Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Anti-gravity

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • vidbid
    replied
    Originally posted by aljhoa View Post
    False, fluid always generates hydrostatic pressure on the round Earth of the New Testament, which varies with depth, even under the Bible's flat earth dome
    Ipse dixit.

    Ipse dixit is an assertion without proof; or a dogmatic expression of opinion.

    Without a citation or source provided, it's just your unsubstantiated claim. Making a declaration of your own beliefs doesn't make it so in reality.

    You can't have gas pressure without the necessary antecedent of a container for the gas to press on.



    If you remove the barrier between the two compartments, the gas in one compartment would rapidly fill the compartment with the vacuum.

    That is part of the nature of gas.

    Second Law of Thermodynamics

    Boyle's Law

    Originally posted by aljhoa View Post
    fluid always generates hydrostatic pressure
    Do you mean a gas or a liquid?

    Without clarity, it's an equivocation fallacy.

    What are you talking about?

    Prove it.

    Originally posted by aljhoa View Post
    on the round Earth of the New Testament
    What are you talking about?

    Prove it.

    Cite the scriptures.

    Balls don't have corners.

    Originally posted by aljhoa View Post
    which varies with depth
    That argument has been tried before.

    You can't have a gas pressure gradient without gas pressure. You can't have gas pressure without a container.

    Is there any evidence of gas pressure existing without the necessary antecedent of a container for the gas to press on?

    No, of course not.

    A liquid is different from a gas. The two act differently.

    You're committing an equivocation fallacy, also known as, doublespeak.

    Equivocation

    Using an ambiguous term in more than one sense, thus making an argument misleading.

    https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/...1/Equivocation

    Originally posted by aljhoa View Post
    even under the Bible's flat earth dome
    Ipse dixit is an assertion without proof; or a dogmatic expression of opinion.
    Your use of the term is misleading.

    You're trying to create a straw man fallacy.

    I am simply asking, "Is there any evidence of gas pressure existing without the necessary antecedent of a container for the gas to press on?"

    And, the answer is no.

    .

    Cheers

    .

    Leave a comment:


  • aljhoa
    replied
    Originally posted by vidbid View Post
    You can't have gas pressure without a container. Obviously.
    False, fluid always generates hydrostatic pressure on the round Earth of the New Testament, which varies with depth, even under the "Bible's flat earth dome".


    Fluid Concepts

    Al
    Last edited by aljhoa; 07-21-2019, 04:42 PM. Reason: 4,873

    Leave a comment:


  • vidbid
    replied
    Originally posted by spacecase0 View Post
    ever seen a line map ?
    they are crude maps that tell you what road to take to get somewhere,
    distances are usually not included,
    this sort of thing was common long ago as they work, and better maps are harder to make.
    referring to the 4 corners of the earth likely refereed to the outer edges of a line map...
    to think that the idea of a line map, and a common reference to them proved a flat earth is just sad.
    This is the map that the military uses: Universal Transverse Mercator Coordinate System Map.

    [VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TlIK-z4dbEI[/VIDEO]

    Mappa Militare UTM conferma, la: Terra Piatta-QUADRATA.. (Sub: 100%) [by, freeanergy] - YouTube

    Code:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TlIK-z4dbEI
    This is the Universal Transverse Mercator Coordinate System Map. This is what the military uses to calculate distances from one point on the Earth to another point on the Earth.



    They don't use a globe.

    That's for you to use.

    .

    Cheers

    .
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • vidbid
    replied


    The distance from Barrow, Alaska, to Longyearbyen, Svalbard, according to the above web site is, 2,111 miles.

    But look how it is calculated.



    So, instead, of plotting a direct course over the globe, they plot the distance from from West to East on a longitudinal course.

    Why is that?

    .
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • spacecase0
    replied
    ever seen a line map ?
    they are crude maps that tell you what road to take to get somewhere,
    distances are usually not included,
    this sort of thing was common long ago as they work, and better maps are harder to make.
    referring to the 4 corners of the earth likely refereed to the outer edges of a line map...
    to think that the idea of a line map, and a common reference to them proved a flat earth is just sad.

    Leave a comment:


  • vidbid
    replied
    Originally posted by aljhoa View Post
    The New Testament.. ..implies that the Earth is round
    Actually, it doesn't.

    "And after these things I saw four angels standing on the four corners of the earth, holding the four winds of the earth, that the wind should not blow on the earth, nor on the sea, nor on any tree." Revelation 7:1 (KJV)

    Balls don't have corners.

    Leave a comment:


  • vidbid
    replied
    Originally posted by aljhoa View Post
    haw culd day
    [VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ki2vVQFPHQM[/VIDEO]

    FED Toe Tag 895 Hillbilly Blue Balls Gas Pressure - YouTube

    Code:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ki2vVQFPHQM
    You can't have gas pressure without a container. Obviously.

    .

    Cheers

    .

    Leave a comment:


  • aljhoa
    replied
    Originally posted by vidbid View Post
    Jesuits Erasing Our Flat Earth.
    The New Testament of the "I am the Alpha and the Omega, the first and the last" implies that the Earth is round therefore,
    haw culd day, sync der r over 1,500,000,000 mahomedans?


    Al
    Last edited by aljhoa; 07-20-2019, 03:35 PM. Reason: 4,786

    Leave a comment:


  • vidbid
    replied
    Jesuits Erasing Our Flat Earth

    [VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=De3AxHackFs[/VIDEO]

    Jesuits Erasing Our Flat Earth! Wake up to the Truth! - YouTube

    Code:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=De3AxHackFs
    Jesuits Erasing Our Flat Earth.

    Cheers

    .

    Leave a comment:


  • vidbid
    replied
    Originally posted by aljhoa View Post
    Reply to the Anti-gravity Thread Bull Shyt
    Most certainly, the following video shows how ballers push their BS by using philosophy and not the scientific method.

    [VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9HVxRM4q7I[/VIDEO]

    Kant can't science and is zero authority Brenda! - YouTube

    Code:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9HVxRM4q7I
    Great comment in the video comments: "Never trust anyone who wants to chop his knob off."

    LMAO



    Cheers

    .

    Leave a comment:


  • aljhoa
    replied
    Originally posted by vidbid View Post

    Understanding how ballers push their BS.
    Reply to the Anti-gravity Thread Bull Shyt

    Originally posted by aljhoa View Post
    "On Bull**** is a 1986 essay, reprinted as a 2005 book, by philosopher Harry G. Frankfurt
    which presents a theory of bull**** that defines the concept and analyzes the applications of bull**** in the context of communication.
    Frankfurt determines that bull**** is speech intended to persuade without regard for truth.
    The liar cares about the truth and attempts to hide it;
    the bull****ter doesn't care if what they say is true or false,
    but rather only cares whether their listener is persuaded.
    "


    "Alberto Brandolini, an Italian programmer, the bull**** asymmetry principle (also known as Brandolini's law[14][15]) states that:
    The amount of energy needed to refute bull**** is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it."
    Last edited by aljhoa; 07-19-2019, 03:47 PM. Reason: 4,709

    Leave a comment:


  • vidbid
    replied
    Scientific Method



    Science is an enormously successful human enterprise. The study of scientific method is the attempt to discern the activities by which that success is achieved. Among the activities often identified as characteristic of science are systematic observation and experimentation, inductive and deductive reasoning, and the formation and testing of hypotheses and theories. How these are carried out in detail can vary greatly, but characteristics like these have been looked to as a way of demarcating scientific activity from non-science, where only enterprises which employ some canonical form of scientific method or methods should be considered science (see also the entry on science and pseudo-science). On the other hand, more recent debate has questioned whether there is anything like a fixed toolkit of methods which is common across science and only science.

    Leave a comment:


  • vidbid
    replied
    [VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9HVxRM4q7I[/VIDEO]

    Kant can't science and is zero authority Brenda! - YouTube

    Code:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9HVxRM4q7I
    Understanding how ballers push their BS.

    Leave a comment:


  • vidbid
    replied
    Book Description:

    "Samuel Birley Rowbotham, under the pseudonym 'Parallax', lectured for two decades up and down Britain promoting his unique flat earth theory. This book, in which he lays out his world system, went through three editions, starting with a 16 page pamphlet published in 1849 and a second edition of 221 pages published in 1865. The third edition of 1881 (which had inflated to 430 pages) was used as the basis of this etext.

    Rowbotham was an accomplished debater who reputedly steamrollered all opponents, and his followers, who included many well-educated people, were equally tenacious. One of them, John Hampden, got involved in a bet with the famous naturalist Alfred Russel Wallace about the flat earth. An experiment which Hampden proposed didn't resolve the issue, and the two ended up in court in 1876. The judge ruled against Hampton, who started a long campaign of legal harassment of Wallace. Rowbotham hints at the incident in this book.

    Rowbotham believed that the earth is flat. The contients float on an infinite ocean which somehow has a layer of fire underneath it. The lands we know are surrounded by an infinite wilderness of ice and snow, beyond the Antarctic ocean, bordered by an immense circular ice-cliff. What we call the North Pole is in the center of the earth.

    The polar projection of the flat earth creates obvious discrepancies with known geography, particularly the farther south you go. Figure 54 inadvertantly illustrates this problem. The Zetetic map has a severly squashed South America and Africa, and Australia and New Zealand in the middle of the Pacific. I think that by the 19th century people would have noticed if Australia and Africa were thousands of miles further apart than expected, let alone if Africa was wider than it was long!
    Here's a link to the full text of said book:

    Earth Not a Globe

    .

    Cheers

    .
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • aljhoa
    replied
    "On Bull**** is a 1986 essay, reprinted as a 2005 book, by philosopher Harry G. Frankfurt
    which presents a theory of bull**** that defines the concept and analyzes the applications of bull**** in the context of communication.
    Frankfurt determines that bull**** is speech intended to persuade without regard for truth.
    The liar cares about the truth and attempts to hide it;
    the bull****ter doesn't care if what they say is true or false,
    but rather only cares whether their listener is persuaded.
    "


    "Alberto Brandolini, an Italian programmer, the bull**** asymmetry principle (also known as Brandolini's law[14][15]) states that:
    The amount of energy needed to refute bull**** is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it."


    Al
    Last edited by aljhoa; 07-19-2019, 06:05 AM. Reason: 4,675

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X