
The energy always enters through this wall at right angles, the energy then couples in the windings of that coil. Producing what everybody terms as Back EMF, how wrong as Back EMF is never more then the source voltage under any condition. However the energy that does couple is at the exact level of potential of the electrical gas that surrounds you. Change the impedance of the coil you change the coupling effect. *
From: Leon Sprink - Antigravity - patents
"Cement is produced under normal conditions in kilns which are subjected to the influence of crossing fluxes produced in a plane at right angles to the horizontal component of the earth's magnetic field, each of the fluxes being produced by silent electric discharges between two opposing pointed electrodes having a potential difference of 1,000-160,000 volts derived from a source of direct current, the cement kilns being outside the paths of the fluxes. The apparatus for producing the fluxes is operated continuously for twenty days before cement making is commenced, the reaction time then being reduced from 2 1/2 hours to one hour..."
That is why I used the term "Blotch wall" instead of "A vector". If it were just the charge, and not charge coupling, why would the orientation relative to the earth's magnetic field matter?
Like I said, I do not mean to confuse people.
If I am wrong, I would like to know your opinion as to why.
I have done my best to lay out my thought process.
Also -- if you can share a bit of comprehension, which feild produces the spirals, and which one produces the cracks?
Is it the canceling of the magnetic fields in the coils which liberates the charge "a-vector"?
I do not mean to confuse, I am trying to translate what I see, through the viewpoints of other people so that we might all realize we are seeing the same thing.
==Romo



) and the Beta Quartz




Leave a comment: