Hi all.
This is my thought about heater.
It will be better to make coil and cut it in the middle,
than put switching element beetween these new two coils.
I will explain why. When you energize the coil and then cut ot in the middle,
you get the same pulse polarity but more strenght.
For example on the end named 3 on the image you get plus and on the end 4 you get the minus.
This eliminate problem with switching reverse polarities when directing current back to battery.
I only can't made switching for this type of circuit by myself and i hope that anyone suggest how to make it.
Thank you ALL!
This is my thought about heater.
It will be better to make coil and cut it in the middle,
than put switching element beetween these new two coils.
I will explain why. When you energize the coil and then cut ot in the middle,
you get the same pulse polarity but more strenght.
For example on the end named 3 on the image you get plus and on the end 4 you get the minus.
This eliminate problem with switching reverse polarities when directing current back to battery.
I only can't made switching for this type of circuit by myself and i hope that anyone suggest how to make it.
Thank you ALL!
in electric terms and thus a loop system is possible
Regular heating elements are high efficiency even at 3000 watts..efficient as far as the current turning directly into heat but heat pump hot water heater retro-fits can make the same heat for only 400-600 watts so that is several COP right there and that can be had now.
Comment