Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism. 92 pages. Free new book

[TheoriaApophasis]

Ken, can you please help me better understand the portion I underlined above?

Are you explicitly saying there is no conversion process?

For instance, if I say a car terminates as a boat, not into a boat, I mean the wheels vanish and what was a car now floats.

If that's correct, then in the case of electricity terminating, you mean the dielectric component returns to counterspace and what is left can only be referred to as magnetism.

I'm not trying to be an attorney here, just very interested in the subtly expressed in your statement.

your analogy is a bad one. You might say a car terminates into a lump of molten steel.

Its not a conversion, its a modality / attributional expression. A 'conservation of the Ether' if you will.

Likewise there are no straight lines in the universe, there is not a conversion, steel is steel is steel, there is only ONE field, incorrectly deemed MANY FIELDS due to attributional expressions of ONE field under multitudinous perturbations as "seen" as autonomous fields, but arent.


extrapolating attributional expressions of steel as a car "magnetism", or as a coiled steel wire "electricity", its just a transverse modality / expression of the steel UNDER perturbation.

[Dog-One]

Electricity terminates AS magnetism , not INTO magnetism

Ken, can you please help me better understand the portion I underlined above?

Are you explicitly saying there is no conversion process?

For instance, if I say a car terminates as a boat, not into a boat, I mean the wheels vanish and what was a car now floats.

If that's correct, then in the case of electricity terminating, you mean the dielectric component returns to counterspace and what is left can only be referred to as magnetism.

I'm not trying to be an attorney here, just very interested in the subtly expressed in your statement.

[TheoriaApophasis]

So "hot electricity" is a hybrid of dielectricity and magnetism. And maybe magnetism is simply just a special perturbation of dielectricity having multiple spins. Wilbert B. Smith has stated, spin is everything. Extremely simplex and possibly correct.
.

[Dog-One]

Thoughts...

I had some thoughts while in the middle of some trivial tasks at work that I'd really like to get your take on.

To start with, let's consider the Aether--the stuff that permeates all of our known world. If we take some this and spin it up like a gyroscope, we get dielectricity, which may also be referred to as "cold electricity". Because this is spinning, it has inertia and therefore can do real work. It is a coherent and stable form of Aether.

So lets think about what "hot electricity" may actually be. Ken has said a hybrid of dielectricity and magnetism. But what do we know about magnetism? For starters, it radiates outward from its source; it is divergent. Could this actually be dielectricity with multiple spins, simplex. Consider this video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2xYhrFgcyWQ

Dielectricity spun-up in such a way it throws itself into chaos. It's only direction for stability is away from its source. If we took several of Fran McCabe's machines into space, spun them up and watched how they moved, would they trace a hypotrochoid pattern as Ken has shown us magnetism does?

So "hot electricity" is a hybrid of dielectricity and magnetism. And maybe magnetism is simply just a special perturbation of dielectricity having multiple spins. Wilbert B. Smith has stated, spin is everything. Extremely simplex and possibly correct.

This leads me to some applications of this reasoning. Consider this video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bo42dHgrJ6g

This is a "bucking coil" arrangement that potentially produces more energy output than it requires on the input. Ken knows Russian so he can correct me if my observation is wrong. Now suppose the input is "hot electricity", meaning it carries with it what we know as magnetism, or dielectricity in its chaotic form. I suspect in order for this device to function, this form of electricity is impacted head-on with its conjugate or mirror image. This neutralizes the over-driven precession as shown in McCabe's video, leaving only coherent spin. If that is the case, the output of this device is no longer "hot electricity" carrying a magnetic component, it is instead "cold electricity" or pure dielectricity.

Anyway, something to ponder. I had to scratch this down while the thought was still clear in mind. Have at it.

[TheoriaApophasis]

Hello TheoriaApophasis
But consider this. Gyroscope is spinning clockwise, you rotate string counterclockwise and gyro rises. ok good stuff but when the gyro continues to flip and is upside down it is then spinning counterclockwise and your hand is also still rotating counterclockwise. ionfuture

Youll notice that it only inverts in a short pulse in response to a short increased pulse of inverse applied force.

its accelerated quickly past the force of inverse applied force, or as explained in the upcoming 4th edition, M.C. mirrored (force) cancellation.

Applied MC of F. must be > C.S. acceleration of the inert mass towards incoherent acceleration of the earth (or X body).

Some of this premise is based on the fragments of Tesla's dynamic theory of gravity.

Ultimate as said in several videos, there is no autonomous "field or force" such as Gravity.

Gravity as an autonom. entity doesnt exist, all is either force and motion or inertia and acceleration.


THere is only one force in the universe, the loss of inertia we call magnetism.


the REST is coherent inverse force vectors applied or mutually cancelling.

It appears to me it is a matter of perspective. Looking down from above the gyro is spinning clockwise but from underneath looking up the gyro is spinning counterclockwise. So the important thing maybe where the gyro is attached to the string, on top then clockwise spin, if attached at bottom then counterclockwise spin for a counterclockwise rotation of your hand.
ionfuture

its a matter of M.C. all coherent force cancellation is achieved by an inverse coherent force whereby which acceleration between the two occurs to cancel both forces.


Much greater details to come tomorrow.


upcoming video tomorrow will be far far more revealing than the simplex intro videos these are.
weight is location specific and medium specific, the same applies to all two possible modalities of force cancellation,
All is about M.C. (mirrored cancellation) by means of inverse coherent force cancellation.



Tesla's Dynamic Theory of Gravity explained the fields of gravity through electrodynamics....... In this Tesla was right, so-called 'gravity' is nothing other than a "ground" in a reciprocating FORCE circuit. While Tesla never said THAT, it follows the extrapolation of what Tesla had meant that "gravity" is. Its just an electrodynamic(FORCE!) circuit

The centripetal accelerative ground to divergence centrifugal force and motion vectors is acceleration towards increasing potential , or as meant counterspace.




magnetic acceleration ("attraction", an utterly wrong term) and gyroscopic levitation are the exact same principles, as I will prove.

ionfuture[/QUOTE]

[ionfuture]

Hello TheoriaApophasis

I just watched your 3 vids (Explaining Gyroscopic Levitation) let me say thanks for that.

But consider this. Gyroscope is spinning clockwise, you rotate string counterclockwise and gyro rises. ok good stuff but when the gyro continues to flip and is upside down it is then spinning counterclockwise and your hand is also still rotating counterclockwise.

It appears to me it is a matter of perspective. Looking down from above the gyro is spinning clockwise but from underneath looking up the gyro is spinning counterclockwise. So the important thing maybe where the gyro is attached to the string, on top then clockwise spin, if attached at bottom then counterclockwise spin for a counterclockwise rotation of your hand.

Just an observation.

ionfuture

[spacecase0]

Im not selling anything to anyone, the books is free, so too the videos etc etc.


knowledge and wisdom are their OWN rewards.


As for what I DO or do NOT disclose, that is my own discretion.



lux et veritas

yes, it is your own discretion,
just pointing out to others that you will likely never do it (if you had wanted to you would have done it by now),
and others in the future will never know what you have really done

I am curious why you don't share or or make money off of it,
do you think that people are not ready for it ?
it will bring the end of humanity ?
maybe someone already payed you not to market it ?

at least tell us what the issue is if you can,
you are driving some of us nuts out here

[TheoriaApophasis]

So which came first? electricity or magnetism?

neither, dielectricity / electrostatics did.

[MasterBlaster]

Just a question

So which came first? electricity or magnetism?

[Dog-One]

Thought youd like this one:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P7t5cKc1-MY

I do like your videos Ken.

I also like how as the mind becomes more aware, the eye finds better focus.

[TheoriaApophasis]

This makes sense to me!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sNrquwHVUPQ

Yeah, hes an insane lunatic.



likewise his voice makes me want to club him with mace.

[TheoriaApophasis]

A real nonsense! Another thought that not comes out of the circle of the current concepts, just an another circular theory! With one statement I agree, "gravity if not a real force at all", it's just an apparent force, an effect of other dynamics and interactions.

Gravity doesnt exist, its not its "own" force or field, its impossible. Gravity is the exact opposite of force, Force is divergence = motion.

Gravity is just a counterspatial acceleration towards higher inertia/ potential as governed by the incoherent polarized MASS/ELEMENTS which comprise said 2 or more objects which comprise same.

so-called "Gravity" is just an acceleration towards counterspace.




Anyone that says "gravity (the principle phenomena seen) is a FORCE"....... run in the opposite direction.

Gravity as an autonomous Field modality or principle 100% doesnt exist.


There is no autonomous principle such as what we deem 'gravity'.






Thought youd like this one:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P7t5cKc1-MY

Something nobody has seen before on Youboob (sic).


I did this video late last night.

incredibly stability and likewise the gyroscope can draw out the hypotrochoid pattern by using a magnet ATTACHED TO the gyroscope!!

[sadang]

A real nonsense! Another thought that not comes out of the circle of the current concepts, just an another circular theory! With one statement I agree, "gravity if not a real force at all", it's just an apparent force, an effect of other dynamics and interactions.

[MasterBlaster]

Now this is what I call a theory

This makes sense to me!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sNrquwHVUPQ

[ldrancer]

theories with no use are still just that theories. work for nothing is a form of slavery