bi
Description
On the Bloch Wall and the Misconceptions Surrounding Peer Review
By FractalWoman
This video is a quasi-review of a paper called "The Quantum Field of a Magnet" by Emmanouil Markoulakis. Although it might seem like I am picking on the author in this video (and I am a little), that is not why I am doing this. In reality, EM and I have the same goal in mind. We both want to understand how the ferrocell works. EM thinks I am misguided and I think he is misguided. But the only thing that really matters (and the only thing that anyone cares about) is the demonstrable truth and not some hypothetical truth that is impossible to prove.
Computer simulations are a kind of proof. If you can't demonstrate your "theory" via computer simulations, then it is of no use to me. I am a computer scientist. I have been for a long time. I need logic, I need clarity, and I NEED CODE, in order to fully understand a concept. When I wanted to understand the torus knot, I wrote some code. When I wanted to understand Ionel Dinu's Aether circulation model, I wrote some code.
AB's CODE clearly demonstrated TO ME how the ferrocell works. It is not an over simplification in my opinion, nor is it a "cartoon". It is the real deal. This is exactly what I was looking for (and what the other ferrocell researchers were unable to produce). In my mind, a computer simulation of the ferrocell is the BEST way to show how a ferrocell works and AB's simulation succeeds in every case that I try. So, in terms of understanding HOW a ferrocell works, I am satisfied with the results.
But it doesn't end there for me. This is actually just the beginning. Now that I have all the tools I need to simulate the ferrocell, I also have all the tools I need to simulate my Aether model. This is why I really needed the the ferrocell simulation code (aside from making pretty pictures). In my Aether model, space is, for all intents and purposes, a "ferrofluid", aka. a colloidal solution of polarizable entities. Using AB's simulation software, I should be able to simulate this in 3D. Not projected 3D or holographic 3D but REAL 3D. So I am very excited about this. That is all I am going to say about this for now.
However, as a starting point for my Aether model, you might want to read (or re-read) this paper I wrote called "A Medium for the Propagation of Light, Revisited" which can be found here:
https://www.researchgate.net/publicat...
All the pieces of the puzzle are starting to come together. I'm so excited.
----------------------------------------
Here is a link to EM's paper on ResearchGate:
https://www.researchgate.net/publicat...
Computer simulations are a kind of proof. If you can't demonstrate your "theory" via computer simulations, then it is of no use to me. I am a computer scientist. I have been for a long time. I need logic, I need clarity, and I NEED CODE, in order to fully understand a concept. When I wanted to understand the torus knot, I wrote some code. When I wanted to understand Ionel Dinu's Aether circulation model, I wrote some code.
AB's CODE clearly demonstrated TO ME how the ferrocell works. It is not an over simplification in my opinion, nor is it a "cartoon". It is the real deal. This is exactly what I was looking for (and what the other ferrocell researchers were unable to produce). In my mind, a computer simulation of the ferrocell is the BEST way to show how a ferrocell works and AB's simulation succeeds in every case that I try. So, in terms of understanding HOW a ferrocell works, I am satisfied with the results.
But it doesn't end there for me. This is actually just the beginning. Now that I have all the tools I need to simulate the ferrocell, I also have all the tools I need to simulate my Aether model. This is why I really needed the the ferrocell simulation code (aside from making pretty pictures). In my Aether model, space is, for all intents and purposes, a "ferrofluid", aka. a colloidal solution of polarizable entities. Using AB's simulation software, I should be able to simulate this in 3D. Not projected 3D or holographic 3D but REAL 3D. So I am very excited about this. That is all I am going to say about this for now.
However, as a starting point for my Aether model, you might want to read (or re-read) this paper I wrote called "A Medium for the Propagation of Light, Revisited" which can be found here:
https://www.researchgate.net/publicat...
All the pieces of the puzzle are starting to come together. I'm so excited.
----------------------------------------
Here is a link to EM's paper on ResearchGate:
https://www.researchgate.net/publicat...
Leave a comment: