Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism. 92 pages. Free new book

[TheoriaApophasis]

Yes Ken, I'm trying to lock this into my brain to a point I can actually visualize a design in my head, then go build it.

Speaking of gears, is it possible to describe the centripetal and centrifugal vortex fields as solid objects in a way people can really grasp the concept? I'm thinking about drawing some 3D objects and printing them on a 3D printer to help people more easily visualize what's really going on. If they could hold a representation looking something like a conical shaped object with threads, I'll bet the whole concept of attraction/repulsion could be sent to the trash bin of history. I'm just not certain these fields can in any way be shown as objects.

I have the formula here:
see link, and video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wHDsnO3y7CA

Additionally, the linear diverge required from the center before making the circle has a radius always of Phi^-3. The centrifugal field which is drawn is the MEAN DIVERGENT FIELD of centrifugal magnetism, obviously and logically so the field extends both further and shorter than this, but this formula calculates the mean field of the predominance of centrifugal divergence.

A while back I read W.B. Smith's incomplete "The New Science" and what stuck with me is that our current science is far more convoluted than it need be. When I stumbled into your work a while back, that confirmed it for me.

If you cannot express it by Euclidean math and geometry, then it isn't real.
Sorry, but Quantum Qwackery can go shove it.

If that be the case, your result has to be in error. As you say, mother nature doesn't do math, but if we are going to use math, we better do it exactly right. That or we'll be out in left field for another 100 years.
Some more to think about.

[Dog-One]

Thats 90% closer than anyone else gets

Yes Ken, I'm trying to lock this into my brain to a point I can actually visualize a design in my head, then go build it.

Speaking of gears, is it possible to describe the centripetal and centrifugal vortex fields as solid objects in a way people can really grasp the concept? I'm thinking about drawing some 3D objects and printing them on a 3D printer to help people more easily visualize what's really going on. If they could hold a representation looking something like a conical shaped object with threads, I'll bet the whole concept of attraction/repulsion could be sent to the trash bin of history. I'm just not certain these fields can in any way be shown as objects.

A while back I read W.B. Smith's incomplete "The New Science" and what stuck with me is that our current science is far more convoluted than it need be. When I stumbled into your work a while back, that confirmed it for me. Something else Smith mentioned that you haven't touched on yet is time. According to Smith, time is completely localized and relative. We should instead use something absolute and global like angle or interval of a complete revolution. I have a real strong feeling the many formulas we use that have "dt" in the denominator of an integral are incorrect or at the very least inaccurate. When you integrate over time, you are summing up infinitesimally small increments of time. Suppose those increments/intervals are not all exactly the same. If that be the case, your result has to be in error. As you say, mother nature doesn't do math, but if we are going to use math, we better do it exactly right. That or we'll be out in left field for another 100 years.

Some more to think about.

[TheoriaApophasis]

Pretty generous with the 99%. The most important part I left out was that the disc magnet also has a dielectric inertial plane and it must align it's rotation (like a gear) with that of the block magnet's dielectric inertial plane. There is simply no other place it can go to find equilibrium within this dynamic system.

Actually I meant 95% (seriously).


Thats 90% closer than anyone else gets

Yes, I knew you implied that about the disk magnet, that is a given, of course.

[Dog-One]

Wow, 99+% accurate. stunning stuff

NOW, you'd have to know why its doing that.

WHAT does the disk magnet have that the steel disk/ring (ring or disk, doesn't matter either way) doesn't have??

Pretty generous with the 99%. The most important part I left out was that the disc magnet also has a dielectric inertial plane and it must align it's rotation (like a gear) with that of the block magnet's dielectric inertial plane. There is simply no other place it can go to find equilibrium within this dynamic system.

[TheoriaApophasis]

duplicate, this forum had a brain meltdown apparently!!!

[tachyon]

y know how orbo works?

[TheoriaApophasis]

I'll take a shot at it.

The ring has aligned itself within pressure gradients flowing from the centrifugal of one side to the centripetal of the other side and vice versa.

The disc magnet has centered itself at the dielectric inertial plane with reverse spins (centripetal/centrifugal) of the big block magnet, so the flows go through the disc magnet and back to the block magnet.

Yes?

Wow, 99+% accurate. stunning stuff





NOW, you'd have to know why its doing that.

WHAT does the disk magnet have that the steel disk/ring (ring or disk, doesn't matter either way) doesn't have??

(also, gravity plays NO PART IN THIS PICTURE, NONE, I can set it up any way you want).


The steel ring will encounter the SAME enormous force in trying to bring it PARALLEL to the inertial plane as the disk magnet will inversely in trying to (and failing) bring it perpendicular to the dielectric inertial plane (the so-called 'Bloch wall' [which is merely a name/description....NOT an explanation])


(Oh, hell, does all this mean that there is NO SUCH THING as "magnetic attraction"?? Crazy! Heresy!!! Insanity!!!)

[Dog-One]

Heres one for you, WHEN YOU CAN EXPLAIN THE PIC BELOW, THEN YOU UNDERSTAND MAGNETISM A LOT BETTER

I'll take a shot at it.

The ring has aligned itself within pressure gradients flowing from the centrifugal of one side to the centripetal of the other side and vice versa.

The disc magnet has centered itself at the dielectric inertial plane with reverse spins (centripetal/centrifugal) of the big block magnet, so the flows go through the disc magnet and back to the block magnet.

Yes?

[TheoriaApophasis]

Heres one for you, WHEN YOU CAN EXPLAIN THE PIC BELOW, THEN YOU UNDERSTAND MAGNETISM A LOT BETTER



HINT: it wouldnt matter if the ring and disk were square , round doesnt matter.


2x2x1" BLOCK magnet


disk magnet can ONLY rest on the inertial plane, and the KNIFE EDGE THIN steel ring can ONLY rest perpendicular to the inertial plane


no glue, no tape, no tricks, all VERY VERY EASILY balanced.

[TheoriaApophasis]

Hi Ken,
These perfect math have to be necessarily proved experiemntaly.

I have already done that.

Because there is nothing perfect in the real world,

I state that in the video, this is only applies to the mathematically perfect "magnet" countless variables are at play.

In nature there is no perfect symmetry, only an apparent one.

Not so, all imperfection are just overlapping symmetries causing resultant asymmetries


Nature produces a 4 legged duck, and a 2 headed girl because of countless millions of symmetries in conjunction producing asymmetry.

And static means nothing, means ether in its initial and athernal state. Dynamics can exist only in asymmetry and continuous stress.

Magnetism is radiation, and radiation is the opposite of static anything.

radiation=polarization=divergence=creating space

just the opposite of static.

However, you have surpassed my capacity of understanding with both the speed and volume of information. I have to take it slowly and see what I can do practically. And to not forget, I have a bottle with dried ferrofluid based on hydrocarbonic oil. Do you consider it can be recovered?
SaDAng

Yes, but it would be cheaper to spend $20 on a new bottle.

[sadang]

Hi Ken,

You work hard for this theory and this is appreciated. I no longer have patience and nor willingness to insist on the obvious aspects, which are ignored or even worse manipulated by current science dogmatists, who like to think in closed loops, without having the courage to revisit the fundamentals of current theories. And not even senses that are cocreators in shaping their own inner realities and the surrounding one.

Back to magnetism, your math using golden ration is a natural way of interpreting the ether manifestation. Everything use the godlen ratio patern, even if it seems to us that it is not. That's because we do not see the whole, but only the part.

Great fromula, with a lot of implications in real world. These perfect math have to be necessarily proved experiemntaly. Because there is nothing perfect in the real world, perfection being a goal. If centrifugal-centripetal geometry would comply a perfect ratio, there would be no power difference between the two poles of a magnet. In nature there is no perfect symmetry, only an apparent one. From the initial ether stress until at cosmic scale or maybe beyond, there should be a specific asymmetry. Otherwise there would be nothing. Symmetry is equal to something static. And static means nothing, means ether in its initial and athernal state. Dynamics can exist only in asymmetry and continuous stress.

However, you have surpassed my capacity of understanding with both the speed and volume of information. I have to take it slowly and see what I can do practically. And to not forget, I have a bottle with dried ferrofluid based on hydrocarbonic oil. Do you consider it can be recovered?

Keep it up,
SaDAng

[TheoriaApophasis]

.

Just discovered, a simple formula for determining the centrifugal field, the centripetal, and the dielectric boundary

Its a serious proof.

(in a perfect magnet as an ideal "perfect" magnet, which of course is nearly impossible)


never the less, its a teaching proof that the golden section applies to all divergent and convergent field reciprocations

Video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wHDsnO3y7CA

Graph:

[TheoriaApophasis]

--- Dielectric Inertial Plane ---

Ken,
.

I CRACKED IT!!!!! IVE PROVEN THE LAST LEG OF THE THEORY!!!!!!

golden ratio reciprocation


PROOF THAT MAGNETIC RECIPROCATION IS = PHI CUBED (1/PHI^3 = Phi Cubed) ~!~!~!!


SEE VIDEO HERE:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vwnM5c0aOes

THEN SEE THIS CHART::::

[TheoriaApophasis]

--- Dielectric Inertial Plane ---
The idea explained to me is the control coils "squeeze" the core winding like a garden hose, creating a DC current.

So back to studying your work. If the core in this device above has in it somewhere a dielectric inertial plane, can these so-called control coils push/force that dielectric inertial plane around? If they can and that dielectric plane is forced in only one direction, would that produce the effect of a DC current?

I'm asking this because you are the scientist here; I'm more of an engineer. And in this case a reverse-engineer. And there is nothing better than to take an example and put it to the test of your research to see what we can explain and what we can't.

I just added 4 more chalkboard videos, however I should NOT have made the videos at 2AM, when I am so tired, but "oh well"

they are here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtoOKA6H_wU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8OW04mByICQ

etc etc


I have about 30 more videos to make and about 200+ more pages to add to the book over 3+ more editions.

There are 2 devices in the "back room" I will not add yet/now due to patent seeking potential.


Lux et Veritas on the kind words.

[Dog-One]

Dielectric Inertial Plane

--- Dielectric Inertial Plane ---

Ken,

I've been studying your book and watching your videos--starting to get a handle on a good portion of this. So I went back to an old project to have another look, the Steven Mark TPU. The modern version in this video that is being taken apart appears very similar:

Akula Self Runner Demo - YouTube


I think what I see in this device is a soft iron wire wound in a half dozen or so loops to make basically a toroid core. This core is then wrapped two more times with "control" coils.

The idea explained to me is the control coils "squeeze" the core winding like a garden hose, creating a DC current.

So back to studying your work. If the core in this device above has in it somewhere a dielectric inertial plane, can these so-called control coils push/force that dielectric inertial plane around? If they can and that dielectric plane is forced in only one direction, would that produce the effect of a DC current?

I'm asking this because you are the scientist here; I'm more of an engineer. And in this case a reverse-engineer. And there is nothing better than to take an example and put it to the test of your research to see what we can explain and what we can't.