Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism. 92 pages. Free new book

[SYDERA]

Yeah, cheers for that.

You dont want to answer my questions, why is that?

If I am talking bunkum and it's not your thing, then let me know and I will cease.

You do a good quickstep, how about a waltz? rolls eyes sarcastically icon

[TheoriaApophasis]

Yeah, I agree, I was thinking about heating my water and keeping my home environment warm, it's cold where I live, so fk the tv, not my thing.

buy a franklin stove and chop down a few trees and burn some wood.

[SYDERA]

Being a nondual Monist, Ive always been of the premise that all actions are based in agnosis and to seek the antithesis.

"doing things to do things to achieve other things being done".

Yes, that's lovely, I like it, it flows and saves time.


Realistically we all want more energy so can power our TV and do things so we can sit on our ass more often / all the time.
Speak for yourself...



All objectivity is radiative, and centrifugal, a discharge based in a fundamental attribution flaw which is necessitated (ananke) but divergent (aoristos dyad).

To create something new, the process has to be divergent, an aberration perhaps?


Magnetism is the ONLY thing that "props up" the entire visible universe (KOSMOS AESTHETOS),.......what/where magnetism comes from, is counterspace, the "REAL" cosmos, (KOSMOS NOETOS).


Magnetism is a force generated via an awareness of something else? It is a function, I m thinking of V Schauberger and his water vortex ideas of implosion (dielectric) as acceleration, the centripetal forces which then change into a centrifugal organisation depending on how the energy shifts through a vortex structure such as water, or through the vortexes of the body .


Rigourous definition of motion, acceleration, and inertia make a divine and IRREDUCIBLE definition of all Aether modalities (dielectric, electric, magnetic, gravity)........


ultimately these 4 Ether modalities are attributional nuances on one thing only,..inertia.................., all 4 are either discharges (motion/force) or counterdischarges. (acceleration)

[B]
Ok, yes inertia, I keep coming across this, thanks

magnetism is motional, spatial, force vectors.........., dielectricity and gravity are centripetal and accelerative.

Yep, got that/getting that


"Seeing" all of them in simple, is a bigger boon (to me anyway), moreso than finding a new way to power my TV set for free.

Yeah, I agree, I was thinking about heating my water and keeping my home environment warm, it's cold where I live, so fk the tv, not my thing.

[TheoriaApophasis]

What could we do with it?
Many thanks
Sydera

Being a nondual Monist, Ive always been of the premise that all actions are based in agnosis and to seek the antithesis.

"doing things to do things to achieve other things being done".


Realistically we all want more energy so can power our TV and do things so we can sit on our ass more often / all the time.




All objectivity is radiative, and centrifugal, a discharge based in a fundamental attribution flaw which is necessitated (ananke) but divergent (aoristos dyad).


Magnetism is the ONLY thing that "props up" the entire visible universe (KOSMOS AESTHETOS),.......what/where magnetism comes from, is counterspace, the "REAL" cosmos, (KOSMOS NOETOS).



Rigourous definition of motion, acceleration, and inertia make a divine and IRREDUCIBLE definition of all Aether modalities (dielectric, electric, magnetic, gravity)........


ultimately these 4 Ether modalities are attributional nuances on one thing only,..inertia.................., all 4 are either discharges (motion/force) or counterdischarges. (acceleration)

magnetism is motional, spatial, force vectors.........., dielectricity and gravity are centripetal and accelerative.


"Seeing" all of them in simple, is a bigger boon (to me anyway), moreso than finding a new way to power my TV set for free.

[SYDERA]

The device is/will form the basis of what is incorrectly deemed "anti-gravity", however this is untrue in reality.


Magnetism is nothing more than coherent 'gravity', and gravity is nothing more than counterspatial acceleration and the cancellation of motion.


Dr. Oleg D. Jefimenko has the math (Gravitation and Co-gravitation) about the co-gravitational field.

As per my device I created and have 2 videos on....


copyright 11-01-2014 Ken L Wheeler
those are just LOOSE NOTES, so yes I know they contain errors and typos..

This is phenomenal information, thanks, a useful discussion. You have encountered me before, so be prepared- some woo is flying your way ... ok here goes.

The above post may explain what happens in the body during the process of intense creativity, it has to involve movement.

As the concert pianist gets ready to play they are gathering and storing energy to be released (dielectric) into the object (piano). They know the maths and then the creative energy flows. That energy is harnessed by a sophisticated version of the 'stage fright' fight or flight mechanism; when harnessed with understanding as opposed to unclear fear, it is the base for sustaining energy production (like a circuit)... the same can be said for the dancer, the athlete, so must be something to do with adrenaline, but the bi-product ( as unseen energy waves ) is interesting- does anyone every measure that? What could we do with it?

Could I use my body energies ( in a high state of creativity) to charge a cell?

I'm not having a laugh, it's something I wish to understand for reasons of health and you are using a language that makes the idea conceivable.

Many thanks
Sydera

[TheoriaApophasis]

Ken,
Did you mean to include a hyperlink in the above text "As per my device..."? You reference notes that seam that they would be contained in that content.
Thanks,
Randy

two obscure youtube videos I made about a device i WILL NOT make any claims about other than personal observed effects and as also tested by 4 others who also claim same.


The premise is working from changing the co-gravitational field of an object by having a rest-mass in high motion (complex yet somewhat easy premise actually) as per Dr. Jefimenkos formula and writing on same.


The device in premise has radical effects I wont make any claims thereof, because it seems too fantastical to barely mention.

[tachyoncatcher]

Dr. Oleg D. Jefimenko has the math (Gravitation and Co-gravitation) about the co-gravitational field.

As per my device I created and have 2 videos on....

Ken,
Did you mean to include a hyperlink in the above text "As per my device..."? You reference notes that seam that they would be contained in that content.
Thanks,
Randy

[TheoriaApophasis]

A need to review what I have built and correct and am also waiting to buy another stack of the Neos for a sister using the opposite polarity.

Smokey

The device is/will form the basis of what is incorrectly deemed "anti-gravity", however this is untrue in reality.


Magnetism is nothing more than coherent 'gravity', and gravity is nothing more than counterspatial acceleration and the cancellation of motion.


Dr. Oleg D. Jefimenko has the math (Gravitation and Co-gravitation) about the co-gravitational field.

As per my device I created and have 2 videos on....


copyright 11-01-2014 Ken L Wheeler
those are just LOOSE NOTES, so yes I know they contain errors and typos..

[TheoriaApophasis]

Here's one for you Ken.

Boyd BUSHMAN : Magnetic Beam Apparatus -- Articles & patent

A magnetic beam amplifier.

Seems like a good fit for your work if it can be shown those angles you have found can in fact be manipulated. Wouldn't take much to assemble such a device and try it against your viewing fluid.

yes, Im familiar with same.


Another researcher on same mentions:

the magnetic flux does not appear to go this far at any appreciable strength, but a subtle energy effect does!



which is true, the field disturbance has affects FAR beyond the divergent magnetic reciprocation


But, I can see those same effects using the gigantic 30 pound neodymium magnet Ive got in the living room.


explaining same isnt so easy, and nobody has an equation for it yet.


Its a attributional torque of the Ether which is translational into a spatial disturbance.

[David G Dawson]

Boyd Bushman

Dog-One,
Did one some months back but do so many projects that this one sits in the background waiting for attention.
You must also be watching the EV Gray Forum.
Repeating here that the 3 antigravity elements were Tellurium, Uranium and Palladium and nothing to do with Germanium which is also a favourite of mine as a converter of the Longitudinal into Electromagnetic.



The Mini Compass came from David Lapoint and his 'The Primer Fields' and wondered why I had not built one earlier when messing with magnets.
The body is an old Biro pen case with a small piece of insulation in the end and the Biro still works.
The magnets used are two very small painted red/blue Neos and a string of the same is sitting on the Gaussmeter case.
The Gaussmeter is home built with the Hall Effect device mounted on a pcb inside an old plastic larger marking pen body.
Both work well.
Used an AllegoMicro UGN3503 but a Honeywell 96B909 is another option.

The Boyd Bushman 'Magnetic Beamer' I put together before I had the tools to measure and I find that the magnetic field coming from the 5 Neo stacks is way stronger than that from what I saw as the beam point where I have the rounded nut.
A need to review what I have built and correct and am also waiting to buy another stack of the Neos for a sister using the opposite polarity.

Smokey

[Dog-One]

Magnetic Beam Amplifier

Here's one for you Ken.

Boyd BUSHMAN : Magnetic Beam Apparatus -- Articles & patent

A magnetic beam amplifier.

Seems like a good fit for your work if it can be shown those angles you have found can in fact be manipulated. Wouldn't take much to assemble such a device and try it against your viewing fluid.

[TheoriaApophasis]

If that scale shows no spike of recoil.

Oooh, theres plenty of recoil.


Ive tested with this before, but no harm in someone else testing if they want. Experimenting is the best fun that can be had while dressed.



As for the "layman" comment, Its the "experts" I dont trust, theyre just spitting out regurgitated nonsense they were told to believe in.


Never trust the "experts" (bit hyperbolic of course).

[Dog-One]

He doesnt know what is "special" about a ring magnet, however you can SEE what it is under the ferrocell

its just a hypotrochoid, a 'doughnut' of counterspace within which he is pressing another magnet thru the ring.

its no different than someone with the SQUIRTS "shooting" an "object" out their "flesh doughnut" while hovering on the pot.



Hes pretty funny in that video, hes convinced hes discovered something

I'm not real certain how much he actually knows. He seems to have a layman side and a full-on egghead mathmatical side to him. Anyone that has looked at the plots from Howard Johnson had to know a magnet has a lot more going on. I didn't know how much more until I saw your work.

The interesting thing he may have discovered is that using magnets, you can shoot a projectile without any recoil. As far as I know, that can't easily be done any other way. So I'd say yeah, something special about magnets. And if it's true, I'll bet TinMan can whip something up rather quick-like to find out. I think the easiest way would be to take Jeff's little gizmo and have it shoot a magnet straight up while the base is sitting on a precision scale. If that scale shows no spike of recoil, it sure would be something to think about for most people, because what it means is the apparent force from the moving object is against the Ether itself instead of the mass where it was launched--changes the whole frame of reference paradigm.

[TheoriaApophasis]

If you mean humor as in the sense of video quackery, no I think he's the real deal.

This is the same guy and he's talking about your latest topic:
Jeffrey Cook on Inertial Propulsion - YouTube

He doesnt know what is "special" about a ring magnet, however you can SEE what it is under the ferrocell


its just a hypotrochoid, a 'doughnut' of counterspace within which he is pressing another magnet thru the ring.


its no different than someone with the SQUIRTS "shooting" an "object" out their "flesh doughnut" while hovering on the pot.




Hes pretty funny in that video, hes convinced hes discovered something

[Dog-One]

what is that video? Science humor? Does he have FLUTES glued to the side of that thing?

Very funny

If you mean humor as in the sense of video quackery, no I think he's the real deal.

This is the same guy and he's talking about your latest topic:
Jeffrey Cook on Inertial Propulsion - YouTube