Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism. 92 pages. Free new book

[sadang]

Hi Ken,

I have to study again what really light is according to your interpretation. Impressive images from laser device. They looks very much as solar flares. However, all these 2D images of a 3D geometry and dymanics require a very good imagination and spatial view ability. Plus a new view of light and magnetism, according to your theory. Otherwise everything is meaningless.

One ideea that crosses my mind now, to see geometrically all three components of a magnet, 360 degrees all around the magnet is to use a plasma globe emptied by noble gas and filled with liquid suspension and ferrofluid. The magnet (preferably spherical) can be put in place of the high-voltage electrod, of course only after the conductive paint has been removed. High voltage wire tube reaches the middle of the globe, so you can see the magnetic field almost entirely. The globe have to be equipped with two strips of RGB LEDs positioned at 90 degrees to each other in the equatorial region of the globe (ideally each LED to be at 45 degrees), I think it would difuse perfectly and the centrifugal magnetic lines could see very well, according to their CW or CCW polarization. What do you think?

Thanks,
SaDAng

[TheoriaApophasis]

Theo, any thoughts on the source of what is commonly called "polarity" in dielectricity? Or is polarity an inherent attribute? Or did I miss something in one of your documents? If so, which one?

polarity = radiation = creation of SPACE


a NECESSITATED (Greek: ananke) attribute.......charge, discharge, divergent , convergent.


Mother called, she said she never created a "negative charge" only discharge.


Hot ice
Pregnant baby
negative charge
fast turtle.


etc etc ROFL


Dilelectricity has no polarity, only the termination of this charge (discharge) is a diff. modality of the Ether and becomes curvilinear (=polarized).


The Ether (Aether) is the Ether is the Ether.




This is also why Tesla spanked Einstein for reifying SPACE as "something that does things" He said it was impossible, and he was right.

Space is an attribute, and posterior to, ALL radiative fields.


Obviously, what makes mass/matter MASSIVE (= spatial) is ONLY magnetism.

This is why Faraday called (and JJ Thomson) magnetism the "dielectric FIELD"


Magnetism is radiation, is the discharge.

Also why its incorrect to say Electricity terminates INTO magnetism., rather correctly "electricity terminates AS magnetism"

Electricity (not dielectricity) is a combo of dielectricity AND magnetism (this is of course a HARD COLD fact)...Ergo, when electricity is terminating, it is losing its dielectric component and hence is then magnetism/ magnetization.


I will write on this much more in the 3rd edition.

[thx1138]

Theo, any thoughts on the source of what is commonly called "polarity" in dielectricity? Or is polarity an inherent attribute? Or did I miss something in one of your documents? If so, which one?

[TheoriaApophasis]

Looks to me like the LEDs are biased higher/lower on one side vs the other... so on one side the red shows through better, and the other green shows better. Really looks more like a left-right phenomenon instead of a north/south attribute.

Using 2 diff lenses, and rotating the LEDS around the lens.


Same thing


ROTATING THE MAGNET ENDLESSLY, .....same thing.


all the same, same same.



Its hyper-logical, phase shift deflection from INVERSE CW and CCW spin

AND dielectric attraction of ALL RGB at the dielectric inertial plane.

(especially BLUE, for obvious reasons as explained)

[d3x0r]

Looks to me like the LEDs are biased higher/lower on one side vs the other... so on one side the red shows through better, and the other green shows better. Really looks more like a left-right phenomenon instead of a north/south attribute.

[TheoriaApophasis]

what is the laser pic above and why do the poles switch colors ?

The laser pics are regarding a device undergoing patent seeking, it has multiple channels, that was ONE.
I cannot/will not at this time explain THAT device



Why the poles are diff. colors and why the center is ALL THREE (RGB = white)

is explained here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jC0GznhY7fk

[tachyon]

what is the laser pic above and why do the poles switch colors ?

[TheoriaApophasis]

then what is it if not ferrofluid? I find it difficult to think of anything similar. what's inside th film?

You didnt understand, the LASER pics above, have nothing to do with ferrofluid.




Only the RGB diodes are passed thru ferrofluid,


BUT that doesnt matter a single bit, since same cannot explain RGB concentration AT the dielectric inertial plane OR either pole being a diff. color phase shift.

[tachyon]

then what is it if not ferrofluid? I find it difficult to think of anything similar. what's inside th film?

[TheoriaApophasis]

its ferrofluid you're seeing there...

Nope, those laser pics above ARE NOT USING FERROFLUID



And NOPE on the magnet using RGB LEDs, latest video disproves THAT


Also that would NEVER EVER account for white light ONLY at the dielectric inertial plane and WHY either pole is either green or red.


Wont work.

[tachyon]

its ferrofluid you're seeing there...

[TheoriaApophasis]

Hi Ken,

SaDAng

New laser splitting disruption from centrifugal and centripetal

SINGLE CHANNEL laser divergence 635NM from dielectricity and centrifugal magnetism


SNAPSHOTS ONLY

[TheoriaApophasis]

Hi Ken,

Thanks for exposing your own interpretation for the results of this ferrofluid cell with RGB light experiment. Because I am not yet prepared a ferrofluid cell and I have a slight different interpretation of the results obtained, I mean the color of CW and CCW centrifugal etheric movement, I'd like you to confirm that the colors do not change with the change of the power of the magnet. I think the color should slight change (should slight increase the wave lenght) with increasing power of the magnet.

Thanks,
SaDAng

NOPE, the colors DO NOT CHANGE with the power of the magnet, only (obviously), the intensity of the light OVERALL of every color

tried MANY diff powers of magnets already

and shapes.....



I already got confirmation to double check from another friend with 8 patents, and much expertise.


HE REPORTS:::::
You're right about blue. I've made a few tests using my spectrometer and see the blue and shorter is mostly absorbed.
This thing even eats blue laser to the point where it barely gets through. Now red is another story altogether- pretty resonant at those wavelengths.

[sadang]

Hi Ken,

Thanks for exposing your own interpretation for the results of this ferrofluid cell with RGB light experiment. Because I am not yet prepared a ferrofluid cell and I have a slight different interpretation of the results obtained, I mean the color of CW and CCW centrifugal etheric movement, I'd like you to confirm that the colors do not change with the change of the power of the magnet. I think the color should slight change (should slight increase the wave lenght) with increasing power of the magnet.

Thanks,
SaDAng

[TheoriaApophasis]

mainly because dielectricity is most closest to the Ether.
.

100% correct !!!

I will think for myself to find a way to practically prove the inertial dielectric plane has the role of generator for the magnetic fields.

Thats the ONLY way it can exist, I have 10,000% certainly of this from proof, logic, evidence after evidence.

ALSO the geometry of the conjugate system IN a magnet is the same as the cross section of END ON AC LINES......... I can prove that its dielectricity 100%, its 100,000% impossible for it to be anything else. Utterly impossible.


WHY IS NO POLE is BLUE???????!!!!!!!!!!! because the wavelength is so short.......blue is only at the point of MAX dielectric attraction!!

blue has higher dielectric capacitance as I state at the end of the book!!

which is WHY IT IS NOT at either pole!

ONLY RED AND GREEN