ENLIGHTENED MAGNETISM (The Full Proof of Ken Wheeler's Theories)

[bistander]

Help understanding your logic

... by allowing light to pass through the lower saturated part of the ferrofluid.

...

Hi Ufo,

In your first paragraph, a couple things need further explanation in my opinion. Many ferrocells use edge lighting with opaque backing. How is light passing through?

Are you speaking about magnetic saturation? Of the ferrofluid in the cell? Can nanoparticles saturate? Aren't all the dipoles in the particle already aligned? Or are you speaking of the combination of particles, in which case, wouldn't saturation just be alignment?

Lower saturated? I don't understand. Saturated means full. If it is less full, then it isn't full.

Regards,

bi

[Iamnuts]

As I. suspected Markoul, you're a wimp.
Ken called Einstein an "idiot" and referred to Quantum
as "bull****".
I'm expecting to see a Nobel prize soon.
John.

[Markoul]

iamnuts,

All these optical effects Rayleigh scattering and so on have little to unimportant role to play once the ferrocell is activated by an external magnetic field where refraction index of ferrocell is directly and almost exclusively overruled and controlled by the polarization of external magnetic field induced in the ferrocell.

If you don't want to accept the real field flux geometry of dipole magnetism shown by a modern nanomagnetic single domain (go read about single domain to understand their importance) nanoparticles observation device and stick to the 200 years old grandpa iron filings showing just where the relative positions of the two poles are and really contribute nothing more to the knowledge on magnetic fields and their actual vortex structure shown correctly by the ferrocell and furthermore to understand that everything in nature and the cosmos spins and creates a vortex, that's fine with me and I respect that.

Also NOT comprehending as shown by your previous reply to me, that ferrocell is totally transparent to magnetic flux coming from both poles of a magnet , therefore 3D Euclidean field of magnet is projected on the 2D surface of ferrocell and therefore flux lines appearing as interlaced at the 2D surface however actually overlapping in 3D space,

with other words don't believing that the image we get from the nanomagnetic ferrocell is due magnetism but rather due some light interference phenomena, that's fine with me and I don't really care to convince you otherwise,



However, name calling a person you don't really anything about in your first reply to me without anything done from my part to provoke you and actually kindly greeting you at the end of my post,

and insulting me... this I DON'T TOLERATE AND ALLOW and I don't respect you.

NEXT TIME iamnuts I WILL NOT BE SO KIND WITH YOU!

take care,

EM

[Ufopolitics]

"Basically we have created many millions of "slits" that have the freedom to self-align with the lowest potential of the field."
I have great respect for Timm, he's a good researcher. Sometimes things discussed are not particularly from his point of view.
The above quote is important because of the" self align with the lowest potential
of the field" this is happening in 2d although it might appear as in a gas.

Hi Iamnuts,

The fact that Ferrocells reacts, aligns their metallic nano particles with the lowest potential of the field is a great advantage...by this metallic particles aligning on the lower potential side, they will darken those lowest potential zones, then showing the HIGHER POTENTIAL SIDE by allowing light to pass through the lower saturated part of the ferrofluid.

Think of it as the 35mm film...it contains some silver crystals which are sensitive to light, when light is processed through the camera and sent to film for fractions of seconds, those crystals which receive the strongest light become metals which obstruct light (become dark)...so we get a "negative image" which is basically lightening up all darker areas of the image while darkening all lightened areas.

Ferrocell is more like a "positive image" rendering of magnetic fields, all particles aligning at lowest potential of spectrum, allowing light to pass through the HIGHEST potential side...and that is what we all see "illuminated" at the lens.

Also the Ferrocell has the capacity (same as 35 mm Film) to show GRADIENTS (smooth degradation's) between Hi-Lo Zones, which render a smooth transition and a Higher Definition Image of the Magnetic Fields.

Ferrocell takes a bit to process the image of the Field, similar to how a Polaroid Film does, except that it will clear back up again when field is not present, also in a slow process. One thing that must be careful with ferrocells...is NOT to leave them exposed for long times to a magnetic field, because it will "burn" the cell...darker blemishes will appear and that's it...not good anymore...sometimes after a few months, it may rearrange itself...but most of times is just trash.

We need to look at the field from any particular point in space, with a compass
although the needle assumes the lowest possible state the pivot point is FIXED.

I agree with you in a 100%...that we should be able to see the field in a "spherical view" around it to perceive a full 3D Imaging...just like Ferrocell does.

Ferrocell particles are free to "swim" inside the fluid and group at the field lowest potential...and that's the way to do it in order to observe a truly image of Magnetic Fields Higher Potential ILLUMINATED based on light filtering.

The earth is in essence a magnet so show me how to view that field and get
the results you get from a cell.
NASA is studying magnetic reconnection, its very interesting and worth a look.
John.

I am pretty sure someone would come up with a far more complex type of technology which includes the ferrocell principle of operation...by "far more complex" I meant to have a hardware-software processing the images, just like a 35 mm camera does...but even better...like a DIGITAL Camera works...where we do not need to send it to a lab to be processed and printed.

Cameras have a very complex and sensitive "Bulb" [imaging sensor] where images are captured then sent to the electronic processors...then sent to the LED Screen...same way we could have a "Ferrocell Bulb" which is directly connected to hardware-software processors for Instantaneous HD Viewing in every single 3D angle of the Field...and from any distance with Zoom, Focusing, shutter speed, light control sensitivity...etc,etc...just like any Digital Cam works...no big deal.


Regards


Ufopolitics

[Iamnuts]

"Basically we have created many millions of "slits" that have the freedom to self-align with the lowest potential of the field."
I have great respect for Timm, he's a good researcher. Sometimes things discussed are not particularly from his point of view.
The above quote is important because of the" self align with the lowest potential
of the field" this is happening in 2d although it might appear as in a gas.
We need to look at the field from any particular point in space, with a compass
although the needle assumes the lowest possible state the pivot point is FIXED.
The earth is in essence a magnet so show me how to view that field and get
the results you get from a cell.
NASA is studying magnetic reconnection, its very interesting and worth a look.
John.

[mikrovolt]

https://www.researchgate.net/post/Ra...Mie_scattering

The chains of ferro particles and filtering spectra toward redshift is thought to be tightening of layers. The dielectric sandwiched not discussed unfortuneately
When H=0 the particles go random, frequency shift not sure possibly thickness.
The data points for scattering are not unique not conclusive. There may be other information.

[mikrovolt]

I never said that. You're confused.

bi

Sorry, Bistander I confused UFO's comment about circles. Friday morning late to work. I must have felt it was important enough to reply. In fairness I should omit circular movement all together. I thought your KJ magnetics post was good. The Gauss meter software is a valid comparison. Again it is in addition to the electro-meter not exclusive to only Gauss

The differences in cathode ray equipment is the applied course objective.

Will a university give full credit or equivalence to a student having
passed a class for a navy tech certificate ? The objective is very different
such that repairing navy equipment needs examples of what can go wrong
and the other approach a physics teacher gives a foundation for quantitative analysis.

The mathematical proofs have been scrutinized countless times.
Those who repair or install navy equipment often express views
that can be disruptive in R&R about what they learned as a tech is usually
outside the scope of the parameters being used in the lab.

[Ufopolitics]

My Opinion about the Ferrocell...

Hello to All,

@iamnuts, that debate link you have shown is very interesting, thanks!

A Ferrocell is comprised of an ultra-thin layer of ferrofluid sealed between two optically flat glass discs. This normally opaque black liquid is made transparent by reducing the distance between glass discs to a minimum (approx 50 microns).Once the fluid is in this condition, it behaves more like a gas than a liquid... The magnetite particle size average is around 10nm...

Above I have quoted the intro from Timm...from that link .

Some experts in Optics...are debating what type of "scattering" could be applied to the Ferrocell...meaning which one would "apply"...if Rayleigh or Mie...or others

IMHO, as this debate could be useful for the Ferrocell application as to know exactly where it could be classified within the Optical Field of Physics...there are facts which are undeniable when we relate it to the Views they offer whenever under a Magnetic Field influence.

To me, whatever the type of Scattering there would be...Ferrocell Views shows CONSISTENT IMAGING REPRESENTING ALWAYS, THE SAME STRUCTURE on every Magnetic Field which is being observed under the Ferrocell.

Which means that whatever this type of "scattering" be...it is NOT SOME RANDOMLY, UNPREDICTABLE IMAGING...BUT A VERY LOYAL, ALWAYS SAME STRUCTURE...DEPICTING THE SAME GEOMETRY...

And to me, for the purposes of UNCOVERING THE REAL TRUTH ABOUT THE WAY MAGNETIC FIELDS LOOK LIKE...those very consistent imaging of a Magnetic Fields are VERY IMPORTANT.

Plus...it happens that -maybe as a "coincidence"- a Magnetic Viewing Film as a Color CRT Imaging of the Magnetic Field also represents the EXACT, SAME KIND OF GEOMETRY AS THAT OF THE FERROCELL even though they are all different kind of technologies.

But then again...that was just my opinion.


Regards


Ufopolitics

[Iamnuts]

ze:

1) that it is showing a compressed more or less 2D image of the Euclidean 3D field of the dipole magnet with the flux lines of both poles fully interlaced and overlapping

Markoul. You're a comedian.

[Iamnuts]

Ferrocell debate

https://www.researchgate.net/post/Rayleigh_or_Mie_scattering

[bistander]

Wrong

Bistander,
...
You admit there is a circular movement and you stated

" I have done that frontal experiment MANY TIMES and there is a point, when beam starts a. PERFECTLY CIRCULAR MOTION..."

Concern about perfection causes you to lose the scope of the process .

I never said that. You're confused.

bi

[mikrovolt]

Bistander,

There is a lot of imperfections in the real world.
You can pick apart any demonstration due to differences in equipment
and many factors that make an experiment less than perfect.
There are always some who struggle with the observation because
there is a chance of inaccuracy with the equation or is it a difference in
equipment. Exact detailed analysis might prove where the problem is.

Permanent magnet domains are not perfectly aligned along with other things just as the angles are not perfectly straight.
The motion of the beam is curved is sufficient to show this general concept using either cathode ray equipment.

You admit there is a circular movement and you stated

" I have done that frontal experiment MANY TIMES and there is a point, when beam starts a. PERFECTLY CIRCULAR MOTION..."

Concern about perfection causes you to lose the scope of the process .

[Markoul]

Unveil the confusion

Hello I_am_nuts [ funny name ] ,

I http://www.energeticforum.com/attach...644862bba0-jpg
That’s what I think.
The force line just goes straight through then you get Rayleigh scattering
or some such thing.
The field must be viewed from a three dimensional point of view.

Do understand what the ferrocell is showing it is actually very easy when you realize:

1) that it is showing a compressed more or less 2D image of the Euclidean 3D field of the dipole magnet with the flux lines of both poles fully interlaced and overlapping.

And...

2) That the iron filings are not showing magnetic field but rather the relative to their position, two magnetic pole spatial locations and actually each iron filing pointing towards the nearest pole, thus point to the strongest two potentials and only, of the field of a magnet, and that actual magnetic field has many different potential values resulting to a flux geometry of two separate vortex toroids back to back at the middle of magnet.

So as soon as you free you mind from the grandpa iron filings experiment and the past and start living in our time everything becomes clear my friend.

I have worked many years (17) in black military projects and believe me the know the truth for magnetic fields. However they deliberately feed the mainstream science and public with a false flag 200 years old experiment to mask the true geometry of magnetic fields because this is the key for free energy as you call it and other technological marvels you can not even imagine.



fig.1 Field geometry of dipole magnet

http://www.ferrocell.us/images/100x8mm%20hybrid%20active%20with%20cube%20below.JPG

fig.2 compressed 2D image projection of 3D field wire-frame shown on fig.1 as shown by the ferrocell

If you don't want compresion to happen you need to use a BIG ferrocell like Brian Kerr:

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-aRxyRuGP2c[/VIDEO]

Kind Regards,

EM

[Ufopolitics]

I think this video shows it clearly:

[VIDEO]t=11s&v=RqSode4HZrE[/VIDEO]

https://m.youtube.com/watch?t=11s&v=RqSode4HZrE.

bi

YES!!!

Thanks Bistander

Regards


Ufopolitics

[bistander]

Crt

I think this video shows it clearly:

[VIDEO]t=11s&v=RqSode4HZrE[/VIDEO]

https://m.youtube.com/watch?t=11s&v=RqSode4HZrE.

bi