Open discussion for projects on this forum.

[Ufopolitics]

Hello Nick

Ufopolitics Thank you for your reply.
I have watched your videos, and yesterday I read the first 5 pages of your
Tapping Radiant Energy thread. I am very curious to know how your batteries are not being drawn from or quickly drained, as well as how the mosfets are not heating up and frying on 36v. I would like to replicate your circuit, to see those amazing results, myself. I had no idea that you were working on this.
Thanks again,
Nick

Hello Nick,

Batteries are just rendering from 2 to 4 Volts Max...
MOSFET's are NTE2397 they are 400V and like 80 Amps pulsed, I have them on great Bus Bars Heat Sinks as a small fan to keep them well ventilated...
The Input Frequency Max is around the 1000 to 1500 Hertz...while the Radiant Out Frequency travels from 2000 to 3000 Hertz...and much higher V and Amps...
The Coils are the Key here...I have from two three layers of 120 turns each on Steel Core... as also Bifilar 200-300 Turns on Air Core...I try to keep Resistance on All Coils above and around the One (1) Ohm value...


Regards


Ufopolitics

[Nick_Z]

Ufopolitics Thank you for your reply.
I have watched your videos, and yesterday I read the first 5 pages of your
Tapping Radiant Energy thread. I am very curious to know how your batteries are not being drawn from or quickly drained, as well as how the mosfets are not heating up and frying on 36v. I would like to replicate your circuit, to see those amazing results, myself. I had no idea that you were working on this.
Thanks again,
Nick

[Ufopolitics]

Hello Nick!

Ufopolitics:
I would like to mention in case you have not been reading my post in the SEC Exciter and other related threads. That I'm more than just interested in your work. I admit that I have not read your thread previously, until you posted a link to it a couple of days ago. As I'm not interested in motor circuits or mechanical devices, as the thread name indicates. But I was not aware that you had left those types of projects, and were now focusing on the oscillator lighting Cfs, and other types of bulbs, using "Cold Electricity", etz...
As I am also very much into the same type of projects, and would love to hear more about your circuits, and progress. I see that you have been modifying and changing your diagrams, and layout, as I also have in trying to find what works best.
Here are a couple of pics of what I've been working on. My main objective now is to obtain FULL light output of my CFL bulbs. Especially the bigger 65 watt 1350 lumen CFL type bulbs, (not pictured) of which I have several of. And to be able to light them all off of solar panels, 12volt batteries, through oscillators circuits.
Greeting from Costa Rica,
Nick Z

Hello Nick,

Hey check out my earliest Thread...My Motors got me to tap...Radiant Energy...

I have there many simple oscillators as many members have posted really nice designs...

Turning On your 65 Watts is NADA...I have turned on 125 W (Replacing 800W)...with just a few volts expense...

Watch me doing it on video below...

RADIANT FREE ENERGY - YouTube

I am using there a simple 555 Timer...in Astable Mode...36V LiPo batteries...and a nice Coil...Diodes rectifying Radiant output...
Diagram posted at Thread in late pages...

Regards


Ufopolitics

[Nick_Z]

Ufopolitics:
I would like to mention in case you have not been reading my post in the SEC Exciter and other related threads. That I'm more than just interested in your work. I admit that I have not read your thread previously, until you posted a link to it a couple of days ago. As I'm not interested in motor circuits or mechanical devices, as the thread name indicates. But I was not aware that you had left those types of projects, and were now focusing on the oscillator lighting Cfs, and other types of bulbs, using "Cold Electricity", etz...
As I am also very much into the same type of projects, and would love to hear more about your circuits, and progress. I see that you have been modifying and changing your diagrams, and layout, as I also have in trying to find what works best.
Here are a couple of pics of what I've been working on. My main objective now is to obtain FULL light output of my CFL bulbs. Especially the bigger 65 watt 1350 lumen CFL type bulbs, (not pictured) of which I have several of. And to be able to light them all off of solar panels, 12volt batteries, through oscillators circuits.
Greeting from Costa Rica,
Nick Z

[Ufopolitics]

Gracias Hermano!!

Hello dear Michael John Nunnerley!!

My God, your Spanish is better than mine!!...
My Spanish have gotten "rusty"...too much time in the "Exile"...my Dear Friend.
My Italian is even worst...too much English lately...lol

Yes I got some interesting mail about to participate in that Thread...It is indeed a great mechanical increase of power!!
However Mike, I have been swamped with work...not precisely on my projects...but to earn my daily bread and butter, my friend...

I have seen your incredible way to manipulate electronics!!...Awesome work!!

I am pretty sure we ALL could seat down one day...and build all together the "Perfect Machine"...that will obtain Assistance from many different "sides"...like Mechanical Assist like Sixto Ramos...Your Great Electronics Controllers-Regulators...and excellent Dedicated Batteries Systems that could take a fast charge...and deliver smoothly linear out...

I know we ALL get there at some point in time...

Many Warm Regards my Dear Friend... !


Ufopolitics

[Michael John Nunnerley]

De nada

Hello Mike,

Thanks for interpreting my statement correctly and correcting other opinions. I appreciate it...

Yes, I was referring exactly at same time factor "on both sides", like you have written above.

As we all know...in any given mathematical equation, even being of different results (Non Balanced Equations)...I have understood that if Time Parameter is not mentioned, it means that it remains idem/identical to both sides of equation...it could be one nano second to Infinite time, for both math operations results...

Unless Time is either part of the equation (in which case no explanation is required) or... when "otherwise specified"...


Regards


Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

Thanks Michael John Nunnerley

The ampere hour is NOT A UNIT OF ENERGY. I think UFO is talking of WATTS as in W=A X V on input and output at the same time interval "which maybe one hour or one minute" Amp hours is a measure of STORED energy as in a battery, it is associated in chemical reaction.

regards

Mike

Hello Mike,

Thanks for interpreting my statement correctly and correcting other opinions. I appreciate it...

Yes, I was referring exactly at same time factor "on both sides", like you have written above.

As we all know...in any given mathematical equation, even being of different results (Non Balanced Equations)...I have understood that if Time Parameter is not mentioned, it means that it remains idem/identical to both sides of equation...it could be one nano second to Infinite time, for both math operations results...

Unless Time is either part of the equation (in which case no explanation is required) or... when "otherwise specified"...


Regards


Ufopolitics

[Farmhand]

That's an opinion not a correction.

@ Michael John Nunnerley, That's your opinion. My opinion is, that it is a fact and
I didn't write anything to correct, unless my calculations were wrong.

It's also my opinion that it's misleading to leave out the time factor. Much more
misleading to leave out the time factor than it is to factor the time in, in an
example, to make my point clear. I'm not saying UFO didn't mean what you
say. But it could be convenient to leave out the time factor, people do play
on that at times, and again I'm not saying that was UFO's intention.

Cheers

I still don't see why you felt you needed to write, " The ampere hour is NOT A UNIT OF ENERGY."

I didn't mention ampere hour. Can you explain what the significance of
mentioning that was ? I know that the ampere hour is not a unit of energy.
It is good to mention it I guess.

Oh, and I think it is also misleading to write that you are correcting me. When
you are just voicing an opinion.



..

[Michael John Nunnerley]

Agreed. The terms power and energy are not interchangeable. Power is Watts, or VxA. Power represents an INSTANT in time. Energy is power integrated over time. Thats why you are not charged on your electricity bill the number of kilowatts you used, but the number of kilowatt-hours.

Yes power represents an INSTANT in time "one equal time period in and out" the case we are talking about in UFO's words.

@ farmhand
I don't think power factor correcting by 59min is a very good example to people on this forum "very misleading", that is what I was correcting. sorry if you did not see what I was correcting, pun intended.

Mike

[Farmhand]

Originally Posted by Farmhand
Below I'm just commenting on the part in bold, this is an open discussion.
Let's be nice.



No not necessarily, here's why. If the 6 amps at 36 volts or 216 Watts
is applied over 1 hour then we would have applied 216 Watt hours, and
if the 3 amps at 200v or 600 watts is drawn out for only 1 minute
then you would have drawn a total of 600 Watt minutes which when divided
by 60 to get Watt hours = 10 Watt hours or the equivalent of 10 Watts for one hour.

Cheers

The ampere hour is NOT A UNIT OF ENERGY. I think UFO is talking of WATTS as in W=A X V on input and output at the same time interval "which maybe one hour or one minute" Amp hours is a measure of STORED energy as in a battery, it is associated in chemical reaction.

regards

Mike

Hi Michael, I don't understand your post, what statement are you correcting ?

I didn't mention ampere hours. And UFO didn't specify, and I did say "not necessarily",
I did not say "definitely not" or just "no". So I know you aren't correcting me.
So could you be more specific ?

Cheers

[citfta]

More disinfo on the Don Smith thread

Some more disinformation has been reinserted into the Don Smith thread.

A couple of years ago I saw a video in which Don stated you could change the frequency response of a transformer by putting a resistor across the input of the transformer. He referenced a chart from the Radio Amateur's Handbook. I am a ham so I have that book. The chart is called the reactance nomograph. The instructions for using it were left off the attachment in the Don Smith thread. The way you use it is to pick out any two of the elements you know and place a straight edge across those two elements and it will show you the rest of what you need to know. For instance if you know what frequency you desire and you know what your capacitance is you can then find the inductance you need to get that frequency. It will also give you the reactance which is expressed in ohms. The confusion seems to be from people that don't understand that reactance is not the same as resistance. This chart is NOT saying you can put a resistor across the input of a transformer and change the frequency response of the transformer.

In fact on page 3 of the Don Smith thread there was a lot of discussion about this already and some of the people tried to change the frequency of a transformer by putting different resistors across the input and found it did NOT change the frequency at all.

Respectfully,
Carroll

[jpolakow]

The ampere hour is NOT A UNIT OF ENERGY. I think UFO is talking of WATTS as in W=A X V on input and output at the same time interval "which maybe one hour or one minute" Amp hours is a measure of STORED energy as in a battery, it is associated in chemical reaction.

regards

Mike

Agreed. The terms power and energy are not interchangeable. Power is Watts, or VxA. Power represents an INSTANT in time. Energy is power integrated over time. Thats why you are not charged on your electricity bill the number of kilowatts you used, but the number of kilowatt-hours.

[Michael John Nunnerley]

correcting the statement

Below I'm just commenting on the part in bold, this is an open discussion.
Let's be nice.



No not necessarily, here's why. If the 6 amps at 36 volts or 216 Watts
is applied over 1 hour then we would have applied 216 Watt hours, and
if the 3 amps at 200v or 600 watts is drawn out for only 1 minute
then you would have drawn a total of 600 Watt minutes which when divided
by 60 to get Watt hours = 10 Watt hours or the equivalent of 10 Watts for one hour.

Cheers

The ampere hour is NOT A UNIT OF ENERGY. I think UFO is talking of WATTS as in W=A X V on input and output at the same time interval "which maybe one hour or one minute" Amp hours is a measure of STORED energy as in a battery, it is associated in chemical reaction.

regards

Mike

[Farmhand]

Ah Hello DR Green!!

Sorry Dr Green...but I have to disagree with you...

If you "invest" 36 Volts and 6 Amps=216 W...and get out 200V and 3 Amps=600 W...aren't you getting FREE 384 Watts?!
I mean your entire investment is returned...then you get an "Extra Bonus" for "investing'...
It was just an example...but real.
And yes, I know...the "Laws" Say it is not possible...



Oh yeah, "The Magician" has had all of Us using Short Circuit Motors for more than 130 Years up to now...and still find some stupid people that say "there is nothing to improve on "our" Motors...they are already very efficient"...
The Magician also said...that His "Short Circuit Motors" could NOT power a Generator...and obtain MORE than We "In"...and Us all..."The Audience"...clapped euphorically after all this years...Bravo, Bravo...Do it again...Do it again...!!






Bad Memory...but I won't tell you...it will not help you to exercise brain if I tell-remind you...and the "German" (Alzheimer) could catch you like that...so be careful...


Regards


Ufopolitics

Below I'm just commenting on the part in bold, this is an open discussion.
Let's be nice.

If you "invest" 36 Volts and 6 Amps=216 W...and get out 200V and 3 Amps=600 W...aren't you getting FREE 384 Watts?

No not necessarily, here's why. If the 6 amps at 36 volts or 216 Watts
is applied over 1 hour then we would have applied 216 Watt hours, and
if the 3 amps at 200v or 600 watts is drawn out for only 1 minute
then you would have drawn a total of 600 Watt minutes which when divided
by 60 to get Watt hours = 10 Watt hours or the equivalent of 10 Watts for one hour.

Cheers

[jake]

Bravo

Excellent debate...

Bad Memory...but I won't tell you...it will not help you to exercise brain if I tell-remind you...and the "German" (Alzheimer) could catch you like that...so be careful...

Regards

Ufopolitics

What experiment!!!