This forum is preserved as a permanent archive. The community continues at eMedia Press.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Oscillating Reed Switch Pulse Motor.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Turion
    replied
    Oh my,

    So here's what will probably happen now....

    Matt will put you back on his ignore list where you belong. He will take what he has learned from what you have done, just as you have taken what YOU have learned from what OTHERS have done, and he will incorporate it into a design using things he has learned over the years from other people and from his OWN work, that have NOTHING whatsoever to do with YOU, and he will build a device that he shares with several others for testing and development that will PROBABLY make what you have done look like the guy who figured out how to make steel sitting around watching his pot of metal bubble while around him sky scrapers were being erected.

    And you will look like the little man who developed the electric light, but forgot to develop a switch, so remains in the dark half the time.

    It's fine that you believe you should get credit for developing something, but when you DON'T know what you've even got, and he you have NO IDEA AT ALL what to do with it, maybe you should learn to keep quiet and quit insisting on all the credit.

    When are you going to figure out that it isn't the CREDIT but the WORK ITSELF that is so important, and the WHO is far, far less important than the WHAT. If more people had figured that out, we might already HAVE the missing pieces so many of us have been searching for.

    I already KNOW how you are going to respond to this, because your character has shown itself over time, and I know enough about people to know you are not going to change. But that's ok. I have a thick skin and to me it is all about the progress we make. Besides, now that your idea has been "stolen", you really aren't necessary anymore anyway, are you? So you can continue to "rule" here while the rest of us go on our merry way.

    Just one thing....I know you said that the original device you built is locked in some shed somewhere, but if it is SOOOOO simple to build and is SOOOOOOO important that others would "steal" your amazing idea, why is it you haven't spent the $10.00 to build another one, but have tried to bully others into doing it instead? Just curious.

    Anyway, I guess you can lump me in with Matt and Carroll as a treacherous, thieving ass hat. Not that I will hear your rant, as I have had my say and can put you back on the ignore list. ;-)

    Leave a comment:


  • Allen Burgess
    replied
    Ignore list.

    @Matthew Jones,

    Quote from Matthew:

    "Go on and keep posting to yourself while everyone ignores you".

    Everyone? There are at least several hundred viewers in my audience Pal. I initiated and run this thread, not you. How many spins have you logged with your "Oscillator"? You talk as if you're the inventor and instructor not the pupil. Start to show some proper respect!

    Another thing is, if the coil wants to follow the magnet, just let it reposition itself, and don't fight it.
    Last edited by Allen Burgess; 02-17-2016, 02:18 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Allen Burgess
    replied
    Cold running.

    Another interesting feature of the oscillator is the cooling effect of the switch and coil compared to the overheating problem we encounter with a transistor at high speeds. I believe the transistor tries to push more power into the coil then it can handle. The oscillating Reed switch does a good job of cutting excess power to the coil.

    Leave a comment:


  • Allen Burgess
    replied
    Originally posted by Matthew Jones View Post
    Wow they told me you were talking a bunch of stuff, so I turned off the ignore for a minute to read it.

    Allen you need to rebuild your motor or go get it out of storage or whatever so you can stop making excuses for your illiterate behavior. Look at what is happening with a scope.

    Your motor for brief time in one rotation motors on the B Field and generates on the A field of the magnet. So I know that does not sound all mystical or anything to you. It has no super physics word or extra dynamic ability. Its very simple.
    The magnet is sideways and when you turn the coil on it tries to align itself but the reed turns off and the A field (Either south or north) then generates energy in coil. The next time the reed is closed the charge in the coil is higher than the charge in the battery and it discharges back. In fact the charge in the coil is several times higher voltage than the battery.

    This accounts for what you have seen in your tests in which the battery seem to not to discharge current, or there is a 0 current reading.

    I have not seen the "Weight Gain" claim but who knows...

    This "No Current" effect can be exploited and tuned. There is a better configuration that allows you to adjust based on the current coming into the motor and the current going out. This can be balanced and I believe with an ability to balance it we can find a gain. But..

    There is no reason to include you even though you stumbled on this, and all your magical mystical super physics explanation only re-enforce that thought train. You don't even have clue as to the simple little effect you have found.
    I don't want to have to push you out the picture I just want you to stop pushing everyone else away with your sense of superiority. Just chill out, watch and if you don't agree then speak up. But don't try to act like you have some superior intellect when you can't build your own project. Just chill out stop with accusations, except there probably a simple answer, and ride it for what its worth.

    Or go on and keep posting to yourself while everyone ignores you. Who cares really, when all said and done with.

    Matt
    @Matthew Jones,

    The coil winding is not as important as balancing the field strength of the magnet rotor with the field strength of the coil adjacent to the Reed switch. This is merely a matter of positioning. Almost any coil and voltage will work depending on the distance where the permanent magnet field equals the pull on the Reed contact from the coil field. This is the critical factor in sustaining the oscillation. The field strength of the rotor increases with speed along with the field strength of the coil, but not evenly. Constant re-positioning is required to sustain the acceleration along with the oscillation.The higher voltage in the coil is definitly a major factor in this motor's apparent ability to begin powering itself!
    Last edited by Allen Burgess; 02-17-2016, 06:17 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Matthew Jones
    replied
    Wow they told me you were talking a bunch of stuff, so I turned off the ignore for a minute to read it.

    Allen you need to rebuild your motor or go get it out of storage or whatever so you can stop making excuses for your illiterate behavior. Look at what is happening with a scope.

    Your motor for brief time in one rotation motors on the B Field and generates on the A field of the magnet. So I know that does not sound all mystical or anything to you. It has no super physics word or extra dynamic ability. Its very simple.
    The magnet is sideways and when you turn the coil on it tries to align itself but the reed turns off and the A field (Either south or north) then generates energy in coil. The next time the reed is closed the charge in the coil is higher than the charge in the battery and it discharges back. In fact the charge in the coil is several times higher voltage than the battery.

    This accounts for what you have seen in your tests in which the battery seem to not to discharge current, or there is a 0 current reading.

    I have not seen the "Weight Gain" claim but who knows...

    This "No Current" effect can be exploited and tuned. There is a better configuration that allows you to adjust based on the current coming into the motor and the current going out. This can be balanced and I believe with an ability to balance it we can find a gain. But..

    There is no reason to include you even though you stumbled on this, and all your magical mystical super physics explanation only re-enforce that thought train. You don't even have clue as to the simple little effect you have found.
    I don't want to have to push you out the picture I just want you to stop pushing everyone else away with your sense of superiority. Just chill out, watch and if you don't agree then speak up. But don't try to act like you have some superior intellect when you can't build your own project. Just chill out stop with accusations, except there probably a simple answer, and ride it for what its worth.

    Or go on and keep posting to yourself while everyone ignores you. Who cares really, when all said and done with.

    Matt

    Leave a comment:


  • Allen Burgess
    replied
    Schematic.

    All it would take to build a "Reed Switch Oscillator" would be to invert and re-position the Reed switch to the end of the power coil in the schematic below: This is a Kindergarten level project. I'm flabbergasted that these "Nerds" can't handle it! All you'd need to do is switch the polarity of the battery contacts if it failed to start up. "You don't want to try that; It would speed up and run out of control"!

    The rotor magnets in the schematic are monopole S pole facing out. The normally open Reed switch has one contact that is fixed, and a second contact that is polarized N and bends. The N pole bending contact is farthest from the magnets in the schematic. That means the end of the power coil facing the magnets would need an electromagnetic S pole to attract the flexible contact away from it's grounding sister when it's energized. This would cause the motor to run in repulsion. The Reed switch in the schematic would need to be turned over when re-positioned on the end of the coil to work correctly. Naturally, the rotor in the schematic would speed up and disintegrate if you hooked it up that way and tried to run it. That's why I designed the "Oscillating Reed Switch" motor rotor with high speed precision ceramic bearings to run inside a protective PVC coupling. It's simple, but "don't try it without first taking the proper safety precautions"!

    Another important point is that a North or reversed coil pole will fry the Reed switch by keeping the contacts closed too long. Best to test for correct polarity in advance! Avoid welding the contacts together.
    Last edited by Allen Burgess; 08-02-2017, 02:10 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Allen Burgess
    replied
    Whining.

    @SisMika of a "walloping 32 posts",

    Drop dead!
    Last edited by Allen Burgess; 02-17-2016, 02:22 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • SisMika
    replied
    Originally posted by Allen Burgess View Post
    I got a comment from Ossie of the "Ossie Motor" back when I first unveiled the "Oscillator". He pitched the same line of malarkey Matthew Jones just threw at me; "How insignificant my discovery was compared the idea he got from it". All four of those copy cats , MH & TK included, tried to seperate the pulse cutting effect of the "Oscillating Reed switch". Ossie did it with a second Reed switch. I built his motor and it nearly dropped dead on me.

    Gotoluc has a pulse width control circuit he copied from Verpies and Itsu over on the OU forum; Just another overworked piece of crap compared to the "Oscillator" that recycles it's own "backspike" spontaneously.

    I bet Matthew Jones tries to spring a Hall effect "Ossie Motor" on us, if he ever gets it to work. How boring!
    What is really boring is watching a supposed to be grownup whining like a 1 year old that has lost his pacifier. It would be funny if it wasn't so sad. I think I need to add you to my ignore list you don't think is real. Maybe you should check your user profile and then you could learn how to ignore posters you don't want to waste your time reading.

    Leave a comment:


  • Allen Burgess
    replied
    Ossie.

    I got a comment from Ossie of the "Ossie Motor" back when I first unveiled the "Oscillator". He pitched the same line of malarkey Matthew Jones just threw at me; "How insignificant my discovery was compared the idea he got from it". All four of those copy cats , MH & TK included, tried to seperate the pulse cutting effect of the "Oscillating Reed switch". Ossie did it with a second Reed switch. I built his motor and it nearly dropped dead on me.

    Gotoluc has a pulse width control circuit he copied from Verpies and Itsu over on the OU forum; Just another overworked piece of crap compared to the "Oscillator" that recycles it's own "backspike" spontaneously.

    I bet Matthew Jones tries to spring a Hall effect "Ossie Motor" on us, if he ever gets it to work. How boring!

    The "top secret" configuration again below:

    A quick review: The "South" diametric neo spinner permanent magnet field closes the normally open Reed switch contacts and charges the electromagnetic coil as it passes the switch. A "South" electromagnetic pole then appears at the end of the coil and opens the attached Reed switch's contacts before the spring action of the metal can seperate them, breaking the circuit sooner. The faster the neo tube spins, the faster the Reed switch contacts close and open, resulting in a steadily diminishing pulse duration as the rotor accelerates. The forced oscillation allows the Reed switch to operate way over it's factory rated speed limit! Harmonic speed bursts result that are truely astonishing!
    Last edited by Allen Burgess; 08-02-2017, 02:10 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Allen Burgess
    replied
    Self shortening pulse width.

    Why is the "Reed Switch Oscillator" Overunity? Answer: The pulse width is self shortening. What would it take to get an electronic circuit to mimic that effect? Think about this!

    I believe it's possible that an (Oscillating Magnetic Plasma Field) forms inside the "Reed Switch" vacuum chamber at the higher speed ranges. There's no way a solid state electronic circuit can compete with this kind of quantum activity.

    Matthew Jones has grossly undergauged this awesome effect by describing it as a "Very small effect". All Mr. Jones will accomplish in the end is delivering another piece of clumsy crap like TK and MH's MHOP!
    Last edited by Allen Burgess; 02-16-2016, 08:30 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Allen Burgess
    replied
    Credit.

    @SisMika,

    Conradelectro explained why free energy would cause more wars on the OU forum. Citfta's with TK and MH and Conradelectro; They're all part of a counter free energy sub culture. Citfta's violating the Energetic Forum ban on those Trolls while he has me moderated by Stephan for frivolous reasons. The "Reed Switch Oscillator" exhibits OU behavior; This is why I am persecuted by that pack of Jackals.
    Last edited by Allen Burgess; 02-16-2016, 03:30 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • SisMika
    replied
    Originally posted by Allen Burgess View Post
    Quote from Matthew Jones:

    "Allen's little motor has a very small event that can be exploited and tuned, into a larger effect that is truely novel compared to anything else, even his motor".

    Matthew's describing just how TK and MH pirated my discovery off my "Self accelerating Reed switch thread" on the Overunity forum. Anyone can view it and see what really went on!

    Of course you are hoping they don't really view that thread. If they do they will see you contributed nothing worthwhile to that effort. If you really contributed anything useful to that thread show us what it was. Otherwise you are just whining over nothing.

    Leave a comment:


  • Allen Burgess
    replied
    Theft of credit.

    Quote from Matthew Jones:

    "Allen's little motor has a very small event that can be exploited and tuned, into a larger effect that is truely novel compared to anything else, even his motor".

    Matthew's describing just how TK and MH pirated my discovery off my "Self accelerating Reed switch thread" on the Overunity forum. Anyone can view it and see what really went on!

    Leave a comment:


  • Allen Burgess
    replied
    Steel bearings.

    Two steel ball bearings will adhere directly to each end of a diametric tube magnet with no axle or disk magnet in the way. How would the tube magnet and steel bearings behave if we simply stood the combination upright inside a plastic ring with attractive metal discs, or disc magnets on top and bottem?

    This looks like an elegant and blindingly simple solution to the bearing problem!
    Last edited by Allen Burgess; 02-16-2016, 03:16 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Allen Burgess
    replied
    Frictionless bearing.

    Two ceramic bearings and a horizontally mounted axle results in downward pressure friction on the bearings. A steel ball magnetic suspension bearing like "Cobra killer2000's", uses the pressure of gravity to reduce friction. One flanged precision ceramic bearing at the base of a vertically suspended axle should eliminate all the downward pressure friction on the bearing, and help to stabilize and secure the spinner following an overhead separation event.

    This combination should result in less friction then a neo tube riding on a ball bearing over glass, and deliver stationary stability too.
    Last edited by Allen Burgess; 02-15-2016, 12:18 AM.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X