Originally posted by Ufopolitics
View Post
As Stevens accurately points out, at least three entire generations have now wasted their lives following the magical flute of the educated, and it is disturbing to me personally to witness how extreme their unethical behavior truly is because knowingly or not these are the agents of deception.
Humans have a great weakness, we are all lazy and we follow the same basic laws of physics as any other piece of matter, we will take the path of least resistance 99 times out of 100. The powers that be know this. They provide the path and it seems so logical, it's so well explained, you don't have to think and we all know how painful it is for the soft bare feet to tread a new path for the first time, so they offer shoes and a glittering carpet to walk upon and this is where most go.
"The presence of the Pied Piper on this 2015-themed cover is downright unsettling. The Pied Piper of Hamelin is a German legend about a man who used his magical flute to lure away the children of the city of Hamelin, never to be seen again."
It isn't widely known, certainly not publicised, that many leading scientists were very uncomfortable with the physics of Einstein and privately held differing opinions. Probably many could not understand the promotion of his ideas at the time but did understand that challenging them was a path not to be taken: The evident punishments were manifest for taking an opposing path, whilst the rewards for praising them could be great.
If we listen to the words of Dr. Joseph Farrell then what we really discover is that this science is a greater failure than previously imagined. A place where the atomic bomb project was a failure. A place where the US might have only had success by way of recovered Nazi Atomic Weapons and which it then presented as it's own. A place where it is almost certain that even if the US was able to create a bomb they were only able to field such a weapon by way of captured Nazi Germany detonators. Those are powerful indictments right there of massive failure on an epic scale.
In that line of historical detective work, which Dr. Farrell is probably the reigning expert, the lies of the corporate industrial dictatorships which rule over all of us are partly revealed. Inside of that story is the story of the unknown secrets of thermonuclear weapons and how only a handful of people have the keys to make such devices work. This knowledge being contrary to their own beliefs based upon what is, then, a manifestly corrupted knowledge base.
Beyond Isaac Newton there is Michael Faraday and afterwards Nikola Tesla. Now I think that if one were to look for signs of ethics then likely you're going to conclude that Tesla's ethics were far and away above those of others, Tesla being one of the few whom refused to work on the atomic bomb, and in the case of Michael Faraday there are also examples of his own ethics such as coming to the defense of a man being ridiculed for suggesting that spontaneous life could take place.
What I put to the reader then is this proposition. Whatever failings one individual might have, the better course is always going to be to follow the failings of an ethical man over that of a deceiver, whom obviously is out to screw you from the get go, whereas the honest man whom may be in error will always attempt to set the error straight.
Originally posted by Ufopolitics
View Post
In the Schappeller Device we have such pipes internal to the design.
In thinking about this device I have considered two avenues in regards to the material in the pipes. My first thought is conventional: That the tubes may have a liquid helium in them. Alternatively, since it is a vacuum chamber then the ability to bring the helium to a possible solid state might exist, which does then create a solid superfluid. Helium 4 does become a solid superfluid at near absolute zero. A vacuum chamber, such as this device is, does then facilitate that objective. It is also noteworthy to recall the story of how the TR#B's supposedly used a pressure chamber pressurized to 250 thousand atmosphere's. Now if we reverse this to a vacuum of 250 thousand atmosphere's we might have something a little more sensible and possibly physically doable. After all, Edgar Foche was just another human with good intentions and maybe he got pressurization mixed up or it was explained to him with this sort of twist just to see if any monkey out there could see the problems and conclude the more obvious reality that the reverse was more likely; that is, rather than pressurized it was instead a vacuum chamber.
However, this idea is at odds with the description and not mentioned in the account by Davson who physically held and studied the device for <three years>~! I'm tempted by the idea of a solid superfluid (see previous posts in this thread) but I think that this also introduces a complexity, and also may be leading away from successful replication.
The reason for this comes from the really odd and strange description of what is, evidently, the motive force contained inside the tubes inside the vacuum chamber. This material is said to be of the odd mixture of bee's wax and carnauba wax and resin (*unknown) and baked until it became a solidified.
That sounds absolutely bonkers until one realizes that the connection here goes back to what little we understand of a potential link to some unknown energy, dark light, via the work of Phillip Callahan, and then the whole of the device begins to take on a kind of "new light" as some kind of possible antenna which accomplishes what you yourself say below, and it's also note worthy to remember that the Schappeller Device is a both a vacuum and dark, at least to begin with, and these may both be critical elements.
Originally posted by Ufopolitics
View Post
Thanks also for this learning tip ~ Like where to go to know thingy
Ever so helpful to know our tax dollars are being spent wisely.
Learning is so important; here let me help you....Lol~
Originally posted by Ufopolitics
View Post
By Firesquall at the English language Wikipedia, CC BY-SA 3.0, 
Leave a comment: