ENLIGHTENED MAGNETISM (The Full Proof of Ken Wheeler's Theories)

[Ufopolitics]

Three Phase Overlapped Sinewave

Hi Ufo,

This took me a while. But I think I see. You show basically a 4 phase AC generator. So wouldn't the output waveform look like this 3 phase except with a forth hump? See below.

[IMG][/IMG]

BTW, you do some nice graphics. Impressive.

Regards,

bi

Hello Bistander,

Thanks, having full control over 3D Graphics and software is an enormous help to visualize this whole magnetism "enigma"...

Now the final sinewave result depends upon the way we connect the induced coils.

For example, a much more simple approach than the one you have shown above:

[IMG]Also, the main point to observe in both pics above, is that peak sinewave is reached when rotor coil and induced coils are fully aligned-engaged.


Regards


Ufopolitics

[bistander]

AC generator

Hello to All,

I spoke on previous post about Cycloids in Induction...well here I would expand just a bit...

Cycloid is the Magnetic Field Rotational Continuity of Flow through Time.

To visualize this better, look at below Graph CAD:

[IMG][/IMG]

Above are the same basic concepts as previous generator I have shown, except that here it is based on Eight Single Independent Coils (Not Overlapped), and spaced apart in order to simplify understanding.

The Rotor is the same type, a main coil fed by linear DC, in order to maintain a static polarization. But it could easily be just a permanent magnet...

The point here is to show how each rotational polarization, by Influencing each ferromagnetic core, transfers its flow converting it in an electron traffic at the coil winds...that we all know as Energy...or Electricity...

So, North Spiral (Blue) is spinning CCW and South Pole (red) CW...and this is referenced based on setting our point of view right at the center of rotor axis.

Generator rotor, looking from above is turning CW (like most of them do)

And to picture this Sequence in a linear fashion let's look at Graph below, where we are observing only a half turn progression of rotor:


[IMG]

Hi Ufo,

This took me a while. But I think I see. You show basically a 4 phase AC generator. So wouldn't the output waveform look like this 3 phase except with a forth hump? See below.

BTW, you do some nice graphics. Impressive.

Regards,

bi

[bistander]

E1 and E2 are just the Exciter Coils connected to Diodes, then to Rotor via brushes.

The green coils are the Generating Coils.

The empty gaps are just like that, empty.

But maybe you did not understand the diagram windings, I am just representing the upper side of each coil, but they wrap around below as well which is not shown. Label L# are for each coil to correspond with the other side. like L1 to L1, L2 to L2 and so on.

I made Graph bigger and without any fields, just plain wiring to see it better:

[IMG][/IMG]

[bistander]

There is always a climbing sine (slope up)...a peak sine (top)and a downhill sine stage (slope down) ... if all conductors are cut with same magnitude, angle, etc, like you are writing above...how could this happen according to you?

Hi Ufo,

It is because of difference in flux density around the air gap. So I don't understand your "same magnitude" comment. And you also have the sum of the series connected coils. The voltages generated in the coils vary with the coil's position. The total voltage is what shows at the terminals.

bi

[Ufopolitics]

Thank You UFO, I see my answer now. You are a fun wiz-kid
cause you know how to explain things and have some great graphics
tools at your disposal. Let the nay sayers perch on a limb and roll their
eyes cause that is all they were pre-programmed to do

As for you recent entries? God Almighty fella I am still reeling from the
overload/back slash dude I love your stuff.

I been waitin on you and you have gone the extra mile here.

The Modified Motor works something like this if I read my UFO's right.

Thanks BroMikey,

You know I have piles and piles of this stuff scattered all over my hard drives...meaning this is not something I made up a few minutes ago...lol

I am just very happy because most of my testing are resulting very positive with the machines am working on, confirming all these old CAD's Graphics, so I decided to keep posting all this data...


Regards Friend


Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

Ufo,

nice explanation. While thinking about your view of magnetism I'm trying to understand how the model you are presenting fits some very basic experimental results. The simple case is the single straight wire where a current is forced into: how does your model fits in this case ? How does the model explains the force and magnetic field associated to that ?

Thanks,

nathan

Hello Nathan97,

Could you be a bit more specific, a drawing or more detailed explanation about the straight wire?

You are not referring to a single wire moving along a uniform magnetic field and connected to a galvanometer right?

Thanks


Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

Hi Ufo,

Interesting read. The conventional terminology defines stator as the stationary part and rotor as the rotating part of the machine.

Hello Bistander,

I just call it "rotary stator" like I mentioned before...because of being a fixed fed DC coil, whether it is a brush or brushless, talking from the magnetism point of view, it always delivers a fixed, static polarity at those ends.

Also in these dynamos, all the flux lines are considered radial across the air gap. So essentially (tangentially at the air gap).

There is always a climbing sine (slope up)...a peak sine (top)and a downhill sine stage (slope down) ... if all conductors are cut with same magnitude, angle, etc, like you are writing above...how could this happen according to you?

The CAD I have shown of this Generator are from a real 3kW Head I have for experimenting...I copied, exactly every slot, every wiring...exactly as they are.

Below are the complete CAD:

[IMG][/IMG]

E1 and E2 are just the Exciter Coils connected to Diodes, then to Rotor via brushes.

The green coils are the Generating Coils.

The empty gaps are just like that, empty.

But maybe you did not understand the diagram windings, I am just representing the upper side of each coil, but they wrap around below as well which is not shown. Label L# are for each coil to correspond with the other side. like L1 to L1, L2 to L2 and so on.

I made Graph bigger and without any fields, just plain wiring to see it better:

[IMG][/IMG]


Regards


Ufopolitics

[nathan97]

Ufo,

nice explanation. While thinking about your view of magnetism I'm trying to understand how the model you are presenting fits some very basic experimental results. The simple case is the single straight wire where a current is forced into: how does your model fits in this case ? How does the model explains the force and magnetic field associated to that ?

Thanks,

nathan

[Ufopolitics]

What is really the Lenz Effect?

I believe that by now would be easier to understand what is really the Lenz Effect?

The Lenz Effect is just whenever we pull away the Rotational Magnetic Field from a ferromagnetic Core (or Air Core as well) which has been previously Induced .

The effect repeats when we try to push field again to the same coil-core (after rotation being influenced by Lenz) this time opposing from our positive field to "screw" back in.

The analogy for comparison would be the same one that Herman Minkowski mentioned way back...The Cork Screw Mechanical Effect.

Whenever we push forward a magnetic field into a generating coil, it "screws" an influence on core and wires according to pole direction...so, when we pull back, a reverse flow would be created on both, core and wires, generating an opposite spin, which opposes our pulling movement.

This effect applies when we are migrating (by rotation or linearly) the magnetic field from core to another core (lowest point on Cycloid) within same polarization, or whenever we are entering a previously induced opposed spin polarization (example: from North to South, or South to North, when switching to a new Half Cycle).

It would be also understood that when generating coil is loaded, meaning closed, the reversed field effect would be much stronger, therefore, generator rotor would become very stiff to turn.


Regards


Ufopolitics

[bistander]

Hello again,

Below I have made two CAD Graphics based on the typical type of AC Generator we must are familiar with, which consists of a center rotary stator (stator from the fact that it is always magnetized by A DC feed), DC converted from just two diodes inside casing, collecting from additional and separate induced coils set where generating coils are and transferred via couple of brushes sweeping to continuous slip rings.

But the main point here is to differentiate where the two main Induction concepts differ:

First I will display what we all know "believe" is taking place, as the Academia have taught all of us...:


[IMG]"cutting" perpendicularly Only the Vertical Conductors within that circled area.

So, this is the peak output (top positive sine wave and top negative sine wave) for all the conductors numbered respectively on left: L2, L1, L8, L7...And on right side : L3, L4, L5, L6.
And let's make sure you all understand that this peak Induction timing according to rotor positioning is perfectly correct.

What is not correct (and very wrong) is the way of interpreting this Induction Process is taking place...:

First, such "Imaginary Lines of Force" ONLY exists under the Iron Filings Method over a piece of paper on top of field, but not in any other more advanced methods to image Magnetic Fields.

All the other Methods coincide on a separation from both polarizations, (a center waist) plus, in specific scanning with a B&W CRT (single electron beam) we can see each rotational nature and directions very clear.

And even whenever the iron filings are used on a 3D Liquid Volume, we can see that separation from both poles, while such "Imaginary Lines of Force" are not observed:



THE ACTUAL INDUCTION PROCESS:



So, the Graphic above shows the Real explanation and note that Peak Induction is taking place, exactly at the same angle from rotor as previous Graph (rotor has not been moved), except, that it is based on the spinning influence from each field polarization on the laminated iron core, then transferred to the respective copper coils winded around those specific core elements under the spinning spatial influence.

And below Graph shows the 3D Divergent Volume Area for both polarizations:

[IMG]

[IMG]"cutting" perpendicularly Only the Vertical Conductors within that circled area.

So, this is the peak output (top positive sine wave and top negative sine wave) for all the conductors numbered respectively on left: L2, L1, L8, L7...And on right side : L3, L4, L5, L6.

{The peak generated voltage occurs in the unlabeled and E1, E2 conductors (slots).} edit... incorrect statement in brackets {}... my bad. See posts 645 & 649 for details.

Regards,

bi

[BroMikey]

Thank You UFO, I see my answer now. You are a fun wiz-kid
cause you know how to explain things and have some great graphics
tools at your disposal. Let the nay sayers perch on a limb and roll their
eyes cause that is all they were pre-programmed to do

As for you recent entries? God Almighty fella I am still reeling from the
overload/back slash dude I love your stuff.

I been waitin on you and you have gone the extra mile here.

The Modified Motor works something like this if I read my UFO's right.

[Ufopolitics]

About Induction Cycloids...

Hello to All,

I spoke on previous post about Cycloids in Induction...well here I would expand just a bit...

Cycloid is the Magnetic Field Rotational Continuity of Flow through Time.

To visualize this better, look at below Graph CAD:

[IMG][/IMG]

Above are the same basic concepts as previous generator I have shown, except that here it is based on Eight Single Independent Coils (Not Overlapped), and spaced apart in order to simplify understanding.

The Rotor is the same type, a main coil fed by linear DC, in order to maintain a static polarization. But it could easily be just a permanent magnet...

The point here is to show how each rotational polarization, by Influencing each ferromagnetic core, transfers its flow converting it in an electron traffic at the coil winds...that we all know as Energy...or Electricity...

So, North Spiral (Blue) is spinning CCW and South Pole (red) CW...and this is referenced based on setting our point of view right at the center of rotor axis.

Generator rotor, looking from above is turning CW (like most of them do)

And to picture this Sequence in a linear fashion let's look at Graph below, where we are observing only a half turn progression of rotor:


[IMG]

[Ufopolitics]

When observing lines of force via iron filings or compass needles etc
what you are seeing is things in their lowest energy state?

Hello Iamnuts,

Yes, that is perfectly correct.

What you are seeing are the Centripetal (lowest magnetic return to discharge AT center plane) from both poles exchange plus also from the Higher Pressure levels from pole to pole cross flow exchange.

If you check any magnet, including Neos...at their center (equatorial zone) you will notice this is actually the lowest magnetic force area for either Attract or Repulse.

You could check with any sophisticated and expensive equipment...like a Gauss Meter...or simply and cheap...approach an opposite pole to this zone...then compare Attract Forces versus top pole.

Or, just approach a like pole to check repulsion, versus the top pole of magnet.

Even a piece of iron would do...

This zone is where both pole returns cross flows, so they are weaker there.


Regards


Ufopolitics

[Iamnuts]

When observing lines of force via iron filings or compass needles etc
what you are seeing is things in their lowest energy state?

[Ufopolitics]

Wrong and Right Induction Process Interpretations...

Hello again,

Below I have made two CAD Graphics based on the typical type of AC Generator we must are familiar with, which consists of a center rotary stator (stator from the fact that it is always magnetized by A DC feed), DC converted from just two diodes inside casing, collecting from additional and separate induced coils set where generating coils are and transferred via couple of brushes sweeping to continuous slip rings.

But the main point here is to differentiate where the two main Induction concepts differ:

First I will display what we all know "believe" is taking place, as the Academia have taught all of us...:

[IMG]"cutting" perpendicularly Only the Vertical Conductors within that circled area.

So, this is the peak output (top positive sine wave and top negative sine wave) for all the conductors numbered respectively on left: L2, L1, L8, L7...And on right side : L3, L4, L5, L6.

And let's make sure you all understand that this peak Induction timing according to rotor positioning is perfectly correct.

What is not correct (and very wrong) is the way of interpreting this Induction Process is taking place...:

First, such "Imaginary Lines of Force" ONLY exists under the Iron Filings Method over a piece of paper on top of field, but not in any other more advanced methods to image Magnetic Fields.

All the other Methods coincide on a separation from both polarizations, (a center waist) plus, in specific scanning with a B&W CRT (single electron beam) we can see each rotational nature and directions very clear.

And even whenever the iron filings are used on a 3D Liquid Volume, we can see that separation from both poles, while such "Imaginary Lines of Force" are not observed:



THE ACTUAL INDUCTION PROCESS:



So, the Graphic above shows the Real explanation and note that Peak Induction is taking place, exactly at the same angle from rotor as previous Graph (rotor has not been moved), except, that it is based on the spinning influence from each field polarization on the laminated iron core, then transferred to the respective copper coils winded around those specific core elements under the spinning spatial influence.

And below Graph shows the 3D Divergent Volume Area for both polarizations:

[IMG]