gravity waves found

[NorthWind]

come on guys...help me out here..i live in salem oregon...my invitation stands solid ...any one ...get a message to me i will show one person or a group of people what i have found ..ask.any questions ..if anyone does not see this wave form with their own eyes..i will remove all posts and videos and post no more....what have you got to loose???this machine works ...you have got to be curious ..send some you trust or come see for yourself...please ..i have nothing to hide ...think about it...i will be in lincoln city today but home in the evening...you will NOT be disappointed....

Hello, David.

I live not too far from you, and would like to see this with my own eyes. Will you show me if I make the trip? See my PM.

NorthWind

[Xenomorph]

LOL Vickers. If e=Mc^2 - and a photon has zero mass - then where does the energy come from that moves the photon at light speed? Zero x any number at all is always zero. I know there's an answer to this somewhere. But one tends to forget that even fundamental mainstream physics has embedded contradictions, qualifications. exceptions and variations. Where we're told that a rule is a rule is a rule, in fact - at best - it's an approximation. The only thing written in stone is that energy is usable. That, and that we can't measure beyond light speed. Else, the most qualified are grappling with the best and worst of us. And you're right. It's as well to remember that gravity was never resolved in Einstein's General Theory. The questions are still out there. Lots of them. All over the place. At least Dave is pointing us to a possible source.

Not to forget his powerful 2nd "helpful clue" about gravity

[witsend]

Hmmmm... Here's a couple of clues for u guys. Number 1. E=MC2. Number 2. Gravity was invented 300 years ago because an apple fell on some guys head.

LOL Vickers. If e=Mc^2 - and a photon has zero mass - then where does the energy come from that moves the photon at light speed? Zero x any number at all is always zero. I know there's an answer to this somewhere. But one tends to forget that even fundamental mainstream physics has embedded contradictions, qualifications. exceptions and variations. Where we're told that a rule is a rule is a rule, in fact - at best - it's an approximation. The only thing written in stone is that energy is usable. That, and that we can't measure beyond light speed. Else, the most qualified are grappling with the best and worst of us. And you're right. It's as well to remember that gravity was never resolved in Einstein's General Theory. The questions are still out there. Lots of them. All over the place. At least Dave is pointing us to a possible source.

[witsend]

Guys, some tricky machining - apparently, but we should have a rig together in a week. We're using steel piping? So there wont be a 'compression' of the two halves - but the 'semi circle' will be achieved by cutting through the pipe. Hopefully it works. We're proposing to take it straight through to a full toroidal shape but with multiple sections - toroidal but roughly angular. Probably as many as 16 sections required.

I'll post when I get delivery.

[Jetijs]

A couple of years ago I had an outer shell of a big bearing broken in two halves and I noticed that it behaved just like a horseshoe magnet with moderate strength. I found that the bearing shell material is hard and brittle, but it is so far the best material that holds the residual magnetism the most out of all materials I have tested so far. So I cur some bearings in half and made a 8 pole piece. This is also good because bearing outer surface is very smooth and insures good contact with no gaps. But I can't see or feel anything from this setup. Still have not tried to rotate it, will do that now.



David, please post the exact dimensions of your setup, the pipe diameter used, the length of each piece, the inner and outer diameter and I will try to replicate the exact setup as I agree with Bruce that dimensions could be important.
Thank you!
Jetijs

[Bruce_TPU]

i am in awe,with that kind of testing there would be no more speculation... for you i would make another model..but i do not have a machine shop.....it would work,,,,but its ugly....any way if you want iwill build one for the sake of science..........david

I think that you should build a second one, to the same specs as your first. Having just one of anything is a bad idea, and having just one of something that is showing a new effect is just a shame.

No one cares what it looks like, only that it works. ;-)

We would pay the shipping and have it overnighted to someone that the forum trusts. And then there would be two.

Cheers,

Bruce

[Joit]

Crop circles

[david lambright]

i am in awe,with that kind of testing there would be no more speculation... for you i would make another model..but i do not have a machine shop.....it would work,,,,but its ugly....any way if you want iwill build one for the sake of science..........david

[Bruce_TPU]

Perhaps the next person building this, should build to the same height and diameter, using the same metal as David. Like an EM wave, different diameters at resonance tap into, his diameter and height may be important. I am concerned that no one has been able to replicate the effect. That should be of prime importance, IMHO.

@ David,
I assume that no word about picture two, is that you had spun the rotor, as Harvey thought?? Thanks for a reply to this.

Cheers,

Bruce

[teslaproject]

..does any body remember seeing crop circles w/ 24 segments? how many original stones in outer ring at stone henge...are there any other monuments w/ 24

David

Actually saw some crop circle photo's the other day many with 'star' shapes but NONE with 24 points or anything. As far as Stonehenge goes, the inner Sarcens (uprights) number 30 not 24 and the outer ring which was supposedly built at an earlier date falls well under 24 (around 11 megaliths). Although the jury is out as to why S/H was built, it seems to align with lunar and solstice cycles therefore the people who built it would have used as many stones as were necessary to create whatever effect (calendar maybe) they needed.

Stay scientific and with the facts.

TP

[Harvey]

So, the scales don't offer a different reading inside the field? I was unable to view all david's new video's. BTW David, also great thanks towards your camera lady, putting up with an inventor. Must have a Mr. and Mrs. Curie thing going on there :-)

I feel an analogy to the earth's equator. It's spinning at mach 1.5 or so, period of 24 hours. The equators should be a huge mountain ridge of all earth's water, but they are not. And gravity reading are basically the same all on earth. Here's where the centrifigal effect of the aether seems to come in. Mass/weight stay the same around the surface, SOMEHOW.

Now I'm interested to see a weight being spun by a small engine, suspended from an elastic band, inside the field. The "lightness" might result in an altered (elastic) radius for a given rpm?
The only way I see the aether/eath thing working, if it's orbit specific. No other spinners I am aware of exhibit zero increased CF. Might be by lack of scale to tap into the dominant counter-CF effect.
If the earth is a kind of locked magnet...

Actually the gravity is not the same everywhere on the Earth. When I worked for a company that made Manometers that used real mercury in tubes, I learned that every one had to be calibrated on site because of the differences in gravity. They are very small, but those instruments were so sensitive (and accurate) that it had to be dead on.

Also, there is a large depression in the Ocean (Southern Hemisphere IIRC) about a mile across and about 300 feet deep. Water seeks its own level right? Well, imaging showed a huge dense mountain range under that spot of water which accounted for the increased gravity pulling the water down. The Navy found that spot during some communication testing and the ship went out of site and then came back up again going in the same direction. (EDIT: Here is a PDF discussing Seamounts and how they change water levels (http://www.tos.org/oceanography/issu...3-1_wessel.pdf )

The Earth has a significant bulge at the equator. And this too creates differences in gravitational acceleration.

The gravity waves predicted by Einstein are not electromagnetic and therefore they do not adhere to the same laws of electromagnetic waves. But they do adhere to some of the other laws as David points out.

You can participate in the search for Gravity waves by joining the Einstein@Home data analysis project. You can join here
to allow your computers processing power to be used for number crunching when you are not using it.

Because gravity is a space-time distortion, it is reasonable to conclude that anything that causes a space-time distortion will also effect gravity to some degree. It is my opinion that space-time is the Aether that Tesla depended on. The Gravity Probe-B was used specifically to test certain aspects of this including Geodetic and frame dragging effects. Tesla felt that the Michelson-Morley experiment failed because he felt the Aether was being dragged along with the Earth as it rotated and revolved. It appears he was right. Space-time does drag along with the Earth to some degree.

Perhaps David has found an easier way for us to look at these effects

[david lambright]

trust me...you will see this and know what an incredible find this is....the results will confirm my findings....thank you for letting me post on your forum....i know some of you were thinking...WACK JOB..then some things i was saying started to fit the new model....is this exciting or what.....to be a part in something great....coming soon...how Ed got energy from his generator to the quarry....."its easy, if you know how".......well, now its easy....like i said...my rig is made out of junk..not balanced..but it performs like nothing i have seen before....great machines by the way....there are a lot of people thinking that this design is too simple......but it works.....the physics behind this new energy fits way better from quantam to universal and back so......get to building..........david

[david lambright]

you guys are good!

Amazing pics David! Circular deformating, who could even think of that?

I am wondering now whether your effect are showing despite the obvious asymetry of your pipe layout, or thanks TO sufficient asymmetry.

i went over some indoor photos...yuk..there is or was 1 video that was posted but it was the wrong one ....well, now it is the right one ...day light works good for HD....i was gonna tell you this,,,the quartz was sitting by the generator all day...usually our TV goes to a blue screen .. this time there was bands of color ,rainbow style ..should have took a pic...i always wanted to be a part of it, seems like now i am the start of it!....now we can bend light...."no lens" lenses....i set up an experiment today , getting ready for video about how Ed really moved those stones....the experiment worked good...does any body remember seeing crop circles w/ 24 segments? how many original stones in outer ring at stone henge...are there any other monuments w/ 24?....i remember seeing petroglyphs with wavy lines and spiral designs....they saw this too...i want every one to see and feel this energetic new wave.....cant wait for someone to try and verify the telescope experiment... i will post pics &vids tomorrow.....tell all leedskalnin people what is going on over here......they are going to flip........david

[Cloxxki]

So, the scales don't offer a different reading inside the field? I was unable to view all david's new video's. BTW David, also great thanks towards your camera lady, putting up with an inventor. Must have a Mr. and Mrs. Curie thing going on there :-)

I feel an analogy to the earth's equator. It's spinning at mach 1.5 or so, period of 24 hours. The equators should be a huge mountain ridge of all earth's water, but they are not. And gravity reading are basically the same all on earth. Here's where the centrifigal effect of the aether seems to come in. Mass/weight stay the same around the surface, SOMEHOW.

Now I'm interested to see a weight being spun by a small engine, suspended from an elastic band, inside the field. The "lightness" might result in an altered (elastic) radius for a given rpm?
The only way I see the aether/eath thing working, if it's orbit specific. No other spinners I am aware of exhibit zero increased CF. Might be by lack of scale to tap into the dominant counter-CF effect.
If the earth is a kind of locked magnet...

[david lambright]

strange photos...

those photos are a little odd...video is 720p HD pictures are 8 mega pix i used an aiptek HD camera....i will be making a start to finish generator build .....sorry about the video......i know that there is FLIR cameras made for detecting gas leaks.... billowing plumes not seen to the naked eye..... i will call tomorrow to see about using a FLIR.....as far as the weights? i tried different set ups nothing worked right.....it feels like it is getting heavier at the poles ...a hanging scale did not work but i have more pics and video coming ...this wave is so amazing and new,about 1 hour ago i pulled out my bushnell 6" reflector telescope......from 3 meters away we could feel the pulse from the generator.....this is new technology...this wave behaves like visible light,IR UV,micro radio....this wave has limitless possibilities.all my hillbilly experiments point the right direction.....thought experiments point the same way. it just makes sense!!!!there will be other builds finished soon, the results will match... i am sorry about not answering all questions and experiments....its been a little wild these past few days[you can imagine]but i say bravo! to all involved....you guys are grasping this very quick...and because we know about light....this technology will grow very quickly.....