Tweet
bye bye bye
-
Last edited by pengrove; 05-12-2011, 09:53 PM. -
I wasn't saying anything about your ability to understand English, just my ability to explain.Originally posted by pengrove View PostI understand english sir. Yes what you have said is correct to my knowledge.
Now ask yourself this question. What kind of dipole is created when the coil is powered with radiant energy?
And then we will draw it and compare drawings.
As i see it the coil will act as an antenna allowing the radiant to pas into the environment but there will be a dipole allowing an exchange of energy so not all energy will be lost.
This would also explain why a negatively charged lead acid battery does not exhibit extra capacity on inductive loads.Comment
-
-
Radiant is like a leaky pipe system heheOriginally posted by pengrove View Postthats ok, just trying to explain why I think that a monopole is not overunity when it is power by radiant energy. John does say that but I would have to look for the quote.
And then we will roll on to what we must do with this harvested vacuum.Comment
-
normally we engineers only count the form of energy we are looking for and count other forms as a loss, that is why we build inefficient systems.
In an SSG we have lots of magnetic losses that we didn't have to pay for so we don't count them. If we close the magnetic loop we loose the radiant so we have an inefficient motor. maybe we should look to capture some of that magnetic loss.
On my small SSG I can easily feel the magnetic pulses 30cm away from the coil, I need to look into how to harvest it. At the same time it may be possible to surround the device with some form of radiant collector, a bit like a gray tube, and collect more of the radiant exchange.
Just a thoughtComment
-
I have been thinking the same thing about the SSG, how to better use the lost energy of the magnets and spinning rotor. I know it's not a system designed for mechanical work, but it seems there is a lot more useful things that can be done with the rotor and magnets.Originally posted by mbrownn View Post
I am hoping to learn enough to actually try out some of the things in my head, but inexperience has them locked in there for now
nice to know that I am at least thinking along the right lines on how all this works, the rest is just seat time
The absence of proof is not proof of absence
Comment
-
-
-
not an expert either
"Damit Jim, I'm a Doctor not an expert" (sorry I couldn't resis )
Just a thought I had for a while about this and figured I would throw it out.
A vacuum is the absence of something.
Whether matter or energy or both.
BizzySmile it doesn't hurt!
Jesus said,"...all things are possible through God." Mk10:27Comment
-
-
We must make sure that History does show the combination of work from Tesla, Bedini, Russell,and Keely is responsible for changing the world.
But we should understand that they are part of the whole. Part of the ONE, like we all are.
Through the understanding of these man and their work we will overcome what we are facing now.
We need the food to feed the visualizations we have in our minds eye.Last edited by pengrove; 05-06-2011, 05:20 PM.Comment
-
-
-
-
T. H. Moray
Hi pengrove,
Perhaps this could answer your question:
Every single star in the universe radiates its energy in every direction. That means space or the "vacuum" is filled with an unimaginable amount of energy at every point.
BWComment
Comment