What is the Vacuum? And how does energy come from it?

[pengrove]

Red and Blue

bye bye bye

[Infunity]

The truth is, a vacuum is not an accurate description of what they're referring to in "Energy From the Vacuum". It is not a vacuum based on the definition that a vacuum is empty. A vacuum is filled with many things. The best way to explain this is as simply as possibly... the vacuum is a sea of energy. If we observe it as a wave, its a much higher frequency than our visible light spectrum, if as a particle its much smaller than the atom. It fills all of what we perceive to be space. It is in my interpretation, the fourth dimension. What you do to space happens instantaneously all across the universe. Now forgive me for what I am about to say, because many would crucify me for mixing spirituality with science; I understand them to be the same. The vacuum of space is filled with an energy that has many names: aether, dirac sea, orgones, the breath of life, prana, the "fabric" of spacetime, these are all relatively synonymous. The differences are that some are conscious, and some are focusing on different frequencies, and some are focusing on different charges of these subatomic particles.

My evidence is that light is a wave, and waves travel through a medium, this medium is this material. Magnets take energy from somewhere and never stop unless their poles are disarranged, this energy comes from this material. When you destroy atoms and get all the quarks, the quarks are very unstable and are not balances, so their energy dissipates into a thinner state. This state is that material. This stuff is what causes gravity, inertia, and time. Its not that complicated once you allow yourself to see its simplicity. This material is the unified theory of everything, spiritually, and scientifically.

Well... thats it for me.

[Farmhand]

Hi all, Even the ancient Greeks new that a true vacuum is impossible.

From Wiki,

Historically, there has been much dispute over whether such a thing as a vacuum can exist. Ancient Greek philosophers did not like to admit the existence of a vacuum, asking themselves "how can 'nothing' be something?". Plato found the idea of a vacuum inconceivable. He believed that all physical things were instantiations of an abstract Platonic ideal, and he could not conceive of an "ideal" form of a vacuum. Similarly, Aristotle considered the creation of a vacuum impossible — nothing could not be something. Later Greek philosophers thought that a vacuum could exist outside the cosmos, but not within it. Hero of Alexandria was the first to challenge this belief in the first century AD, but his attempts to create an artificial vacuum failed.

Reading more of the Wiki tells that even in outer space there is at least a few hydrogen particals per cubic cm as well as the Aether, which is easily explained as has been done many times, it is potential in a constant state of flux, swinging from one side of zero point the "positive" through "Zero" point to the other side of zero point the "negative", kind of like AC power but "Not" .

At the zero point, net energy is zero the swing either way is equally opposite.
This makes complete sense because for there to be something, there must be the potential everywhere to support it's exsistance. Everywhere !

Everything (all matter) is borne from this Aether and taps the Aether fluctuations to maintain exsistance. This is very difficult to explain but it is done very well with picture's, by Walter Russell in his many books.

Well this is how I see it.

Vacuum - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

There is also nothing that is truely static within the entire universe. That is also impossible. Try to make something stop moving and you will prove it to yourself.

Cheers

[Sun Fusion]

Vacuum is any place devoid of any matter in solid, liquid or gaseous forms.. I m not sure about how they derive energy from it though.. But it is said to be in the lowest possible energy state..

[philopolymath]

Simple terminology & cohesive solutions needed.

There seems to be no shortage of insight into Aether but we lack a simple unified terminology. (Db Larson aside). I'm convinced there is only one means of energy transfer. Inductance by way of harmonic resonance. I refer to the misunderstood workings of the common "Transformer" as a clue. Correct me if I'm wrong but I think this is consistent with Russell and Tesla. I'm futher convinced by Russell that ultimately there is only one expression of energy. We however see only the divided +/- expressions. The Vacuity of space as the maximum density of Neg potential and Sun's as the Max density of Pos. potential. Occasionaly we can see both interacting in opposite directions as Lightning,spark,plasma.
(Opposites DO NOT Attract,Gravity is a push). Again consistent with Leedskalin. The anti-entropy Bio/life (W.Reich/ode/prana etc..) force is my weak area but it seems to be the interaction of this life force upon the fundemendal energy that coheres/precipitates all matter. The role of consciounness may also be a contributing factor. More succinctly there is but waves of light conditioned by accoustics. I find this accords well with all recorded physics. The vortex seems to be the universal mechanism, as such, I feel there is only one true "machine" man can employ that being the "Mark I Torque converter", though we have many variants depending on the medium we are harnessing. The geometry of propellers for water/air are well established. Is the Tesla coil an Aether propeller? If not what is? Sadly David Hamel is no longer available to teach us. Perhaps V.Shauberger has but it's being sequestered.
The Mark TR-3B (Aether torque converter) may be the most current variant.
I concur with T.Beardon in that all the worlds power grids have not "Produced" a single watt of power, but only provided the conditions for the Herzian TEM to propegate from the Aether while dismissing the LEM component. (Re-Dollard,Lindeman,Brown@Borderland). Tesla grandfathered AC but quickly abandonded futher research to move on to the other component of the Aether. Can someone remind me whom (Moray?)recorded distant "energy events" instantaneously Before the radio waves reached earth. Clear evidence of LEM detection.(Dr.T.G.Heironymous)
We know Moreley-Michelson is flawed and will offer evidence if employed in a vertical plane.
We have copious examples of persons "tapping" the Aether but many don't understand the how and why and give us a plethora of names. (Bedini/exciter/SEC/Newman/JouleTheif) Which I feel only serve to confuse.
I applaude and deeply appreciate their efforts. I just find it frustrating & time consuming to dechipher.
We also must suffer the Profiteers whom covet discoveries for personal gain.
If you wish to SEE the Aether there is an excellent example offered as an optical illusion by Brusspup where a sheet of cellophane is patterned as +/- (black&clear) then the movement of the Aether coheres matter and provides the illusion of movement we experience. It's my favourite youtube video.

[philopolymath]

Tesla's WhiteFire & Black Void

Further evidence of the Aether was offered by Tesla in the form of white fire and the black void. I find this consistent with Russell in that WhiteFire is a condensation or concentration of the Positive flow and the Black void the reciprical expression of Neg concentration. Acheived only under the most extreme of conditions which he certainly investigated. The de-coherence of matter (ie: dissapearing tools) is consistent with the dark void and the WhiteFire's "pleasant" physical sensations is consistent with other research furthered to fruition by radionics. I am suprised that these phenomena are not pursued more agressively by current researchers. Like wise with Stubblefields ability to draw/impart "Illumination" directly from/apon ground and possibly ambient heat. Again language has been a dis-service in dividing related concepts such as Earth energy/telluric currents/lay lines from the Aether. Keely was probably the most gifted yet misunderstood. I have noticed that mainstream science is slowly yet reluctantly accepting the Electrical/plasma nature of our universe as the overwhelming amount of astronomical evidence begins to tip the scales.