Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Gray Tube Replication

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Marcoz
    replied
    Originally posted by Aaron View Post
    Marcoz, I found this that I posted a while back here and on Peswiki.
    The top diagram is like yours in concept and because of the gap, a diode isn't needed. Anyway, I'm in agreement with the basic concept you show.

    This is at: Directory:EV Gray - PESWiki

    Hi Aaron

    I am happy to see the diagram you posted.
    I have never seen it before, but it confirms that my findings are indeed correct.
    When no spark gap is used, parts of the circuit resistance will not be opend/closed by the spark, because it is not there.
    That is the reason why i use diodes in a non-spark setup.
    It's only a means to Prevent unwanted oscillations which may overlap repetition rate ,poisioning the clean DC and happens when there is back flow.

    Marcoz.

    Leave a comment:


  • stevend
    replied
    First tests with Van de Graaff machine power supply

    My diodes finally arrived Thursday and I spent Friday assembling it all and doing my first tests (plus a few last night when it was dark.) If you recall, my plan was to use a Van de Graaff machine as the power supply to test if the effect could be gotten with the same high voltage but low current. i.e. Hoping for some quantum vacuum energy tapping in the tube. I uploaded a video here:

    I also started a webpage about it here:

    and while I was at it, added a main EV Gray tube page to my website:


    So far, no radiant event. But it's early days.

    I took C1 out altogether since I realized my Van de Graaf machine is a capacitor, but I kept the microwave oven diode on the positive lead. Also, I started out with C2 as a 5kV, 5uF capacitor but given the small current from the Van de Graaff machine, it charged way to slowly. So I replaced it with a homemade 340picofarad capacitor and then it charged just fine to 1500kV.

    I do wonder if I should be using a pulsing power supply. i.e. Should the input to the circuit be a high voltage, DC spike? Or is it okay that the only spikes that happen are a result of the spark gap between the HV and LV rods and the arcing in the gap between the HV rod and the grid? In the latter case I guess I'm relying on the diodes to keep any spike DC without oscillations. I have a scope but I'd hate to use it in this case since the one connection of the scope probe is Earth ground and I don't want any Earth ground in this circuit. I want it entirely floating out of fear of Earth grounding destroying any quantum vacuum energy tapping effect.

    Aaron, I mentioned your name in the youtube description and on the web pages. Let me know if you don't want it there and I'll remove it. I like giving credit where due.
    -Steve

    Leave a comment:


  • antena
    replied
    Voltage level

    Hallo
    Can I have some question about power source of HV ?
    I am using MOT so on secondary winding I have about 2200VAC it is rectified 3100VDC. I am using voltage multiplier so I get about 6200VDC.
    In my country we have ignition coils that can produce up to 30kV. If I want to charge 4000VDC capacitor I cannt go over this voltage level 4000VDC. If I want to use this ignition coil with 30kV I need to have protection spark gap which guarantee only 4kV level not more.
    Or there is another kind of ignition coils which can produce max voltage below 4000V Ghst ?
    Thank for anyhow advice
    Antena

    Leave a comment:


  • Aaron
    replied
    tube concept

    Originally posted by Marcoz View Post
    Exactly,
    And anyone that takes a good look at the image i posted yesterday will see that this is no regular cap/coil discharge.

    Marcoz.
    Marcoz, I found this that I posted a while back here and on Peswiki.
    The top diagram is like yours in concept and because of the gap, a diode isn't needed. Anyway, I'm in agreement with the basic concept you show.

    This is at: Directory:EV Gray - PESWiki

    Leave a comment:


  • Altair
    replied
    Thanks Aaron, once again you made it perfectly clear.
    Originally, I thought you were talking about 2 (or more) HIGH voltages being connected together, but now I see you were refering to the +12V and HV.
    I understand perfectly the effect of joining different voltages together, having a formation in electronics.
    Now I just have to work out my own theory as to how this thing is supposed to work

    Regards

    Leave a comment:


  • Jbignes5
    replied
    just a trigger

    From his description it is a replacement for the scr's he was using to trigger the cap dump. He describes it pretty well. There are other links to his experiments on that site just goto the projects tab on top and walla 3-5 projects based on it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Aaron
    replied
    3 points

    Originally posted by Jbignes5 View Post
    His experiment is a
    little larger cap wise but it shows you Can do what you are talking about with good old electricity and actually it uses the same 3 probe arc points.
    Would have to see the exact schematic to see what he is doing. I see the picture of three points but that doesn't really tell me anything.

    Leave a comment:


  • Aaron
    replied
    multiple positives

    Originally posted by Altair View Post
    Thanks Aaron for that in-depth explanation in your post 1388.

    Now, if you would be so kind as to do another clarification; when you write "multiple positive voltages moving into each other" and "When one positive voltage is moving into another positive voltage " are you refering to the construction of the tube itself that allows the incoming high voltage to "spread" to a larger area (the electrode) before being transfered to the other electrode, effectively dividing the HV into many paths, or is it some other thing that I missed?
    In fact, it's just the expression "multiple positive voltages" that confuses me, I guess.
    Hi Guy,

    You're welcome and of course that is just my take on things.

    The HV from the front side cap jumps into the LV rod with the battery 12v+ sitting there. That is a positive jumping into a positive. Then the diode slams shut, turns this HV away and it has nowhere to go except for the grid which is its only other path to ground - the 2nd or alternative higher resistance path. As it does this, it creates an extremely strong negative pressure behind, which causes a super fast "cold current" punch of current moving into the LV source. Then that moves into another positive from the cap sitting behind the coil, which of course is again connected to the common ground.

    Basically, it is getting one positive to move into another positive. Normally, most people think you have to have a negative for the positive to move to but that isn't true. It is only about potential differences.

    10v can move into 9v if they share a common ground because you have a difference of 1v that the 10v can move to...not a steep gradient at 1v difference but point is, get a postive to move into another positive, which is connected by a common ground.

    Ghst's schematic is almost deceptive but if you trace everything, you'll see they do indeed share a common ground between the ignition coil and the hv capacitor. It is easier to see the common ground on the popular stock Gray schematic and even easier on the older Gray schematic in the patent.

    I don't know if I made it more confusing here or not. lol

    Leave a comment:


  • Aaron
    replied
    Gray concept

    Originally posted by Marcoz View Post
    Exactly,
    And anyone that takes a good look at the image i posted yesterday will see that this is no regular cap/coil discharge.

    Marcoz.
    I saw your schematic Marcoz. It shows the essence of the basic principle in my opinion. The older Gray patent is easier to trace than his newer ones and shows the principle and uses a gap instead of a diode - just remembering off the top of my head.

    This effect can be hand as a single shot event and doesn't need "oscillations".

    However, what hasn't been shown is the effect at higher speeds, which may manifest something else such as coil cooling, etc... and there may be certain frequencies that the overall system will be more efficient at - and I would bet $ that of course each system would have it's own optimum frequency. It is only speculation what all happens at higher frequency until we show something and Magdude hasn't posted anything else as far as all the other details people want to know about his system.

    This whole concept could be operated at high frequency in resonance, where the whole system is synchronized, which is my goal for certain applications. This would be like the Meyer VIC method that I experimented with - like a "DC Resonance" or whatever you want to call it. A unidirectional resonance.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jbignes5
    replied
    Lets see...

    FYI Aron:

    Is this what you guys are talking about? Because it has been done or is being done with regular electricity the right way with proper respect for what he is playing with.
    There is no majic force and yes it can be done with out RE. There is the proof and also this came about from a railgun setup. His experiment is a
    little larger cap wise but it shows you Can do what you are talking about with good old electricity and actually it uses the same 3 probe arc points.
    Also at some point the pulse that gets emited could end up being like a good old emp bomb. I doubt being so close to that would be a good idea at all. Seeing that your body has voltage and current running thru it already. Much like a zap from a medical defibulator but on a much higher scale.

    Leave a comment:


  • Altair
    replied
    Thanks Aaron for that in-depth explanation in your post 1388. That was much more than I expected and I hope it will also benefit others who just arrive into this thread. This post is a keeper.
    I have checked the thread previously a few times in the past 3 months but, as a result, didn't get the feel as to where the experiments were going. Now with that all nicely summed-up in a single place, I can now get up to speed on the whole process.

    I also totally agree with LAMARE about the wiki page idea.
    As a relatively newcomer to this forum, I can tell you that I spent countless evenings and weekends reading long threads end to end that finally dead-ended for one reason or another. Having a summary available for the important technologies will allow a much quicker integration for newcomers, and serve as an historical brief about the evolution of the ideas and experiments contributed to that particular subject. Of course, the forum can be consulted for all the specific details. The wiki should also include an up-to-date schematic.

    Now, if you would be so kind as to do another clarification; when you write "multiple positive voltages moving into each other" and "When one positive voltage is moving into another positive voltage " are you refering to the construction of the tube itself that allows the incoming high voltage to "spread" to a larger area (the electrode) before being transfered to the other electrode, effectively dividing the HV into many paths, or is it some other thing that I missed?
    In fact, it's just the expression "multiple positive voltages" that confuses me, I guess.

    Regards,

    Guy

    Leave a comment:


  • Marcoz
    replied
    Sounds similar to writing a book

    My understanding comes from experimentation.
    When i post a circuit, you can try it, and it will do what i claim, given you used the correct component values etc.
    This has got nothing to do with theory, but all with replicatable results.

    Marcoz.

    Leave a comment:


  • lamare
    replied
    Do we need a wiki page somewhere?

    Hi all,

    I see a lot of discussion going on here about how the Gray tube works, and there are a few different theories. Since these discussions are shattered all over the thread, it is very hard to keep track of what is going on.

    Therefore, I think we need to think of maintaining a wiki page to bring structure into the discussion and think of how we can work more systematically.

    What theories do we have?
    What experiments could we do to verify or debunk a certain theory?
    What experiments have been done?
    What were the results?
    What can we learn from the results so far?

    If we agree that a wiki page is a good idea, where do we host it?
    Peswiki??


    Furthermore, I'd like to stress that there ain't no such thing as a bad experiment or a bad theory. While I have certain theories that do not necessarily match the theories of others, none of the work people are doing here is useless or "the wrong way", and there is no way to say which theory is the right or wrong, unless we systematically try work out some experiments that bring our knowledge and understanding a step further and document our results in a structured way. Every experiment and idea adds something to our knowledge and understanding and the more we are able to build on previous results and experiments, the further we can all see.

    Leave a comment:


  • Marcoz
    replied
    Originally posted by lamare View Post
    Hi Marcoz,

    Nice pictures!

    Based on this, I don't think oscillations are the key. Radiant energy is all about pulsed DC with sharp gradients, *not* harmonic oscillations.
    Hi Lamar
    There seems to be a misunderstanding.
    The AC picture shows why AC does not work, it conducts the energy through the tube's capacity to the Conversion Grids.

    I posted this picture because there was somebody saying the Gray tubes worked on a resonant principle and so ive made it to show why oscillations cannot work.

    The DC picture shows what happens when fed DC and i share your oppinion as to this being the correct setup.

    I have also studied the most part of Eric Dollard's work and also replicated some of his work, i have also studied the work of many, many others.

    Marcoz.

    Leave a comment:


  • Marcoz
    replied
    Originally posted by Aaron View Post

    Anyone that questions if it is just a simple cap discharge hasn't done the experiments and should just do them to find out. I have done countless tests with just this concept of comparing it to a typical cap discharge and there are huge differences.

    A regular cap (charged to same amount) and dumped into identical coil charges MUCH MUCH SLOWER and the magnetic field appears to be spread over more area around the coil. Maybe because it is slow enough to feel it.
    Exactly,
    And anyone that takes a good look at the image i posted yesterday will see that this is no regular cap/coil discharge.

    Marcoz.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X