3 Battery Generating System

[Turion]

Whatever it was burtpulizzi is trying to say is obviously some kind of spam that has gone though a really bad translation software into English. Either that, or we have just had our first real communication with an alien life force. The former is of little interest, while the latter could definitely be interesting.

[Matthew Jones]

Whatever it was burtpulizzi.....

Its one of those thingamagigs.....

IN the event of Spam...
-Click "Permalink" On the top right corner of the post.
-Copy the address from your browsers address bar.
-Click on the little button for "report"

- Paste the address into the comment box, with a small note humbly requesting the post be removed as spam.

- submit the request and look out for the magic to happen.


LOL
Matt

[Duncan]

mag amps AV plug

Duncan,
Very, very interesting. I don't have any toroids lying around except extremely small ones and they are too big a pain to wrap, so I have ordered a couple to experiment with. My researching the things you brought up led me here:

Avramenko's Free Electrons Pump v1.0 by Jean-Louis Naudin

This, I believe, is a most interesting post in and of itself, but fits in with what we are all searching for. I feel like we are all nibbling around the edges of the same pie and eventually someone is going to take a bite and get bit of that dark chocolate filling. (My favorite)




Dave

http://maybaummagnetics.files.wordpr...68-71-27-2.pdf

[Guruji]

Maybe apollo 20 returned again to the moon to see again the mothership

[Skeptic]

Duncan, I appreciate your taking the time to respond. It gives me hope that you might get to know me a little better and vice versa . You said ..... and is not reproducible.... I disagree. The 3 battery system is indeed reproducible even if not consistent in its results, although I do agree it is not yet ready for university testing. That's why my suggested 3 phase tests allow for multiple runs of the 3 battery system until the best result is obtained in phase 2 without adding any outside extra energy to phase 2. This allows for the most favorable result possible. Then phase 3 measures it. Let's not worry about the universities yet. Just show a reasonable metric for over unity. If successful, the testing can be made more specific and reliable. Now, do I really sound like the other mentally deranged skeptics you mention? I believe in what Turion is reporting at this point and would like to add some value to the project. I hope I've made it clear that I hope this project succeeds even though I do not currently believe that over unity currently exists in our universe. An over unity device model perpetually working on my desk would definitely change my mind (and would go great with my office decor). A good skeptic should thoroughly and fairly investigate phenomena without discouraging anyone from succeeding. We may not agree all the time, but we can still be friends. Do not let other reported failures (on the internet) stop you from succeeding.

By the way, have you tried using a specific gravity battery tester on all cells to predict if a prospective dead battery will be successful? It might help save money when buying dead batteries and if it works, may help in understanding what is going on.

[OrionLightShip]

I do not currently believe that over unity currently exists in our universe.

I can easily prove that you are incorrect. All you need do is ask.

An over unity device model perpetually working on my desk would definitely change my mind (and would go great with my office decor).

I can make that happen for you and for little cost if you are indeed truly interested. Well, let's leave out that nasty word perpetual nothing last forever.

A good skeptic should thoroughly and fairly investigate phenomena without discouraging anyone from succeeding.

I've yet to meet a good skeptic.
However, you seem to be a good egg so I rescind the above joke.

All scientific inquiry should be met with a healthy skeptical approach, however, a true skeptic does not care about scientific methodology. They are normally stuck in a belief system based on scientific dogma and their own personal filters and prejudices.

Using the moniker Skeptic, implies that you are of that sort, however, like I said; you seem to be a better egg than the typical skeptic so I reserve judgement, but it is easy for me to understand Duncan's initial response to you.

You must also factor in his British dry humor and cultural differences. A better egg and a more thorough researcher than Duncan doesn't exist in my opinion.

Edit: Your request would have to be in the form of a new thread entitled OU Proof or similar so as to not hijack this thread.

[tachyoncatcher]

Semantics

My friends,
We are diverted from our true purpose when discussing the possibility of over unity. It is not. Only due to the archaic definition. Who cares. We are working with an environmental energy that is not yet defined or explained in our taught version of this universe. That is the true nature of what we do on this thread. Even our tools that have been built based on our current definitions and are faulty when it comes to measuring this energy. What can be measured is the amount of work done by these devices. Most of you on this thread know my observations by now. I have testified my results over the many posts. This system is successful at pulling the "unknown" environmental energy from the "aether" and give us more work than what would be expected with our current laws of energy. If you want proof, build it yourself. It's easy and cheap. What we seek is a way to "lock" in the influx of power when everything is just right. This requires an understanding that is currently, more intuitive observation, than scientific fact due to all the undefined unknowns. I know of a number of individuals who have seen that big influx and THAT is what drives us to understand. Over unity, bah... just an excuse to do nothing. We are tapping the environment for something a bit better than our current energy sources. Nothing more. It's been there all along, we are just starting to pay attention.

Randy

[Duncan]

Part 1 of 6: Eric Dollard Tesla Longitudinal wave Energy SBARC Ham Radio with Chris Carson - YouTubeKennelly–Heaviside layer - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Marcus Reid Crystal Converter Battery - Casimir Effect - Part 1 - YouTubeResonant RLC CircuitsSimple DIY Induction Heater - RMCyberneticsLead acid battery maximiserFree Energy Power Generator - YouTube ALWAYS A TEMPTATION ALAS
seems folks cant accept they are looking looking at enigma variations
This is the Royer being used to the same effect
TROS - DC/DC charger/converter - YouTubeSquare Wave Pulse Resonance - YouTubeMAGNETIC VORTEX SPIN DISCOVERY, Sept. 2011, TORNADO UNDERWAT.mp4 - YouTube
and you counteract the spiral with its exact opposite spiral .. the result of which has been hugely amplified by the Aether is free energy. And of course there's lots of it .
Here's an example of that counteracting the spin in part of a rough sketch I put on another thread a little time ago
which I'll link you to rather than repost the picture .. if you don't mind (its not a good daub)

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/12439-re-inventing-wheel-part1-clemente_figuera-14.html#post234866

Steven Mark solid state generator video 1 - YouTube

[tachyoncatcher]

Well Done!

Well done Duncan. This post is a keeper. Like I said before, no one sums it up like you.
Randy

[a.king21]

To Skeptic:
Just buy Magnacoaster's device. lol
Home

https://twitter.com/magnacoaster

Magnacoastermotors - YouTube

Willis running on DEAD BATTERIES: Pulse motor running on dead battery inverters maxed - YouTube

[Skeptic]

a.King21

Thank you for the response.

This is what Sterling Allan and Hank Mills at Peswiki have to say about Magnacoaster:

"Richard Willis, of the Canadian company Magnacoaster, has been promising to ship solid state, over unity generators for three years, but has failed so far to do so. All these years later, though no units have been shipped to customers. He still talks like this will happen very soon."

I've corresponded with Sterling in the past and I believe it is fair to say that he's a strong believer in over unity. If even he doubts the validity of this, a better example would need to be found. Also, my purpose here is not to investigate every claim of over unity on the internet (been there, done that - it never ends). Just the 3 battery system please. Why? Because, in my opinion, you guys are obviously real and genuine in your pursuit. This is what science is all about and is very exciting.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Duncan - I need more time to completely understand your post to do it justice.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
OrionLightShip: Thanks for the offer and the explanation. What I am looking for in a device model is one that can run without any fiddling for enough time to clearly demonstrate that some type of over unity is at work, and any on-board power (like a battery) cannot explain the length of the run. Perhaps you would describe the device and its operational characteristics in detail you have in mind? With such a working device in hand, I could be just as persistent as an advocate as I am a skeptic. A working device would be a big deal!

[a.king21]

a.King21

Thank you for the response.

This is what Sterling Allan and Hank Mills at Peswiki have to say about Magnacoaster:

"Richard Willis, of the Canadian company Magnacoaster, has been promising to ship solid state, over unity generators for three years, but has failed so far to do so. All these years later, though no units have been shipped to customers. He still talks like this will happen very soon."

I've corresponded with Sterling in the past and I believe it is fair to say that he's a strong believer in over unity. If even he doubts the validity of this, a better example would need to be found. Also, my purpose here is not to investigate every claim of over unity on the internet (been there, done that - it never ends). Just the 3 battery system please. Why? Because, in my opinion, you guys are obviously real and genuine in your pursuit. This is what science is all about and is very exciting.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Duncan - I need more time to completely understand your post to do it justice.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
OrionLightShip: Thanks for the offer and the explanation. What I am looking for in a device model is one that can run without any fiddling for enough time to clearly demonstrate that some type of over unity is at work, and any on-board power (like a battery) cannot explain the length of the run. Perhaps you would describe the device and its operational characteristics in detail you have in mind? With such a working device in hand, I could be just as persistent as an advocate as I am a skeptic. A working device would be a big deal!

It's out of date. Magnacoaster is now shipping. Nice try.

[OrionLightShip]

no hijacking zone

Perhaps you would describe the device and its operational characteristics in detail you have in mind?

Any discussion on this thread of anything other than Dave's 3BGS technology, which I know to be the real deal, is not proper forum etiquette and I really have a huge respect for these guys so.......please see my previous post.

[Duncan]

perhaps ?

I hope your right a.king reading through this there seems much in common
Rasa's Zero Point Institute Announces Emerging Generators Galore

[Skeptic]

It's out of date. Magnacoaster is now shipping. Nice try.

a.king21: Since this is off subject for this thread perhaps it can be continued elsewhere. Anyone can say it's shipping without any reference. Links? Reviews? Any evidence? Please email me some evidence of a successful device.