Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism. 92 pages. Free new book

[TheoriaApophasis]

Al

I LUVS OWLS

[aljhoa]

"the dielectricity flows between the two conductors right?"

Yahh, but he got same from Steinmetz, and others......and of course he admits that, and even told me same firsthand.

the only really important diagram to study is this one:


people look at it, but they dont SEE it, or grasp it.

Al

[TheoriaApophasis]

Agreed.

What I see when looking at that image, is the strong possibility for electrostatic induction, which in my thinking would be a transfer of dielectricity from one medium to another.

If those wires are insulated and you wrap them with a split (almost complete) coax, where the split is on the outside (away from the center), you will contain (most all) the dielectricity. Since there is a split (unlike a normal coax) and the material is a dielectric reflector, in effect you have an electrostatic transformer. Because this "shield" is split, you do not disturb the magnetic lines between the two main conductors, at least not until you connect something to both of these shields.

Me thinks a few bench experiments are needed. I'm very curious as to whether the dielectricity is actually transferred, or if it is copied/magnified. This could prove to be far easier than magnetic induction without nearly as many pitfalls.

now think further,


if you draw a box around that diagram, you ALSO have the Magneto-dielectric model of a magnet




now think further.......thats a diagram of looking END ON at 2 lines of AC CURRENT


thats also the cross sectional diagram of a magnet looking edge on with both "poles" top and bottom ,........if you draw a box around that diagram and label the top "N pole (or south)", and inversely so on the bottom.


sink into that one.

[Dog-One]

the only really important diagram to study is this one:


people look at it, but they dont SEE it, or grasp it.

Agreed.

What I see when looking at that image, is the strong possibility for electrostatic induction, which in my thinking would be a transfer of dielectricity from one medium to another.

If those wires are insulated and you wrap them with a split (almost complete) coax, where the split is on the outside (away from the center), you will contain (most all) the dielectricity. Since there is a split (unlike a normal coax) and the material is a dielectric reflector, in effect you have an electrostatic transformer. Because this "shield" is split, you do not disturb the magnetic lines between the two main conductors, at least not until you connect something to both of these shields.

Me thinks a few bench experiments are needed. I'm very curious as to whether the dielectricity is actually transferred, or if it is copied/magnified. This could prove to be far easier than magnetic induction without nearly as many pitfalls.

[TheoriaApophasis]

Two questions:
1. Counterspace is a single point correct? It has no attributes of space, such as X, Y & Z. It's coordinates are simply 1, -1, J & -J.

2. When Eric draws the simple LC circuit with the capacitor on the left, the inductor on the right and two conductors top & bottom connecting them like a transmission line, the dielectricity flows between the two conductors right? As this circuit oscillates, the dielectricity doesn't flow in the wires, only the magnetism orbits the wires. Correct? So for the dielectricity, its flow simply bounces back-n-forth between the plates of the capacitor and in between the turns of the inductor.

Even 1 is a number (except in metaphysics, there are 2 "1s", but thats another matter).


Even point denotates something spatial, so its also unfitting to say POINT.


One might consider where all electrical and magnetic phenomena are WAVES, etc etc.

but the "ocean" of counterspace , the Ether is absolutely invisible unless disturbed, at which time the "phenomenal waters/ waves etc" are then measurable, spatial. etc.



"the dielectricity flows between the two conductors right?"

Yahh, but he got same from Steinmetz, and others......and of course he admits that, and even told me same firsthand.

Yes on the rest.


the only really important diagram to study is this one:


people look at it, but they dont SEE it, or grasp it.


further, from Dollard:


DIELECTRIC ENERGY STORAGE SPATIALLY DIFFERENT THAN MAGNETIC
ENERGY STORAGE
Unlike magnetism the energy is forced or compressed inwards rather than outwards. Dielectric lines of force push inward into internal space and along axis, rather than pushed outward broadside to axis as in the magnetic field. Because the lines are mutually repellent certain amounts of broadside or transverse motion can be expected but the phenomena is basically longitudinal. This gives rise to an interesting paradox that will be noticed with capacity. This is that the smaller the space bounded by the conducting structure the more energy that can be stored. This is the exact
opposite of magnetism. With magnetism, the units volumes of energy can be thought of as working in parallel but the unit volumes of energy in association with dielectricity can be thought of as
working in series.

[Dog-One]

Counterspace SHOULD have you "thinking",

ALL GEOMETRY IS PROJECTIVE GEOMETRY

meaning it "all begins with counterspace/ inertia".

Okay Ken, just finished watching (again) a three and a half hour lecture from Eric Dollard, where he states, if you cannot understand counterspace, you cannot understand anything electrical.

Two questions:

1. Counterspace is a single point correct? It has no attributes of space, such as X, Y & Z. It's coordinates are simply 1, -1, J & -J.

2. When Eric draws the simple LC circuit with the capacitor on the left, the inductor on the right and two conductors top & bottom connecting them like a transmission line, the dielectricity flows between the two conductors right? As this circuit oscillates, the dielectricity doesn't flow in the wires, only the magnetism orbits the wires. Correct? So for the dielectricity, its flow simply bounces back-n-forth between the plates of the capacitor and in between the turns of the inductor.

[aljhoa]

its a permanent wavefront in the ether.


Its an invisible tear in the Ether which both 'leaks' itself and "drains" itself on the other 'side'.....and likewise vice versa from the other 'side'


as a crude analogy.




i wont comment on that one



yet

Nature of Properties of Material Bodies.
1911 Encyclopædia Britannica/Aether - Wikisource, the free online library


The Red Rectangle shines like a squarish jewel in this Hubble image.
The actual structure of the nebula is a double cone.
Its rectangular appearance is an optical illusion.




The Butterfly Nebula
The bright clusters and nebulae of planet Earth's night sky are often named for flowers or insects.
Though its wingspan covers over 3 light-years, NGC 6302 is no exception.
With an estimated surface temperature of about 250,000 degrees C, the dying central star of this particular planetary nebula
has become exceptionally hot, shining brightly in ultraviolet light but hidden from direct view by a dense torus of dust.


Al

[ldrancer]

dont say i said something i didnt say. get mad about this but i dont got to hear it, then some big long drawn out explanation about something, about bismuth then for ken to say he won't say anything.

your right you can sell somethign that works to people but not anyone can understand it. and you're also the smartest person and noone else can find out this either.

bismuth comes out of the earth, so you don't own it.

[ldrancer]

i didnt say nothing like that. didnt mention the bismuth and talked about words you have ot have a problem. im talking, about talking, not you or anyone elsei just made that comment but you got to find somehting wrong with what i say and associate it with something completely not related, bismuth.

what is bismuth?

[TheoriaApophasis]

It's becoming very clear to me now why a permanent magnet is relatively permanent. It is quite literally leaking the energy in Counterspace

its a permanent wavefront in the ether.


Its an invisible tear in the Ether which both 'leaks' itself and "drains" itself on the other 'side'.....and likewise vice versa from the other 'side'


as a crude analogy.

You don't suppose Bismuth might be just the material we need for such a gizmo do you?

i wont comment on that one



yet

[Dog-One]

words work like getting more power out of something you put in it. if you can talk about it, you can do it.

I highly doubt Ken bought a truckload of Bismuth just for financial security. He's got something up his sleeve.

BTW Ken, that hourglass representation of Counterspace is quite intuitive. I also think as I mentioned previously, we need to come up with another one using a capacitor as an example. As space is crushed down from two sides towards Counterspace, charge potential increases. That's a dead-ringer for where this particular electrical phenomena sources its energy. It's undeniable. It also explains ol' Bearden's, "Don't kill the dipole." To me it looks like you can't kill the dipole, but you can move away from Counterspace and the energy of the dielectricity is lost. You want it back, you need to move towards the source...

Counterspace.

It's becoming very clear to me now why a permanent magnet is relatively permanent. It is quite literally leaking the energy in Counterspace. With some serious thought, it seems more than possible to imagine a battery doing much the same thing as a permanent magnet. You don't suppose Bismuth might be just the material we need for such a gizmo do you?

[ldrancer]

words work like getting more power out of something you put in it. if you can talk about it, you can do it.

[spacecase0]

I have a hunch W.B. didn't actually mean Nothing-At-All. If someone would have whispered in his ear, "Counterspace", I'll bet it would have made sense to him.

If we can accept the possibility he did have communications with advanced living creatures from other worlds, it's very easy to assume he had difficulties understanding what they were telling him.

I read everything I could find that wilbert smith wrote or was said about him at the time,
Wilbert said that he had a hard time understanding them,
and that they kept pointing him in the correct direction when he got lost.
I have the same issue understanding Wilbert and Ken, all new words, and hard to get at what they are thinking
I have verified a good deal of Wilbert's ideas and it seems to be as he says
Ken does not talk of what his hardware is, so it makes it much harder to figure out what he is talking about
but my real problem is how long it takes to build the hardware for each test

[TheoriaApophasis]

Now counter-space, that one has got me thinking...

[TheoriaApophasis]

Hello Ken,

Ufopolitics

not let it be said you cannot be both entertained and educated at the SAME TIME