Motor Generators

[bistander]

Hi! A flywheel is a kinetic capacitor. Proper calculation and control will allow you to create a device that will operate in a closed loop and generate electricity for an external consumer. I've laid out everything in both a publicly available publication (FLYWHEEL FOR OVERUNITY SYSTEMS | Patreon?) and a paid one with a calculation calculator and examples (AUTONOMOUS INERTIAL ELECTRICITY GENERATION SYSTEM | Patreon?). In the video, featuring Uzbek inventor Toir Kamolov, the manual system is used for a complete overhaul. The self-propelled system is much more visual. Again, my assumptions are in the material (Self-propelled motor generator from Uzbekistan. | Patreon

Hi Rakarskiy,

Thanks for the reply. You say "A flywheel is a kinetic capacitor." I agree, but a capacitor is an energy storage device, not capable of providing free energy. It can only deliver energy it received when charged. No more.

No amount of "calculation and control" will enable it to "generate electricity for an external consumer."

I realize that you claim it can. You are wrong. This is why there has never been proof. You can not prove it. Theoretically and practically it is impossible.

You really should stop endorsement of falsehoods.

bi

[Rakarskiy]

Inertial energy storage is well known and not a free energy source. What is your point?

Hi! A flywheel is a kinetic capacitor. Proper calculation and control will allow you to create a device that will operate in a closed loop and generate electricity for an external consumer. I've laid out everything in both a publicly available publication (FLYWHEEL FOR OVERUNITY SYSTEMS | Patreon?) and a paid one with a calculation calculator and examples (AUTONOMOUS INERTIAL ELECTRICITY GENERATION SYSTEM | Patreon?). In the video, featuring Uzbek inventor Toir Kamolov, the manual system is used for a complete overhaul. The self-propelled system is much more visual. Again, my assumptions are in the material (Self-propelled motor generator from Uzbekistan. | Patreon

[bistander]

Inertial self-propelled electric generator - YouTube?

Self-propelled motor generator from Uzbekistan.?

Hi Rakarskiy,

Nothing new in those vids. Inertial energy storage is well known and not a free energy source. What is your point?

bi

Anybody heard from Turion lately?

[Rakarskiy]

Inertial self-propelled electric generator - YouTube?

Self-propelled motor generator from Uzbekistan.?

[Vinyasi]

Demo gone international public

https://infinitysav.com/magneticgenerator/

https://infinitysav.com/wp-content/uploads/gen_6000.jpg

https://infinitysav.com/wp-content/uploads/04-2000x1500.jpg

The magnetic generator MG10 consists of 60 neodymium magnets
and 60 bifilar coils. It puts out 900vac @ 11amps

Corrected website address since the website, above, is a scam site >>
Infinity SAV USA Magnet Generator Investment Opportunity

[bistander]

Was able to meet with the guys last Thursday, and we got the generator back together. For some reason they had half the magnet holes filled with plastic plugs by the machinist, so the machine will only put out half of what I was expecting. It's their baby now, so I didn't even ask why. Just want to get it up and running and all tuned and see what the output is. If it needs to have those 10 magnets on the rotor put back in, we'll cross that bridge when we come to it. I intend to go tomorrow to work on it, but will see what actually happens.

Hey Turion,
How ya doin'? Been a couple of months since a report from you. Any progress on that O.U./F.E. generator of yours? The years, since you made the public claim of possessing the machine which produces way more real power output than required to run it, are nearing a decade. Would you please put some urgency providing proof of that claim? I don't know how many more years I have. And I sure don't want to pass before seeing you live up to your promises.
Thanks in advance.
bi

[bistander]

Hi Rakarskiy,

Nice to here from you. Hang in there.

I wonder why I am unable to edit my post. Anyway:

It should read:

"Nice to hear from you. Hang in there."
bi

[bistander]

Good time seekers!
Living under the constant shelling of modern fascists who have set the goal of destroying my people, the nation (literally recently, a kamikaze warhead hit a neighboring house 50 meters from my window), I still continue my research.
Today I completed the translation of my publication from Ukrainian to English.

Electrodynamics without electrons

PS
Unfortunately, I was unable to experiment with the mechanical commutator by removing the test winding, which was wound using the correct slot laying algorithm. The winding was wound in a distributed manner - the only possible one in the core I used - but it turned out to be incorrect. I have neither the time nor the opportunity to find a new, suitable stator and anchor under war conditions. In any case, when mutual induction prevails over generation, you will not get what you are looking for. What is the difference between generation and mutual induction, I tried to indicate in the publication, the link to which is above.

Hi Rakarskiy,

Nice to here from you. Hang in there.

I have not read your linked article word for word, but did scroll to the end to find your conclusion.

The mechanical power required to rotate a rotor or armature is not energy converted into electrical power (energy). Rotation is a condition for performing a change in magnetic flux relative to the inductor wires (phase windings). Why do I say so? Mechanical power in watts is expressed by the formula Pk=Fv, where the force is in newtons [H], and the speed is [m/s] (1W = 1J*1sec). Electric power in watts is expressed by another formula W=IU, where I force of the stump in amperes [A], U is the voltage in volts [V]. No one has ever answered me how it is to convert [Fv] to [IU]. The fact that the electromagnetic moment of the magnetic rotor of the alternator is somewhere proportional to the mechanical moment of the drive motor is not at all a basis for the statement of physics in the form of a constant that the electromagnetic generator is a converter of mechanical energy into electrical energy. The electromagnetic generator works on the phenomenon of electromagnetic induction, where a change in the magnetic field gives rise to an electric one.

"The mechanical power required to rotate a rotor or armature is not energy converted into electrical power (energy)."

This is easily disproven. Simply instrument an electric motor driving a generator and vary a resistive load on the generator armature. You will demonstrate that the electrical power into the motor is proportional to the electric load power. And obviously the mechanical power is transferred through the shaft coupling, P = T * S, torque times angular speed. A torque sensor will give numerical data to confirm.

"It is known that the excitation power of a turbine generator at power plants has 0.5-3% of the output power of the generator. That is, the direct transformation of magnetic induction into the induction of electricity can be expressed:
η = Wgeneration / Wexcitation = (100 / 3) *100% = 3333%

Are you surprised?"

No. But realize that "η" is not power conversion efficiency, which is the ratio of electrical output power to mechanical input power.

"η = Wgeneration / Wexcitation" fallacy is evident by the permanent magnet (PM) generator where Wexcitation is zero. Then "η" is infinite. That would be free energy and we know it is not the case.

As for referencing Holcomb, poor choice. His scam and false claims have been debunked and he awaits prosecution which is pending in court.
Regards,
bi

[Rakarskiy]

Good time seekers!
Living under the constant shelling of modern fascists who have set the goal of destroying my people, the nation (literally recently, a kamikaze warhead hit a neighboring house 50 meters from my window), I still continue my research.
Today I completed the translation of my publication from Ukrainian to English.

Electrodynamics without electrons

PS
Unfortunately, I was unable to experiment with the mechanical commutator by removing the test winding, which was wound using the correct slot laying algorithm. The winding was wound in a distributed manner - the only possible one in the core I used - but it turned out to be incorrect. I have neither the time nor the opportunity to find a new, suitable stator and anchor under war conditions. In any case, when mutual induction prevails over generation, you will not get what you are looking for. What is the difference between generation and mutual induction, I tried to indicate in the publication, the link to which is above.

[Turion]

Was able to meet with the guys last Thursday, and we got the generator back together. For some reason they had half the magnet holes filled with plastic plugs by the machinist, so the machine will only put out half of what I was expecting. It's their baby now, so I didn't even ask why. Just want to get it up and running and all tuned and see what the output is. If it needs to have those 10 magnets on the rotor put back in, we'll cross that bridge when we come to it. I intend to go tomorrow to work on it, but will see what actually happens.

[Turion]

No progress from me. Still trying to meet up with the guys to put the generator back together. We tried a few weeks ago and the bolts holding things together had gotten bent, so we had to order new ones. I think they are in now, so hopefully in the next few weeks we can get together.

[bistander]

Another couple of weeks. What's happening Turion, Rakarskiy?
bi

[bistander]

Rakarskiy and Turion, Hi guys. Just checking in. Have either of you made any progress? bi

[bistander]

Rakarskiy and Turion, Two members, each with their claimed overunity generator. Who will be first to post proof? The world awaits. bi

[Turion]

Finally got my machine out of the shop.

Will be working on getting it all put back together next Tuesday. It's missing some things that didn't need to be there to have work done on it.

The first picture is of my machine in the back of the car, ready to bring home from the shop.

The second picture is the machine my friend built. He thought that the second set of opposition magnets on the rotor were causing him problems, so he cut them off and removed the opposition magnets from the stator. Then he discovered they PROBABLY were NOT the problem because he discovered something else that was wrong and fixing it seemed to solve the problem.

He was using TWO electric motors to run the machine with belts and pulleys. "Magnetic drag" of rotor magnets to coil cores. He finally settled on a small gas motor with a centrifugal clutch to drive it so he didn't have to mess with TWO drive motors. After he got EVERYTHING working perfectly he ADDED the missing rotor and stator magnets back in with a new rotor and stator made out of WHITE plastic that you can see in the picture.

By adding the correct capacitors and a step down transformer with a smoothing cap, he is able to operate a 12 volt inverter. So far the most load I have seen him put on it is 1600 watts. The thing is, the generator outputs a certain amount of energy at a specific RPM. You have to wind a transformer for the output you get at the speed you want to run the generator. I believe he said the machine is running at about 2400 rpm. And I think that's with the motor at idle. My motor runs my machine at 2800 rpm, so my results will be different.