Confirming the Delayed Lenz Effect

[qvision]

Ah well that's a shame

[smoky]

Hi QV,
Truth is, he is not doing the measurements correctly.

The apparent power isn't zero at all.
He needs to work out the rms values for the TOTAL voltage and current supplied to the transformer.

For a symetrical sine wave as shown in his scope shots he has to multiply the max peak to peak current by the max peak to peak volts.

Then bring this answer to rms value multiply his answer by ......one half of the square root of 0.5, (approximately 0.3535 times the peak to peak values).

This is the total apparent or reactive power including any I squared R losses etc. to the circuit.

You can see from the scope shot it is far far from zero.

There has to be a certain amount of energy sloshing back and forth between the inductor an capacitor to keep the reactances charged over their own part of the cycle. If it were zero power there'd be no deflection on at least one of the channels of the scope. (E times I, so anything times zero is zero)

His first scope shot shows there's a phase lag of over 90 degrees, I think.
If it were precisely 90 degrees then the Cosine of the phase difference would be exactly zero giving true FREE energy as output. From apparent power times Cos phi.

BUT because the indicated phase difference is slightly over the 90 degree mark. It means there is indeed some REAL power supplied to his circuit.

This REAL power may well account for the 10.6 Volts seen across his 10 Ohm resistor, giving a dissipation of about 11 watts.

Gerry

[qvision]

Ferrite cores do work, just not as well, they need a higher frequency to be as useful.

Gotoluc's video is amazing, 0 Watts in, 10 Watts out ...

[Allen Burgess]

Delayed Lenz Effect Overunity in transformer.

Gotoluc's got money for nothing here:

Delayed Lenz Effect in Transformer Test 3 - YouTube

[Allen Burgess]

Spiral coil test

I failed to get my Rodin Spiral output coils to show any sign of the "Lenz Delay acceleration" effect at any RPM over the past few days of testing, so I'll upload no video. I sent my 1' sphere magnet on a very high speed run, but still a bite from the shorted trifilar at top end.

[woopy]

Hi,
very good expirement.
But, using coil core is metal, isn't it ? Why do you use ferrit core ?
Ferrit core never accleration at the short circute genrator coil .. İf using ferrit core and getting accleration, all problem solved...
Sorry my bad english..

ok Please try it and than post your results perhaps you will be suprised

good luck

laurent

[antony27]

Hi,
very good expirement.
But, using coil core is metal, isn't it ? Why do you use ferrit core ?
Ferrit core never accleration at the short circute genrator coil .. İf using ferrit core and getting accleration, all problem solved...
Sorry my bad english..

[woopy]

Hi Allen

Thank's to you for bringing my video and experiment here, because it takes always a lot of time and energy to publish everything all arround the different forum, and answer all the questions.

Just for info i have modified the datasheet (blue which i replaced by a more brown but correct one ) because the first line is wrong

i made a mistake, the no load is 836 rpm , and the current is 470 ma AND FROM THIS POINT ( what is slightly under the threshold ), the deceleration is going on and on down , slowly and constant , to 230 rpm, so the rpm lost is 606 rpm and not 240. (836 -230 = 606 rpm as i have wrongly written) while the current on the prime mover is increasing from 470 ma up to 570 ma.

But for the acceleration result all seems to be correct.

And of course i wait for Toranarod and all the Muller replicator for some input

So as i am here, i profit to ask if you have any idea as off the acceleration process , and if it is a delayed Lenz how it occures ?

So happy to share here also

and good luck at all

laurent

[Allen Burgess]

Table.

Table from Woopy:

The rotor gains 441 rpms while imput drops 101 ma when power's increased to 10 volts in his new double magnet setup. Woopy's gaining a great amount of power with just one coil! Woopy's output coil is now shorted through a FWBR and a 1 Ohm resistor. Still a very rudimentary setup.

[Allen Burgess]

Video

New video "Lenz Delay Propulsion" confirmation video from Whoppyjump!


accelerating rotor under load 1.wmv - YouTube

[qvision]

Test results, 500g of 0.25mm, bifilar-wound, series-connected, laminated-core coil.

This coil/core combination overspeeds the rotor when shorted.


Rotor with no coil/core present.

Hz : 450
mA : 443

Rotor with coil/core present, open-circuit.

Hz : 450
mA : 438

Rotor with coil/core persent, short-circuit.

Hz : 455
mA 433

Video here :

Exploring the Heins Effect, a coil/core combination that overspeeds the rotor. - YouTube


Thanks for reading,

QV.

[Allen Burgess]

Try placing a diametric magnet in the core of the bifilar output coil, and compare the results!

[qvision]

My laminations arrived today.

The performance was not as good as my loose anchor bolts !

Results in spreadsheet here :

Core tests.xls

If you don't have excel installed then get the viewer here :

Download Details - Microsoft Download Center - Excel Viewer


Best to all,

DC.

[qvision]

Just a small update.

Yesterday i tested a bifilar-wound, serially connected coil, the same 0.25mm coil i previously had as straight-wound, the performance increases in terms of a rise in frequency and a drop in current draw are on the order of four times better than a straight-wound coil.

Here's a short clip of the new coil in action. I plan to get a cheap HD camera soon, apologies for fuzziness and mesy desk ;+}

The Heins Effect - Bifilar-wound, series-connected coil. - YouTube


Best to all,

DC.

[Farmhand]

Hi Farmhand & Muon,
There is a couple of ways to do this without increasing frequency.
One is to bring the secondary into resonance. Trouble is when power is removed from the circuit it loads down the resonance effect, real power then starts to exceed reactive power. Also with parallel resonance output volts goes through the roof & arcs over inside transformer.

The second method is to delay the magnetic field created by the primary from getting to the secondary by one quarter of a cycle.
I am experimenting with this method.
At 50Hz... it's 5 millisecond delay required, cause one cycle at 50 Hz takes 20 milliseconds for full 360 degrees or one cycle to complete.

Tesla used the delay method in his US Patent 433702 (in year 1890, a nice easy read too).
He wound a thin shield of insulated steel wire between the transformers' primary and secondary windings, he left the ends unconnected. Only using magnetic properties of the steel. ie Shielding at first then when saturated field lines pass through same as in air.

I hope this helps...Gerry

Yes that patent refers to what looks to be the method Tesla found to be best
for transformers because it DID NOT reduce the primary current and provided
a constant current for the load on the secondary.