Hi Jetijs
Bravo as usual for your great work
so far i see on the pix
1- the magnetic poles seems not to be joined = no contact (blue color arrow)
2- there seems to be small coills on each corner (lila color arrow)
3- it seems that the iron piece is one single piece joined at the green arrow
Hope this helps and waiting for your results
good luck at all
Laurent
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
gravity waves found
Collapse
X
-
Jetijs wheel
Sorry, Jetijs, I think you may be right on the angle of the magnets and the separation between them. My thinking there was that Dave ground down the contact surfaces (or sanded them) for good metal on metal contact. In my opinion, if the pieces are not in close phyiscal contact they cannot lock. Perhaps connecting on just the ends is enough to do it.
Some of the magnets on Ed's wheel really do look paralell on at least one edge, but that could just be the angle of the photo.
I am really interested to see the results of your clover-shaped PMH ring.
Also, there is a guy is selling a completed wheel on EBAY. He wants something like $4600 or best offer? Anyway I have looked at many of his photos and videos and it seems like he is very close to an Ed Leedslanin wheel, I'd say you are very close to having it figured out.
Jon Depew did some work in this area, and his ring was 5 layers deep. I know that is a LOT of construction to put into it. His videos seem to lack any descriptive audio and he leaves many of us guessing about the principles he says he has discovered and the "magnetic gears" he describes.
Hopefully you can get a lock and some sort of result with 1 ring, and then later increase the effect with more layers, if it seems too weak with a single layer.
I think everyone here hopes you will be successful and make yet another working device.
Best wishes,
Van
Leave a comment:
-
Van, there are gaps between magnets. The poles are compressed together but that is also the only thing where they touch see for yourself:

These magnets have 18 degree bend on them, this would make a wheel with full contact with each other if only 20 magnets were used. Since Ed used 24 magnets, they would need to have a 15 degree bend in order to get them in circle and full metal contact. Ford T magneto used only 16 magnets and as the bases of the magnets were almost together, the ends were far apart from each other.
I tried putting 4 extra coils on the wheel and pulse all 8 coils in parallel using 24V, that makes a huge spark but still nothing happens. I am sure that we need the lock effect somewhere on the wheel, but I guess it wont be the magnets. Maybe the clover shaped ring on top. I will get the colver shaped ring lasercut for me and see how this works
nat1971a, what experiment exactly do you propose?
Leave a comment:
-
Jetijs wheel
Jetijs-Originally posted by Jetijs View PostHi all
I finally overcame my laziness and put all of my 24 Ford T magnets on a rotating wheel. They are all magnetized and put in NNSSNNSS configuration. I wound a coil of 15 turns on four of the magnets and did try to pulse all four coils in parallel to get the locking effect. Nothing to report so far...
I cannot tell what work you did in the assembly process. The first thing that comes to mind is making sure that you have bare metal - free of any grease, slag, oxidation, or dirt. Each magnet needs to be able conduct magnetically AND electrically around the circle.
Secondly, I think in Ed's wheel, the magnets were touching in such a way that the ends or poles of each magnet is roughly paralell with the one next to it. Looking at your set-up, you have a "V" shaped gap between each magnet, effectively reducing the contact surface to the very ends. The greater the contact surface the better the EM lock between the various pieces. You may have to file or grind each magnet so it sits flush with the one next to it.
I'm not sure about wiring coils in parallel... that may be another problem. Does anyone recall if David wrapped four different points on his wheel, and if he did were they connected in series or in parallel?
Thanks,
-Van
Leave a comment:
-
jet,
if this is a standing wave generator like you mentioned earlier. How about using a pmh (that is wound equally and oppositely) to hit the neutral centre with a huge standing wave pulse. (keely always talked about pulsing the neutral centre)
anyway my thought of the day.
N.
Leave a comment:
-
Hi all
I finally overcame my laziness and put all of my 24 Ford T magnets on a rotating wheel. They are all magnetized and put in NNSSNNSS configuration. I wound a coil of 15 turns on four of the magnets and did try to pulse all four coils in parallel to get the locking effect. Nothing to report so far. The poles stay the same and don't do nothing even at the moment the coils are being pulsed. I guess I need higher voltages and more current to overcome the magnetization of the magnets to get this thing rolling. Will try 24 and 36 volts tomorrow and if that wont work, I will put coils on four more magnets so that every third one has a coil and try to pulse them again. If that won't do anything then it will go on the shelf until some new info.
Leave a comment:
-
sorry
Lambright, you seem like a nice guy but you have been bumbling on this topic here and at Energetic Forum for a good part of a year with thousands of posts. I'm not sure you have much to 'boast' about as regards what 'your' device can or cannot do. Right now it cannot do a damn useful thing and you continue to play and post useless videos which don't really show the viewer anything.
Having said this, I KNOW that the Leedskalnin wheel/pmh produces these effects, therefore dont think I am refuting what you have to say. Where you are failing big time is in your scientific methodology. You run around like a little kid, freezing water, doing this and doing that, posting videos and trying to convince people....THIS IS NOT SCIENTIFIC METHOD! For a start....forget trying to convince the audience of anything....are you a believer? If the answer is yes, then start building your 'evidence locker' and decide where you want to take this technology. If you want to attain funding or come out with a useful product you will not achieve this by roping in half interested forum people meanwhile acting like a child yourself who has Attention Deficit Disorder because he can't stay focussed on one track.
Until then all you have is a mystical novelty that isn't doing you or humanity any good.
E-Goose...........sorry for wasting your time...david
Leave a comment:
-
Regarding Crystals
when talking of crystals and electricity in the same line;
there is nothing that actually beats Black Tourmaline.
Besides its non-physical uses, it does have some very
interesting properties when rubbed, heated, cooled,
pressurised, electrical or magnetically charged.
Oh, and it is VERY practical mineral in electrical,
magnetic and gravity readings; often used in expensive
instruments.
enjoy!
Leave a comment:
-
Thanks Van, I'll have to read through it when I have more time but I did take a cursory look at it.
Quartz is well known for it's piezoelectric properties and it is interesting how the transition states do effect the electrical emissions. One of my colleagues witnessed a quartz laden hillside that was so actively discharging energy that sections were glowing blue in the black night on his way home to Angeles Oaks, California. It wasn't long after that, there was an Earthquake in the Big Bear area. Evidently some of the veins were under stress and strain from the associated faults and the electrical discharges were causing series cascades in the fractured rock as they would emit a burst of electricity which in turn would flex another section etc. Of course in his case the rocks were not in thermal transition, but the phenomenon is noteworthy.
Leave a comment:
-
Mad (Russian) Scientists
@ Harvey - Thought you might find this interesting - quartz and quartz-containing stone samples exhibiting EMP output when heated in a vacuum... SpringerLink - Russian Physics Journal, Volume 18, Number 8
Russian scientists tested this in 1975 and discovered a temperature range where EMP emissions would reach a maximum level under an applied voltage.
Leave a comment:
-
OK
OK , maybe not better than that....davidOriginally posted by Harvey View PostYeah! Toast! YouTube - YEAH TOAST!!!
Leave a comment:
-
@ thekubisak - Too bad that all you have to offer is is your armchair critique of the this thread. I see where your previous posts were more of the same. I don't know what you have built - or what you know - that qualifies you to cast judgement. At best you're a lurker. (I won't stoop to tell you what I think you really are.) However, until you actually build a PMH and have something unique to offer... you are just background noise for the real transmission.Originally posted by thekubiaks View PostThis thread is entertaining to say the least. No shortage of imagination.
Its like seeing Elvis on a piece of toast.

Van
Leave a comment:
-
Yeah! Toast! YouTube - YEAH TOAST!!!Originally posted by david lambright View Postwell if you are ever in town, come by...none of the videos do justice...seeing it with your eyes is the best way by far....better than toast!....david
Leave a comment:
-
hey
well if you are ever in town, come by...none of the videos do justice...seeing it with your eyes is the best way by far....better than toast!....davidOriginally posted by thekubiaks View PostThis thread is entertaining to say the least. No shortage of imagination.
Its like seeing Elvis on a piece of toast.

Leave a comment:
-
Bump
This thread is entertaining to say the least. No shortage of imagination.
Its like seeing Elvis on a piece of toast.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: