domain structure. The metal is composed of microscopic crystal grains. The domains are the light and dark stripes faintly visible within each grain. Due to magnetic anisotropy, the crystal lattice of each grain has an "easy" preferred direction of magnetization, and the domains form as stripes roughly parallel to this direction. The magnetization of light and dark domains is opposite, parallel to their long axis. In most of the grains the domains are parallel to the surface, but in the outlined grain the "easy" direction of magnetization is almost vertical, so only the ends of the domains are visible. ).

bi

[Ben2503]

Thanks Ben,

If you think this Video was mind boggling...then just wait for Machine Applications, and please fasten your seat belts...

I like that video, the guy is good, fast, sharp...I love that kind.

Particularly a paragraph I have copied from time 14:36:



Where I kind of disagree with Distinti's Magnetic Wave Theory...is that we can not just simply "jump" to the New Theories of Magnetic Waves structures...IF our simple and merely Source, the Field, the Magnet, the Electromagnet... has not been dissected to the Max possibilities by experiments.

However, I do agree there are electromagnetic waves that travel at a distance...But my focus at this point is still in the close range distance effects primarily...Why?...just because they are the ones directly involved when we are talking about Electrodynamic Machines development...

That is my "Field" so far...

Thanks again and Kind Regards


Ufopolitics

Hi UFO.
Glad you liked it. This guy is also very 'common sense' driven and that's what I like.
I am not a blind follower and do not agree to all he (or anybody else) is putting forward but I have the greatest respect for guys like him and you that put so much effort in trying to get a better understanding of the world around us.

After watching several YT videos I am more and more becoming convinced that there are big differences between permanent Magnets fields and electro magnetic fields. One video ( I think it was by Tinman) showed clearly the vortex of a permanent magnet, whereas the electromagnet didn't

Again, looking forward for your next installments. The more you puzzle me, the more I like it.
Thanks again.
Best regards,
Ben

[Ufopolitics]

Great video (as always) UFO!!
Really mind boggling. Looking forward for the next episodes.
Best regards,
Ben
P.S you may want to watch this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lGmn...SrtI_EvryYCqBt

Thanks Ben,

If you think this Video was mind boggling...then just wait for Machine Applications, and please fasten your seat belts...

I like that video, the guy is good, fast, sharp...I love that kind.

Particularly a paragraph I have copied from time 14:36:

Scientists blindly defend what they were taught (most really don't understand what they were taught); therefore, science has become a religion based on blind faith.

Where I kind of disagree with Distinti's Magnetic Wave Theory...is that we can not just simply "jump" to the New Theories of Magnetic Waves structures...IF our simple and merely Source, the Field, the Magnet, the Electromagnet... has not been dissected to the Max possibilities by experiments.

However, I do agree there are electromagnetic waves that travel at a distance...But my focus at this point is still in the close range distance effects primarily...Why?...just because they are the ones directly involved when we are talking about Electrodynamic Machines development...

That is my "Field" so far...

Thanks again and Kind Regards


Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

Hello,


Thanks Brother Mikey,

@Bistander:

Hi Ufo,

Inside the magnet there is not an all North domain on one end and an all South domain on the other end divided by a wall down the middle. I don't believe there is anything "in" the magnet in the middle which shows as the white line on your images.

Up to that discussion we had in the above quoted post from you in another thread...you did not even know about the proven discovery and existence of a Main Domain Wall or Bloch Wall, exactly in the middle of every single magnet in the world...search Felix Bloch discovery of its structure.

If you keep looking at a Magnetic Field as a One(1) simple loop from North to South...Ignoring any center "interference" like in reality takes place....then all those formulas will look nice and dandy...but they don't apply when we see the real deal.

If You insist on keeping the same Closed Mind about something proven otherwise, then that is called stubbornness, and I can't keep dealing with a completely closed mind.

There is absolutely no angle between iron cylinder and magnet cylinder, they interact exactly in a straight, vertical line. And it is NOT just to "place" cylinder on top of magnet's pole...there must be a directional space travel accelerated by SELF attraction or like Ken calls it a Linear Voidance.

It is way more than what we all have learned, the formation of a dielectric plane right at the tip of iron cylinder under the influence of the field shows there is more involved that simply comes to when dealing with classic magnetism...Or is it a secondary "Domain Wall" formed there?...absolutely NOT, Domain Walls are supposed to form between Two Opposite Domains, a North and a South...in this case the iron is just an extension of whatever that influenced polarization was, a continuation...so what it is formed there on the tip of the iron cylinder?

When we approach two magnets by their opposite/alike poles the formation of a "Third dielectric field" (having in mind there are one dielectric at each magnet's center) takes place, except that it forms exactly in the middle of "nowhere"...in the exact space between both N-S poles, no matter if the distance to approach varies...the "constant" field will remain right in the middle spatial between both bodies, until they make contact, then all fields UNIFY into just one...right at center of the two magnets...

So then We could ask ourselves...Does a Domain Wall can form right in the middle of the Space between Two Opposite Polarization separated by a considerable air gap?...and not only within the ferromagnetic mass?


Those facts above will change everything right?

The "N-Machine" from DePalma shows clearly the collection of Energy Differential between equatorial plane of Magnet and either one of the two extremes center...and so Faraday's Disc...None of this "phenomena" has been explained clearly by Classic Magnetism.


Take care guys


Ufopolitics

[Ben2503]

Great video (as always) UFO!!
Really mind boggling. Looking forward for the next episodes.
Best regards,
Ben
P.S you may want to watch this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lGmn...SrtI_EvryYCqBt

[bistander]

Nice going UFO, don'tcha think, BI??

http://web.mit.edu/8.02t/www/materia...tion_W08D2.pdf

From page 7 of that linked presentation:



I think that when the iron cylinder is placed on top of the magnet, the angle of the flux through the coil is altered. The third bullet in that slide applies. And also notice the minus sign per Lenz.

bi

[BroMikey]

As in E = - dΦ/dt. It is arbitrary since you choose the direction of coil turns, polarity of the magnet and polarity of the scope. If you could actually analyze and define the flux field change in the space occupied by the coil, then you could see that the polarity of E would adhere to Lenz.

bi

Nice going UFO, don'tcha think, BI??

http://web.mit.edu/8.02t/www/materia...tion_W08D2.pdf


I am still listening to the presentation guys, great info but I think
the simple explanation to how right Ken is comes down to seeing
fields with more modern techniques. We have all of the work of
Howard Johnson that no one seems to ever talk about that was done
long before Ken came around.

When it comes right down to who is right and who is wrong about
possible theories I will always stick to the rule of thumb procedure
I came up with many years ago that goes like this:

If the university told you that the theory is one way and someone
told you it is another, it probably is a lie on the college level side or
let's say "Not the whole truth"

It is video's like UFO has put out here today that are far more
enlightening and there is no teacher there to tell you to go sit
in the corner when the students begin questioning the faulty reasoning
that "They" call concrete. Many you men and women have pointed out
how they view any experiment with very young, sharp minds who
have been told they were wrong, when in fact were seeing clear.

For this I have developed a righteous hatred for arrogant bullies who
never once in their lives gave precedence to any real science, only
show-boatings religion.

Hats off to UFO and any real thinker who is not a push over taking it laying down because "TEACHER SAYS SO"

I'll be back.

[Ufopolitics]

As in E = - dΦ/dt. It is arbitrary since you choose the direction of coil turns, polarity of the magnet and polarity of the scope. If you could actually analyze and define the flux field change in the space occupied by the coil, then you could see that the polarity of E would adhere to Lenz.

bi

Oh come on Bistander,

Sorry, but it seems you are now running out of "other logical possibilities" so then you are resorting to nonsensical ones.

The direction of the last tested coil, the highest output one...I swap it so many times related to also so many different probabilities...however, ALL just rendered/pointed to the expected results according to the Vorticity of each tested polarized field versus the winding directions.

Besides, you know that everything here is Relative...A loose Coil only needs to be wounded one way, then just by turning it related to magnet axis we have exactly the opposite geometries.

You also know exactly what a typical moving coil into magnet induction sine wave output of plus and minus over time would look like...where it is very obvious the In-Out signal reflecting in sine plus sine minus...where Lenz would exactly that same sine but minus...and not only in a simple math formula...but real observation on scope...No such thing here, it is just a very straight up vertical spike with the negative also reflected and written there in every test.

I chose the Polarity of the Scope?...

That was the best one you have shot so far...I thought you knew better than that!

You know the Scope, any scope, would "interpret" (meaning process) ANY Signal...and send it to screen the right way?...no matter if I just use One Terminal...the "Positive" or the Probe Pen without the gator clips?

Now, please, let's take a brake from our dialogue here...and let me hear what others have to say...


Take care


Ufopolitics

[bistander]

...then where is the negative equation of the same magnitude represented by Lenz Law in that signal?

As in E = - dΦ/dt. It is arbitrary since you choose the direction of coil turns, polarity of the magnet and polarity of the scope. If you could actually analyze and define the flux field change in the space occupied by the coil, then you could see that the polarity of E would adhere to Lenz.

bi